Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16501242 times)

guruji

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 470
    • http://andyborg.tripod.com
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16800 on: April 09, 2013, 08:38:04 PM »
I have the scheme but in russian

Grumage

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1113
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16801 on: April 09, 2013, 09:37:20 PM »
A BIT OF LATERAL THINKING

Hello all,

How about applying the NMR theory to an ordinary transformer? We have a Nickel Iron core, both suited to transmutation. Copper windings also suited to transmutation!!
And a secondary winding just waiting for those pulses!! Too outlandish? or "so simple you would laugh"?

This is my last fall for today ;D

Cheers Grum.



Ganzha

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 156
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16802 on: April 09, 2013, 10:30:13 PM »
Is it thrue - Stivep said 1,1 mgr of mixture producing 1,1 KW power?

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16803 on: April 09, 2013, 10:58:47 PM »
How about applying the NMR theory to an ordinary transformer? We have a Nickel Iron core, both suited to transmutation. Copper windings also suited to transmutation!!
Nickel-62 has the most tightly bound nucleus of all elements.  It is a poor choice for stimulated beta decay.
The high binding energy of Nickel isotopes in general makes nickel an "end product" of many nuclear reactions.

Otherwise, the idea is viable if :
1) the iron core of the transformer is saturated by high DC in the primary winding (in series with a HF choke).
2) a proper activating RF signal is applied to another primary winding. Preferably a winding that is perpendicular to the first.
3) the core is large enough so that the beta particles do not escape it - that means large enough to contain their Lorentz orbits inside the core.

The BASER's schematic diagram indeed resembles a transformer.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16804 on: April 09, 2013, 11:14:25 PM »

there you go:




to Wesley from England

Quote
Rossi keeps all these things to himself, except what he has revealed in his blog at http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/ (to get to the blogs you have to click on the comments links attached to individual papers). You probably know as much as me! Re the Geiger counter, all I know is that he stopped Prof.Celani measuring the radiation spectrum at the Jan 2011 demo as he thought it might reveal something about the process, but then he is very scared that people might find the secret and get ahead of him.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7lAlzMBzLQ





Wesley

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16805 on: April 09, 2013, 11:20:24 PM »
Is it thrue - Stivep said 1,1 mgr of mixture producing 1,1 KW power?


30 milligram of Colman mixsture =1.1KW


but in Rossi reactor
1g Ni powder and hydrogen =10kW/h in thermal  power.
or 180days needs 150gr of nickel


Wesley



verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16806 on: April 10, 2013, 12:33:02 AM »
30 milligram of Colman mixture = 1.1KW
Do you mean 1.1kW or 1.1kWh ?

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16807 on: April 10, 2013, 01:14:14 AM »
Do you mean 1.1kW or 1.1kWh ?




 1.1kWh




Wesley

Ganzha

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 156

Farmhand

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1583
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16809 on: April 10, 2013, 02:21:32 AM »


 Wait is this not what I have been suggesting and TK is doing the whole time? Excitation of the copper to output more then it takes to cause the excitation. The gain medium is the impulse across the gap. The exciter is around a copper coil connected to a load. Wow so now that you have found a French patent that says the same thing you give credence to what I have been saying the whole time and TK has been doing.


 Wow talk about bringing up the same exact method and then saying look what I thought of...

jbignes5 Who are you referring to ? Please have the decency to mention who it is you are trying to run down so that person can defend themselves.

Who found a french patent ?

Who is giving credence to what you have been saying ? Be specific, write names !

Are you the only one who has said that ?

Did you come up with the copper transmutation idea all on your own?

Who said they thought of the copper transmutation first ?

What about all the kacher circuits doing tests in this area previously.

You mention anything and everything you can think of, then want to lay claim to everything just because you mentioned it.

Many people have you on ignore so they have no idea what it is you have been rambling on about.

Get used to the word coincidence.

And if you want to be taken seriously do some experiments and post them so we can see your work.

Anyone can ramble on with their own poor interpretations of different things, mentioning so much stuff and getting most of it wrong anyway.

Just mentioning something means next to nothing. Show us the experiment.

Do you think someone is going to lay claim to having thought of the copper method first ?

If there is a patent for the copper method where is it ? Since you know all, produce it.

I couldn't care any less who thought of it first or who mentioned it when, I just want to try it, by experiment, which may be a foreign concept to you.

This is open source, get some humility.

Is there a patent or not for the copper method ? If there is would someone be so kind as to link it and translate it if necessary.

Cheers

bolt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 921
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16810 on: April 10, 2013, 05:29:40 AM »



 1.1kWh




Wesley


No that is wrong that is a measure of energy plus time.   The device can provide 1100 watts according to the patent.  = 1.1 kW   Its capable of producing


674,520 kWh's!!   before it needs replacing.   At 15 cents a unit it can produce over $100,000 worth of electricity:)    Some people will be pissed if this came to the market.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16811 on: April 10, 2013, 06:15:32 AM »

No that is wrong that is a measure of energy plus time.   The device can provide 1100 watts according to the patent.  = 1.1 kW   Its capable of producing


674,520 kWh's!!   before it needs replacing.   At 15 cents a unit it can produce over $100,000 worth of electricity:)    Some people will be pissed if this came to the market.


1.1kw/h is the energy of 1.1kw during  1 hour
that is what I understand from patent.
and is that because  after one hour there is a need for another 15s of charging time but from very low power.
That stays about energy extraction from  nuclear bonds of unstable nuclei ...... that also is prove of transmutation


Wesley
But yes someone will be very much pissed of 
f...  them too...however if I "love them so much" I would like prefer 30 grams instead of 30 milligrams
And in the future 3kg of Colman  mixture :)   

bolt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 921
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16812 on: April 10, 2013, 09:32:14 AM »
I  be happy to see the mg version first without going to grams!   Don't have a problem finding pure cadmium, copper powder or zinc powder. Phosphorus in elemental form highly reactive and dangerous. Can get it in stable compound forms and oxides.  Lithium, Cadmium and Calcium  all undergo transmutations easy.  They are nuclear unstable and easy suck neutrons which is why they are used in batteries.   But I need more information and alternatives for the chemical filler mixture.


10mm 20mm and 30mm Quartz glass tubes can be found in the fish tank section under UV lamps:)   10mm Brass studding reduced to fit tube then mounted in to sprung holders alike halogen flood light tubes with brass nuts. Be aware this tube going to get EXTREMELY radioactive and IR hot . Lead shielding required.


UHF ham radio good source of Nuclear trigger!   Cheap on ebay.


Has anyone thought about "nuking" a nickel metal hydride battery?  We might get an AA battery to provide 20v @ 5 amps for 10 years:)  All batteries undergo some minor nuclear transformation and dissociation but the normal chemical action is terribly inefficient.    If you doubt this then only have to consider two metals twisted together as a thermocouple produce a voltage when exposed to heat. This is a minor nuclear dissociation process that produces free electrons.

  Almost any metal can undergo dissociation just some much easier than others. Including gasses. For gas use UV light which is modulated and polarised should do the trick.


Rossi uses Hydrogen and Nickel (hydride) Reactor.   I bet he uses modulated UV to crack hydrogen and use that electron to dissociate  nickel. 

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16813 on: April 10, 2013, 10:03:33 AM »
Almost any metal can undergo dissociation just some much easier than others. Including gasses.
According to this patent, all isotopes that have exposed neutrons can undergo beta decay.  This patent even provides a list of some good candidates.
In normal environment the beta decay of these isotopes is prevented by a large nuclear parity and angular momentum difference before and after decay, but adding spins to the nucleus, by NMR or just RF, makes this difference much smaller and the nuclear rearrangement becomes much more probable (faster).
BTW: NMR is more efficient than pure RF in adding angular momenta to the nucleus (Watts vs. kW of RF power).
Also, if EF NMR is used then the device becomes sensitive to its position on the table.

Rossi uses Hydrogen and Nickel (hydride) Reactor.   I bet he uses modulated UV to crack hydrogen and use that electron to dissociate  nickel.
And I thought that he uses Nickel to trap Hydrogen inside its crystal lattice, just like Pons and Flashman did with Palladium.
Rossi's output is heat, not an organized stream of beta particles, isn't it?

Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4135
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16814 on: April 10, 2013, 12:39:39 PM »
Nickel-62 has the most tightly bound nucleus of all elements.  It is a poor choice for stimulated beta decay.
The high binding energy of Nickel isotopes in general makes nickel an "end product" of many nuclear reactions.

Otherwise, the idea is viable if :
1) the iron core of the transformer is saturated by high DC in the primary winding (in series with a HF choke).
2) a proper activating RF signal is applied to another primary winding. Preferably a winding that is perpendicular to the first.
3) the core is large enough so that the beta particles do not escape it - that means large enough to contain their Lorentz orbits inside the core.

The BASER's schematic diagram indeed resembles a transformer.

As TK is supposed not to have used any high capacity batteries to power his devices, would just a short burst of saturating DC be sufficient or would this need to be constant?