Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16407056 times)

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20205 on: November 14, 2013, 01:44:24 PM »
P.S.: Since we don't know what an electric field actually is, then maybe it doesn't matter that we also don't know what a magnetic field actually is, does it?


Zeit: If you look up Jo Newman in Patrick Kelly's book his is the best explanation of what a magnetic field is,  and I believe he deserves the Nobel Prize - in spite of the fact he was rude to me when I spoke to him.

captainkt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 262
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20206 on: November 14, 2013, 01:52:53 PM »
@a.king 21, Hi yes that 's the next stage it was 10. 30 last night and had to be up at 6.   I was thinking the coil is giving out energy (heat) without any noise or circuit overloading or alterations in either the 1200watt fire the 100 watt bulb or the wattmeter so need to tap it so it is of use. Will play again Saturday.
Regards
Keith

Acca

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 563
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20207 on: November 14, 2013, 02:56:49 PM »
 Magnetism and spin fields that make waves in magnetic materials, generating current.. Pressure waves !!!
This is what is  “new”  in “spintronics” however this spintronics goes back to the early 1950’s  as most of this research was secret..  This is by Takuya Satoh is an assistant professor at the University of Tokyo, Japan and is supported by the Japan Science and Technology Agency Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology (JST-PRESTO) program.
 
“The relatively new technology of spintronics, which exploits electron spin, overcomes these problems and, as a result, has been studied extensively. In a magnetic field, the spins of individual electrons precess around the direction of the magnetic field. In a magnetically ordered material, the interaction of spins leads to a propagating wave of spin precessional motion.”
 
I am  just dumbfounded just how much scientific supression there is… I hope that everyone follows most of the links as they will maybe end the debate where this energy comes from …in the ferrite core… as well as what magnetism does as it moves through a magnetic material.... I really do try to help.. here …
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MZv7DhxpX8
 
https://spie.org/x91893.xml   
 
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=42&ved=0CDAQFjABOCg&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.uni-goettingen.de%2Fde%2Fdocument%2Fdownload%2F860210fd9bf07fa08abfb673f47f294a.pdf%2FMuenzenberg_Photomagnonics_Recife.pdf&ei=TdCEUoGOLOqmyQGHhICYDw&usg=AFQjCNH9WOIn8sEGiNJKgHd2w5ihA_HdcQ&cad=rja
 
 
http://www.amazon.com/Spin-Waves-Magnetic-Excitations-Volume/dp/0444568107#reader_0444568107
 
http://www.e10.ph.tum.de/fileadmin/w00bka/www/Ausgewaehlte_Zeitschriftenbeitraege/MagnonicCrystalWaveguide_APL_102_22_222412_1.pdf
 
http://www.nist.gov/pml/electromagnetics/magnetics/nanomagnet-spin-damping.cfm
 
http://www.u-tokyo.ac.jp/en/todai-research/research-news/control-of-terahertz-light-by-spin/
 
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=33&ved=0CDIQFjACOB4&url=http%3A%2F%2Fpublikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de%2Ffiles%2F22572%2Fkreisel_phd.pdf&ei=l82EUqS1B8epyAHQ84C4Dw&usg=AFQjCNGsevsofSxFMOiJgukGhB62pRIQJQ&cad=rja
 
 
http://www.jetp.ac.ru/cgi-bin/dn/e_043_04_0794.pdf
 
http://www.physik.uni-kl.de/fileadmin/hillebrands/Diplom-_und_Doktorarbeiten/PhD_Ciubotaru.pdf
 
This thesis was top secret in the 1960’s… (below).  It’s amazing that this is now just being re-discovered…
 
https://circle.ubc.ca/bitstream/handle/2429/38632/UBC_1964_A1%20P5.pdf?sequence=1
 
http://www.ncnr.nist.gov/summerschool/ss09/pdf/BT7_Handout.pdf
 
 Spin Pumping Effect Proven in Magnetic Layers In magnetism we have observed, the appearance of a new research
field known as spintronics (or magnetoelectronics) which exploits both the electron charge and its magnetic spin. Within this research field many important effects have been discovered such as the giant magnetoresistance effect, or the so-called spin transfer torque effect
(STT)
 
The spin torque effect is based on the exchange of angular momentum between a spin-polarized electric current (for which a percentage of the electron spins are oriented to a certain direction) and the magnetic moment of a thin ferromagnetic layer. For large enough current densities the exerted torque leads to a magnetization oscillation in the microwave frequency range and, consequently, to the emission of spin waves.
 
Through their rotation of the magnetic moments, the so-called magnetic precession, single electrons can mutually influence each other's rotation (spin) through a non-magnetic intermediate layer.


Magnetic spinning tops are different
 Once put into motion and left to itself, a spinning top will slow down after a few rotations and eventually come to a halt. Friction losses deprive it of energy, until it finally stops spinning. Also, two spinning tops put at a certain distance to avoid touching show by and large the same behaviour.
 
Once triggered, the magnetic moments rotate in a crystal lattice until their rotation energy is exhausted through excitation of lattice vibrations and spin waves. Spin waves are excitations of the magnetic moments in a crystal, which propagate in form of waves.
 
 

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20208 on: November 14, 2013, 03:45:39 PM »







Quote
Quote from: verpies on November 13, 2013, 02:00:59 PMWhat is an electric field?  What are its mechanical properties and interactions?
</blockquote>
Quote from: Zeitmaschine on November 13, 2013, 03:52:05 PMa) Has the Earth an electric field?
</blockquote>
I asked the question first. 
Please define electric field and its properties as you understand it.

P.S.Just because a question is fundamental, does not mean that it is simple.



Quote
Quote from: verpies on November 13, 2013, 04:43:59 PMI asked the question first.
Please define electric field and its properties as you understand it.


Simple as that in the context of what we are seeking here:
Has the Earth an electric field of such a kind like a charged capacitor has?
The only thing that is of interest in this context:
Can I convert the electric field (of the Earth or a capacitor) into radiation by connecting e.g. an incandescent lamp to it?
 Yes for the capacitor. And for the Earth?




Electric Field of the Earth - Free Electromagnetism Physics Worked
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yT15S92PxEo








Quote
http://hypertextbook.com/facts/1998/TreshaEdwards.shtml

The electric field is a measure of the force that is exerted per coulomb of charge.
Its measure is defined as kq/r2   where k is the electrostatic constant constant, q is the amount of charge, and r is the distance between charges.
 The presence of an electric field is identified using a test charge.
The earth's atmosphere has an electric field that is directed radially inward.
 Most of my sources show that knowing the electric field of the earth can lead to the calculation of the charge on the earth's surface.
 Though some of the figures obtained are for the earth's atmosphere,
 it is true that the magnitude of the electric field outside a uniformly charged sphere
 is the same as if all the charge were concentrated at the center.
I obtained values for the magnitude of the electric field at the Earth's surface.
These were in the range of 66 N/C to150 N/C. These values are close enough
to assume that each source received their data from a different primary source and each may be accurate in their own right.
 I am convinced that the figure is closer to 150 N/C than to 66 N/C because of the sources themselves.


http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20120330034248AApMj92


Quote
The Earth has an electric field whose magnitude near Earth's surface is about 150 N/C.
The direction of the field is towards the center of the earth.
Assume that this field is due to charges that are uniformly spread over the Earth's surface.
What is the Earth's net charge? Suppose that there is a charged particle in the air near the surface of the
Earth with a mass of 1.3x10^-15 kg the only forces acting on the particle are gravity and the electron force due to its charge.
If this particle remains at rest find the sign and magnitude of this charge.

Magnetic field strength:

F = q(v x B) = qvBsin(90) =qvB
mg = qvB
B = mg/qv

where

F is the force (in newtons)
E is the electric field (in volts per metre)
B is the magnetic field (in teslas)
q is the electric charge of the particle (in coulombs)
v is the instantaneous velocity






here is my point of view :

the main problem people do not take to an account is that
-in the given point, , that reality of that point does not match other points potential.(so that describes  condition of the point)
So if that happened - it must  happen  due to that specific conditions of that  particular point.


If analyse point of your interest,  you can see that you can alter point properties  (say- limit the point)
Such limitation  is not permanent condition of the point and  depends
from  variables  affecting the point in time frame.


Such variables are artificially created by Akula or TK.


At  certain point there is in Akula device presence of  iron pipe . That pipe at very bottom of it in presence of  usually traces water( or water saturation)
creates transmutation , resolving ,metal = interaction.You can see big  chunk of soil  stack to the pipe usually at deep very  end of the pipe.
chemical condition of the  ground at Akula house matters as well but


All that in  concept of  {Electrostatic Pump} must be seen as constant presence of {balanced forces} + addition  of forces alteration by Akula.


I see that as bucket  with water that is  close to overflow on the  swing permanently attached with its bottom to the bottom of swinging piece of wood

There is a little more  of  water needed to create reaction and  magnify the reaction of {disbalance}


If swing is started properly, than  addition of swing motion does not make water in the  bucket overflow.


Quote
to read this sentence  properly  read it first  without parentheses


The acceleration and deceleration does not create water spill if kept in linear fashion of forces {balance}
( from the point of  view of G vector at point of zero .)(zero =very top swivel of swing)
pointing to middle of bucket swinging at  the piece of wood( bottom of the swing)




So you can see   at any point, of any acceleration, no  losses of the overall mass of water.
But due to the same factor G the higher  the swing it is - the more of push to the swing wood is given by the water in the bucket. So the gravity vector is  preventing water to  overflow  but only at certain condition 
(however the {balance} is maintained at any given time
and
 {disbalance}= change,    ( affects  linearity of process)
characteristic of  {disbalance} is -  it is < than {forces of sustainability}


That what is mentioned above is Acula PLL or TK spark gap mechanism.






So look at Akula device as
- {initial force}         ( whatever is the origin of it- say 12V battery)
-{original  force}      ( preexisting forces of electric,electrostatic,  and magnetic  origin)
-{accelerating force}     as result of initial force acting upon
-{losses}                 due to interaction with  original balance of preexisting forces
-{balanced forces} at any given time frame,  and any given potential.(are responsible for sustainability of action)




================================================================================

this article  in parts of conclusion has not been finished on purpose.










conclusion:
any change to {balanced forces} =  {disbalance}= change,   that  affects  linearity of process{disbalance} must be just temporary change of state of {balanced forces}
{disbalance}  will be smaller  than {forces of sustainability} at given time frame
{disbalance} will be present at acceleration and deacceleration AS A STATE CHANGE INTERVAL.


Disbalance is responsible for energy production.
Balance creates no electricity and no current but makes energy potential level existing in balance level.
Quote
Wesley:

example:
electrical outlet at point of  an outlet has no energy dissipation and stays at energy potential.That energy potential is at level of balance but differs from any other state of balance in its static state.


In the {electrostatic pump} concept we heave the same mechanism. Mainly any state of balance is not responsible for energy production and current flowing  in the closed loop  threw the load is process of  transition to another state of balance.
AS we create the current the {electrostatic  pump} will manifest needs for balance and balance will come as a current flow( affecting the potential difference of balance.)
In PLL or  spark gap of TK there is self adjusting mechanism allowing  state of balance being reached.
but that always will be not the same state of balance due to imperfections of balance demanding switch)




The intervals of balance must become shorter but disbalance will become  shorter as well.
Now we getting to  {balance and disbalance frequency of changes.}


Primary conclusion:
In the  car pushed by 15 girls - at certain speed there is need to only one girl to balance  energy losses to sustain the motion.
At  even higher speed there is a need for only one finger of that girl to sustain the motion .
+  addition to that and  than we got acceleration (e.g: ion  engine in space)


So at given point Akula or TK device needs only  a very small amount of  accelerating  energy as differences between  balance and disbalance becomes  smaller and smaller.

That might be similar to ( ion engine in space or my own vacuum pump in my vacuum chamber  where I have roughing pump and  diffusion pump-(no moving parts )
that does the job at the and  when  roughing one is no longer needed)


So  whatever the additional energy comes from it does not need to be big one and does not need even to be significantly  noticeable .
Quote
However there is the catch:
The balance and disbalance must  include load as steady factor of no change.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That is why Akula could not put more light bulb to work  or less of them  as well.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


If less of lightbulbs are being powered - it is only because  the bandwith of the balances is maintaned and disbalance is  kept in between.
That also proves the fact that Load is an  active part of resonant circuit  and resonant  process.
I assume that TK was heaving different stages balance/disbalance sustaining  mechanism  gradually   switched on as load increases carefully  watching  when that must be done in time frame.
Akula experiences lack of understanding of that mechanism and inability   at this  point to find the solution.


-











 








Quote
Quote
Verpies: quotes Wesley


Such variables are artificially created by Akula or TK.


At  certain point there is in Akula device presence of  iron pipe . That pipe at very bottom of it in presence of  usually traces water( or water saturation)
creates transmutation , resolving ,metal = interaction.You can see big  chunk of soil  stack to the pipe usually at deep very  end of the pipe.
chemical condition of the  ground at Akula house matters as well but


Wesley: Are you saying that transmutation caused by water is the secret of TK's device?If so  -  what about counterpoise?  Surely no water transmutation there.




Verpies you  one of the biggest brains on this forum that I value so much  but
you not reading my note   at the very bottom that this article "I still'm working on it"
I give up finishing this article


I have to think how to  express myself in shorter  format as some of  you guys  skip my work by laziness or by being  impatient







Wesley
« Last Edit: November 14, 2013, 07:59:16 PM by stivep »

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20209 on: November 14, 2013, 05:14:25 PM »
re the hendershot.... the russian replication doesn't seem to have a sound component ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3LRmSovEX8
Ah, but you are very wrong.  The whole purpose of the resonator shown at 43:40 is for those two cylindrical coils on the sled to magnetoacoustically resonate the iron bar in front of the magnet bar.
They just muted the audio when the device was run at the end, but I've seen the original Russian video with unaltered audio  and the resonator could be heard making quite a strong buzzing noise.

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20210 on: November 14, 2013, 05:28:30 PM »
Ah, but you are very wrong.  The whole purpose of the resonator shown at 43:40 is for those two cylindrical coils on the sled to magnetoacoustically resonate the iron bar in front of the magnet bar.
They just muted the audio when the device was run at the end, but I've seen the original Russian video with unaltered audio  and the resonator could be heard making quite a strong buzzing noise.


Any chance of a link to the original?

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20211 on: November 14, 2013, 05:30:47 PM »
post deleted


dllabarre

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 750
    • Portal Page

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20213 on: November 14, 2013, 05:41:27 PM »
Any chance of a link to the original?
I did not save it but I remember that it was on rutube.ru

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20214 on: November 14, 2013, 05:45:56 PM »

Such variables are artificially created by Akula or TK.


At  certain point there is in Akula device presence of  iron pipe . That pipe at very bottom of it in presence of  usually traces water( or water saturation)
creates transmutation , resolving ,metal = interaction.You can see big  chunk of soil  stack to the pipe usually at deep very  end of the pipe.
chemical condition of the  ground at Akula house matters as well but



Wesley: Are you saying that transmutation caused by water is the secret of TK's device?
If so  -  what about counterpoise?  Surely no water transmutation there.

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20215 on: November 14, 2013, 05:47:32 PM »
I did not save it but I remember that it was on rutube.ru


What is therefore a replication of the Hendershot device as detailed in the video? - or did they have their own variation?

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20216 on: November 14, 2013, 07:52:00 PM »
...you not reading my note  at the very bottom that this article "I'm still working on it"
I give up finishing this article
I was not the one who who quoted you (see quote below "Verpies: quotes Wesley" in your previous post).
Yes, I saw your red note "I'm still working on it" at the bottom of your post.

Khwartz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 601
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20217 on: November 14, 2013, 07:53:55 PM »
So let's define these conceptual errors so we have something concrete to discuss:

I claim that space (and time) of our daily lives are just geometric reference systems and their only properties are magnitude and direction. 

You on the other hand, seem to claim (and correct me if I'm wrong) that space is a 3D container that envelops us all and is endowed with myriad of properties, such as permittivity and permeability and is filled with something called Aether that acts as a fluid or gas and has the following properties (list them) needed to support propagation of light between atoms as waves.  You do not address the properties of time at all, other than its one-dimensional nature. 
Most likely you think that time represents one dimension of some 4D continuum, while space represents three dimensions of the same continuum.

I realize that I'm putting a lot of words in your proverbial mouth but this is to provoke you to revise the paragraph above according to your framework of understanding the physical universe.
Much groundwork would need to be covered first.
Read this with a rigorous understanding and follow the links in it (even if it takes you a week), but remember that this is not my framework. 
While I agree with most of Mathis' conclusions, my framework is much more fundamental because it addresses the composition of charge, photons as well as the nature of space and time (Mathis' framework does not).

I'm starting with somebody's else's framework because you have mentioned Dirac's concepts and they need to be addressed first (Mathis addresses legacy concepts much better than I) before we jump into the more fundamental framework of mine. 
As a teaser of what's coming when we get to it - I will ask you a simple question:
What is "motion" and what are the units of it?

P.S.
Let's create another thread for such discussions before we upset people here with this off-topic stuff.
Hi dear Verpies!

Very thanks for your answer and the very rigourous and constructive approach looks to me you take.

I will open soon the new thread where I will probably paste our former posts here on the subject so that the discussion could be understood from its beginning, and let you know. I will take too the necessary time to study the material you gave me. And yes, I do understand your way to put in my mouth words so I could react and so specifying my point of view.

Thanks for the opportunity you give me to discuss this very fundamental subject.

Cheers, Khwartz.

PS: did you have look on my suggested schematic-test for possible EM pumping effect?

d3x0r

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1433
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20218 on: November 14, 2013, 08:13:18 PM »

I have to think how to  express myself in shorter  format as some of  you guys  skip my work by laziness or by being  impatient


Wesley
Please don't increase brevity :)  But it is hard here, I'm often afraid if I spend too much time writing a response, the forum will time me out and I'll lose all the work... 

dllabarre

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 750
    • Portal Page
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20219 on: November 14, 2013, 08:25:09 PM »




I have to think how to  express myself in shorter  format as some of  you guys  skip my work by laziness or by being  impatient


Wesley

« Last Edit: Today at 01:59:16 PM by stivep »



For me the long post is NOT a problem.


For me the problem is when you keep going back and adding more & more information to old posts.
If I don't happen to go back and see it I (and others I'm sure) miss out on the new information you added to the old post.


It's OK to add a new post with the new information so we all get to see it.   ;)
DonL