@ cosmicfarmer,
Ha ha, I also have noticed this, just try 4 days away and see what happens, now this is experience talking, lol
 

Wow I take a nap and 5 pages get posted :-)
This forum is flying. 

I apologize for not reading the stubblefield forum, but keeping up with energetic forum, Youtube, AND this forum is more then a full time job!  That, and I am moving to japan shortly. 

I think the trick is to take a ground sensor's signal, pass it through an amplifier and flyback transformer (you pay the power), and then broadcast that back into the ground how ever you like. The signal will be in phase with earth, and when 2 signals are in phase, energy transfer happens. So imagine all the energy DEEP DOWN that there would be no way you could get at with the deepest pipes... is now in your machine's circuits! So, any metal in the ground within a large distance will have immense power, volts and amps. (maybe?) You will be putting back into earth its own signal, amped. This is what I imagine the magnifying transmitter was. Almost reverse of what people are trying here. Most ideas I have read so far (sorry if I havn't read them all ) are passive systems and are showing incredible results, but I have yet to see an active system like I said above. 

That EER Tower idea which shows increased power in the earth is groovy, your are one step away from making the coolest ground powered flashlight ever. All you need now is a ergonomic case. Even have a + and - plug for charging batteries... but then you need a charge controller... bah

"No More Batteries EVER! You dont even need to SHAKE IT! Just dig a hole, put (product name) in the EARTH, and in 10 minutes you will have FULL POWER!! No more poisioning the sea with chemicals! No more over expensive batteries! "

I would call it Ninja Light, because its quiet and stealthy.

I think everything you mentioned above has some merit, good thinking and have a safe trip to Japan, don't forget to login here when you are able to.

jim

Jeanna

you have some interesting thoughts there concerning those fractuls at

different frequencys your seeing could chaos theory be involved here at all ?

I havent tryed inductors yet on my eer setup but have used potentiometers

resistors good for verying voltage on eers

Jeanna

you have some interesting thoughts there concerning those fractals at different frequencies you're seeing could chaos theory be involved here at all ?

Hi nightshade,
First I want to appologise for calling you nightlife! and welcome you on your own merit! 

Is it still called a theory?
I think it is a mathematical way to express what is seen in nature. I remember that theory was very hot in the late 80's early 90's. There were photos of the julia set in every magazine.
It is also a favorite with the crop circles makers. They come in and poof a julia set has appeared on the crop field.

But what I am talking about is how they repeat at repeating intervals. And I think it is not doubles in all cases either.
At first I thought I was seeing a simple harmonic, but when the same design figure appears way inside another figure... I call it fractals, like, for instance, the julia set.

I haven't tried inductors yet on my eer setup but have used potentiometers

resistors good for varying voltage on eers

How have you used the pots?

Except for the fact that the stubblefield generator IS an inductor, I haven't tried that either.
I am think little ones to take advantage of the very high frequency then adding ... I am quickly trying to learn about inductors asap.

In the first youtube video I was showing the little green NS generator because that is the one I had in my hands when I turned on the joule thief and saw the scope come alive.

That has an additional pair of inductors wrapped around a couple of free wires.
As detected by a DMM, the one wrapped around the iron wire shows an increased voltage difference when compared to (I think it is ) the center bolt even when that is not in the ground.

I need to re-read my notes from last year.
I did things that I knew were important but at the time had no clue what they meant. This was one of them.

Thank you,

jeanna

Hi everybody,
I have a few pix for todays report.
I did not add water and the volts are down some.
I do not think it is making any or much of a difference to the ac portion of this element.
This is the Plain Cu+,Zn- EB with just 2 probes in the ground. It is showing that it is qualifying to be an EER.

(not a lot of mv)

here are today's pix.

jeanna

Hi Kamax,

In the crystal battery thread I made a lot of things like the ones you are making.
They all, without exception stopped working when they were dry.
There is serious galvanic stuff going on inside the wet cement which is very alkaline, and it dissolves the aluminum. You may have noticed this. It takes very little time to dissolve lots of aluminum.

I am not saying this to discourage you.

Have you no piece of ground to stick some probes?
There is something really special that happens in the ground.
You could do your cement experiments along side the earth probes.
We could use your datalogging information.

thank you,

jeanna

85 probes in the ground now...
i gradually realized that straightening papersclips is a painfully monotonous chore...

so i picked up a 100-ft spool of galvanized steel wire.
seems to work pretty much the same for volts. but only half as much current as from a paperclip. so i have to use 2 to 1.
but i save time and fingertips this way, and allows me to continue my efforts.

i'll post more results tonight after im done adding to this mess i call an "earth battery"...

Hi Kamax,

In the crystal battery thread I made a lot of things like the ones you are making.
They all, without exception stopped working when they were dry.
There is serious galvanic stuff going on inside the wet cement which is very alkaline, and it dissolves the aluminum. You may have noticed this. It takes very little time to dissolve lots of aluminum.

I am not saying this to discourage you.

Have you no piece of ground to stick some probes?
There is something really special that happens in the ground.
You could do your cement experiments along side the earth probes.
We could use your datalogging information.

thank you,

jeanna

Thanks for the info jeanna, that's what i think too about cement. More the cells are dry less they give power but i want to see it by myself and i have make some cement/earth mix 
I have seen some pics of the marcus reid crystal battery and some looks very close to mine. He's battery was tested and give output, not a lot, but for many years.

I don't live in a house so it's a little hard to put someting in the ground

Someone has tested with the house copper pipe and the ground ?

Jeanna:

Excellent idea.  This is exactly why I had asked Jim to do an out of ground on the table test, just so we might be able to ascertain the difference the earth currents are making on these devices.  It would make a good control and if a lot of folks did it, we could see if the percentage of gain would hold to some sort of constant a various locations on the planet, or if it would be all over the place.

I remember testing my original set-up out of the ground and did not get much.  Looking back, when I set the new one up, I should have put a meter to it.  Oh well, just shows my hindsight is still working, ha ha.

Bill