Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16408486 times)

zcsaba77

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16170 on: February 24, 2013, 11:07:52 AM »
Yes, but you would have to put the resistor value at zero; means no loss. All the problem is that damn loss, in the real devices... Cheer.

No. I set to 300Ohm. Do u know how much approx. oscilating coil resistance?

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16171 on: February 24, 2013, 01:30:21 PM »
  a.king21:
  I've build and work with a similar LaserSaber cross-over circuit, pictured below.
  Some of the effects that are shown are caused by the capacitive link coming from the house wiring, which is found throughout the house floor, tables, and anything close to electrical ac wiring. If the house breakers are turned off this effect goes away. But, this stray ac capacitance is one of the reasons that the small led bulbs light. Especially if the circuit is also connected to an earth ground. May not be the only reason, but the ac link needs to be isolated, or it will affect the results.
It is an interesting and highly sensitive circuit. And may have some similarities to Dr. Stifflers SEC or PSEC devices.
I did find that it would drain the battery quickly, but also recharge it to back to the  starting voltage, again, then drain to 1/10 of the starting voltage, then recharge itself again. I used 1.5v, as an input source, as well as 7v, (white AA battery bank).
I still don't know what to make of it.
I've done  a lot of experiments and understand some aspects here. If you pulse charge a capacitor over several hours, it becomes conditioned to gating energy from the vacuum, and self charges at a much faster rate than an ordinary capacitor. The trick is to loop it. Looking at TK's patents he uses a transformer to perform the loop. But a capacitor is at the heart of both his patents. Maybe you could try a 1:1 isolation transfomer with a bridge on the secondary side to perform a loop function instead of lighting a bulb first.  You could then start the capacitor with a battery - Kapanadze style. Please let us know the results.
I think you are on the right track.

pepsimaxzu

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16172 on: February 24, 2013, 01:36:07 PM »
guys, what frequency should be on primary side of voltage source?

I have 20hz-20kHz generator will be enough?

sorry google translator  :-[

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16173 on: February 24, 2013, 05:16:06 PM »
  a.king21:
   Thank you for you comments. I do think that the loop-back is essential to a self runner, with some source of current still needed to kick-start the device into operation.
  I will do some more experiments on this idea to see what I can come up with.

  One thing that I've noticed... I connected a small Cfl transformer to the device's secondary (HV over 1000v) output. This small Cfl transformer which also had a primary coil wound on it, was  connected through its own transistor switching circuit, using the HF secondary output as it's input, then going back to the main device input. Although this caused both of the transistors used, as well as the small 7 watt incandescent bulb to burn up. But,  the bulbs lit very very bright for about two seconds, before the the main transistor and the 7 watt bulb burnt out.  I'm still wondering about this, as there may be something similar to what you are mentioning.
  I've also been able to do something similar by combining two different types of bulbs in series, then back to the battery + rail. Like the picture below.
                                                                                                  Nick_Z


jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16174 on: February 24, 2013, 05:41:26 PM »
  a.king21:
   Thank you for you comments. I do think that the loop-back is essential to a self runner, with some source of current still needed to kick-start the device into operation.
  I will do some more experiments on this idea to see what I can come up with.

  One thing that I've noticed... I connected a small Cfl transformer to the device's secondary (HV over 1000v) output. This small Cfl transformer which also had a primary coil wound on it, was  connected through its own transistor switching circuit, using the HF secondary output as it's input, then going back to the main device input. Although this caused both of the transistors used, as well as the small 7 watt incandescent bulb to burn up. But,  the bulbs lit very very bright for about two seconds, before the the main transistor and the 7 watt bulb burnt out.  I'm still wondering about this, as there may be something similar to what you are mentioning.
  I've also been able to do something similar by combining two different types of bulbs in series, then back to the battery + rail. Like the picture below.
                                                                                                  Nick_Z


 Right so now you need to limit that runaway. Once you limit the runaway you can maintain the system in balance. You'll have to add an automatic load balancer in to keep it from burning itself up. Maybe that's what the ground is for in the TK systems. You could always convert the balance of the energy into a coil and tie the extra into a magnetic field to be used later like a tank circuit.

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16175 on: February 24, 2013, 05:55:45 PM »
  It may be possible to limit any runaway condition by going through another Cfl bulb then back to the battery input side. I did not have the big 65watt Cfl bulb connected at that time. Like in the picture.  But, it may be possible to take the secondary coils output, through another drop down transformer, and back to the input side.
I've tried 1000uf caps, but have not gotten anything unusual from it, yet. I alway use an earth ground, or two earth grounds, but coming off of the same ground wire, not separate ones, which might work better.

jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16176 on: February 24, 2013, 06:14:57 PM »
  It may be possible to limit any runaway condition by going through another Cfl bulb then back to the battery input side. I did not have the big 65watt Cfl bulb connected at that time. Like in the picture.  But, it may be possible to take the secondary coils output, through another drop down transformer, and back to the input side.
I've tried 1000uf caps, but have not gotten anything unusual from it, yet. I alway use an earth ground, or two earth grounds, but coming off of the same ground wire, not separate ones, which might work better.


 Or you could put a solenoid coil in line that will choke the back feed. You just want to limit the flow back to the input. Just remember about the resonant condition of coils. You don't want the choke to go into resonance that way it will choke the current off. You might have to do this to the input of the run away device. The current is killing the unit. Choke it off a bit and see if that helps.

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16177 on: February 24, 2013, 07:16:34 PM »
  It may be possible to limit any runaway condition by going through another Cfl bulb then back to the battery input side. I did not have the big 65watt Cfl bulb connected at that time. Like in the picture.  But, it may be possible to take the secondary coils output, through another drop down transformer, and back to the input side.
I've tried 1000uf caps, but have not gotten anything unusual from it, yet. I alway use an earth ground, or two earth grounds, but coming off of the same ground wire, not separate ones, which might work better.

Runaway: Kapanadze uses a spark gap in parallel with the output load to prevent runaway. That way you can adjust the gap to get the balance just right.

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16178 on: February 24, 2013, 07:45:24 PM »
  Yes, a spark gap may work also, but they are noisy. A series connected Cfl back to input source does not make noise, at all, but does not light in this case. It is used for the same purpose as the spark gap, but as it can't be adjusted,  I use different Cfls to see which one works best for this purpose. All these different circuit configurations are feed back circuits, as well.

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16179 on: February 24, 2013, 08:05:16 PM »
  Yes, a spark gap may work also, but they are noisy. A series connected Cfl back to input source does not make noise, at all, but does not light in this case. It is used for the same purpose as the spark gap, but as it can't be adjusted,  I use different Cfls to see which one works best for this purpose. All these different circuit configurations are feed back circuits, as well.
Yes, I agree. However if the parallel load is too great then you also kill the loop. With the spark gap method you get to tune it. So my opninion is that a spark gap in parallel to start with, and afterwards experiment with a quiet method.
Anyway, good luck and please post your circuits when you have  time.

jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16180 on: February 24, 2013, 08:25:53 PM »
Yes, I agree. However if the parallel load is too great then you also kill the loop. With the spark gap method you get to tune it. So my opninion is that a spark gap in parallel to start with, and afterwards experiment with a quiet method.
Anyway, good luck and please post your circuits when you have  time.


 Yeah the spark gap method is very very good for doing the job and having the ability of being adjustable. likewise you can add the magnetic quench and get true one way impulses. The magnetic flow biased across the gap polarizes the gap. If this is chosen then you must adjust the circuit to handle only one way impulses. Although the tank circuit that is oscillating would not be doing so with the polarization channel. Using bifilar coils is another way to change an oscillating circuit into a polarized impulse effect.


 Like I said earlier we need to contain the field inside of the unit by statically shielding the core unit then everything coming out of that unit. We only want the energizing energy to interact with materials in certain exposed areas. This allows the system to pressurize and flow with more intense fields. Adding texture to the fields like diagonal angles to the exposed material will allow for better current flow. In this example copper exposed to the fields emitted from the heavy coil will sweep through the copper and excite the metal with a heavy current flow as the sweep continues along the exposed copper material.

Grumage

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1113
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16181 on: February 24, 2013, 09:33:00 PM »
  a.king21:
  I've build and work with a similar LaserSaber cross-over circuit, pictured below.
  Some of the effects that are shown are caused by the capacitive link coming from the house wiring, which is found throughout the house floor, tables, and anything close to electrical ac wiring. If the house breakers are turned off this effect goes away. But, this stray ac capacitance is one of the reasons that the small led bulbs light. Especially if the circuit is also connected to an earth ground. May not be the only reason, but the ac link needs to be isolated, or it will affect the results.
It is an interesting and highly sensitive circuit. And may have some similarities to Dr. Stifflers SEC or PSEC devices.
I did find that it would drain the battery quickly, but also recharge it to back to the  starting voltage, again, then drain to 1/10 of the starting voltage, then recharge itself again. I used 1.5v, as an input source, as well as 7v, (white AA battery bank).
I still don't know what to make of it.

Hi Nick Z,

Would you be willing to share your version of the circuit with us?

Having noted your post's today and having all the components to hand I quickly built a "mock up" using a 24/240 V Iron cored transformer (10:1 ratio). I was able to easily light a 240V 11watt CFL using my body between circuit and ground but only at 12V supplied and an operating current of 600mA. Way above 11watts!! No OU at this stage :)

Cheers, Grumage.

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16182 on: February 24, 2013, 11:00:55 PM »
   Grumage:
   The circuit that I was testing was the LaserSaber cross-over circuit. But, I've had the best result from his Joule Ringer 3.0 circuit. Here is the diagram of the cross-over circuit.
But, the 3.0 version is an easy build only needing one component (2n3055 transistor).
To this I've made several versions, using various transformer cores, and different coil configurations. I try different things to see what works the best. Whatever doesn't burn up and makes the bulbs light brighter is what I keep, while working towards even more light output.



Farmhand

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1583
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16183 on: February 25, 2013, 12:18:05 AM »
No. I set to 300Ohm. Do u know how much approx. oscilating coil resistance?

Maybe this calculator can help.

http://ncalculators.com/electronics/reactance-calculator.htm

Cheers

jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16184 on: February 25, 2013, 01:27:53 AM »
 I had a chance to go over the new theory of everything, you know the magnetic one. It definitely looks good from the magnetic point of view but my one question is where does the magnetic fields come from? How do we synthesize the magnetic field currently? You got it provide a voltage and the current will flow and the magnetic fields form. He tells us by admitting that he needed to use 70k volts in the vacuum chamber. Also how come he has to have two bowls made of matter to get the fields to form?


 Anyways if this universe was all magnetic how could the fields separate. Wouldn't they all just stick together? And if this is the way it is then how come the universe is speeding up wouldn't it be slowing down or become static? The universe is so vast that only potential can breech the gaps of light years in between galaxies. It is indeed an electric universe and not a magnetic one. The magnetic is only a byproduct of the electric field. Yes it can convert back and forth but the potential is the real key.


 Not once in his video did he show anything about the electric fields and how they relate to his bowls. If he did look into this he would find the true structure of the natural medium and not the byproduct.