Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16408093 times)

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16185 on: February 25, 2013, 01:55:14 AM »
  All electromagnetic as well as any non-electromagnetic fields are a result of the Aether/Vortex interactions. If there was no Aether, we could not explain the existence of matter, as all matter is dependent on it for its existence. Atoms are held together by it, material worlds are made from it. Everything that we can see, and can't see, comes from it.
 Once we get a real grasp on this unseen force, we will see that the cause of "fields" is not confined to corporeal mass. But, all mass is derived from the Aether, and vortex interactions. To tap this Aether directly, is the trick.


zcsaba77

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16186 on: February 25, 2013, 09:26:09 AM »
Maybe this calculator can help.

http://ncalculators.com/electronics/reactance-calculator.htm

Cheers

hi

capacitive reactance and inductive reactance must be same?

Farmhand

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1583
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16187 on: February 25, 2013, 10:03:47 AM »
hi

capacitive reactance and inductive reactance must be same?

Basically the same effect I think.

..

zcsaba77

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16188 on: February 25, 2013, 11:31:12 AM »
Basically the same effect I think.

..

I mean on these 'like Tesla coils' must be same cap. react. and ind. react. values for reach amplifying effect?

Farmhand

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1583
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16189 on: February 25, 2013, 12:02:28 PM »
I mean on these 'like Tesla coils' must be same cap. react. and ind. react. values for reach amplifying effect?

Oh I see what you meant now. Yes I think it does work out that way.
I used it mainly to get a bit of an idea how much current I would get through a resonant charging circuit (pre-primary).

This calculator here is useful as well it will give the reactance/resistance of the coil. http://www.extremeelectronics.co.uk/calcs/index.php?page=oltc_calc.php

When I design a coil in the OLTC calculator and add the toroid capacitance to the coils self capacitance the total capacitive
reactance at the resonant frequency is about the same as the inductive reactance.

Cheers


zcsaba77

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16190 on: February 25, 2013, 01:54:48 PM »
When I design a coil in the OLTC calculator and add the toroid capacitance to the coils self capacitance the total capacitive
reactance at the resonant frequency is about the same as the inductive reactance.
Cheers

Hi

When u are used this OLTC calculator, did help u? I mean u built by these parameters, and work is it in real life?

Farmhand

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1583
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16191 on: February 25, 2013, 02:46:55 PM »
Hi

When u are used this OLTC calculator, did help u? I mean u built by these parameters, and work is it in real life?

Yes it works for me, by inputting some data into the boxes next to the white writing in the three sections the Secondary section the primary section and the Toroid section
it then gives out the results in the boxes next to the red writing. For example if you use no toroid just put in a really small value like 0.000001 in the Toroid section but it must have a value, each of the boxes next to white writing must have a value. Then to determine a coil size - turns - length of wire for a certain frequency is just trial and error. It will also tell the capacitance needed for the primary and other stuff. Just using the top three sections will work but it does do other stuff below as well.

It took me a little while to work out how to best use it. I've designed a few coils with it and they come out to be very close to the calculators predictions.

If you have any problems using it just say and I'll make a screen shot labeling what to put where ? I think it's designed for close wound coils of magnet wire.

Cheers 

zcsaba77

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16192 on: February 25, 2013, 03:48:51 PM »
If you have any problems using it just say and I'll make a screen shot labeling what to put where ? I think it's designed for close wound coils of magnet wire.

Cheers

Hi

Upper 2 section is clear for me, but what mean under 'toroid'? toroid ferrite ring? or this calc work just air cored ones? others lower section is not clear, maybe some, can u shot pic about filled by values, and post here, and 'little' explain what is what, please

Grumage

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1113
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16193 on: February 25, 2013, 08:34:04 PM »
hi

capacitive reactance and inductive reactance must be same?

From memory, but this is getting a little old now!!! Capacitive Leads and Inductive lags from the Zero point of a fully resistive circuit.

jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16194 on: February 25, 2013, 08:35:03 PM »
Basically the same effect I think.

..


 Not totally the same. Although they are lumped together they are quite different.


 Capacitive reactance is the capacitor version. Capacitive reactance is the opposition of a change in voltage across the capacitor. The ideal concept should be thrown out since all capacitors have an inductive component and also has the capacitance. The same goes for inductors.


 Inductive reactance is the opposition to current flow changes in the inductor. likewise an inductor has a capacitance value as well.

Grumage

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1113
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16195 on: February 25, 2013, 08:45:44 PM »
NMR as a prime candidate for Modus Operandi?

Hi All, I posted this with Energetic Forum, it died a death, what do you think?

"My reason for this post. I first trawled the web to find out the NMR of Fe 56.
This apparently is 3.237778,Mhz but this value is related to magnetic field strength. The field strength being 2.35 Tesla. If one increases the field strength so increases the Resonant frequency.
Looking at it in the other direction, Global magnetic field strength taken as an average is around 50 micro Tesla and at that field strength the NMR of Fe56 is only 68Hz!!!!

With this in mind there is always going to be a shift in field strength due to the alternating nature of the Bias coil. It makes me wonder whether a softly softly approach is the answer?

It may also be the reason why someone quoted the phrase "you find the target, but it moves"

This was a little museing on my part but it might spark an idea, padon the pun!!!

Technical data provided by webelements.com and Geotech-LRLs-info-NMR"

How difficult could it be?, the answer seems like childs play to acheive, especially when you look at the diagrams of Patrick Kelly's E book.
Does the Iron require massive amounts of energy to start emitting beta particles? Or does it just happen once the resonant frequency is found?

What do you think?


verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16196 on: February 25, 2013, 10:33:29 PM »
NMR as a prime candidate for Modus Operandi?
Most readers of this thread do not subscribe to the NMR as the operating principle of some of the devices described here.

The strongest reason for this seems to be taking Tariel Kapanadze's words "It's so simple you'd laugh" at face value.
NMR is perceived by the readers as a very "not simple" process.

You'd have to use your own judgement to determine whether it is "simple" for you.

A "knee jerk" reaction to the "N" word appears to be another reason...
« Last Edit: February 26, 2013, 02:27:27 AM by verpies »

Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16197 on: February 26, 2013, 02:00:02 AM »
The strongest reason for this seems to be taking Tariel Kapanadze's words "It's so simple you'd laugh" at face value.
This is not completely off-topic, but I have noticed that the Bessler Wheel is »so simple you'd laugh« too. It can rotate in both direction depending on the direction of the initial push given. That means it must be constructed symmetrically. That is the first hint. It needs a push to start and then it accelerates to approx. 26 RPM. That means it works on centrifugal force because it needs a little bit of centrifugal force to start and once started the acceleration stops as soon as the centrifugal force has reach a certain limit. That is the second hint. And of course the use of eighteenth century technology should be sufficient . That is the third hint

Hence who wants to attempt a working replication? :D

But now something completely off-topic: NASA’s cold fusion tech could put a nuclear reactor in every home, car, and plane

So we should hurry up with our replication attempts (of something) otherwise NASA will win the race to cheap and clean power.

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16198 on: February 26, 2013, 05:43:26 AM »
  a.king21:
   As I could not post a picture of my the yoke on my reply PM to you, that I'm currently using, I had to upload it here. I also wanted to mention that the yoke had no windings directly on it, and so I wound it using 28gauge magnet wire, on both halves. One half of the secondary is used for lighting regular 120v incandescent, led, or Cfls, and I use both secondaries in series for lighting gutted bulbs.
 



Farmhand

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1583
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16199 on: February 26, 2013, 07:13:14 AM »
Hi

Upper 2 section is clear for me, but what mean under 'toroid'? toroid ferrite ring? or this calc work just air cored ones? others lower section is not clear, maybe some, can u shot pic about filled by values, and post here, and 'little' explain what is what, please

No, no ferrite ring, that calculator is for "single layer air core solenoids" only. The toroid box is for the capacitance of the top"load" or top terminal, it could be a sphere or some other kind of capacitance (in pF), so a toroid with a 50 mm tube and a diameter of about 200 mm is about 6 to 8 pF as far as I can tell. If the coil ends with just a wire then i just put a really small value in there like 0.000001.

Then when the first three sections have values in the boxes next to the white writing click in one of the boxes in the next section and some results should be filled in.

It's useful because it tells us beforehand what the self capacitance of a coil and the self inductance of a coil will be as well as other things like frequency for H/D ratio and the effect of increasing the toroid/Terminal capacitance ect.

Here's another calculator to determine roughly the "Q" of a coil, it's not the best because it requires converting to nH and GHz.

http://www.circuitsage.com/tools/tool_view&tool_id=17

ie. there is a big difference in the Q of a coil wound with thicker wire. A coil with 1 Ohm resistance, 1.8 mH inductance and resonant at 780 KHz has a "Q" of about ( 8800 )
But if the coil was wound with thinner wire and had 20 Ohms resistance with 1.8 mH and resonant at 780 KHz it would have a "Q" of only ( 440 ). So much more energy would be wasted or the oscillations would die that much quicker ect.

Cheers