Grum and All:
   Thanks for your concern, well taken.  Yes, after I turn off my device at night the Cfls, and myself stay somewhat lit.  I know it must be some kind of decay... mental I think...

   One thing that comes to mind. The Edison battery with it's chemical compounds and metal powders goes into a Alfa/Betta/Gamma decay, which may be somewhat similar to a regular galvanic reaction. But, How would the materials in the tube (those elements) last for 70 years while putting out 10kw?  Really???  Why aren't the many battery hi-tech manufacturing plants using this technology. They don't know about it?   I don't think so...

  There definately is a polarity present from an ambient source, such as a positive and negative flux. regardless of material substance. Energy is not dependent on matter, matter is dependent of energy for its existence. Field energies, and such...
  What I'm trying to say is that this electrical output (beta decay) may not be due to the decay from the breakdown of the elements, but from the ambient that TK is also mentioning. The polarization process makes this possible, for an hour at a time, then equilibrium set in, and the process stops, until another bump charge is given. Or not?
   Yes, the yokes can also produce this same or similar effect, Barrium, or not. But do they?
  I'll repeat myself at the expense of boring all of you: All electricity comes from the ambient.  An electric generator will never run out of energy, no matter if it produces or manufactures it for a million years. Or a solar cell.  Even a galvanic reaction, is a by- product of the produced output, not the cause of it.  We are in the middle of a field of energy, That is what Tesla, Kapanadze, Moray, and many other great men have been trying to tell us, for years. It is this field that needs tapping, not the breaking down of matter.
No wonder that Tariel gets so upset.

NickZ
You need to ask Your self this question!
Where's the energy coming from!

Solar flares are teleconnected to earthly radioactive decay:

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/08/23/teleconnected-solar-flares-to-earthly-radioactive-decay/

Strange, Unexplained Solar Influence Over Earth's Radioactive Material Could Herald Solar Flares

http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-08/strange-unexplained-solar-influence-over-earths-radioactive-material-could-herald-solar-flares

Transmutation of elements by NMR

NMR is the key!

This is the neutrino power from cosmic rays!

Neutrinos interact with matter when NMR is induced in some materials and that neutrinos interaction induce radiation decay in matter!

Then how to get it to work practically?

 NickZ
For Your Information SUN IS LOSING MASS to give ENERGY! FUSING THE MATTER!
So Its MASS to ENERGY Conversion On the Sun!
THE SUN IS LOSING MASS TO GIVE ENERGY!

    quote:
   "Wesley has proven that nuclear decay can be induced artificially".

   How has he proven this? He has not shown an output, from his device. Even a tiny one.
Even a Cfl gives off radiation, so do cell phones, Tv, microwaves ovens, etz.. so what? This does not lead to an electrical output, per se.

  I will be patient, as always, but mark my words, there will be no electrical output from beta decay. If I am wrong, I will be the first to acknowledge it.
Do you really think that the best of the worlds scientist and the best labs know about this, but aren't doing anything about it.  They could be make billions, but no, they aren't.

  We can say that "Sun light comes from the Sun", but it does not. Again, mark my words.
  We can attribute this so called beta decay to whats producing an output. But, that may not really be the cause of this output, but a consequence of it, instead.
 We must look at the cause of causes.
 Who has lived for 70 years to test the continual output of an Edison battery?
  I'm not trying to be negative about this, even though it may sound like it, I'm trying to be real. The proof is in the pudding.
   I suspect that you Verpies are correct, that the waiting for his chemicals will not give any better expected results.
  I have nothing but time. so... My best to Wesley, I am on his side, as well.
Team effort...  We don't all need to agree, in any case. We just need to get somewhere with all this.

to Verpies and others:



I got to certain assumption today but I must  put all of it  together to have clear picture


It strike me that high voltage with small radioactive component(* source)
 near  vicinity of say coil capacitor
where source  is on negative charged   plate
 attracts - influenced Alpha particles and these are   very  heavy and very very energetic
Whats more alpha is not harmful as much ...could be stopped by skin or paper.


that avalanche is loud and pretty much spectacular.
What is more.
The source of radioactivity does not have to be alpha source.


could be beta  or gamma
but reaction is seen only on plates especially if we take  capacitor that has insulation medium -  air

What puzzle me is  shiny object inside of coil  capacitor of TK right in the middle ( aquarium)
I could see in there  Colman glass tube or any other  possibly radioactive source.
I ask few times  if someone has the picture of it.
It  was definitely posted here on this forum   long time ago  but I could not find it.

Alpha particles[/font] have a typical kinetic energy of 5 MeV (that is, ≈ 0.13% of their total energy, i.e. 110 TJ/kg) and a speed of 15,000 km/s. This corresponds to a speed of around 0.05 c. There is surprisingly small variation around this energy, due to the heavy dependence of the half-life of this process on the energy produced (see equations in the Geiger–Nuttall law[/font]).

Wesley