Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: plants, pyramids, and collecting electricity (new breakthrough).  (Read 20103 times)

nitinnun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 713



electricity is electrons, moving away from negative magnetism, towards positive magnetism.
if you have negative magnetism, unbound electrons, and positive magnetism,
you may have electricity.
it is important to remember this paragraph, as you read this post.



1:
all atoms radiate out positive and negative magnetism.
the magnetism comes out in 8 streams.
4 positive, and 4 negative.

each stream is located 45 degree's, from the other (or something similar).
alternating positive/negative/positive/negative.


2:
plant roots are usually positioned 90 degree's from the plant stem.
which means that plant roots build up the negative magnetism, generated from the atoms that make up the roots.

the smaller rootlets are also usually positioned 90 degree's from the root.
which generates even more negative magnetism.


3:
rainwater is absorbed from the soil, into the plant roots.
the electrons want to move away from the negative magnetism of the soil (oxygen in sand and rocks).

the electrons have nowhere to move but up the plant stem. because the plant stem is the path of least negativity.
so the electrons move away from the soil/roots, and up the stem.

4:
the entire plant, is full of unbound-electron-conducting water.
so the electrons may move upwards, through the entire plant !


5:
plant branches are usually positioned 45 degree's from the plant stem.
which means that plant branches build up the positive magnetism, generated from the atoms that make up the branches.

the smaller branchlets are also usually positioned 45 degree's from the branches.
which generates even more positive magnetism.

sunlight, the ionosphere, and the entire atmosphere in general, also have a positive magnetic charge.


6:
the electrons moving away from the negative dirt/roots, are attracted to the positive magnetism in the branches. and towards the positive sunlight/ionosphere/atmosphere.

the electrons raise upwards. as high as they can.
the electrons build up in the leaves.

because the leaves have more positive water/material to hold the electrons, and because the leaves are usually as close to the sunlight/ionosphere/atmosphere, that the electrons can get.


7:
the water inside the plant, is ALL connected.
it is ONE body of water. without division.

the electrons may only be free to build up in the stems/leaves,
BECAUSE they are still magnetically attached to the electron/absence in the roots water.

electron-absence in the roots, allows electron-excess in the branches/leaves.

and electron excess in the branches/leaves, allows electricity/electron-movement,
in the branches/leaves !!!!!!!!!


8:
the chloroplasts in the leaves, store the electrons/electricity, in chemical bonds. AKA sugar.

the plant feeds itself with this sugar.
but i also suspect that the plants cells can live off of the electron movement, too.

sunlight is NOT turned into sugar, by the plants chloroplasts.
sunlight is merely the positive magnetism, which attracts electrons into the leaves.
the moving electrons (electricity !), is the plants food source !




the great pyramid in egypt, used these EXACT SAME ENERGY PHYSICS, to generate electricity/electron-movement !!!

*
the pyramids passages and rooms were completely filled with water. the water-filled passages and rooms, were the water-filled body of the plant !!!

*
the dirt/rock under the pyramid, was the soil of the plant !

the well in the subterranian chamber, was at a 90 degree angle from the rest of that chamber !
the subterranian chamber was the negative magnetism generating root of the plant !

*
the descending passageway was positioned 45 degree's from the ascending passageway.
this made the ascending passage the positive magnetism generating branch of the plant !

*
the base of the pyramid was square. all 4 angles on the base, were 90 degree angles.
each base-angle generated negative magnetism, free of charge from the atoms of the stone bricks.

the 4 walls of the pyramid were positioned 45 degree's, FROM THE GROUND.
this 45 degree's of the walls FROM THE GROUND, generated positive magnetism !

the negative magnetism built up strongest, where the ascending passage of the pyramid is.
the negative magnetism pushed electrons up the ascending passage.
the negative magnetism attracted electron-absent water down the ascending passage.
keeping the 2 waters sepperately polarized.


*
the positive magnetism generated by the 4 corners, built up strongest in the center of the pyramid.
where the kings chamber is.

positive/diamagnetic metals such as gold and copper, were placed in the kings chamber.
to make the kings chamber even more positively charged.
to attract electrons even harder, into the center of the pyramid.


*
the positive metals in the kings chamber were attached to a wire.
the wire ran up the air shaft.
the wire was attached to the positive metal peak, which sat on top of the pyramid.

positively charged sunlight touched this positive metal peak.
causing its positivity to grow even stronger than it already was, whenever the sun was out.

(this was obviously the origin of osiris dying when the sun went down. and resurrecting when the sun came up.)

(set represented the negative electrons, which killed the electron-attracting positivity of the pyramid. and when the peaks positive magnetism was restored by the sunlight of day, set was banished.)


*
when the atlantians had a device that they wanted to power, they connected one wire to the positive peak metal (which had the greatest electron-excess "pressure"), and another wire to the electron-absent water in subterranian chamber (which had the greatest electron-absent "pressure").


spare electrons violently moved from the badly crowded peak, through one wire, through the device, through the other wise, and into the electron-absent water in the subterranian chamber.

the electrons moved from the subterrainian chamber,
through the descending passage,
through the ascending passage,
through the grand gallery,
through the kings chamber,
through the wire in the air shaft,
and back into the positive peak metal !

and as long as the 4 corner angles on the base were the same,
as long as the well was 90 degree's from the subterranian chamber,
as long as the ascending chamber was at 45 degree's,
as long as the dirt was negative and the sunlight was positive,
as long as the pyramid was stuffed full of electron-conducting water (which is always positive),
the pyramid continued to spew out vast amounts of electricity !!!


and the vibrations coming from the earth, only excited the whole process.
making it work even better.



i'm working on implementing this. but i'm not ready to release anything to the public.
when i do release it, i'll do it for free.

because i am motivated to save the world from doom.
not to stuff my bank account with monopoly money, like the pyramid stuffs its peak with electrons.
which makes me immune to the illumi-nutty's siren-song of false-wealth.


by the way.
if you want physical proof, than every green plant on earth, is the proof.

if you place plants inside copper pipe pyramids, the plants grow better.

if you place magnets below or above the plants, they grow better.
one half of the magnet makes them produce more fruit with less nutrition,
the other half of the magnet makes them produce less fruit with more nutrition.

if you pour vinegar/salt onto a plant, so that the electrons are unable to build up into the leaves, before being electrically conducted back into the roots, the plant dies.
this kills even the most unkillable of plants. because no plant can compensate for the change in energy physics.

if the plant runs out of water, or the weather
gets so cold that the water freezes, the plant dies.

if the plant lacks enough sunlight to attract electrons into its leaves, it dies.




HeairBear

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 440
Re: plants, pyramids, and collecting electricity (new breakthrough).
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2009, 04:11:24 PM »
Wow! very interesting! where can I find more info? One of the reasons I found this interesting is another person somewhere on the net claims that the chambers inside the pyramids make up what we call the "RAM" pump. The Sphinx is also worn from water erosion... Yes, very interesting! Thank you for sharing and the illustrations.

Cloxxki

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1083
Re: plants, pyramids, and collecting electricity (new breakthrough).
« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2009, 06:00:28 PM »
Interesting theory indeed.

Would you expect the pyramid's geometry "strong" enough to actually draw water up from the soil, or would you expect manpower to have been topping off the pyramid to keep it fully submerged?

Have you already calculated how strong the current atop the pyramid might have been? Enough to make the top spike buzz displaying (by day) visible light?

nitinnun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 713
Re: plants, pyramids, and collecting electricity (new breakthrough).
« Reply #3 on: June 28, 2009, 08:24:31 PM »

i put together this knowledge mostly under my own power.
there were "hints" floating around in places. and thomas thrawager for the ball rolling.
but most of it was made possible by my mental processes.

i seriously doubt thomas thrawager knew the energy physics as well as i have described.
or else he would have built his pyramid differently than he did.

the biggest reasons why his pyramid worked, is because his capacitor and its supporting copper band, was positioned in a place to milk the electron movement sweet spot on one of the 4 walls.

and because the positive half of the magnet that was placed againt the screw, was acting like the positively charged sunlight.
to attract electrons away from the negative base, through the electrical circuit, and towards the positively charged middle.

he was also fortunate that the positively charged middle without a positively charge peak, was enough to get electrons moving.

but he was likely running electricity through the steel pyramid frame itself.
which undoubtedly shorted out the pyramids magnetic fields.
which undoubtedly harmed the pyramids ability to move electrons, and create electricity.



the knowledge/science that it took to build the pyramid, is FAR beyond what we are taught the egyptians had.

not only did the builders understand these hard to figure out energy physics, but they had machinery to move the massive stones. most of which through the air, to build the pyramid.

at the very least, they had advanced knowledge of electricity.
which likely means they must have also had a slew of electrical devices.
because why else would they want such massive electricity badly enough, to build a huge stone structure, on the equator, in the desert, under the most intense, undisrupted sunlight on earth ?

the builders didn't "happen" to live in egypt.
they CHOSE egypt, because it has the strongest, least disrupted sunlight in the world.
because when positively charged sunlight stops attracting electrons into the positive peak metal, the electricity output would greatly drop off.

i theorize that when the sun was fully out, the great pyramid produced enough electricity to power a large nation.

or to power enough energy weapons/vehicles, to stage a massive, unending war.

neutrally charged water is magnetically attracted by the positive electron-absent water, in plant roots.
so the pyramid had the ability to pump water.
but if they moved water too quickly through the pyramid, it might have disrupted the 2 polarizations of the water.
these 2 polarizations are CRITICAL, if free electrons are to continue moving up the ascending shaft and through the circuit.

but the electricity produced was certainly strong enough to pump water from the nile, into the pyramid.
or even saltwater from the ocean, into the pyramid. so they could abuse the minerals and salt in the ocean water, to "improve" the water inside.

so if the pyramid could pump water on its own, the water was a perk.
the water was likely allowed to flow out the air passes, and down the outside of the pyramid too.

so anyone who wanted water/electricity, would just have to touch the extremely electron-excess
water running down the pyramid, and a positive terminal which likely connected with the electron-absent water in the descending chamber, to get a lot of electricity.



again. the builders did everything they could, to milk more electricity out of it !
i wouldn't be surprised if they used every trick they knew of, when they built it.

even the queens chamber was likely used to alter the composition of the water inside.
to make the water better able to conduct electrons.
or to make the water better able to stay polarized between the electron-excess in the ascending chamber, and the electron-absence in the descending chamber.


whoever build the great pyramid also had the technology to have a world-civilization.
there is no way that they were smart enough to milk the pyramid for electricity so efficiently, yet NOT also be smart enough to have their civilization cover the planet.


i'm also convinced that whoever built the pyramid, was at least 12 feet tall.
because the entrances for most fancy buildings of that time, are at least that tall.

and because the ascending chamber in the pyramid is tall enough for a human to talk, if they are hunched over. yet still has 2 feet of excess to the left and right of the hunched walker.

why didn't they use the 4 feet of excess on both sides, to just make the roof taller ?
so a 6 foot tall human could walk upright, with the walls closer to their sides ?
when building wider was less supporting to the structure, than building taller ?


the answer is because the square shape of the ascending chamber, was BARELY big enough,
for a 12 or more foot tall person to CRAWL through !

if the ascending chamber was tall and narrow enough for a mere 6 foot tall human to walk through, than a 12 foot tall being could neither crawl nor walk through it !
because it would be too narrow for the 12 foot tall being, no matter how they tried to move !



ResinRat2

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1242
    • Hydrogen Reactor Vids
Re: plants, pyramids, and collecting electricity (new breakthrough).
« Reply #4 on: June 28, 2009, 09:31:53 PM »
I find the concept interesting from the point of view of using plants.

So if this is true, what you are saying is that by simply putting a copper connection into one of the branches of a tree (negative -), then putting another copper connection into the roots of a separate nearby tree (positive +), that you would get a voltage difference that could probably be exploited in some way?

That is what I deduce from your drawing of the charge separation on a plant.

nitinnun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 713
Re: plants, pyramids, and collecting electricity (new breakthrough).
« Reply #5 on: June 28, 2009, 10:42:38 PM »


the idea is that the electrons build up in the branches water, and become absent in the roots water.

a device is connected to the electron-rich branch, and the electron poor roots.
electrons move from the branches, through the device, and into the roots. in the form of usable electricity.

then the electrons move from the roots, through the trunk, and into the branches. because of the physics i mentioned.
to generate more electricity.



http://www.hunkler.com/pyramids/great_pyramid.gif

the great pyramid used the energy physics that i talked about.
my suggestion is to get electricity, using a steel-frame pyramid.

the pyramid is obviously more convenient, durable, and modifiable, than some plant.
i mentioned the plant, to show how the plants physics are present in the pyramid.

that the builders of the pyramid most likely discovered the physics which the pyramid functioned on, by studying plants.



sunlight to chloroplasts, is a lie.
chloroplasts are just an organ that converts ELECTRICITY/ELECTRON-MOVEMENT, into sugar.


i know that this opens up a big scientific can of worms.
but someone else will have to debate their way through every nook and cranny of it.
because i just want to power my house. and maybe help others power theirs.


Cloxxki

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1083
Re: plants, pyramids, and collecting electricity (new breakthrough).
« Reply #6 on: June 28, 2009, 11:29:28 PM »
It has been popular belief that pyramids required electrical power to be built. However, the Maya's also built great things, and it's known they used long ramps to get the heavy stones up there. I've seen convincing proposals to build the Egymptian pyramids this way, a spiral ramp around the structure.
If a builder today were to be commissioned one, and not use modern day technology, that's what would be used, cranes can't be built big and strong enough from timber and rope.

I'm ready to consider a theory on plants, but to just decide that the Eqypians had electricity, and THUS the pyramids meanings MUST have been...seems like cuting corners.

Not sure why Egyptians would need to study plants to build something big. They had pretty elaborate knowledge of atronomy and astrology, and designed the great pyramids based on their science and beliefs in those fields.
Start with a foundation almost 200 by 200 metres, lay down layer one, proceeed with layer 2, but keep room for passages and ducts. If gets more complicated as you go higher, the ramp gets longer, every next stone costs more man power to place. But, they had decades to complete a pyramid, the workers were well compensated and cared for, and they believed in their goal and that their King was in a sense a god.

If the builders were 12 feet tall, they'd be the gods worshipped, and they'd get the best burials. Time we'd dug one up.
Sure, gret structures appeared one both sides of the oceans nearly simulataniously, in times we didn't sail the oceans. And, similar wise mens were epicted by the various cultures, as coming from the seas. But 12 feet tall? That would leave a greater impression on the world by those write-happy Eqyptians.

I'm sceptic that a pyramid with passages full of water can pump to such heights from free flowing electrons alone. Plants likely have a much more clever leverage and storage system, to do it one cell as a time.
If you build a steel framed pyramid that acts as a self powered fountain, all from a bit on sunlight hitting a bar at the top, I'm going to take off a huge hat to you. I hope you are going to be proven right, actually.

ResinRat2

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1242
    • Hydrogen Reactor Vids
Re: plants, pyramids, and collecting electricity (new breakthrough).
« Reply #7 on: June 28, 2009, 11:57:22 PM »
Hi Nitinuum,

I'm not going to comment on the pyramid side of this, but I wasn't saying that you were wrong about the plant ideas. It sounds interesting and I was just thinking of a simple way to test your thoughts. If there is a separation of charges into the branches and the roots then it should be easy to test. Using the same metal (copper) to run wires into the branch of a tree and another wire into the root of a neighboring tree should quickly show any favorable results and rule out any galvanic possibilities.

Heck, I feel like trying it myself. Now where did I put that copper wire?

I'll be back.
« Last Edit: June 29, 2009, 12:46:14 AM by ResinRat2 »

ResinRat2

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1242
    • Hydrogen Reactor Vids
Re: plants, pyramids, and collecting electricity (new breakthrough).
« Reply #8 on: June 29, 2009, 12:44:10 AM »
OK, I tried an experiment.

I drilled a 3/32" diameter and 3 inch length hole into the second branch of a 30 ft tall Linden tree in my backyard and inserted a platinum coated nickle wire of very thin diameter deeply into the hole. I then drilled the same size and length hole into the root of an apple tree that is about 30 feet high and 15 feet from the first tree, also in my backyard; and I inserted another platinum coated nickle wire into that hole as well.

I then connected copper wires by using alligator clips to each of the tree wires and hooked them up to my voltmeter. It read 0.000 volts.

So from this preliminary experiment I don't see the charge separation.

Could anyone suggest a change in my experiment to show otherwise?

Thanks for your help in advance.

ATT

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 187
Re: plants, pyramids, and collecting electricity (new breakthrough).
« Reply #9 on: June 29, 2009, 07:52:53 AM »
I drilled a 3/32" diameter and 3 inch length hole into the second branch of a 30 ft tall Linden tree in my backyard and inserted a platinum coated nickle wire of very thin diameter deeply into the hole.

A thin wire 3" inside the tree might not be the way to go if you want to get to the 'live' water-bearing portion of the tree. Only the outer layer, right underneath the bark, hauls water up the tree (that's where the xylem is that utilizes capillary action).

Now I can't say whether you should get any potential difference or not from the second wire 15 feet away, but years ago I worked for an outfit that needed proven earth-'grounding' for it's equipment and we used a 'megger' to determine the quality of the grounding system.

The fact is, if the earth is uniformly moist, you probably won't see much of a potential difference between one point and another, but if it's 'spotty', you could very well see a noticeable potential difference, distance between the wires matters too (just going on past experience, here).

In any case, that's what little bit I know of it. Good luck with your experiments.
.

tishatang

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 296
Re: plants, pyramids, and collecting electricity (new breakthrough).
« Reply #10 on: June 29, 2009, 08:59:11 AM »
@ResinRat2
Did you try switching the voltmeter from DC to AC?  Also, try another time of day or night?  Living things may be using more subtle forces than we can measure with our instruments?

Just some thoughts,
Tishatang

ATT

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 187
Re: plants, pyramids, and collecting electricity (new breakthrough).
« Reply #11 on: June 29, 2009, 09:07:16 AM »
@ResinRat2
Hey, you know how you can jam your VOM leads into a potato or a lemon and get about 1/2 volt? I wonder if you could jam your leads into a tree and get any reading?

Expose a root and push your + lead in, extend your - lead and get it as far away as you're able, push it into a branch and see what happens (I can't do it where I live, I'm in the middle of the desert, no trees...). If you don't get deflection, switch polarity + for - and check it out again. I like analog meters for this kind of thing (like a Simpson 260), digital sampling in VOMs can get a little sketchy for some stuff.

Use the smallest DC scale you have. Make sure your leads have good contact. See what happens.


.

LightRider

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 155
Re: plants, pyramids, and collecting electricity (new breakthrough).
« Reply #12 on: June 29, 2009, 06:27:28 PM »
"...pH difference between xylem and soil..."

Using tree power to prevent forest fires?
http://blogs.zdnet.com/emergingtech/?p=1045#more-1045

"...Here is the abstract. “It has long been known that there is a sustained electrical potential (voltage) difference between the xylem of many plants and their surrounding soil, but the mechanism behind this voltage has remained controversial. After eliminating any extraneous capacitive or inductive couplings and ground-mediated electric current flows, we have measured sustained differences of 50–200 mV between the xylem region of a Faraday-caged, intact, potted Ficus benjamina tree and its soil, as well as between its cut branches and soils and ionic solutions standardized to various pH values. Using identical platinum electrodes, no correlation between the voltage and time of day, illumination, sap flow, electrode elevation, or ionic composition of soil was found, suggesting no direct connection to simple dissimilar-metal redox reactions or transpirational activity. Instead, a clear relationship between the voltage polarity and magnitude and the pH difference between xylem and soil was observed. We attribute these sustained voltages to a biological concentration cell likely set up by the homeostatic mechanisms of the tree. Potential applications of this finding are briefly explored.”..."

LightRider

Cap-Z-ro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: plants, pyramids, and collecting electricity (new breakthrough).
« Reply #13 on: June 29, 2009, 11:19:42 PM »

@RR,

It may be worth while to try wrapping a cloth insulated wire around the root and another around a branch of the same tree.

I know Nathan Stubblefield used wire of that type, and its said he used trees to power lanterns...with wire wrapped around the roots.

Regards...


Cherryman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 642