So why should he do that if this behavior is just due to a hidden battery in the faked device?
What if this device simply does not behave like an ordinary transformer, therefore the output voltage stays constant regardless of the load (at least up to a certain point)?
Just considering all possibilities ...

Even hidden batteries would not provide constant output voltage regardless of the load.

Constant voltage reading can be achieved with very low source impedance, faked measurement or active regulation.
I'm also considering all possibilities.

Did you know? Batteries are obsolete since 1985:

Free energy TPU (Steve Marks) part1
Free energy TPU (Steve Marks) part2

That's one more thing to consider.

A thing is only made obsolete if there is something to replace it that is proven to work better.
Where is the something better to replace batteries ?

Batteries are different to any "active circuit" device because they provide a stable dipole and can be made very small for many many different uses.
Using a double A battery to power a small transistor radio is very convenient. What beats that ?

Charge the batteries with solar energy it's free.

You could say batteries have been obsolete since the grid became available to people, but even with the grid people use batteries for convenience.

When the grid power goes out here the only thing that concerns me is the food in the freezer. and how long the power will be out.
I have 6 x 70 aH batteries and about 100 Watts of panels, I have one 800 Watt inverter that can run inductive loads.
As long as I can keep my food cold and run a light, I'm happy. If the grid went off tomorrow and never came back on I would find a way to survive.
I also have a fuel generator but I don't like to use it because it is noisy.

In my opinion we all should already have a plan in place in case the grid fails and never comes back on line. 

I'm lucky, if worst comes to worst I can light a fire to cook food and keep warm, I keep livestock so I can feed myself and others as well.
Everyone should have chickens if it's possible and those who can keep them should fight for the right to keep a rooster,
screw the complainers about the noise, it's a national security issue.

What annoys me is there is supposedly an energy crisis and yet look at all the fancy lights at night by the big consumers who get thier energy cheap.
Shopping centers, C a s i n o ' s and such. Our entire society is geared to the increased use of electrical energy and increased waste of all things.

Advertising and consumerism needs to have a war waged on it. Frugality and conservation should be rewarded rather than laughed at.

eg. I know of a motorcycle retailer who when a bike battery goes flat he discards it and claims it back on tax because it is the easiest thing for him to do and it is allowed.
the battery might be only used once or twice to start the bike for customers. No skin off his nose it costs him nothing. This is the kind of thinking that is the ruination of all things.

Cheers

In contrast, a reddened heating element has its own physical delay time for the element to start cooling off so you have a greater dead time potential without you noticing any visual flickering of the element. This means you can turn on and off a heating element 10 times per second and that element will remain a steady red color. It will never be full red because there is no 50Hz but the difference in redness from 50Hz to 10 Hz will not be 1/5th but maybe 3/5th because of the physical delay. Also, they never plugged the heater directly into the means socket so you are not able to make the real visual comparison. So whatever you see in the element brightness you will consider as normal because you have no real basis to compare.

Power is proportional to the duty cycle, not the frequency.  10Hz waveform will deliver the same power to the filament as the same waveform at 50Hz.
The 1sec. integration time provided by the heater's filament, will prevent any flicker above 1Hz.
Charging capacitor by the hidden wire does not prevent heating of that wire.

With, this explanation you just had outdone yourself.  It makes little sense and is scientifically incorrect.

The Ockham's Razor principle points in the direction of high voltage in the hidden wire.  This is easy to generate with a step-up transformer.

In reply to the bollox postings by some members.
If you were putting mains into the aq2 via the braid you would be brain dead to put it next to a
water source. (drain)
TK's patent CLEARLY shows the earth connected to the output load.
Therefore wattsup's analysis that the earth braid  goes to a live wire is absolutely correct and
CONFIRMS TK's patent.
The heater was 2 kwatts.
The output was verified by the team members there as they could feel the intense heat.
Posters should understand Tesla's later electricity (which is different from what is in the books) before posting.
TK CLEARLY shows in his patent that he is using Tesla's switching methods, which Tesla sometimes calls
a circuit controller.
I suggest that contributors analyse TK's patent before commenting irrationally.
TK put the output into a heater because I asked him to. I wanted to ensure that the
output was real, as lights can be faked. Heat can not.

I would see this the other way round. It looks to me as if wattsup is on the payroll of the oil industry and this thread is very close to the solution - much too close in fact.

Step up voltage means what to you, 1 million volts? Man we are talking step-up by 2, 3 or 4, not by 100. No special wire is required for that. Actually, the exact thinner wire is required.

You seem to equate very heavily that if this or that person is faking OU, then OU does not exist. You have to absolutely believe that someone else has achieved OU before you can believe it is possible. Why? Why can't you just believe that OU is possible. Possible regardless if one guy or another guy winds up faking it. Why should the veracity of OU rest on any one persons shoulders. Did I say OU is impossible? No I did not. I know deep down to my bones that OU is possible and have always believed and worked towards that. Just because I don't have OU yet, it does not mean it does not exist. It also does not mean guys like SM or TK have to be real for me to discover it for myself. They can be fakes while we are the real guys doing the real works to discover it. That's what doing better means.

You are so wrong but no problem man. If this is what you really think then I will leave this thread and sorry for the trouble. So good luck with your TK and SM quest.

So last message goes to....

@a.king21

I know what you are saying and realize that the heat cannot be faked but do you actually know how much heat a 2000 watts heater will produce when connected straight to the 220 vac mains, to then compare it with the actual heat produced via the Aq2 demo. I doubt any human can do that comparison without actually doing the real comparison and not by sensing only the Aq2 heater. They should have used two identical heaters, one on the demo unit and one on the mains each with a thermometer placed 1 foot away. This would have given you the real data. But even then, had you demanded in advance that a second heater be used as comparison, knowing TK, he would have placed a type of resistance inside the second heater that when plugged into the wall socket would match the heat of the Aq2. So you would need to take apart both heaters to make sure they are identical and even open up the wall socket. These guys have no limits.

Also, the white wire is not an illusion, it is there and it is going under the cement block and they probably used some heat shrink on it. Also, why would the guy take the trouble of covering the cement block with a wooden plank and a brick if there was only a ground wire there. Did they cover up the water pipe in the Green Box with all those countless people moving around?

I don't know why you guys are here. Are you here to discover the reality because I didn't invent it, I only observed it and only after 1020 pages or so. Better late then never I guess. TK is the one who made those devices not me. I understand you want to believe they are real but what is the difference between real and not real when all you seek is the truth of the matter based on what they did.

The main point here is flagrant. Anyone that is content on doing videos and demos for hire that purport OU are just simple fakes. There is no other answer that could fall into any realm of logic. You can rationalize that there are valid excuses, investment, time, caused family troubles, MIB, etc., is just kidding you with stories man.

Anyone thinking they can invent OU and make a business of it while holding it a secret or giving it to one company is just fooling themselves. This is not your regular new product launch that you can decide which distribution channels you will use. It does not work that way man. OU is only possible if it is given to the world for free. FREE. Free does not mean the world will not recognize your gift, but once given free, there is no stopping it to grow and the inventor will grow with it more then if he was stuck in an office trying to make sales calls. Keep it a secret and there is only one guy to stop and game over.

The reason is simple. If you invent OU, for some, you will be the greatest hero, but for others, you will be the greatest foe. That is the normal and natural truth. Give the device to the USA and Russia will get mad, give it to Japan and China will stomp, give it to Christians and Muslims will go mad with rage. Give it to General Electric and Westinghouse will get mad, do anything you want besides giving it simultaneously to the world and there will be some powerful guy somewhere that will get really pissed off that you did not give it to them as well. Try and patent it and you will thereafter be stuck in commercial limbo.

There are surely many ways to achieve OU, but there is only one way to let is flourish and that is to give it to the world with no strings attached. Try and put a string on it to hold and it will burn your hands. It's about time guys got that through their heads.

So any bimbo saying they have OU and will keep it a secret can only be one thing, liar and cheat, as well as being a major waste of time, money and orientation.

@a.king21, the only real good thing your guy took on the video is the cement block. Besides that, all his video is totally useless. We had more information from the pictures that were posted. So the guy that went to see TK was not up to par for the task. That happens but you always know after the fact.

Before you sent your guy to see TK, if you would have come here and indicated your intentions and methodology, we could have helped you fine tune it as fail safe, and because of that, if you then gave that criteria to TK, I am sure he would have refused to do the demo. That would have saved you some bucks and clarified the matter right there.

TK greatest phrase "No I will not do that because it will give out my secret", is exactly how he locks you into his game and pulls you out of your game. And should you then still accept, well you lose, he wins.

Also, I am even sure you must have had more criteria but you are not telling us what they were and if TK refused them. That would clarify matters even more because if you then accepted to go ahead and pay him anyways, then you must accept full responsibility for your loses. Just answer this one question that I will read but no longer post here. Why did you send someone to see TK or what were your interests in such a deal? Reality has a way of coming back to bite you. That's what I get from all of this drama.

Anyways, forget it.

wattsup

PS: Time to open a new category for real OU research.

Except that a hidden high voltage wire needs to be thick because of the thick insulation

Wrong. Even a regular copper enameled wire with thin film insulation can withstand many kilo Volts before breaking down.
See here.

what else could be the reason for one to over and over repeat that something is a proven fake without any real evidence but assumptions based on blurry images and in doing so risking his reputation? If one thinks TK is completely fake then why not just leaving this forum silently?

Maybe because Wattsup is really pissed off at TK for wasting his precious time and resources.  He's not a spring chicken AFAIK.

...
What are your thoughts about the Mustafa circuit. I tried it but not even a nudge on the secondary. Must be because of they way the C1 capacitor is placed.

Yes, Mustafa circuit has a working potential.
At least, it should be possible to efficiently transfer power from P1 to P2 (see below).
It does not mean though that any two transformers connected through a 60 uF capacitor will transfer power efficiently from P1 to P2.
To accomplish this, the circuit (L2+L3)C1 has to resonate at 50 or 60 Hz (depending on the grid frequency). This means that C1 has to be adjusted (tuned). Induced  resonant oscillations in this circuit are biasing the core of the transformer T2.
However, there is more to this schematic than initially meets the eye.
Transformer T2, depending on it's shape and core cross-section, is just another possible implementation of the arrangement from Michel Meyer patent CZ 284,333. In here,  L3 provides magnetic biasing and magnetic modulation and L4 serves as a pick-up coil and supplies RF excitation, when pulsed either by a spark-gap or a thyristor. The detailed working principle of this kind of an arrangement has already been described by McFreey.
Induced transmutation of the core material in transformer T2 may provide additional energy. It does not mean though that any two transformers will do the trick.
The circuit, depending on implementation, has a working potential.

Did I say OU is impossible? No I did not. I know deep down to my bones that OU is possible and have always believed and worked towards that. Just because I don't have OU yet, it does not mean it does not exist. It also does not mean guys like SM or TK have to be real for me to discover it for myself. They can be fakes while we are the real guys doing the real works to discover it. That's what doing better means.

And if we discover OU then why should this OU device by chance not look like that of TK or SM? As far as I can imagine electric OU can only be achieved by connecting some electric components together like coils, capacitors, semiconductors, but not by using a brick or piece of wood or a candle etc. If OU is possible then I can see no physical evidence so far why the TK or SM devices are not real. Just because they keeping their secrets? If I discover OU maybe I will keep my secret as well. In this point I do not even trust myself. If people are willing to pay me 1000$ half a day for demonstrating the device to them, then how do I know for sure whether or not I could resist that offer (instead of giving it away freely)?

Wrong. Even a regular copper enameled wire with thin film insulation can withstand many kilo Volts before breaking down.
See here.

But only if the enameled wire is not mechanically damaged. Means it would be a bad choice to put an enameled wire on the floor and use it like an extension cord, even with surrounding braid.

But, you don't really need to get into the details of power transfer via a hidden wire.  Once the presence of concealed wire is proven, there are many many different ways it can be used to transfer power.

And maybe that's the reason why this thread is going on and on without result. Because instead of figuring out the principle of work of the device if it is real, half of the effort goes in figuring out the principle of work of an unproven fake.

BTW: I have found wattsup's missing  5th wire. It shows up right in the other wattsup image. Five wires in, five wires out, no fake visible. Isn't that good news?

Hence if there is something wrong here, then it is surely not the connection of the Kapanadze device.

That's just my two cents for the next day.