Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16492470 times)

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21075 on: February 14, 2014, 03:42:37 AM »
In a cyclotron why are the dee's enclosed in a vacuum?
To increase the intercollision period


I have got  just to   many signs that I'm being closely watched.

Quote from: Joseph Heller
Just because you are paranoid, does not mean, that they are not out to get you.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21076 on: February 14, 2014, 05:08:28 AM »


To increase the intercollision period


Quote from: stivep on Today at 12:49:37 AMI have got  just to   many signs that I'm being closely watched.
[/font]



Quote from: Joseph HellerJust because you are paranoid, does not mean, that they are not out to get you.




yes you right
here is something for you.Dig for more:


Fuel gain exceeding unity in an inertially confined fusion implosion
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature13008.html


The interesting is fact that it took them time to approve the article


Quote
Nature (2014) doi:10.1038/nature13008Received 01 November 2013 Accepted 07 January 2014 Published online 12 February 2014
and look at the names of the people  assigned to the project:O. A. Hurricane, 
Quote
D. A. Callahan,   
D. T. Casey, 
P. M. Celliers, 
C. Cerjan,   
E. L. Dewald,   
T. R. Dittrich, 
T. Döppner,   
D. E. Hinkel, 
L. F. Berzak Hopkins, 
J. L. Kline,   
S. Le Pape, 
T. Ma,   
A. G. MacPhee, 
J. L. Milovich, 
A. Pak,   
]H.-S. Park,   
P. K. Patel, 
]B. A. Remington, 
J. D. Salmonson, 
P. T. Springer 
& R. Tommasini

most of them from:

Quote
D. T. Casey
close

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, PO Box 808, Livermore, California 94551, USA






Although I agree with you Verpies
This is how paranoid I'm.
 :)
Dear Friend Verpies
I have so much  respect to you.
I have been playing with Colman for  close to year now.
Just  simple question:
How if I'm right?
What would you say than?


=========================================================
Based on it we might look at work of other  researchers from different perspective.


Another question would be What, if Andrea Rossi was right?
- he could be said to stay silent for money
- he could be eliminated
but
 is not that ......that this can not be stooped at all?



Wesley
« Last Edit: February 14, 2014, 12:17:27 PM by stivep »

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21077 on: February 14, 2014, 09:51:59 AM »
Just  simple question:
How if I'm right?
What would you say than?
I would not be surprised.
Stranger things have happened.

Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21078 on: February 14, 2014, 01:10:15 PM »
Do you intend to build it and report?

Still waiting for an idea to connect two thyristors to one transformer the wrong way. :(

Jack Noskills

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 346
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21079 on: February 14, 2014, 01:22:56 PM »
Question for verpies. What happens in below circuit at resonance ?


At resonance impedance of the whole system is zero.


When load is applied, impedance is still zero ?
When power is taken, more power you take less power will be consumed in the source ?

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21080 on: February 14, 2014, 03:27:06 PM »
Question for verpies. What happens in below circuit at resonance ?
This.

At resonance impedance of the whole system is zero.
At resonance the input impedance is infinite (open circuit), because the primary winding forms a parallel LC tank with the cap.
The secondary winding forms a series circuit - an important difference.

When load is applied, <input> impedance is still zero ?
No, as it was never zero to begin with.
When a resistive load is connected to the secondary winding, the apparent inductance of the primary winding decreases due to reflected secondary impedance caused by mutual inductance and the Lenz law.
As a consequence, the primary LC tank's resonance frequency increases under load.
In other words, the primary LC tank goes off-resonance under load.  This video illustrates this behavior.

Of course, the secondary load in your circuit and in the circuit from the 1st video is not purely resistive (R), but the principle remains.
In those scenarios, when the magnetic coupling is complete (1), the load is a series RC load and when the magnetic coupling is incomplete (<1) the load is a series RLC load.
BTW: Magnetic coupling coefficient (0..1) is related to the mutual inductance.

When power is taken <from the secondary>, the more power you take, the less power will be consumed in the source ?
No :(


P.S.
It shall be emphasized that the brightness of the input light bulb does not indicate the average power drawn from the power source.  It only indicates the average input current.
However, the brightness of the output bulb, does indicate the power dissipated in the output bulb.
Measuring input power and output power with light bulbs is very different due to MPTT.
 


Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21082 on: February 14, 2014, 08:00:19 PM »
Question for verpies. What happens in below circuit at resonance ?

The question should be, what happens at PARAMETRIC RESONANCE. Because if we rule out high voltage and high frequency as well as a spark gap, then all what's left is parametric resonance that could do anything useful with a coil or a transformer.

Going on with wrong connections: When both anodes of the two thyristors are connected to a transformer's coil and the two capacitors are also connected to the anodes then we have a resonant LC circuit made out of two capacitors in series and one coil in parallel. What if these two capacitors are shorted in alternating mode by the thyristors? (provided that SR193 is not fake) How to connect a three-pin two thyristor construction to a four-pin transformer in an intelligent way?

Given the size of the two Stepanov capacitors I think they are too large to just connect the gates of the thyristors to something.

Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21083 on: February 15, 2014, 01:20:11 AM »
One more guesswork: Either it is the poor image quality or it is another strange coincidence. But as it seems one wire (of the cable) coming from the two capacitors is connected to the thyristor's anode or cathode (depends on the construction type of the thyristor) but not to the thyristor's gate. That's the same unusual connection method like the odd SR193 wiring.

Furthermore that whole capacitor switching technique seems to be not very far from that idea of mine a year ago. Interesting ...

Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21084 on: February 15, 2014, 02:00:20 PM »
Two capacitors in series = low overall capacity = high resonant frequency
One capacitor shorted = high overall capacity = low resonant frequency

The curious thing is, shorting one of the capacitors (in order to get parametric C resonance) on the peak of a half-wave means destroying the energy stored in that capacitor because on voltage peak all energy of the LC circuit is stored in the capacitors as an electric field. Or I'm wrong? On the other hand, shorting a charged capacitor 50 times a second would explain why the thyristors have to be on big heat sinks cooled by a fan in addition.

Thinking twice: In case of the pendulum, does down shifting of the weight (go to low frequency) on its end positions not also destroy the elevation energy of that weight? Nevertheless the energy budget of the parametric excited pendulum is positive.

gigitonggos

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21085 on: February 16, 2014, 01:41:35 AM »
spiral coil better for EM than selenoid coil.nature has gives hint,galaxies shaped etc.ancient people  love spiral shape.even some sign for outspace.
tesla pancake coil / similar wouldbe/shouldbe /willbe the future for coil based EM  for energy generation  :)

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21086 on: February 16, 2014, 11:30:31 AM »
on voltage peak all energy of the LC circuit is stored in the capacitors as an electric field. Or I'm wrong?
You're correct

On the other hand, shorting a charged capacitor 50 times a second would explain why the thyristors have to be on big heat sinks cooled by a fan in addition.
...but in each subsequent cycle the shorted capacitor will have less and less energy.

Thinking twice: In case of the pendulum, does down shifting of the weight (go to low frequency) on its end positions not also destroy the elevation energy of that weight?
It does decrease the mechanical potential energy (akin to voltage).  This also affects the kinetic energy (akin to current) in subsequent cycles.

Nevertheless the energy budget of the parametric excited pendulum is positive.
It is?

energia9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21087 on: February 16, 2014, 12:25:35 PM »
this is going nowhere but confusion, its a dead end.
simple lc circuits, modifying their value only no matters what are you playing with.
this forum is a dead end and all of them are.
there is something that you cant recognize when you are playing around with circuits like this.
kapanadze could be real im not saying,  but this forum will never get it, that is most likely.

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21088 on: February 16, 2014, 01:38:30 PM »
We already know it just have to put it together.
Ionization is the key, separate the charges then collect.
There are two charges pos and neg combined neutral separated energetic,
High voltage ionization separates, separate circuit to collect what has been separated.
Separate - Collect

energia9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21089 on: February 16, 2014, 02:56:29 PM »
We already know it just have to put it together.
Ionization is the key, separate the charges then collect.
There are two charges pos and neg combined neutral separated energetic,
High voltage ionization separates, separate circuit to collect what has been separated.
Separate - Collect
i have heard like a hundred different variations of "this is the key"   
if there is no explanation of the phenomena in general that what is happening in the physics level,  then we can not say something is the key to it.