Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16408284 times)

Meta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22500 on: March 24, 2016, 07:11:19 AM »
The Electric Universe is still a little short on the Big Picture.

Actually it should be the ever existing, Electric/Magnetic/Gravitic Universe since these are the three, 90 degree forces that bends all straight line forces into logarithmic spirals....thats the spirals we find on the first curve of space, I mentioned, and on Rodins tori.

The states of matter are solids, liquids, gasses and plasma and now The Electric Universe states that there is a 5th state? Where did this 5th state originate?

Nutrinos are the electrons of the next higher octave of electrons. Meta

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22501 on: March 24, 2016, 10:06:46 AM »
Nanoseconds, not picosecnds.
Fast switches
http://blackle.com/results/?cx=partner-pub-8993703457585266%3A4862972284&cof=FORID%3A10&ie=UTF-8&q=fast+switch+5-30+nanoseconds&sa=+#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=fast%20switch%205-30%20nanoseconds&gsc.page=1
This search page does not list any bilateral switches capable of switching on&off faster than 10ns, that that can conduct appreciable currents and block high voltages. e.g.: at least 1A, 50V.

Next time, don't post links to dynamic search pages, especially to commercially non-available devices.
If you want to illustrate the feasibility of your idea, post links to actual datasheets for devices that can be obtained below $10k.

Meta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22502 on: March 24, 2016, 10:28:47 AM »
Next time, don't post links to dynamic search pages, especially to commercially non-available devices.

__________________________________________________________________

If you want it, search for it. I dont take orders.

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22503 on: March 24, 2016, 10:30:26 AM »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izzujmKROWI
That is beautiful!
How much did you pay for it ?

Too, bad you cannot use it for your Coleman investigation while under the RF stimulation.
Can you see the betas Lorentz curving in the presence of a permanent magnet next to the sample?

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22504 on: March 24, 2016, 10:32:38 AM »
If you want it, search for it. I dont take orders.
It is you who wants to prove that such fast power switches are available, so the burden of proof is on you.

My position is that bilateral on&off power switches that fast are not available commercially. 
So far you have not shown otherwise with your link to that dynamic search.
Optical nanosecond switching in LCD crystals does not count, and most of the hits on that search page referred to that.


P.S.
Press the "Quote" icon if you want to quote my posts.

Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22505 on: March 24, 2016, 10:40:10 AM »
Some years ago I asked why has not a single person on this thread replicated or even tried to replicate at least their version of the TK device(s). And Verpies answered, that there is not enough information just from looking at the video, to know just how it's built, to be able to replicate it properly.

Then here the question would be: What is enough information? What exactly is it that we can't see in the videos? What if all information is there already but we are just to stupid to put it together?

I took his advice and moved to the Daly thread, instead. There I've been ever since. Because of Ruslan and his videos, and diagrams, and explanations, along with Akula's ideas. Which there is some information on.

What if that information is false? Doesn't the Ruslan device contradict the lack of information? Where did Ruslan get his information from how to build his version of the device?

And up to now we have not found even a single diode out of place, that could lead to calling any of those devices fakes. At least on the Ruslan videos, and schematics.

But a time ago I have found a reflection out of place (see image and video below). Here Ruslan's mistake is the same like with Kapanadze's spark gap: If that high voltage antenna coil is causal responsible for the energy output of the device then disturbing that antenna's function by means of a screw driver must make the light bulbs flicker. But they do clearly not react to that disturbance of the antenna.

So this looks suspiciously like a fake device. I don't know how he did it, but maybe he deleted the hot wire by means of a video editor. Those videos are always looking like quickly taken with a mobile phone and then uploaded to youtube straightaway. But who knows? There could be easily some editing between, especially when the video is taken by one single person without any independent witnesses.

The other problem with Ruslan is that he builds one device after the other, all looking basically the same. I can see no real development here. If I would have a working experimental setup then my next step would be to make it usable in a more practical way, like putting it in a small box in order to make handy presentations in front of real people (not just on video).

On the other hand there's No schematics, no diagrams, nor any idea what's inside the black box, or how the driver circuit really works, on the TK device, such as he's showing on his last video, or on any other one he's made or shown previously.

What is a driver circuit? I can't see any electronic circuits in the Stepanov videos, and I don't think there is a lot of electronics hidden in Kapanadze's tin can. Also it has to work with components available in the 1930's. And I would also guess that the mysterious Moray Valve was nothing more than a simple semiconductor diode bridge which was not common in those days.

I'm not suggesting that you give up the search for free energy. I'm just suggesting that one should build what there is some info on, and not try to build what there's little to no information on. Of course it's up to you.

I think it is better to look at little but real information instead at some but false information.

On the other hand: If the Ruslan devices (and some others) are fake then this could be second hand evidence that the Kapanadze and Stepanov devices are real. Because why should one go through such lengths building phony devices without good cause? The reason would be, because someone told him to do so in order to distract the forums from focusing on the real thing.

It is you who wants to prove that such fast power switches are available, so the burden of proof is on you.

Doesn't matter. Why should we need fast power switches?

P.S.
Press the "Quote" icon if you want to quote my posts.

Maybe he can't see that icon from the vantage point in his parallel universe. ;D
« Last Edit: March 24, 2016, 01:10:06 PM by Zeitmaschine »

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22506 on: March 24, 2016, 10:53:16 AM »
Doesn't matter. Why should we need fast power switches?
I did not write that we need nanosecond/picosecond SPDT switches for Kapanadze's replication.

It is Meta who needs them for his design.
MetaQEG.pdf:
The fast switch - Incorporated in the switch are the two single pole/double throw switches. This one Fast Switch chip
must be rated at the Relaxation time of the electron. This is far faster than 1ms as designated. It should be in the GHz or
nano/picosecond range...

It is well know that ESR frequencies are well into GHz range, which yields periods below 1ns.

Meta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22507 on: March 24, 2016, 10:54:06 AM »
This search page does not list any bilateral switches capable of switching on&off faster than 10ns, that that can conduct appreciable currents and block high voltages. e.g.: at least 1A, 50V.

______________________________________________________________

I mentioned, already, that this MetaQEG doesnt deal in physics.

The battery is only a gateway to metaphysical spatial potential with no readings of voltage or amperage. Dont charge the battery.

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22508 on: March 24, 2016, 10:56:33 AM »
I mentioned, already, that this MetaQEG doesnt deal in physics.
Does it deal in reality or practicality?

Meta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22509 on: March 24, 2016, 11:00:40 AM »
Does it deal in reality or practicality?

________________________________

There are two sides to the Universe, the

Reality- The invisible, virtual, mind world of potentials.

Actuality- The world that is actually seen and visible.

Both of them are practical. One needs the other. One can do nothing, it takes two, baby.

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22510 on: March 24, 2016, 03:23:22 PM »
Then here the question would be: What is enough information? What exactly is it that we can't see in the videos? What if all information is there already but we are just to stupid to put it together?

What if that information is false? Doesn't the Ruslan device contradict the lack of information? Where did Ruslan get his information from how to build his version of the device?

But a time ago I have found a reflection out of place (see image and video below). Here Ruslan's mistake is the same like with Kapanadze's spark gap: If that high voltage antenna coil is causal responsible for the energy output of the device then disturbing that antenna's function by means of a screw driver must make the light bulbs flicker. But they do clearly not react to that disturbance of the antenna.

So this looks suspiciously like a fake device. I don't know how he did it, but maybe he deleted the hot wire by means of a video editor. Those videos are always looking like quickly taken with a mobile phone and then uploaded to youtube straightaway. But who knows? There could be easily some editing between, especially when the video is taken by one single person without any independent witnesses.

The other problem with Ruslan is that he builds one device after the other, all looking basically the same. I can see no real development here. If I would have a working experimental setup then my next step would be to make it usable in a more practical way, like putting it in a small box in order to make handy presentations in front of real people (not just on video).

What is a driver circuit? I can't see any electronic circuits in the Stepanov videos, and I don't think there is a lot of electronics hidden in Kapanadze's tin can. Also it has to work with components available in the 1930's. And I would also guess that the mysterious Moray Valve was nothing more than a simple semiconductor diode bridge which was not common in those days.

I think it is better to look at little but real information instead at some but false information.

On the other hand: If the Ruslan devices (and some others) are fake then this could be second hand evidence that the Kapanadze and Stepanov devices are real. Because why should one go through such lengths building phony devices without good cause? The reason would be, because someone told him to do so in order to distract the forums from focusing on the real thing.

Doesn't matter. Why should we need fast power switches?

Maybe he can't see that icon from the vantage point in his parallel universe. ;D
[/quote.


   

  Zeit:  You have many questions, I don't know all the answers to. All I can say is, first of all you're looking at an older Ruslan video.  His newest one is a 4000w output device.  Each version is different, with different components, but with the same basic working system.
   I'm not interested in the Don Smith device, until it is proven to work and is able to be replicated by someone we can trust.
Energetic forum has a thread on his devices, if you are interested.  I'm not.

   I'm not going to try to convince you that Ruslan's devices are real. Nor that there is no faking going on.  I just work on replicating the "effect",  myself.   
  I've given you my opinions, and advice. Take it or leave it, it's up to you.
   I'm not here to discuss fakes, I'm here to work on and replicate the Ruslan type of device (on the Daly thread),  in my own way.

Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22511 on: March 24, 2016, 04:20:20 PM »
You forgot a bracket. :(

Meta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22512 on: March 24, 2016, 06:12:38 PM »
Doesn't matter. Why should we need fast power switches?

______________________________________________

In my MetaQEG.pdf the modified Bearden circuit is supposed to match the relaxation frequency of the electron which is between 5 and 30 nanoseconds, wherein the load circuit collects a bit of virtual, cold, spatial potential and delivers it to the load. Doing this over and over again as long as the load is demanding it.

Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4135
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22513 on: March 24, 2016, 07:49:36 PM »
Nick,

You write "I'm not interested in the Don Smith device, until it is proven to work and is able to be replicated by someone we can trust."

Are you really saying that you trust Ruslan more than Don Smith? Don Smith has shown a self-runner, so why not believe that his device has been proven to work. Where is the evidence that Ruslan's devices have been proven to work as self-runners and who has achieved this??

Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22514 on: March 24, 2016, 11:34:38 PM »
Don Smith has shown a self-runner ...

Hi Hoppy. Where did Don Smith ever publicly demonstrate a self runner?
In one presentation Don Smith was giving, Don Smith allowed his suitcase device to be
connected to a light bulb board, but that suitcase device was powered by a battery, I think,
and the output voltage from the device to the light bulb board began to slowly drop after just a short
amount of time. That device might possibly have been OU to some extent, (this couldn't be determined
from the relatively short test done), but it didn't appear to be a self runner.