Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 897337
  • *Total Topics: 15814
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 7
  • *Guests: 24
  • *Total: 31

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 13763345 times)

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2914
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22440 on: March 20, 2016, 10:12:39 PM »



Roberto:
Quote
Hi Wesley,
1 -  I just started reading paper you kindly shared. I've been for more than 30 years a licensed Radio Amateur (i0LY).
So, even if the power considerations made are theoretically correct...
I've never seen any kind of usable power coming from an unbalanced transmission wave! 
what happens is direct conversion mainly into heath....as predicted ....


2 - Few years agò I tested a complex ONE TO MANY TMT system (1 x transmitter and 6x receivers) just to check existance of possible power multiplication at the combined receivers end.  Even if I noted some interesting facts...I failed to obtain in output more energy than the supplied input.


----I continue to read the article....




Note in the  article:
-first force is  the force that we create by our-self and introduce to the system
-second force is the force in NEAR FIELD that  is induced in the secondary winding of  transformer. that source is only  serving a source to   any other devices connected to it.
 However  that is not the source in relation to primary force. It is only force that   was created by the first one.
- third force  is an independent force that is "pushed" to work for our benefit like horse   for the farmer


 


Unfortunate is for OU  community  that I   very much  agree with you.


The advantage of photon  radiation in  microwave region is  only when in NEAR FIELD  coupling  rate  of change , of  magnetic component of electromagnetic force, is able to induce something or anything in  secondary winding.( of the transformer) There is no gain proved to be  available for us  from that  arrangement.

As always  the voltage is  increased with current dropping  down  so that transfer is at no gain.
We need   “third  source”- /force that is being activated by the  primary force and  than stimulated   to the point where  under first force  influence,
- the power drown by the load is solely  coming from the third source 
That force is the one that is not being  charged  for-( does not cost us money)


Microwave region of frequencies  - has insufficient energy per photon to
 interact with the matter,  other  than  being converted to  heat.


Wave-guides DO NOT serve as photon  summarizes. Photons  can not interact with themselves nor accumulate their own energy nor see  each other.
They have no idea how many photons  of the same or different  properties  is  there  exactly on their path., Photon of particular wave length   can interact only with suitable resonators of the same  wavelengths of its ½, ¼  and so on.


I see OU that is useful for us as No OU in reality.
 e.g Tubing  used to  suck with your mouth , gasoline from the car tank  uses only one short  under pressure    impulse  and the rest of the flow  is done with gravity ( at the condition of  gravity dis-balance between the two tanks.
That serves as the example of  “third force”= gravity.


======================================
 e.g. stimulating force of the hand  opening the valve  of the water  pipe is  small.
Comparing to water flow  paid  by a river.


When we leave classical mechanics  and go to the quantum world the same mechanism must be present.


So  I'm asking you if there is something in that paper that I simply did not noticed.


I read  so much of material and  it is  impossible to    make suitable analysis all the time.


Wesley
« Last Edit: March 21, 2016, 06:39:43 AM by stivep »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Meta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22441 on: March 21, 2016, 05:15:36 AM »
"And is why meta-physics should be included and not excluded from our discussion.  Right? Meta?

_________________________________________________________________

Yes, that's why my name is Meta.
It means "over and above" physics.
That which controls physics.
The hidden world.

Now NickZ is asking questions I can only take as needing an answer so I will.

What is light?

Packets, I hear, however I did make a hypothetical advance and say that light, "travels" in 2 opposite directions just like DNA spirals in 2 opposite directions so faster-than-light travel can be explained easily, seeing that the detectors are only detecting the returning packets, at the velocity of light. "Traveling" here, means more like communicating rather than moving. It seems the matrix of deep space communicates at the velocity of light.

And light or, technically, its energy, already pervades all of space but unless lights energy touches mass of any kind, it will not radiate its light unless reflected off the mass. In deep space there is lights energy but there's nothing to reflect it so we can't see it. Technically there's 1 electron per cubic foot of deep space.

Offline Meta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22442 on: March 21, 2016, 05:30:42 AM »
verpies,

A "dimension" is defined by all of Science, as "a 90 degree rotation of an electron". Meta

Not strictly - a dimension is just an independent variable.

Of course in geometric systems, 90º symbolizes that independence, e.g. as in a perpendicular motion.

BTW: Any motion is a ratio of space to time.

____________________________________________________________

Let me ask you how you can demonstrate your claims without using more words. Do you have some kind of documented evidence? When we make claims we should be able to back them.

Define Independent variable. What creates it?

"BTW: Any motion is a ratio of space to time."

What does that mean?  You can only use more words to describe these words.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22442 on: March 21, 2016, 05:30:42 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Meta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22443 on: March 21, 2016, 05:50:47 AM »
acca,

Kapanadze's device doesn't seem to have any antenna to pick up the spatial potential like a Moray device or Tesla's Black Box powering his car. I think Moray and Tesla used a series of step down transformers to bring the extremely high spatial potential down to usable levels.

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2914
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22444 on: March 21, 2016, 05:53:00 AM »
Word: Meta
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta
If there is no practicality  fallowing theory in any field than any  equivalent or substitution to theory  newly introduced is worth nothing.
At first it is only  concept  that has not been fallowed in modern times
Second even if that concept of perceptual processing  is really right way to go it  does not have push to rewrite science as we know,


I'm not denying nor protesting Meta involvement in this forum.
I'm not able to take any benefit  from  it.
the simple way to  explain it is that I  have the same comfort of going on  like Meta has  with his new form of processing  information.
At the end if it is proven that Meta was right  it would not give me any harm. 
If it is proven that Meta is wrong that would not be any revolution.


Definitely I do not see it as a conflict.
If you get somewhere where solid solution is  proposed - Meta  just share it,
I can admit that in "your world" I'm completely lost.
I'm in physics not metaphysics
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphysics


Quote
Metaphysical Cosmology is the branch of metaphysics that deals with the world as the totality of all phenomena in space and time. Historically, it has had quite a broad scope, and in many cases was founded in religion. The ancient Greeks drew no distinction between this use and their model for the cosmos. However, in modern times it addresses questions about the Universe which are beyond the scope of the physical sciences. It is distinguished from religious cosmology in that it approaches these questions using philosophical methods (e.g. dialectics).
With all due respects to all believers.


do not drag me there...
This is for me unacceptable form  of  wasting my time.
Charlatans have been working hard to  their own benefit based on facts that are  mixed together  fights with dragons and holly wars, killings  punishments an angels with swords .
And than even if one person is trying to clarify  that branch of science and place it as valuable tool - first it must be taken out of the trash and washed  out from all of the dirt.
And I see it as next to impossible. 



I wish you the best.
 
Wesley

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22444 on: March 21, 2016, 05:53:00 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Meta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22445 on: March 21, 2016, 06:01:58 AM »
Westley,

I should have sent this to Roberto, rather than you..my error. Im referring to his TMT system he mentioned.....

What transmitter, you ask? This one....


"2 - Few years agò I tested a complex ONE TO MANY TMT system (1 x transmitter and 6x receivers) just to check existance of possible power multiplication at the combined receivers end.  Even if I noted some interesting facts...I failed to obtain in output more energy than the supplied input."

____________________________________________________________

If you would have stepped the transmitter's 3D voltage up into the 4th dimension using a transformer, then stepped that 4D HV, HF back down again using another transformer, to 3D again, you would have multiplied the output, just like Gerard Morin did. Im sure of it.
« Last Edit: March 21, 2016, 11:30:41 AM by Meta »

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2914
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22446 on: March 21, 2016, 06:22:42 AM »
"2 - Few years agò I tested a complex ONE TO MANY TMT system (1 x transmitter and 6x receivers) just to check existance of possible power multiplication at the combined receivers end.  Even if I noted some interesting facts...I failed to obtain in output more energy than the supplied input."

____________________________________________________________

If you would have stepped the transmitter's 3D voltage up into the 4th dimension using a transformer, then stepped that 4D HV, HF back down again using another transformer, to 3D again, you would have multiplied the output, just like Gerard Morin did. Im sure of it.




I  will try to  explain where  is that I get lost:
Quote
If you would have stepped the transmitter's 3D voltage up into the 4th dimension using a transformer


1. what transmitter
2 what frequency
3. what is the power
4. what is the modulation or it is unmodulated carrier
5.what is 3D voltage
6.what is 4th dimension
7.what is  the property of each of the dimension causing it to be significant.
8. how would you specify potential difference or any other properties that could be reached  by going to 4th dimension.


Quote
back down again using another transformer, to 3D again, you would have multiplied the output, just like Gerard Morin did. Im sure of it.
9.  why do we need to jump between dimensions.
10. what kind of multiplication do you have in mind give me  measurement units. e.g Watts / Jules / Coulombs / and so on
11What is significant in similar kind of behavior between Gerard Morin and your experiment.
11a. what is gain energy coming from?
12. attach the drawing or the schematic  of the practical arrangement of your  experiment setup.


 Please provide answer to the questions without being send  to literature to find the answer by myself.
However links are appreciated as well.

Wesley

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22446 on: March 21, 2016, 06:22:42 AM »
Sponsored links:




Online pix

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 212
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22447 on: March 21, 2016, 07:49:10 AM »
acca,

Kapanadze's device doesn't seem to have any antenna to pick up the spatial potential like a Moray device or Tesla's Black Box powering his car. I think Moray and Tesla used a series of step down transformers to bring the extremely high spatial potential down to usable levels.
Yes Meta,
That is what Kapanadze is doing.

Offline Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22448 on: March 21, 2016, 10:25:23 AM »
How the coil is wound is not important,however the length(how long the wire is) is very important

Then is it also important how long the wires/cables are between the device (fancy coil) and the load?

I can wind a toroidal coil that cancels all electric and magnetic readings on a meter leaving only higher energies. What do you say to that.

Show me.

Do we also ignore the circulating electricity in the Perpetual Motion Holder (PMH example), which is very similar to the circulating electricity in the power strip?

The holder stores energy, it does not continuously dissipate it like the bulb on the power strip.

If you would have stepped the transmitter's 3D voltage up into the 4th dimension using a transformer, then stepped that 4D HV, HF back down again using another transformer, to 3D again, you would have multiplied the output, just like Gerard Morin did. Im sure of it.

Where can I see a (self-running) free energy device built by Gerard Morin? ???

Kapanadze's device doesn't seem to have any antenna to pick up the spatial potential like a Moray device or Tesla's Black Box powering his car. I think Moray and Tesla used a series of step down transformers to bring the extremely high spatial potential down to usable levels.

Do we need two transformers? If we have a 3-phase (or even 2-phase) step up (or step down) transformer, then can we perhaps step up and step down voltage with one and the same transformer at the same time with a single magnetic field?

:P Just an idea. I think Stepanov uses the second transformer in the carpentry setup only to distribute the energy between the three phases.

And so far ionization (of a transformer winding) is the best explanation where the extra energy is coming from. The ionization connects to the medium (aether) and therefore it can collect additional energy from that medium. Maybe we can call that medium also the 4th dimension; it does not really matter.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22448 on: March 21, 2016, 10:25:23 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Meta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22449 on: March 21, 2016, 11:13:42 AM »
Yes Meta,
That is what Kapanadze is doing.

Are you sure this is what he's doing.
I dont see a line of transformers in Kapanadze's device.
He will need from 2 to 12 transformers to bring extremely high spatial potential down to usable levels. Thats why Morays box was so long, hum?

Offline verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3465
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22450 on: March 21, 2016, 11:18:44 AM »
A "dimension" is defined by all of Science, as "a 90 degree rotation of an electron". Meta
Hey, you started it, so let me ask you first how you can demonstrate your claims without using more words.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22450 on: March 21, 2016, 11:18:44 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Meta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22451 on: March 21, 2016, 11:24:20 AM »
Westley,

"do not drag me there...
This is for me unacceptable form  of  wasting my time.
Charlatans have been working hard to  their own benefit based on facts that are  mixed together  fights with dragons and holly wars, killings  punishments an angels with swords ."

_____________________________________________________________

I hate religion more than you do. I dont go into religion but you have to understand that the ancient religion was science in ancient times...it was all a super-science and then some priest made a religion of part of it so we have to acknoledge it occasionally then bypass it.

Offline verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3465
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22452 on: March 21, 2016, 11:51:48 AM »
What is 3D voltage
Although I do not subscribe to the idea of such "voltage", by semantic analysis a "3D voltage" would be an electric difference in potential, that can be completely described by three independent numbers.   By "independent", I mean that any one of these numbers can be varied without affecting the two others.

6.what is 4th dimension
It can be a mathematical dimension as in the equation ax3 + bx2 + cx + d, where the coefficients a,b,c,d can be varied independently of each other.  As such, that equation is 4-dimensional and e.g. the coefficient "d" is a 4th dimension in that equation.

A dimensionality of an abstract Euclidean geometry can also refer to the minimum number of coordinates needed to describe position in it or the maximum number of lines that can be mutually perpendicular to each other.

In such geometry, the 4th dimension would be the direction along some 4th line, that is perpendicular to the remaining 3 lines , which are also mutually perpendicular to each other.

In a 3D euclidean geometry, three 1D motions can occur parallel to these three orthogonal lines, without effecting each other's magnitudes.  The orthogonality of such motions guarantees their independence.  That's why the axes in a 3D-printer are all perpendicular to each other.
If one of these motions was not perpendicular to the others ( e.g.:  at an 89º angle ), then it would affect the magnitude of the remaining motions and the their independence would be lost ....because cos(89º)>0.

BTW: We commonly measure motion as space divided by time, with units such as kilometers per hour (km/h) or miles per hour (mph).

7.what is  the property of each of the dimension causing it to be significant.
The defining property of a dimension is its independence from all of the remaining dimensions.
Of what is the magnitude of each dimension in a "3D voltage"? I don't know - you'll have to wait for Meta to answer that, but whatever the answer, these magnitudes must be independent of each other.


ALL OF THIS IS ELEMENTARY but could not be communicated without words to convey these concepts. Especially on a forum, such as this, where words are the primary means of communication.
I'd like your feedback whether you understood these words.





P.S.
The rest of your numbered questions refer to NON-ELEMENTARY concepts, which are not mine, and I will not endeavor to answer them.

Offline Meta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22453 on: March 21, 2016, 12:31:59 PM »
Westley,

I already posted Morins video and my MetaQEG.pdf for everyone but I'll do it again for you. Why do I

have to do things two or three times? Those posts will be after you make me answer all these

unnecessary questions that are answered in Morins video and in my Addenda page 2 and 3 of the

MetaQEG.pdf.

_______________________________________________________________________

I  will try to  explain where  is that I get lost:
Quote

    If you would have stepped the transmitter's 3D voltage up into the 4th dimension using a transformer



1. what transmitter
The TMT transmitter of another poster I erroneously sent in your direction.

2. what frequency
Frequency of the solution? HV, HF RF...15,000 v, unknown freq, no instrument measuring Morins freq


3. what is the power
Power in watts....In- 1,500 watts, Out- 6,500 watts

4. what is the modulation or it is unmodulated carrier
No carrier in 4D, space is the carrier?

5.what is 3D voltage
120v in, on the low side of transformer 1
120v out on the low side of transformer2
15,000v between transformer1 and 2, horns on top.

6.what is 4th dimension
The dimension following our 3 dimensions, simple....only they come in sets...1,2,3 and 4....5,6,7, and 8

7.what is  the property of each of the dimension causing it to be significant.
The higher the HF, RF and HV reached in 4D, the more electricity is produced when stepped back down

to 120-240v.

8. any other properties that could be reached  by going to 4th dimension.
All other miraculous phenomea is available from 4D upward...invisibility, Tesla shields, beam weapons,

space-time anomalies, matter changes, Hutchison metal breakdown.....


Quote

    back down again using another transformer, to 3D again, you would have multiplied the output, just

like Gerard Morin did. Im sure of it.



9.  why do we need to jump between dimensions.
That's where the spatial potential is.
That's the source. The Dirac sea.

10. what kind of multiplication do you have in mind give me  measurement units. e.g Watts / Jules /

Coulombs / and so on
1,500watts in, 6,500watts out.
It depends upon the Kw rating of the two transformers


11What is significant in similar kind of behavior between Gerard Morin and your experiment.
Gerrard starts in the 3rd dimension, then jumps to the 4th then comes back down to the 3rd.
I bypass the 3rd, nullifying it and go directly to the 4th and extract the potential directly in the

MetaQEG.pdf

11a. what is gain energy coming from?
Space energy already existing, eternally open to the dipole battery terminals.


12. attach the drawing or the schematic  of the practical arrangement of your  experiment setup.

Im gonna make you read and listen now..

MetaQEG.pdf


Morins set up
Free Energy Feb 2015 The Doubt about OverUnity is Over Gerard Morin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DROoUg1Hio8

Offline Meta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22454 on: March 21, 2016, 12:48:04 PM »
Westley,

Metaphysical Cosmology is the branch of metaphysics that deals with the world as the totality of all phenomena in space and time. Historically, it has had quite a broad scope, and in many cases was founded in religion. The ancient Greeks drew no distinction between this use and their model for the cosmos. However, in modern times it addresses questions about the Universe which are beyond the scope of the physical sciences. It is distinguished from religious cosmology in that it approaches these questions using philosophical methods (e.g. dialectics).

________________________________________________________________

The information is error.

First there was Cosmology, the beginning.
Then Cosmogony, the process of toroidal SELF creation, no creator required.
Then Mythology was created to symbolize Cosmogony's story...
Then Religions were derived from Myth,
And now we have forgotten the source, Cosmology...

Ive studied all of this for 40 years

 

OneLink