Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16406586 times)

Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4135
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22530 on: March 26, 2016, 03:25:22 PM »
Excellent post Wotsup.

Maybe human conciousness masks other realities or maybe the reality of our universe is created by human conciousness.

Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22531 on: March 26, 2016, 03:50:06 PM »
There seem to be two ways of varying the parameters of an LC system - by varying the capacitance and by varying the inductance. On the face of it the techniques used in magnetic amplifiers to vary inductance look more promising. As for a Lenz-free output transformer ...

The quick drawing below could make that stuff a bit more clearer.

Question: What would be the feedback on the right hand LC circuit due to the frequency doubler circuit supplying the left hand coil with current? Could there be a parametric frequency variation in that LC circuit? How would this affect the right hand side generator?

At least it would be a closed loop that could create some unforeseen effects. :)

And since the high voltage coil is open, it would be Lenz-free anyway.

batfish

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22532 on: March 26, 2016, 04:33:55 PM »
Zeitmaschine, in your diagram, is the feedback varying the parameters of the oscillator (which would perhaps lead to exponentially increasing amplitude), or is it directly driving it?

Batfish

wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22533 on: March 26, 2016, 04:47:44 PM »
@all
So here is the question. hahahaha Always a question hey.

Is it possible to take one AC line and pass it through a type of full bridge rectifier where you can then output TWO DISTINCT outputs that are 180 degrees out of phase? If this is possible, then you can make transformers with two primaries, one left primary, center secondary, one right primary where each primary now gets its own AC peak pulsed that is 180 degrees out of phase and the secondary will now have the impulses coming from two changing vectors. If this can work and increase the intensity of the Sway of copper nuclei, we just made a new toy for working towards OU devices.

wattsup

@Zeitmaschine

The TK device (if it is real) can have one of two workings.

1) Flyback Coil (1) primary produces HV to Tesla Coil (2) type primary where its HV is compressed to higher amps and returned to #1 primary in a loop.

2) AC mains is used to created two outputs at 180 degrees offset.

So as I had posted above more then a week ago, here is a challenge. Take two standard identical transformers having 1 primary and 1 secondary each. Put identical light bulbs on each secondary.
Using the 120 or 220 vac mains (I use a variac), use as many properly rated diodes as you want to produce the final outcome of the bulbs lighting up in alternation. This means when one light bulb lights the other is off and alternate like that. If this can be done first, then OU is not that far away.

While anyone with the proper abilities tries to accomplish this, it would be a good idea to write down all the connection methods used, all the scope shots shown per connection method and try to understand all the changes taking place with each change in connection method. Just this small exercise if done in a methodical manner will make your mind go crazy when you start to try and understand what is happening inside those two transformers. I will not do it for you or anyone. It requires someone with good EE street cred.

The basis is very simple. If AC is alternating as our books explain, and if the full bridge rectifier takes up and down waves of a normal sinewave and produces double the up waves and no down waves, then it should be possible to split the output with one line having only up waves at every start of a cycles and the other line should be able to have only down waves at the second half of each cycle producing two 30Hz (if 60Hz) or 25HZ (if 50Hz) bulbs to light in alternation. Sounds simple enough and if the books are right then this should be very easy to do. Good luck. Just be careful if you are using your scope. Do not use the ground lead.

wattsup


Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22534 on: March 26, 2016, 05:55:22 PM »
Zeitmaschine, in your diagram, is the feedback varying the parameters of the oscillator (which would perhaps lead to exponentially increasing amplitude), or is it directly driving it?

I don't know. That was my question. But since there is something we don't know yet, the chances are good that we can learn something new here.

This means when one light bulb lights the other is off and alternate like that. If this can be done first, then OU is not that far away.

I can't parse that theory. What is it that collects here the energy and from where, that is needed to get OU?

I don't know what you mean by an external feed-back loop,  as there is no internal feed back loop.

leo48

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 254
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22535 on: March 26, 2016, 06:50:38 PM »
Quote
If we connect two diodes back-to-back, what do we have? A non-linear resistor?

This system is used to transform the square waves into sinusoidal

Leo48

batfish

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22536 on: March 26, 2016, 07:45:06 PM »

...

Is it possible to take one AC line and pass it through a type of full bridge rectifier where you can then output TWO DISTINCT outputs that are 180 degrees out of phase? If this is possible, then you can make transformers with two primaries, one left primary, center secondary, one right primary where each primary now gets its own AC peak pulsed that is 180 degrees out of phase and the secondary will now have the impulses coming from two changing vectors. If this can work and increase the intensity of the Sway of copper nuclei, we just made a new toy for working towards OU devices.

Like this? This sounds very like one way of looking at the  Clemente Figuera system.

Batfish

AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22537 on: March 27, 2016, 09:52:21 AM »
@Zeitmaschine

The TK device (if it is real) can have one of two workings.

1) Flyback Coil (1) primary produces HV to Tesla Coil (2) type primary where its HV is compressed to higher amps and returned to #1 primary in a loop.

2) AC mains is used to created two outputs at 180 degrees offset.

So as I had posted above more then a week ago, here is a challenge. Take two standard identical transformers having 1 primary and 1 secondary each. Put identical light bulbs on each secondary.
Using the 120 or 220 vac mains (I use a variac), use as many properly rated diodes as you want to produce the final outcome of the bulbs lighting up in alternation. This means when one light bulb lights the other is off and alternate like that. If this can be done first, then OU is not that far away.

While anyone with the proper abilities tries to accomplish this, it would be a good idea to write down all the connection methods used, all the scope shots shown per connection method and try to understand all the changes taking place with each change in connection method. Just this small exercise if done in a methodical manner will make your mind go crazy when you start to try and understand what is happening inside those two transformers. I will not do it for you or anyone. It requires someone with good EE street cred.

The basis is very simple. If AC is alternating as our books explain, and if the full bridge rectifier takes up and down waves of a normal sinewave and produces double the up waves and no down waves, then it should be possible to split the output with one line having only up waves at every start of a cycles and the other line should be able to have only down waves at the second half of each cycle producing two 30Hz (if 60Hz) or 25HZ (if 50Hz) bulbs to light in alternation. Sounds simple enough and if the books are right then this should be very easy to do. Good luck. Just be careful if you are using your scope. Do not use the ground lead.

wattsup

Ha, ha, that's getting close to the 'flicker' rate, I can remember playing with that idea in the 70s when SCR's first came out, you end up using a diode if you like to experiment  instead of the scr but the bulb lights 'dimly' it sounds like false economy, one would do better to modulate the bulbs power supply frequency up to oh I don't know 10 to 20 khz and use an air space coil and collect the fly back at the 4th harmonic but don't rectify it and you will get a hell of a lot more light out of that bulb, try it! It's not free energy but a better use of what you have got.

regards AG

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22538 on: March 27, 2016, 04:46:27 PM »
    Zeit:
   This video below is showing the most amazing Kacher driven device. If it's for real.
   It also looks a lot like the simple circuit that you showed previously. Using only Kacher driver circuit, to power kWs of loads.
I don't understand what is being said. But, I heard the word Kapanadze.

    To me there is something or very wrong there, or very right.  But, I'll bet that it is not so easy to replicate the effect that it's showing. You'll never know unless you try it out.  If you could only know what is going on with all hidden details, as well as  what that driver circuits looks like.

   This video has me baffled.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qi1SdKAiK1E&ebc=ANyPxKrJj98oBQI8H8UMlNAouv8zL1EMJ1dPmmXJtXbao8eIo6aKxTaun1FU5djpbSJdtPaVyzn83THzQ1DIei98adeISDjqzw

Meta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22539 on: March 27, 2016, 05:31:07 PM »
 "If AC is alternating as our books explain,  ....."

________________________________________

Consider this: The books are not right...

Gerard Morin explains, "AC is RF (radio frequency) which drives our motors."


NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22540 on: March 27, 2016, 05:46:06 PM »
     Zeit:
    I had mentioned:
   "I don't know what you mean by an external feed-back loop,  as there is no internal feed back loop".

    If everything is placed inside of one box, then it would be an internal feed back loop?
   
    Is buying a $15 PS to be used for the (external) feed back loop, more complicated, than making a home made one and putting inside of the box?

Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22541 on: March 27, 2016, 06:02:45 PM »
Gerard Morin explains, "AC is RF (radio frequency) which drives our motors."


Ha ha. You just have to be trolling. ;D  Gerard Morin very obviously has no clue at all about
what he is talking about. He has no understanding of even basic electronics and physics and
just makes up his own absurd 'definitions' for terms and concepts he clearly has no understanding of.
Please stop the trolling...


Meta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22542 on: March 27, 2016, 06:21:53 PM »
    Zeit:
   This video below is showing the most amazing Kacher driven device. If it's for real.
   It also looks a lot like the simple circuit that you showed previously. Using only Kacher driver circuit, to power kWs of loads.
I don't understand what is being said. But, I heard the word Kapanadze.

    To me there is something or very wrong there, or very right.  But, I'll bet that it is not so easy to replicate the effect that it's showing. You'll never know unless you try it out.  If you could only know what is going on with all hidden details, as well as  what that driver circuits looks like.

   This video has me baffled.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qi1SdKAiK1E&ebc=ANyPxKrJj98oBQI8H8UMlNAouv8zL1EMJ1dPmmXJtXbao8eIo6aKxTaun1FU5djpbSJdtPaVyzn83THzQ1DIei98adeISDjqzw

The video seems like the very basic set up for a Kapanadze device, only it haunts me that it is set up like Gerard Morin's two pole transformers with a primary mover and a load.

The Bosch battery is the prime mover, like Morin's McCollugh 1500w generator.

The red coil and the light blue coil are the primaries just like the low voltage primaries in Morin's two pole transformers.

Time: 0:46
You can see one primary wire hooked up to the heavy copper secondary from the light blue primary coil. A capacitor is between the secondary heavy copper on the light blue primary and then to the plug to the load. The other negative side of the load plug goes right to the negative battery terminal.

Time: 0:46
The evidence of RF between the heavy copper coils is that the free light bulb lights up in the RF field around the copper coils.

This device has all the necessary parts required for it to act just like Morin's system of adding two high voltage pole transformers to a common prime mover and a load...

It has a prime mover...the Bosch battery
It has two primaries...the red coil and the light blue coil.
It has two secondaries....the two heavy copper coils.
It has a load.

It takes the low voltage primaries and steps the voltage and frequency up from DC to get HF, HV between the heavy copper coils with no heavy wire between the horns of two transformers like Morin uses....the question is, can DC be changed into RF and how? The alleged HF, HF radiant Tesla energy is stepped down again into the light blue coil to the load, amplified (not multiplied, corrected 3/27/16).

This is what I see.
« Last Edit: March 27, 2016, 08:55:09 PM by Meta »

Meta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22543 on: March 27, 2016, 06:28:18 PM »


Ha ha. You just have to be trolling. ;D  Gerard Morin very obviously has no clue at all about
what he is talking about. He has no understanding of even basic electronics and physics and
just makes up his own absurd 'definitions' for terms and concepts he clearly has no understanding of.
Please stop the trolling...

THIS IS WHERE WE PART COMPANY, MR.

Ive been studying this science for 40 years, dont insult.

Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22544 on: March 27, 2016, 06:55:55 PM »
THIS IS WHERE WE PART COMPANY, MR.
Ive been studying this science for 40 years, dont insult.

I have not made any insults. I just pointed out the very obvious about Gerard Morin. He
has very obviously been babbling complete nonsense. A person would have to be a troll or be very
gullible and ignorant to actually speak of Gerard Morin's nonsensical babblings as anything other
than the absurd nonsense it obviously is.

The topic of discussion here is about Kapanadze. Kapanadze actually has actual devices that he demonstrates
and which he has allowed independent third parties to inspect in person while running. Kapanadze could be a fake,
but to date even though various third parties have viewed his devices operating up close, as far as I know no one has
yet detected any tricks. Therefore Kapanadze is at least potentially demonstrating real over unity with his devices.

That is the difference between Kapanadze and various other people who are making wild claims and posting
many videos on youtube. Kapanadze at least has actual devices that he can demonstrate to people in person. It is still
possible that Kapanadze may be using tricks, but at least Kapanadze can actually demonstrate something that could
potentially be showing over unity. However, it is very clear with people like Gerard Morin that they have no clue what they
are talking about, and even though they go on and on with their absurd babblings, such people typically can show nothing
that will actually stand up to any scrutiny at all. What Gerard Morin has showed in his videos to date is just a joke.

The difference between the flakes and the people who are at least potentially authentic is the potentially authentic
people can actually show something that stands up to at least some basic inspection. The trolls and flakes just babble
on with all kinds of nonsense but can't show anything that would stand up to any scrutiny at all. That is really what it
boils down to in a nutshell.