Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16404258 times)

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15840 on: February 02, 2013, 04:17:55 PM »
Thanks A.King21,  That was a great video.  How would that pulse be created by a circuit.?  Isn't that what TK's doing?  He did site Bedini in his Patent.. He could be  Using that impulse waveform, but with Solid state instead of monopole??

AC

jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15841 on: February 02, 2013, 04:45:21 PM »
 
 
 I just wanted to clarify a few points about the character of currents. There are two different components to all currents. One is voltage and the other is amperage. One leads to the other in a wire. Voltage is the genesis to current. And as has been shown you can have a high voltage with very little current. This fact means that the voltage goes unhindered because there is little real amperage to get lost in this character of that type of current. A resistance to this kind of current poses no real hinderance and flows readily. Most resistors will not heat up and will seem to be not there at all. This is why Tesla designed very high voltage lines to transfer the power from his source to the end consumer's transformer. It allowed for a very low loss when in transportation over very long cables. The less amperage you have in the current the less of a reaction the current will pose to the resistance. But in that example there is a higher electric field effect from the transmission wires. If the power companies had applied the static shielding that Tesla devised via patent they would have reduced this field effect and would have very little loss at all. But of course that would have costed more in initial investments.
 
 Has anyone thought about why they got rid of the power station at niagra? It was free and after many years paid for the equipment that was installed there. They could not justify raising the prices we pay for electric so they devised ways to get more from a system by removing the part that gave free energy to all. It makes no sense at all except to increase the cost of power that could free man from the chains that binded him.
 
 The concepts that Tesla was working on like transfer of energy without wires woulkd have made it very impossible for power companies to justify charging for something that was paid in full many years ago.
 
 His wireless concepts were very simple to understand. If we excite the metal ball we live on it would develop a field all around the ball and would only have a very short distance to the end user reducing the loss even further. The rubber ball that Tesla envisioned in his analogy would move equally at any point around that ball and each station would only go to strengthen that field going in and out around that ball.
 His experiments with capacities above that surface prove beyond a shadow of doubt that one could tap that field with accuracy since in relation to the surface you could easily calculate the amount of power you could get due to the heigth above that surface.
 Eventually Tesla found out that one didn't need the earth to do this. Only a capacity is what was needed. Since he related the earth to have a capacity and for the matter of fact any conductor has a capacity. This capacity is mass based and the resting capacity is based on the distance above the earth in relation to the earth if the earth is used. A capacity could be concidered as a spring bound by the matter. Learning how to utilize that capacity can and will free you from the chains that bind us all and this scares a great many that make a living from the current process. Hence the deception of a great many book thumpers here.
 TK is only reporting, not to us but the world of what he did. Why? because the ones in power are doing nothing to bring these facts out. Those videos were not made for us they were only a record of what he had learned. The only thing TK is guilty of is taking the experiments and expanding on them like TESLA said we were to do. He applied the techniques of Tesla and they worked. Plain and simple.
 
 There is a simple example I would like to share with you.
 
 In the training process of an elephant they use a heavy chain when they are young to bind them to a post and keep the baby elephant bound to a certain range. As they fight against that chain they learn that they are limited to that range. As they get older and much stronger the trainers change the chain to a flimsy rope but yet the now adult elephant still stays in the range of that flimsy rope. It never tries to go beyond because it knows it to be futile.
 
 This is where we are today. This is how most are controlled in this field. They are taught to not ask questions that go beyond the scope of what they are taught. They think it is futile. They think within the box made for them. When they step out of line they are ridiculed and called all kinds of names, they are shamed into submission. And if that doesn't work then they are taken out and shot behind the barn.
 
 Not one person on the other side of this example that TK shows us has ever built the device in the proper configuration. Why? Because they could never build it with what they are taught because they know little of the teachings of Tesla. Only what the system teaches them. They will never build a working device because their thinking is trapped in that box. When some of us try to re-educate the ones interested they quickly step in and throw everything they can to discredit the re-educators. They throw all kinds of math and book taught theories at us expecting us to ignor whats in front of our eyes.
 
Most of these people still believe in the electron. Well to be honest that is something that never will be seen but yet they believe with all that they are that it still exists because that is what they are taught as young explorers of this field. It's like the chain and rope example. Not true but yet held as truth because it is all that they know. The belief in the electron is most unscientific. It goes against everything they are taught yet they still believe.
 
 Now I see that most colleges have corporate sponsorship???? WTF... Injstead of doing this through peer manipulation they are now getting directly involved with tightning the chain. This is most unacceptable in my opinion. When are we gonna say enough is enough? When are we gonna listen to the ones who show us it is possible?
 
 TK did what he did because he didn't have this teaching telling him it was impossible. He learned from the one source that also self taught himself by example. Tesla.
 
 This is not hero worship in fact the ones hero worshiping is Verpies and the others who admire Einstien and the rest who chained them into thinking that nothing is for free when in fact there are processes out there that do not run with wires and sources of current. Natures does not have a bill for you to pay. The price for a water fall has already been payed and is free for the taking. The waterfall would still run just as well without thier input and does so till this moment in time. We just need to recconize the systems in play and learn to intercept them and harness that power for our own uses.
 
 I'm sorry for the long drawn out post but I think we have to start looking at what is wrong in this picture and I hope this is a better description of the problems we face in the free energy field..

segar

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15842 on: February 02, 2013, 05:23:13 PM »
hi, FreeEnergyInfo

actually to post its simple, but must have proof and reason ,but when see the your circuits ,its not free energy and also its largest loses power will happens, the reason is input DC and change to AC back again, this is the big loses in the circuits shows.
all is direct switching element , have to consider its not correct solution to do experiments.

thank you   

jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15843 on: February 02, 2013, 05:47:06 PM »
Tesla's impulse technology:
 
http://www.4shared.com/video/gGAKnsmi/Energy_From_The_Vacuum_Part_07.html

 That is exactly what I have been trying to relate. To the letter. Although the method is very different then TK's it is the same non the less.
 
 In TK's method the ground is the source of charges. In bedini's method it uses batteries to strengthen or condense the energy. Thats the difference between silicon vs. spark gap. Silicon=weaker, spark gap is much stronger. Batteries use ions and TK's method uses charges in the ground matter.

 In the video you can see Bedini still stumbling with the explanation he is presenting. This is because he still hasn't gotten the total picture but he is very close now. Even Tesla didn't have the total picture and relates that we the future generations were left to devise the total picture. If we can get past all the name calling and degrading comments we just might be able to figure this out. It is gonna take a new understanding of nature and the nature of objects in our environment to fully figure this thing out. Fields play heavily in this new view. Both the electric and subsiquent magnetic fields need to be explored fully before this understanding can mature.

 Resonance also has a deeper meaning as well. Not only do we need to work with resonance in electric ways we must also work with resosnace in mass and this is key. Division of that mass determines the outcome as well which I suspect has to do with surface area of an exposed mass to the field.

 Lets look at this reference: http://intuitor.com/resonance/circuits.html

 Ignore everything but this statement:
" Note in figure 7 that we have put a resistor back in the circuit. If there is no resistor in the circuit the current's amplitude will increase until the circuit burns up. Increasing resistance tends to decrease the maximum size of the current's amplitude but it does not change the resonant frequency. "

As I have stated before higher voltage low currents do not react the same way as lower voltage higher currents do with resistances. In fact the higher voltages act like the resistance is nil or not even there. And this is the key! Now can we figure a way to extract the amplitude at a precise level and dump the excess before the ciruit burns up and power a load by converting the very high voltage to low voltage high current in our load?

Jon_sparky

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 31
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15844 on: February 02, 2013, 10:49:56 PM »
Outstanding post!  too bad about the elephants  ;)


 
Has anyone thought about why they got rid of the power station at niagra? It was free and after many years paid for the equipment that was installed there." ...

I'm sorry for the long drawn out post but I think we have to start looking at what is wrong in this picture and I hope this is a better description of the problems we face in the free energy field..

Farmhand

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1583
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15845 on: February 03, 2013, 11:33:27 AM »
Farmhand

Please don't mess people in heads ! Power is all we need, but SUSTAINED power , not a power burst but continuos power magnification and this is what Tesla did and if you carefully read that (and other ) patents you will surely agree with me. ONLY REAL POWER can generate various effects he described in his lectures., if that was only HV or high frequency he would never use the term : magnification.
You touched the truth saying he had HUGE reactive power in his circuit - yes, indeed. And he knew how to convert it into usable effects and that's all what we need....


Here I want to mark something which may sound silly for you : I believe in RCL resonant circuit power is always real until disturbed. Like a soap bubble - nice look but you do not touch it

I'm trying to help, I can just as easily not try to help. But I don't do it just for you, I do it so an ever increasing number of people do not pick up the same misconceptions. When we see a spark or arc that is real power yes, but the accumulation of energy which enabled the high potentials to produce the effect is oscillating power. The real output power is what goes out of the system, the oscillating power stays in the system, oscillating. The real input power is the power that replaces losses and the actual output so as to maintain the high power oscillations, so that the output effects can be had. Depending on how the circuit is arranged some of the oscillating power could become reactive power and go back to the source. There are many different situations which could occur with different circuits. The addition of a de-q-ing diode can stop energy returning to the source of a DC powered system and so eliminate reactive power even though the oscillating power is still there. The way I see it the oscillating power in an L/C tank is not necessarily reactive power, it's active power or activity and it's all in the system until it leaks off as radiation (losses) or is taken as a load, then it is real output power.

Cheers

elementSix

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 350
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15846 on: February 04, 2013, 04:14:47 AM »
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsS0BeVeIwM    Karl Palsness AEPC 2009

These 10 videos are mainly on Tesla Hairpin circuit, but they have some good remakes of Tesla HF transformer that is specially made and when powered up it draws large amounts of Ambient Energy to it.  He says that in the dark you can see the wire coil he holds up in the Air, light up a bit and you can see the energy going toward the HF Coil. Watch it and lets try to make this special HF coil..

garrypm

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 53
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15847 on: February 04, 2013, 07:37:00 AM »
Hi
 
I wonder if TK was simply looking for a way to slow down power meters ?
 
Just got my bill - over $800 for the quarter!
 
Search net for tricks to "slow" power meters and came across this -
"The 'meter running backwards when welding' thing is a real phenomenon but it's only a factor with 3 phase installations and a welder across just 2 phases (huge assymetrical loads and rotten power factors).  The distributors have an answer for that one unfortunately, they fit meters with detents that prevent the disk running in reverse."
 
Will now dig a bit deeper. Interesting how you need 3 phase eh.
 
Garry
 
 

zcsaba77

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15848 on: February 04, 2013, 02:11:18 PM »
hi

can someone translate second picture, please from this page:
http://www.freeenergylt.narod2.ru/anonimus_free_energy/

thanks

Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15849 on: February 04, 2013, 03:50:24 PM »
"The 'meter running backwards when welding' thing is a real phenomenon but it's only a factor with 3 phase installations and a welder across just 2 phases (huge assymetrical loads and rotten power factors).  The distributors have an answer for that one unfortunately, they fit meters with detents that prevent the disk running in reverse."
A backward running meter due to a connected welder (if this story is true) indicates that the welder produces electric energy and wants to feed it back into the grid (like a solar panel does), therefore the meter runs backwards. Now when the distributor prevents this by fitting the meter with a detent then actually he acts illegally because he steals the energy generated by the welder without paying for it. :D 8)

So, how to replicate the function of a welder without actually welding something? How to »rot« the power factors with just coils, capacitors and thyristors? Ideas?

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15850 on: February 04, 2013, 04:58:00 PM »
ha ha of course  ;D Kapanadze invented magic way to slow down every meter around - it's called hucpa field  ;D ;)

you better stop before LMAO

Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15851 on: February 04, 2013, 06:00:30 PM »
Interesting welder schematics anyway.

Transformers, capacitors, diode bridges and SCR's connected in a mysterious way. Hmmm ...

Maybe one of them is Kapanadze scheme. ::)

Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4135
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15852 on: February 04, 2013, 06:22:35 PM »
Interesting welder schematics anyway.

Transformers, capacitors, diode bridges and SCR's connected in a mysterious way. Hmmm ...

Maybe one of them is Kapanadze scheme. ::)

Maybe TK was a welder  ;)

elementSix

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 350
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15853 on: February 04, 2013, 09:45:32 PM »
I am sure other people have noticed this, but I like to see what others think.  TK said during his experaments that he would not let people, Like A.King21's team, test the temp. with a sensor because it would reveal his secret.  This could be BullShit but lets follow it up.  Cold Electricity is what I get from that statement.  I have also noticed that when someone demonstrates a real working device, be it what ever version that uses radian energy.  I have noticed in certain light that the bulb produces a long straight up and down purple tinted blue beam.  I have seen it in some of TK's videos and others like the link below,  that is on Cold Electricty.  I don't know anything about the subject at the moment.  So I am going to learn what I can about it. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=0MchjJy1GOs

It is interesting that in the GB video, the camera man pans to the welder in the garage.  I believe that it in the 2Kw version also, but I might be mistaken.  He could be using something out of that welder for HV or HF application. 

zcsaba77

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15854 on: February 04, 2013, 10:47:25 PM »
I am sure other people have noticed this, but I like to see what others think.  TK said during his experaments that he would not let people, Like A.King21's team, test the temp. with a sensor because it would reveal his secret.  This could be BullShit but lets follow it up.  Cold Electricity is what I get from that statement.  I have also noticed that when someone demonstrates a real working device, be it what ever version that uses radian energy.  I have noticed in certain light that the bulb produces a long straight up and down purple tinted blue beam.  I have seen it in some of TK's videos and others like the link below,  that is on Cold Electricty.  I don't know anything about the subject at the moment.  So I am going to learn what I can about it. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=0MchjJy1GOs

It is interesting that in the GB video, the camera man pans to the welder in the garage.  I believe that it in the 2Kw version also, but I might be mistaken.  He could be using something out of that welder for HV or HF application.

this is interesting   ???, what is this 'laser drive'?