Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16406361 times)

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22185 on: February 09, 2016, 05:34:34 AM »
Wesley... aren't you worried that your instruments may get all "nano-coated" inside from being connected to the Keshe device? I think this will probably void your warranties and make your calibrations questionable ....     ;)


(Also... could you please resize your images so that they are no more than 1024 pixels wide. If you need to show a closeup in greater magnification, you can crop out the area of interest and blow it up, but the images wider than 1024 pixels cause problems for people with narrow screens.... )



I did removed the last pictures.
The others I have  no access to.
Sorry for the trouble
As far as nano coating I take it as  a joke :)


I had no problems before.
I was taking pictures   with  Nikon D600
I recently switched to   FDR XA-100 Sony.
But in both instances I was taking snap shoot  using  FullShot9.5 this is just excellent program.
So I assume  there should be no difference  what camera I'm using.
 I need to  check  properties  of FullShot9.5
But id you  good in it than I take your advice.




Wesley

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22186 on: February 09, 2016, 10:40:45 AM »


I did removed the last pictures.
The others I have  no access to.
Sorry for the trouble
As far as nano coating I take it as  a joke :)


I had no problems before.
I was taking pictures   with  Nikon D600
I recently switched to   FDR XA-100 Sony.
But in both instances I was taking snap shoot  using  FullShot9.5 this is just excellent program.
So I assume  there should be no difference  what camera I'm using.
 I need to  check  properties  of FullShot9.5
But id you  good in it than I take your advice.




Wesley

Why do you think I'm the one who is joking? If Keshe's devices work as he claims, then anything connected to them should become nano-coated in its power and sense wiring, no? I'd hate to see you ruining your good equipment by making all the wiring inside them superconducting.
 
And since you are already seeing readings that indicate more power output from Keshe's device than input..... aren't you worried about this? Have you already decided that your instruments are somehow in error and the device doesn't actually work? Maybe it does work after all and that's why you are getting the readings you are getting.

 :P



(As far as the photo size goes.... there will be settings in the camera and in your processing application; both will determine the final size of the saved image. Perhaps you had the Nikon set to make smaller images in the first place. In your application, look for "scale image" or some such setting where you can set the resulting image size in pixels. Normally, 800 pixels wide is enough for the forum. The maximum for this forum to display the page properly is 1024 pixels wide. If you need to show some details up close, you can crop them out of your original larger image and show them in a 1024 pixel wide image. And obviously, the file size in bytes is related to the pixel (width x height), so smaller images will upload/download faster and require less storage on Stefan's servers.
My Canon Xti camera's normal image pixel size is 3888 x 2592 pixels  and I think your cameras will be similar; this is far too large for good display on the forum ... )

Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22187 on: February 09, 2016, 05:25:54 PM »
Why do you think I'm the one who is joking? If Keshe's devices work as he claims, then anything connected to them should become nano-coated in its power and sense wiring, no? I'd hate to see you ruining your good equipment by making all the wiring inside them superconducting.


Hi TK. I took Wesley's comment to mean that he doesn't take Keshe's claims about 'nano-coating' seriously.


T-1000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1738
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22188 on: February 09, 2016, 05:55:16 PM »
Hi all,

Simple question:
Why people are still wasting time on Keshe empty claims and money on that phishing marathon?
Aren't there other free energy prospects to explore?

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22189 on: February 09, 2016, 06:52:48 PM »
Hi all,

Simple question:
Why people are still wasting time on Keshe empty claims and money on that phishing marathon?
Aren't there other free energy prospects to explore?


I like your comment Arunas.
I was asked to  make evaluation of that device and that is only what
I do.


Wesley

Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22190 on: February 09, 2016, 08:09:07 PM »
Hi Wesley, T-1000. Can you guys confirm that when you were lighting the 150 Watt bulb
in your Lithuania experiment using the yoke core, that you guys were only driving
the yoke core with two USB signal generators? You weren't using any other higher power
generators than just the two low power USB signal generators to drive the yoke core? Also, was earth ground
connected to one side of the 150 Watt bulb to get it to light up?
Also, what were you using for the earth ground connection?

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22191 on: February 10, 2016, 01:13:30 AM »
Hi Wesley, T-1000. Can you guys confirm that when you were lighting the 150 Watt bulb
in your Lithuania experiment using the yoke core, that you guys were only driving
the yoke core with two USB signal generators? You weren't using any other higher power
generators than just the two low power USB signal generators to drive the yoke core? Also, was earth ground
connected to one side of the 150 Watt bulb to get it to light up?
Also, what were you using for the earth ground connection?
In yoke experiment there have been only two generators  connected with effective signal  output  power of 1W from each one of  the generators.
However after impedance mismatch the   effective power  in range of milliwatts  was  delivered to the windings.
We have not have per say ground wire  connected  however body of the   experimentator  was acting as  a ground ... to be more accurate  counterpoise.
As far as ground wire:
In nature everything is trying to get to equilibrium.
It could be compared to  the balance  ( weigh scales)
If resonance circuit is loaded with  a  dipole antenna than every antenna needs    counterbalance called also counterpoise
with walkie talkie it is your body
with car antenna for FM radio  it is  metal body of the car.
With antenna on  10th floor of the building it is metal plate  below the ground plane antenna and so on.
in horizontal dipole  one arm  is the counterbalance to the other  and reverse in  lower part of the  cycle.
For the new concepts of cellphone there is smart microprocessor  rebalancing if the phone is in your hand or on the table, however mostly manufactures do not care.
the Cell is about 1 mile away so mismatch of impedance does not count  that much. 
there are plenty of other examples, however  artificial ground is  comparable to  real ground.
That is part of the story  the rest  of it  is in my video
For more accurate information please  turn to T-1000 . He is the real brain behind it not me.




Wesley
 

Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22192 on: February 10, 2016, 01:32:18 AM »
In yoke experiment there have been only two generators  connected with effective power of 1W from each one of  the generators.
However after impedance mismatch there   effective power  in range of milliwatts  was  delivered to the windings.
We have not have per say ground wire  connected  however body of the   experimentator  was acting as  a ground ... to be more accurate  counterpoise.

Hi Wesley. Ok, thanks for the info. I just wanted to make sure because T-1000 mentioned a 9V, 1A mains transformer was
used, so I wanted to make sure that it wasn't connected to the mains, but only used for impedance matching between the signal
generator and the 15 turn winding. Also, T-1000 said he thought you guys were always using a ground wire when you were seeing
the 150 W light turn on, so I was wondering what you were connecting the ground wire to...

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22193 on: February 10, 2016, 02:37:21 AM »
Also, T-1000 said he thought you guys were always using a ground wire when you were seeing
the 150 W light turn on, so I was wondering what you were connecting the ground wire to...
As far as I remember, there was no ground wire connected to the yoke device when lighting that 150W bulb.  Just the operator's hand until a longer counterpoise was connected.  See the video time index 10:06.

Also, later I think that when they blew up one of their USB generators and were waiting for the replacement, they used the 9V mains transformer as a 50Hz sine signal source.

Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22194 on: February 10, 2016, 04:15:08 AM »
As far as I remember, there was no ground wire connected to the yoke device when lighting that 150W bulb.  Just the operator's hand until a longer counterpoise was connected.  See the video time index 10:06.
Also, later I think that when they blew up one of their USB generators and were waiting for the replacement, they used the 9V mains transformer as a 50Hz sine signal source.

Hi Verpies. Thanks. Yes, I had seen that part in that video, but T-1000 had mentioned that he thought they
always required earth ground to get the light bulb to light. At any rate it appears synchronization of some sort
was also required between the two signal generator signals as T-1000 wrote here:
http://www.energeticforum.com/164613-post28.html?s=194d7739ca54847a7cfe3c15918da88d
http://www.energeticforum.com/165262-post62.html
http://www.energeticforum.com/165188-post51.html

After reviewing some of the former notes on the setup and tuning, I think I will set this project aside now due to their
being too many 'unclears'.

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22195 on: February 10, 2016, 10:50:51 AM »
At any rate it appears synchronization of some sort
I heard that, too, but there is a problem: namely these USB signal generators do not have any inputs, that would allow for phase synchronization between them.

After reviewing some of the former notes on the setup and tuning, I think I will set this project aside now due to their
being too many 'unclears'.
I've been trying to clear up these points for years now.  See here and here.

Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22196 on: February 10, 2016, 06:41:09 PM »
I heard that, too, but there is a problem: namely these USB signal generators do not have any inputs, that would allow for phase synchronization between them.
I've been trying to clear up these points for years now.  See here and here.

Hi Verpies Ok on that. In the first two old posts from T-1000 I linked to in my previous post,
T-1000 said they were using modified horizontal/vertical sync circuit boards from CRT TV's for each
signal generator to set the signals to some special synchronization. T-1000 also mentioned adding capacitors
to the two primary windings to tune them for resonance on some particular frequency.

Although many of the details of the exact circuit setup that was used to tune and the exact circuit setup they
were using when lighting up the 150W bulb may be unclear, I do at least have the overview of the
setup, so that is potentially useful anyway. I do see parallels to what Akula has done in his high power circuits,
so that is interesting.

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22197 on: February 10, 2016, 07:41:27 PM »
Hi Verpies Ok on that. In the first two old posts from T-1000 I linked to in my previous post,
T-1000 said they were using modified horizontal/vertical sync circuit boards from CRT TV's for each
signal generator to set the signals to some special synchronization.
You realize that an unmodified TV synchronization circuits max out at 15-20kHz.
In the Yoke device the frequencies are 20x higher.

Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22198 on: February 10, 2016, 08:02:56 PM »
You realize that an unmodified TV synchronization circuits max out at 15-20kHz.
In the Yoke device the frequencies are 20x higher.

Hi Verpies.  I was just pointing out what T-1000 stated they did back in 2011.  :)
T-1000 did not appear to provide any further details of how that was utilized.

In my own testing with my own OC-90 yoke core, I noticed that 50Hz is well below
the useable bandwidth of my ferrite yoke core, so unless their ferrite core material was quite different
than mine, if they were getting a large 'carrier' sine wave at 50Hz on the secondary, it seems it wasn't through
magnetic induction through the core from the primary to the secondary windings. I get almost no output at
all on my secondary winding at such a low frequency when I tested in that low frequency range.

Another issue I had is that I have several local AM broadcast stations in the medium wave frequency band, which
where showing as large peaks on my spectrum analyzer. I tried placing the yoke core in a shoebox completely covered
in aluminum foil to try to reduce picking up the radio signals from the AM broadcast band, but this made no difference.
Grounding the outside aluminum foil covering seemed to make no difference as well.
The cables going into the shoebox were a coaxial cable from the signal generator and a coaxial cable for my scope
which was set to spectrum analysis mode. If there was any peaks coming from the ferrite that were close to a local
AM broadcast station frequency, I wouldn't be able to see them. The only prominent peaks I saw seemed to be the AM
broadcast radio stations. I also tried feeding with the white noise signal to check the resulting spectrum up to
a little above 45 MHz and saw nothing in the higher frequencies showing up. Most of the peaks were in the low MHz
and below.

At any rate, as I mentioned I think at this point I will leave it at that. :)

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22199 on: February 10, 2016, 09:08:10 PM »
In my own testing with my own OC-90 yoke core, I noticed that 50Hz is well below the useable bandwidth of my ferrite yoke core, so unless their ferrite core material was quite different than mine, if they were getting a large 'carrier' sine wave at 50Hz on the secondary, it seems it wasn't through magnetic induction through the core from the primary to the secondary windings. 
Yes, there is a huge impedance mismatch at 50Hz that limits the classical transformer induction.

However you have not discovered yet, that the permeability of the ferrite used by the STAAR team is strongly influenced by the electric field at 400Hz to 20Hz at potentials as low as 600V/m.  This is a rare but known ferrite phenomenon documented by Konrad and Brudny in an article titled "An Improved Method for Virtual Air Gap Length Computation" in IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 41, No. 10 from October 2005.

I also tried feeding with the white noise signal to check the resulting spectrum up to a little above 45 MHz
Did you get to 45.5MHz ?