Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16406549 times)

magpwr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1168
    • Youtube Channel
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22170 on: January 28, 2016, 04:50:42 PM »
Hoppy there is the generation of neutrons from the ferric chloride by the Italians in 2007 .

They used cavitation to set up the iron in to decay at 42 khz and used bubble detectors to show gamma..

Iron has the strongest nuclear binding energy, it was after 90 minutes that the reactions started to happen..

There is also some indications that an isotope of copper may have same effect...

I have posted this data here in the past ...

The very fast AC frequency in the magnetic component of the glass iron (spinwave) creates extra electrons..

After all it' s the de-stabilization of the binding weak atomic force that is what the Coleman device has show..

100 Watts and that is shocking... I just don' t have way to detect neutron bursts .. I have a  gamma spectrum analyzer

That is not enough as these  gammas and beta electrons come off at sharp bursts and no as a constant emission like uranium.

I suspect that the decay of matter is finite ... and it has an end unlike the conventional scientific theory has it ..

The amount of energy coming from the atom is large that it takes only a trillionth to get some electrons out..

Wesley did get radiation effect in Lithuania so did his friends..

When that TV yoke sings it also has harmonics up and down, if the right frequency is hit you will get betas and fast

neutrons, with that copper band (wire) you will slow down the fast neutrons and make collisions in copper and

more neutrons and betas.. Neutron capture..

Look there a lot of evidence to low energy dis-assembly of the electrons from the internal structure of the atom..

When the nucleus looses an (Internal electron) neutron it becomes a different element,  look up the weak force..

Acca...

hi Acca,

Can i safely say that Akula must have figured out to somehow create "micro fractures or micro cavities" within the ferrite core (Maybe through heating and cooling).

And this is was the missing link to ou for his non kapanadze devices.

This was what i come up with in my head few days back before wanting to reply to Wesley.Maybe it's good thing you brought it up again.


stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22172 on: February 08, 2016, 07:20:47 AM »
Colman FE device  progress Particles Lab:
Few of major devices used in   ongoing scientific investigation
Wesley

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22173 on: February 08, 2016, 08:27:42 AM »
Keshe --"whatever" call it any name
ZeroFossilFuel has made video showing test of the device. (1 photo at very bottom)

I'm also testing it.
However mine has no name on it.
It came this way to me for test.




Wesley


The bottom line is:
Oil guys
Don't be afraid of being scared.
I'm not interested with FE devices.
I'm interested only with mechanisms of physics
So more likely  I will have not much hesitation to give that what I'm not interested with to the public

Acca

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 563
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22174 on: February 08, 2016, 07:57:16 PM »
Wesley thanks for the photos...

Carbon has a nuclear effect.  You are dead on... I will post some photos for you ...soon..

Acca..



Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22175 on: February 08, 2016, 11:29:57 PM »
Keshe --"whatever" call it any name
ZeroFossilFuel has made video showing test of the device. (1 photo at very bottom)
I'm also testing it.
However mine has no name on it.
It came this way to me for test.
Wesley

I researched Keshe and the magrav thing a fair bit a while back, and frankly Keshe comes off overall as being
quite delusional. The chances of the magrav unit ever producing over unity seem to be very slim to none.

You didn't mention following the special magrav breaking in procedure that is supposed to take several weeks
before you start attaching loads of any significant wattage to the output. Not that I think it will likely make
any difference whatsoever, but you should try to get your hands on the magrav user manual if you don't have a copy,
which is supposed to outline in detail the recommended breaking in procedure, if you want to test the magrav properly.
Personally I think you probably have yourself nothing more than a ~$2000 extension cord, but maybe miracles do sometimes happen. :)
Good luck with the testing.

P.S. Wesley, you need to keep the picture attachment width 1024 pixels or less, otherwise it messes up the page width
when viewing the thread.  :)



TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22176 on: February 09, 2016, 01:35:24 AM »
Wesley.... congratulations on being the second person ever, that I know of, to have used  a proper wideband power analyzer to test a device on this forum. (the first was me, of course.) Even though your C-H 255 analyzers are old and obsolete, they are still better than nothing, or better than DMMs, when used properly.

However... I cannot help but notice that the "output" C-H analyzer has its "input overload" indicator lit up. The unit will not give accurate results in this case.

And also, it may not be correct to use two separate units, since they may not be precisely calibrated together. It would perhaps be more appropriate to use a single analyzer and compare its readings when connected to input, then to output.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22177 on: February 09, 2016, 01:41:57 AM »
I researched Keshe and the magrav thing a fair bit a while back, and frankly Keshe comes off overall as being
quite delusional. The chances of the magrav unit ever producing over unity seem to be very slim to none.

You didn't mention following the special magrav breaking in procedure that is supposed to take several weeks
before you start attaching loads of any significant wattage to the output. Not that I think it will likely make
any difference whatsoever, but you should try to get your hands on the magrav user manual if you don't have a copy,
which is supposed to outline in detail the recommended breaking in procedure, if you want to test the magrav properly.
Personally I think you probably have yourself nothing more than a ~$2000 extension cord, but maybe miracles do sometimes happen. :)
Good luck with the testing.

P.S. Wesley, you need to keep the picture attachment width 1024 pixels or less, otherwise it messes up the page width
when viewing the thread.  :)


I do not have manual. If you have one than publish it please.
I did  have made first round of testing already.
Some of the results are published in out  on Lab Grade


Model 255  digital V/A/W/Pf meter.
The difference between Swedish testing:
1. They used electronic random  out of shelf  chinese  garbage.
2. They do not seem to have suitable knowledge
3. It is not important how old  is your reference or measuring device, the important is that is or can be traceable to the bureau.
Most of general public equipment  is just toys for crowd to play with.
 
The device  was delivered to me free of charge.
Just for testing
I got OK to take it apart and see what is inside.
I need to obtain OK to publish inside of the device.
As the device come to me with no manual  no contract and no signs  that it is in did Keshe device I assume I have no responsibility  of any kind.
The device of Swedish guys- has had clear  marking that  belongs to Keshe Foundation.


there is also interesting story about origin  of the device.
One thing I can say  is that Keshe is NOT an Inventor nor originator of that  particular device.
He must of be in contact with the original guy and he made deal.


I do not have authorisation to be more specific as of yet .
But As I know the history  secrets of today fly out  often very soon.
the device is not of european origin or to be more specific ,concept is not.


Wesley



Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22178 on: February 09, 2016, 01:46:14 AM »
Wesley.... congratulations on being the second person ever, that I know of, to have used  a proper wideband power analyzer to test a device on this forum. (the first was me, of course.) Even though your C-H 255 analyzers are old and obsolete, they are still better than nothing, or better than DMMs, when used properly.
However... I cannot help but notice that the "output" C-H analyzer has its "input overload" indicator lit up. The unit will not give accurate results in this case.
And also, it may not be correct to use two separate units, since they may not be precisely calibrated together. It would perhaps be more appropriate to use a single analyzer and compare its readings when connected to input, then to output.

I noticed that overload light as well.
I guess the 'Power x 10' scale means you should multiply the meter reading by 10?
Yes, the two different power meters should ideally be connected one at a time to the exact same load
to compare the readings between the two for the exact same load, to see how closely calibrated they are.

Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22179 on: February 09, 2016, 02:13:20 AM »

I do not have manual. If you have one than publish it please.
I did  have made first round of testing already.
Some of the results are published in out  on Lab Grade

Model 255  digital V/A/W/Pf meter.
The difference between Swedish testing:
1. They used electronic random  out of shelf  chinese  garbage.
2. They do not seem to have suitable knowledge
3. It is not important how old  is your reference or measuring device, the important is that is or can be traceable to the bureau.
Most of general public equipment  is just toys for crowd to play with.
 
The device  was delivered to me free of charge.
Just for testing
I got OK to take it apart and see what is inside.
I need to obtain OK to publish inside of the device.
As the device come to me with no manual  no contract and no signs  that it is in did Keshe device I assume I have no responsibility  of any kind.
The device of Swedish guys- has had clear  marking that  belongs to Keshe Foundation.


there is also interesting story about origin  of the device.
One thing I can say  is that Keshe is NOT an Inventor nor originator of that  particular device.
He must of be in contact with the original guy and he made deal.

I do not have authorisation to be more specific as of yet .
But As I know the history  secrets of today fly out  often very soon.
the device is not of european origin or to be more specific ,concept is not.

Wesley

Hi Wesley. It's nice to see someone putting a magrav unit through some proper power measurement testing.
That Swedish guy appears to have no idea what he is doing, as I couldn't make heads or tails out of his video. :)

Apparently some of the early magrav units that were shipped were recalled due to there supposedly being some sort
of manufacturing flaw in them, although I don't know what the specific reason was that they were recalled.

I don't have a copy of the magrav user manual, but I took screen shots from a Keshe video which shows the magrav
conditioning step by step procedure taken from the user manual (from a Keshe video from a few months ago).
The screen shot images in the attached PDF file have overlap in them from screen shot to screen shot, as you will notice.
There are 6 steps listed, as well as some notes. For every step, they stated that if you don't follow that step exactly
you will void the warranty. If you have a used magrav unit, if the proper conditioning procedure was not followed the
implication is that the unit may well not work, but it really seems that they were just making excuses. Keshe's comments on
the conditioning procedure seemed to change from video to video, and even Keshe's own followers seemed very confused
by Keshe's vague and constantly changing statements from video to video. Maybe you can get someone to send you the
magrav user manual, if someone has a copy of it.

I wouldn't worry about telling about what's inside the magrav unit, as all the details were already released in Keshe's videos and
on his website for quite a while now. It is just some specially corroded copper wire formed into various coils that are configured a certain
way. Keshe calls this corrosion procedure/treatment of the copper wire 'nano-coating', and claims it has very special properties.

P.S. See below. TK posted a link to the current Magrav user manual.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22180 on: February 09, 2016, 02:17:34 AM »
Yes, it does matter "how old" your equipment is, because more modern versions have higher bandwidth, more precision and better accuracy. A NIST-traceable calibration only means that the instrument is within its specified performance parameters, not that it is absolutely accurate or even as accurate as a later model instrument.

Compare, for example, the 300 kHz C-H 255 with the more modern (but still obsolete)  1MHz C-H  2335. Which do you think will be more accurate on a signal with possible high-frequency components, even when both have NIST-traceable calibrations and are performing within spec?

Here are your manual and schematics. Note the frequency range and the percentage accuracy values, as well as the instructions and cautions for making measurements.


https://blueprint.keshefoundation.org/manual.php

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22181 on: February 09, 2016, 02:55:04 AM »
Yes, it does matter "how old" your equipment is, because more modern versions have higher bandwidth, more precision and better accuracy. A NIST-traceable calibration only means that the instrument is within its specified performance parameters, not that it is absolutely accurate or even as accurate as a later model instrument.



That is true  however USA holds itself on money using  equipment  required to make measurement.
It will not pass a test and It will not be approved, And I t will not count if you use other methods or instrumentation   not listed  for that particular task.
Military will only buy what pass their requirement.
So at the end they do not need more accuracy, more precision...
They do not care,
That is why VNA of HP that is 20 years old  is more expensive  than new never used chinese,  or any other  asian junk excluding Japan( approved only)
The rest of that garbage is  for simple crowd to play.
Is it better?
Might be........
 Nobody Gives a Damn




 






Compare, for example, the 300 kHz C-H 255 with the more modern (but still obsolete)  1MHz C-H  2335. Which do you think will be more accurate on a signal with possible high-frequency components, even when both have NIST-traceable calibrations and are performing within spec?

Here are your manual and schematics. Note the frequency range and the percentage accuracy values, as well as the instructions and cautions for making measurements.


https://blueprint.keshefoundation.org/manual.php
Here you  100% right.
 However   if simpler  version  can be used it pass the scrutiny of the Bureau.
That is why American  fly to space on traditionally  checked technology.


The best way to tell if someone's a dipshit is if they use any form of Russian  technology , checked  according to Russian  standards.
Do they have something good?
 Yes they have  Brains............... then loooooooong nothing than ............ deep shit.............
 $1= 78.41 ruble
And russian  average  salary is $173 per month


Only my personal  opinion


Wesley


PS: Man You have got  a beauty  there, 3 independent measurements  at the same time.
 HOT... uh................ Hot............
I love it.
I was not so lucky  like you my friend
Clarke Hess  is a standard  on its own.







« Last Edit: February 09, 2016, 05:27:22 AM by stivep »

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22182 on: February 09, 2016, 03:18:12 AM »
Hi Wesley. It's nice to see someone putting a magrav unit through some proper power measurement testing.
That Swedish guy appears to have no idea what he is doing, as I couldn't make heads or tails out of his video. :)

Apparently some of the early magrav units that were shipped were recalled due to there supposedly being some sort
of manufacturing flaw in them, although I don't know what the specific reason was that they were recalled.

I don't have a copy of the magrav user manual, but I took screen shots from a Keshe video which shows the magrav
conditioning step by step procedure taken from the user manual (from a Keshe video from a few months ago).
The screen shot images in the attached PDF file have overlap in them from screen shot to screen shot, as you will notice.
There are 6 steps listed, as well as some notes. For every step, they stated that if you don't follow that step exactly
you will void the warranty. If you have a used magrav unit, if the proper conditioning procedure was not followed the
implication is that the unit may well not work, but it really seems that they were just making excuses. Keshe's comments on
the conditioning procedure seemed to change from video to video, and even Keshe's own followers seemed very confused
by Keshe's vague and constantly changing statements from video to video. Maybe you can get someone to send you the
magrav user manual, if someone has a copy of it.

I wouldn't worry about telling about what's inside the magrav unit, as all the details were already released in Keshe's videos and
on his website for quite a while now. It is just some specially corroded copper wire formed into various coils that are configured a certain
way. Keshe calls this corrosion procedure/treatment of the copper wire 'nano-coating', and claims it has very special properties.

P.S. See below. TK posted a link to the current Magrav user manual.
The conditioning is only time  Keshe wanted to buy
He was in need of the time to cash as much money as he could.
He new that he needs to sale  X number of devices and Safely run away.
He new that whatever is the truth he made to wide statements and even for that he might be arrested.
Only the money paid for his seminar or attendance  is enough to launch a case
Wesley

Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22183 on: February 09, 2016, 05:08:43 AM »
The conditioning is only time  Keshe wanted to buy
He was in need of the time to cash as much money as he could.
He new that he needs to sale  X number of devices and Safely run away.
He new that whatever is the truth he made to wide statements and even for that he might be arrested.
Only the money paid for his seminar or attendance  is enough to launch a case
Wesley

Hi Wesley. I suppose Keshe could just be a common scammer, but my impression is that he
may well be suffering from a serious delusional disorder. He declared himself in one of his videos to be
the messiah. He has put out many, many hours of videos, but to my knowledge he has not ever demonstrated
one single prototype of his claimed 'new plasma' technologies that does anything at all out of the ordinary.
As far as I know Keshe has not even demonstrated a working Magrav unit producing over unity, even though he is
selling them on his website, unless something has changed in this regard very recently. From what I have seen so far,
it is not looking very good at all for Keshe's 'new plasma technology'. :)




TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22184 on: February 09, 2016, 05:25:08 AM »
Wesley... aren't you worried that your instruments may get all "nano-coated" inside from being connected to the Keshe device? I think this will probably void your warranties and make your calibrations questionable ....     ;)


(Also... could you please resize your images so that they are no more than 1024 pixels wide. If you need to show a closeup in greater magnification, you can crop out the area of interest and blow it up, but the images wider than 1024 pixels cause problems for people with narrow screens.... )