so simple ?    http://www.elma-energia.pl/resources/image/bez%20t%C5%82a-%20moduloXD%20zdj%C4%99cia.gif

or here http://www.korporacjasystem.pl/baterie_kondensatorow.html

 If you are eluding that he used batteries then you are dead wrong.


"No, the battery produces only capacitive reactive energy, thus compensating for inductive reactive energy consumed by the device of the recipient.The battery takes little active energy while reducing energy losses in cables and transformers. It is therefore to be expected from the active energy consumption does not change or slightly decrease."


 The meaning to the word battery in this sense is a group of capacitors specially designed for 3 phase power as a power factor corrector unit. They use the word battery to describe the unit as a set of capacitors.


 we had already mentioned the special capacitors that he used in the turkey tent expo.
[size=78%]
[/size]

jbignes5


just be more creative.... things have more then one usage i think 

 We went over this about 700 pages ago.


 Stivep pointed them out and thought they were ignighters. I then showed they were Russian 3 phase caps. These were used because of all the inductors in the system and a very large 3 phase motor was used on the load. This was from the Turkey video of the tent.

That is pretty silly video. Good that you kept it short this time as there is no value watching this other than maybe for entertainment (way of wasting time)
BTW what revolution are you talking about?

Only what you did not noticed.
chemical  compound explained not by me!! + my added notes








1926 Tendershot made device that  used core from pencil battery that served as reactor ( transmutation as effect)using radio-wave as activator


1901 patent of Edison shows  pencil battery internal chemical recipe   very much alike Colman 1956 but Colman made it better.( transmutation as effect within 70 years )using radio-wave as activator.( frequency range 300MHz)


in somewhere around 1980 John Huthison  made his first transmutation-anti-gravity experiment. You see him holding "probe" in his hands ( antenna connected to "strong amplifier" ( transmitter)


in around 1982 he was visited by pentagon 4 scientists


in 1988-89 US Army released paper that was non secret- public  only in 2004
  = after  9/11
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022369771900369[/font][/size]
Document stand  about transmutation of the ferrite using radio-wave as activator. (frequency range matching Colman 300+ to 555 MHZ)
In 2008 Andrea Rossi has made his reactor using thermal exchange  part of that process only.
He used radio-meter to measure Beta and aluminium foil to stop Beta.( former Sicilian criminal)
You see at his video activation circuitry. One of readers send me info about Andrea Rossi connecting capacitors to tune resonant   circuit. apparently his transmitter has limitations
so he is playing with receiver.He can not obviously  connect  high  gain antenna But dipol  in form of coil might work excellent  - only it will have very narrow bandwith So Rossi must match desired frequency.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtQJyHKVuio




In about that time Tariel Kapanadze was already famous for his 100KW/h device
At TK show in the island there was one of his "workers" left in the hotel on the cost (water in between) and during  presentation  hotel experienced extreme energy consumption. -supposedly connected to some "load" of unknown  origin.


In 2011 I was assisting Lithuania Experiment  and  all of us 6 people experienced side effects( we did not know what was that but now it seems to be explanation for it) Arunas pointed to me  after that, that higher frequency might  be sutable for experiment recheck.(200-500MHZ)
We have been extracting electrical energy from  yoke- ferrite from old Russian TV that  was heaving crystalline similar to Army Experiment
and possibly beta active.


Aluminium foil has no problem with Beta. And based on my experience  the Colman device is more safe than concentrated microwave when properly contained .


The suspicion 1- is that TK uses Colman   reactor charged at first minute  and than the device  works by itself for certain period of time.
The suspicion 2- is that TK is not  as sick from diabetics but from  exposure to BETA


In March 30 of 2013 Me and my  friend scientist we activated compound and concluded that Andrea Rossi  might be using Colman  receptivity as  his secret additive.


 The common point to all of that is extremely low level of activating energy and compound resources needed ( miliW- based on Andrea Rossi and Colman   statements)
But  there is a catch  Over the distance with say 90 DB  of  attenuation  transmitter signal must have big power ( that might expain TK  island presentation.




For what was  said above:
1 All of the  people technology contributors listed as inventors above happened to withhold secrets from  ( for me )very obvious reasons.
Eventually some of them died with it.


2 Colman was  the only one who accurately  provided patented substance.


3 There is Czechoslovakia patent  also but I do not remember how to find it.


I do not intend hold secrets in this area nor build  personal fame. I do not care.




Wesley














 

3 There is Czechoslovakia patent  also but I do not remember how to find it.

Hi Wesley,

Is this the Czech patent you probably mean:

http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=worldwide.espacenet.com&II=83&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19980812&CC=CZ&NR=9603387A3&KC=A3

PROCESS FOR PRODUCING POWER BY CONVERSION OF Fe 56 TO Fe 54 BY WAY OF NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE AND APPARATUS FOR MAKING THE SAME  by Michel Meyer

If yes, this exists in French when Meyer's co inventor was Mace:
http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=worldwide.espacenet.com&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19930226&CC=FR&NR=2680613A1&KC=A1

Activator for isotopic mutation   

rgds, Gyula

Hi Wesley,

Is this the Czech patent you probably mean:

http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=worldwide.espacenet.com&II=83&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19980812&CC=CZ&NR=9603387A3&KC=A3

PROCESS FOR PRODUCING POWER BY CONVERSION OF Fe 56 TO Fe 54 BY WAY OF NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE AND APPARATUS FOR MAKING THE SAME  by Michel Meyer

If yes, this exists in French when Meyer's co inventor was Mace:
http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=worldwide.espacenet.com&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19930226&CC=FR&NR=2680613A1&KC=A1

Activator for isotopic mutation   

rgds, Gyula

Yes this is it


I  was looking for English version ready to view of it.
If someone has it. ??


I understand Slovak but reading skills  is less than my Russian


As  Legality of Colman.
I'm not  very much  afraid that it will become illegal.
It is enough  power for us to  be happy in it.


EVERYTHING DEPENDS FROM WHO IS FIRST.
SUCCESSFUL REPLICATION IN  MILLIONS IS UNSTOPPABLE.


Additional info got it   yesterday.


 Zinc and cooper  oxide must be in minimum 6 hours ( not one hour like I reported before)
in temperature of 100 Celsius 
      in annealing oven 
it helps if it is in liquid nitrogen
it might be in vacuum oven
to take oxide out.


Wesley

I  was looking for English version ready to view of it.  If someone has it

I have never seen the Michael Meyer patent translated into English.

All I know about this device is that the Iron rod must be saturated in order for the device to work.
Saturation decreases permeability and low permeability minimizes the skin-effect.  If this is not done, the RF activation/stimulation cannot get inside the rod because the skin-effect prevents it.

The skin depth (d) of the RF penetration into the rod [in mm] depends on the frequency (f) in [Hz], electric resistance (R) expressed in [Ωm] and relative magnetic permeability (µ_r) of the material that the rod is made out of, like this: d = 503120 * ( R/(f*µ_r) )^0.5

From the above skin-depth equation, it is evident that decreasing magnetic permeability and increasing the electrical resistance of the rod helps RF penetration.
- The permeability can be decreased by saturating the rod.
- The resistance can be increased by forming the rod out of phosphate passivated and compressed fine-iron-powder.

In March 30 of 2013 Me and my  friend scientist we activated compound and concluded that Andrea Rossi  might be using Colman  receptivity as  his secret additive.

Do I read it right, that successful attempt to activate some compound is supposed to give a reason to speculate around Colman patent, while you guys were still not even close to extract any useful energy out of the tube?

I can sense your excitement and intention to drag scientist's to sort out all the missing parts like the exact compounds to be used, excitation frequencies etc. but while it is so popular here to blame men in black and government trolls in all the evil then I would think it is easiest to have control over patent offices and make sure nothing 'revolutionary' can be ever extracted out of any published patents. Like it is been said there is always some important detail missing or replaced with misleading ones not mention the possibility to reject or make disappear the whole thing.
Would expect some more proof to be presented before claiming a breakthrough and making big words. So far there is only some silly finger showing in videos and really no additional detail to what is already known from the patent

I found this from a post from wattsup

Start translation:
To shake atoms so they render the energy they contain, you must send via a high !important frequency oscillator (in the order of 173 kHz) a wave that is in resonance with the vibration of the copper electrodes. This is via an  !important]oscillating  magnetic field thanks to the   !important]coil winding  that is connected to the oscillator and that covers the copper. One part of the feed current is used to polarize the metal that restitutes (gives back) up to 30 times the energy consumed by the oscillator.
End translation

So in general, the oscillator is pulsing current onto the copper rod and there is another wire from the positive of the battery that goes through a diode and a resistor so only a small portion of the battery power is used to ensure the copper rod s polarized in a fixed manner to initiate a steady positive/negative output off the copper rod. If copper was magnetic, you could have used a magnet to do the same polarization, but since it is not, a small current on one side will do the same thing.