Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16407881 times)

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21015 on: February 05, 2014, 03:47:09 PM »
example:
40; 80; 120; 500; 1000 kHz

its reason because I want to know how deep inside bulb in wolfram tread, I watched one of Igor's video, he immerse to water fully and take out and again immerse, if bulb rise normaly like on use main power, 200-300w bulb raise temperature inmediatly, and his bulb glass not broke/explode in water, I think bulb on HF produce less heat, but it is my theory, maybe wrong
Igor says it is a fake.
There are hidden thin wires.
Thin wires can only handle the current to light the bulb if they are high voltage and high frequency in my experience.
At high frequencies and high voltages you enter the realm of cold electricity, and resistive load light bulbs behave differently in those circumstances.
Tesla showed this in many of his patents from 1891 onwards.


d3x0r

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1433
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21016 on: February 05, 2014, 04:10:38 PM »
Not really we can have high voltage without current and hi current without voltage, neither can do work without the other, its a combination of both.
Current still doesn't reverse; if it did, added negative particles to positive wouldn't help ... your current arrows are indicating electrons moving towards positive; wouldn't happen... and if it did, it's not what would be wanted; would defeat charging of a cap that was used instead of a battery....


'sides your current is going opposed to the diode... wouldn't even reach the charge battery.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21017 on: February 05, 2014, 04:52:31 PM »
Yes, but that is beside the point.
The point was that "back EMF" does not cause the current through the inductor to flow backwards (if it is allowed to flow at all).


I agree with Verpies. There is no such  thing as current without voltage and reverse.
does not exists  never existed and will never exist.
However due to electrostatic potential difference - there is so many " weird " things that  I would love to  analyze.
I stated in  my video  describing electrostatic pump  theory- that delay time mechanism is responsible  for energy accumulation due to  inertia of the mass in flow.
I'm trying to point something that  nobody cares to understand.


Acceleration and comparison of force vectors.



step1.  Take car at 0 speed= 15 girls push.
step2.  Take car at speed that requires one girl
step3.  Take car at speed that requires 1 finger of the girl to sustain  the motion.( that finger compensates the loses)
step4.  Take car at speed that requires 1 finger of the girl to sustain  the motion with 4 people inside ( that  finger compensates the loses as well with the same joules force applied.
 The only difference  is what has happened before it gets to that point, That means initial power to push the car to that point- must of be greater, but after that it,is not important for sustaining the motion if we heave 1 or 4 or 10 people in the car.There always would be a point where one finger of 15 years old girl will compensate the losses. Acceleration  if any at any vector of forces will be at some point no longer present, but will be  at the " finger level for sure"


It is not important that we  deal with car, flying will,  electrical current versus electrical potential(V) 
The system will obey the same  "function mechanism" in time


What is-Delay Time Line:



So what than square signal does?
 I creates  temporary acceleration as BEMF is not seen immediately but with delay.
Similar to the bank teller holding  pack of dollars in his hand  and being at that fraction of time "in possession of that money"
She can put it to flow, or theoretically he can go to pizza  store to buy  energy, or get the car rental , to borrow energy... in any  scenario he is not paying with his own "money" (with his own potential).
The balance will come later.


Another example:
Can you just concentrate  guys for the moment?
Car is standing  in between two bumps with its rear tire  front wheel drive)
Car on the bump- if pushed with force F, however it does not  go over the bump.
Than car is pushed back to go on rear bump with force F than forward with force F and than with 1/10 of force  F is going over the bump as it already has swing power of time based  acceleration.
result:
So in practice one can use 1/10 of Force F, and increasing frequency to swing the car, swing the bridge, (swing his  attention to understand  simple  physics) 




Madoff's ponzi scheme was possible because of the same mechanism, but Madoff used "constant acceleration" to the point at  no more compensation from new investors.

So why FE device  works?
It uses someone energy, with addition of small  compensating energy to sustain  phenomena.
Like square impulses on the top of sinusoide.
or
 Like 10" water pipe with water when flowing charging "capacitor" whose energy is  used to release  the valve holding it from flow. And the only outside energy could be  the 15 years  old girl pressing button with one finger, or just timer circuit doing it  automatically when charged from the same source.


So initial energy, or energy of water flowing is  what we do not care about  let's someone  pay for it( gravity,river stream, sun, wind, )
We add some to it  to start the process and than  let it go...in controllable fashion.


So what would happened if we accelerate system ( any system) to the point where additive  energy could be so small  that by means of resonance( in our case) we would be able to employ appropriate source to compensate it?
One of the simulators- compensators could be Americium 241 of smoke detector   ionizating  spark gap .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8GlzUjYazs
 




Wesley














 
« Last Edit: February 05, 2014, 06:55:57 PM by stivep »


TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21019 on: February 05, 2014, 06:35:12 PM »
Power is not energy.

Resistive elements convert electrical power to heat, by the relation P (in watts) = I2R. Low currents mean low heat dissipation by the resistive elements.

Lots of different kinds of motors will NOT produce a high-current, overheating state when stalled by heavy shaft loads. The ordinary attraction or repulsion Pulse Motor is one such type, the Steorn core-effect pulse motor another.

It's true that the video is just a "news article" and is largely journalistic hype, and without knowing more details, it's not possible to evaluate all the claims made by the narrator. But if he really thinks he's discovered a "new type of energy" or he thinks he's working with "cold electricity" which is different somehow from "regular electricity"... he's just wrong. He's discovered high voltage, low current, high frequency AC.... what a miracle.


stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21020 on: February 05, 2014, 07:00:20 PM »
Power is not energy.

Resistive elements convert electrical power to heat, by the relation P (in watts) = I2R. Low currents mean low heat dissipation by the resistive elements.

Lots of different kinds of motors will NOT produce a high-current, overheating state when stalled by heavy shaft loads. The ordinary attraction or repulsion Pulse Motor is one such type, the Steorn core-effect pulse motor another.

It's true that the video is just a "news article" and is largely journalistic hype, and without knowing more details, it's not possible to evaluate all the claims made by the narrator. But if he really thinks he's discovered a "new type of energy" or he thinks he's working with "cold electricity" which is different somehow from "regular electricity"... he's just wrong. He's discovered high voltage, low current, high frequency AC.... what a miracle.


Comparison chart:


Definition of Energy:
Energy is the capacity to do work.
Energy is power integrated over time.
Unit: joules = watt-seconds
Example:
I left a 60W light bulb on for 30 days, which raised my electric bill by 43.2 kWh (kilowatt-hours)




Definition of Power:
Power is the rate at which work is done, or energy is transmitted.
watt = joules/second
Example:
My car's battery can provide 500 amps at 12 volts, which equals 6kW of power.



What is that?
How about domestic cat:

 You get to cat from the  rear and you dealing with  cat ( Energy of cat running out)_
 or you  get to cat from the front and you dealing with the same cat .( manifestation  of Power of the cat)
One can not be alive without  the other
Cat with no  energy? hm...........
Or no Power manifested by cat? hm............ only when is  in sleeping mode but we know the Power is there  with small impulse of F force  applied.







.



Wesley

Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21021 on: February 05, 2014, 09:00:15 PM »
I cannot answer that in the light of the statements made above.  Try restating the question.

The restated question is this: Is the COP of a transformer always the same regardless whether the source and the load are connected at the same time (to the primary and secondary coil) or is the COP lower or higher when the load is not connected at the same time the source is connected (by means of toggle transistors)?

A varying magnetic field will accelerate even static electrons, albeit not for free.

But it accelerates electrons for free when the circuit is not closed. When a magnet moves through a non-connected coil then this magnet generates a voltage difference between both endings of the coil's wire. So the electrons are moved towards one end of the wire (the negative end) by the magnetic field for free without any resistance in the coil's wire. And we are talking indeed about an open circuit because it is connected to ground only.

As a matter of fact, if we assume a) the self-running mode of the SR193 device is not fake b) the high voltage, the spark and the big blue coil are just nice distractions then c) we are left with essentially a 50Hz transformer and two switching thyristors (or transistors). This should be less enough to find the principle of work, shouldn't it?

Everybody sure the relevant equations are not wrong or incomplete?

zcsaba77

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21022 on: February 05, 2014, 09:11:05 PM »
Igor says it is a fake.
There are hidden thin wires.
Thin wires can only handle the current to light the bulb if they are high voltage and high frequency in my experience.
At high frequencies and high voltages you enter the realm of cold electricity, and resistive load light bulbs behave differently in those circumstances.
Tesla showed this in many of his patents from 1891 onwards.

I see, Igor mentioned in video 'is here thin wire', but I wanna know the bulb reach temperature like in normal use, I mean on main power, or not? what inside bulb goes? temperature? if temperature is smaller, must be power consumption smaller? or not?  spectrum of light? because I many times I see this bulbs shines different, looks like 'cold light'

d3x0r

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1433
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21023 on: February 05, 2014, 09:20:29 PM »
*nevermind*

elementSix

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 350
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21024 on: February 05, 2014, 11:28:47 PM »
I am going over past posts to renew the determination of those working on this project and have read what I posted way back..  I have yet to find a reliable switching Transistor to replace the rotary cam contact switch I made for the energy conversion device.  Here is some info on the source of all free energy devices, Which is the spike at the moment of switch closure. 
    Tesla understood that the resistance of lines or components, viewed from the dynamo end, seemed to be an impossible “barrier? for charge carriers to penetrate. This barrier caused the “bunching? effect. Electrostatic charges were literally stopped and held for an instant by line resistance, a barrier which only existed during the brief millisecond interval in which the power switch was closed. The sudden force application against this virtual barrier squeezed charge into a density impossible to obtain with ordinary capacitors. It was the brief application of power, the impact of the charge against the resistance barrier, which brought this abnormal electro-densified condition. -- Gerry Vassilatos, Secrets of Cold War Technology as quoted in The Free Energy Secrets of Cold Electricity by Peter Lindemann

pon investigation, it became apparent that the switched potential function of the device, in which Voltage translates instantaneously, but the flow of Current is slower to propagate, and is interrupted by the Switch before a closed circuit is actually in effect, is the single mechanism common to all legitimate FE/OU electromagnetic devices, of every description, from Coler (1945) to Stoern (2007) - including the Water Fuel Cell - and likely many prior to that as well. The underlying switch dynamic is one articulated by Tesla in a variety of writings and patents throughout his career. Supported by analysis of the Gray Tube by Bedini and Lindemann, and of the energy yield from Spark Gap Discharges by Aleck, and other sources, the switch itself was rapidly realized to be the key everyone has been looking for all these years. All of the rotating machinery, the coils and magnets, armatures and flywheels and counterweights, are all bit players in the drama; the switched potential is the star of the show. It is where the free energy (known as "Radiant Energy" by Tesla,

Moreover, these "negative current" pulses (which are actually positive {+} polarity, or rather, a 'current of holes'), must be matched with an electron source in order to generate the conventional current flow that provide a useful charge to the battery bank.

I know that these "negative Current pulses" can destroy capacitors.  I have replaced quite a few.

http://peswiki.com/index.php/OS:Tesla_Switch_-_Geovoltaic_Energy_Pump_%28GVEP%29

elementSix

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 350
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21025 on: February 05, 2014, 11:32:09 PM »
Heres a project that we should all look to.  I haven't got to read it yet.  But I came across it this morning..

http://www.easternvoltageresearch.com/documents/book_minibrutepreview.pdf

elementSix

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 350
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21026 on: February 06, 2014, 02:18:55 AM »
If you go by what I have said about how the setup I built works.  I am having problems, I know that I just lucked into having a device that works.  I am having problems tuning this newer device.   My question is,  What could Kapanadze be using to get automatic Resonance?  I first was thinking he was using a ramp generator type of controller.  But Akula Has that small compact Copper Ribbon he uses in his setup.  I know that it is real good to put Impulses into, but could it create a focusing Effect?  Thats my problem...

The reason is I saw a video with a guy who built this special transformer that was from Tesla that found resonance automatically.  It was a thick bifilar coil cooked in para-fen wax and put into a pressure cooker.  Link for Karl Palsness Tesla Wax transformer.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00Q7UhxxlEA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxdS_2wMypE

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21027 on: February 06, 2014, 03:21:38 AM »
Current still doesn't reverse; if it did, added negative particles to positive wouldn't help ... your current arrows are indicating electrons moving towards positive; wouldn't happen... and if it did, it's not what would be wanted; would defeat charging of a cap that was used instead of a battery....


'sides your current is going opposed to the diode... wouldn't even reach the charge battery.
Hey d3x0r
  ;) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8y_fKEAMWw&list=PLmnThfAl6mDq2sfI0BDcK5iswdFGh_RXW

d3x0r

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1433
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21028 on: February 06, 2014, 04:04:09 AM »
Hey d3x0r
  ;) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8y_fKEAMWw&list=PLmnThfAl6mDq2sfI0BDcK5iswdFGh_RXW
Right... but whether your arrows represent one flow or the other (and I thought we had decided ground to positive was the common direction for an arrow)  In one drawing your arrow is with the diode, and the other it's against the diode, so again it couldn't reach that potential...


and since the circuit does work; maybe it's that the current doesn't reverse in the coil...








a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21029 on: February 06, 2014, 05:51:51 AM »
Elementsix: If you look at the Benitez 4 battery patent he covers all this and much more.


He uses the same make break technique, but adds a small cap which discharges into the circuit at mhz frequencies.


http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Patents/Benitez/GB191514311A.pdf


The cap and interrupter was an integral part of the coil pack in those days and were usually not shown in schematics.