Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16404212 times)

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15390 on: December 19, 2012, 05:25:44 PM »
  What is interesting is that in the backyard video the run time when the battery is disconnected is always shorter than when it is running on the battery.  Stivep's demo of the ability of a resonant circuit to "store" power same way.  First thing I noticed.  This ability of a resonant circuit to store energy is a good thing.  You can convert highfrequency low wattage into low frequency high wattage.  A small event happening millions of times a second can power a large event happening 60 times a second.  My little transistor radio tuned to noise keeps on blinking an led once in a while.  Acts as a scource of inspiration.

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15391 on: December 19, 2012, 05:39:56 PM »
TK faked all of his devices and just finding one is enough to disqualify all of them. You can't fake one and all of a sudden really discover OU.
So was Stevep or Wesley and his team also duped by TK?   
They seemed the most competent investigators and even the most rudimentary due diligence should have discovered any external supply of power to TK's tubular devices.

Anyway,  can we get back to the YOKE DEVICE, now?

Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4135
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15392 on: December 19, 2012, 06:37:56 PM »
happyness may only come from our inner selves.
Nature holds no hoaxes for you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrMJwIedrWU

peace wattsup brother

What a wonderful film !!

Thanks for posting the link.

Hoppy

Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15393 on: December 19, 2012, 07:40:26 PM »
So all these wanna-be's that hold their secrets should all be thrown in the trash
Including Tesla. >:(

Regards

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15394 on: December 19, 2012, 11:56:38 PM »

Little of topic:
But also a little of entertainment of different sort


While I was looking into DC motor 5Hp driven by separate
Motor -Generator in one cylindrical body using smaller exciter for field weekending procedure ( with  rehostat)
I have got puzzled.
I was trying to find connection  between  TK  rotary concept too.
There is definitely something in it How about if playing   with fields is done dynamically?


one  of the comments:


Quote
The tach-ometer --//-- is a magnetic eddy current type similar to car speedometers of the period the 10EE was designed. A permanent magnet is spun inside an aluminum cup, it induces eddy currents in the aluminum cup which create magnetic fields in the cup that interact with the spinning permanent magnet's field.

Long story short: the torque induced on the cup is proportional to the rpm of the spinning magnet. The cup torque acts against a spiral hairspring connected to the cup and indicating needle, the spring torque and induced cup torque come to balance at a fixed input speed and the needle is steady.
How about if tachometer is used as back-loop in TK motor

Quote
40-50 years ago speedometer shops were common, now not so. Some specialty shops are still around that can recalibrate and make a new dial for your old tach. They mostly cater to auto and motorcycle restoration folks. Your work will be unique to most, they'll need to know input rpm to indicated rpm (not the same). Be prepared to pay a fair price for the work.
http://emph.com.ua/11/pdf/fowler.pdfhttp://www.findpatent.ru/patent/246/2460200.html


http://www.freepatentsonline.com/2922942.pdf


http://www.lathes.co.uk/monarch/page2.html


http://www.practicalmachinist.com/vb/monarch-lathes/10ee-ward-leonard-system-detailed-99923/



This video shows specific information I have never found on you tube in regards toMonarch10ee [/size]Motor conversion and concept of original work done by manufacturer.
First Days with Monarch Part#2. - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJNTpM0gXkU


THANK's to Friend from mech forum who shared with me his personal experience and presented his successful modification.
Completing mechanical part of lab.
Arunas  has taken approach with mechanical concept of
LEEDSKALNIN.COMa: MAGNETIC CURRENT RESEARCH
Aidas Friend helped him to make  mechanical disc for it.










I got help from Japan in
http://www.rexresearch.com/colman/colman.htm
Otto Sabliaric in December 2009 says about importance of the metal that interacts in his TPU
http://purco.qc.ca/ftp/Overunity.com%20-%20Forum%20members/otto/ottos-open-tpu/ottotpu.pdf


http://www.nuenergy.org/pdf/GB763062.pdf


http://www.hendershotgenerator.com/files/pdf/hendershot_book.pdf


All of the elements ( metals) he mentioned  could be found in  ferrite but now composition of Colman glass tubee could be done with  XYZ NMR environment.
That might correspond to Lithuania  Experiment but at Colman setup.










I have got  few coil winders and when mechanical shop asked me  to pay $300 for making one pulley I simply protested and with  help of some friends
I was able to get the best ever made in the history of USA tool-room lathe  from 1949 still better than any of Chinese import.
This  machine is considered to be Rolls Royce   of lathes even  English man would be proud of.


The man who sold the lathe to me  did  it at incredibly low price 1.5k  transport included.He got it for free from Ammunition Manufacturer.
Few words from the man. "Wesley  please G.T.B.T.B. if you can with your friends as soon as you can guys. So help you God."




Wesley











qwekw

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15395 on: December 20, 2012, 12:48:42 AM »
maybe tk coil is this configuration

Khwartz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 601
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15396 on: December 20, 2012, 01:36:42 AM »
There is no point for discussing possible hoax in this thread  >:( If you don't believe TK device is real then fine, but inventing more and more conspiracy theories wouldn't help.
Only truth, help! And knowing what doesn't it's alredy knowing more on what could work :)

Khwartz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 601
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15397 on: December 20, 2012, 01:46:03 AM »
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=guWga5Q6Dxo

Power supply 220 through a step-down transformer. As I plan to use a current transformer toroidal transformer 220/12, with the winding 220 is closed and only use 12 volt coil.

Efficiency determined by the total power in VoltAmperah (and I think it is right, no matter who said it took into account not only the active power without reactive). Ie this is simply multiplied by an ordinary tester readings taken in volts input and output on the amps input and output.

At Stepanova video output was about 9000 VA and input about 3300 VA. Ie Efficiency in his case, it was 272%. What is written on the "machine" is a 1000% efficiency on the active power that I think is wrong because it does not include the reactive power.
Based on the testimony of a video Stepanova in English, the resonance set is not very exact, because the proportion of reactive power at the input is large enough. Power factor is approximately 1264/3322 = 0.38.
Wow! So happy to see that someone here cares about to differentiate reactive power, direct one and power factor.

Indeed, with so many capacitors and coils, your Amps and Volts can go "zero" while still huge unphased current, so completely fack the ratio of efficiency, IMO.

Cheers, Khwartz. 

Khwartz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 601
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15398 on: December 20, 2012, 02:28:03 AM »
  What is interesting is that in the backyard video the run time when the battery is disconnected is always shorter than when it is running on the battery.  Stivep's demo of the ability of a resonant circuit to "store" power same way.  First thing I noticed.  This ability of a resonant circuit to store energy is a good thing.  You can convert highfrequency low wattage into low frequency high wattage.  A small event happening millions of times a second can power a large event happening 60 times a second.  My little transistor radio tuned to noise keeps on blinking an led once in a while.  Acts as a scource of inspiration.
I don't think so! But I better think that, as I said to Stivep: ordinary meters are not good for high frequencies and need to care about the power factor (as just stated before).

The power remains the integral of the curves (Amps & Voltage): with a same maximum voltage, if you increase the frequency, you increase the power of consumption in a resistive/linear load. If you low the frequency, you low the wattage too. But in coils, I think it could have a great risk that you can increase the power factor and "no more see" some Amps.

For E.M. O.U. R&D, 4 entries oscilloscopes with caring of the reactive power looks to me the minimum required.

Cheers, Khwartz.

elementSix

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 350
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15399 on: December 20, 2012, 04:07:53 AM »
WOW, MagnaCoaster has finally shipped out a bunch of orders.  How about that.  I mean 4 years to get the "kinks" out.  Or they were buys shitty Chinese parts. They are using huge magnets and specially positioned coils, using Quantum Tunneling effects for the power increase. 

http://pesn.com/2012/06/11/9602107_Rasas_Zero_Point_Institute_Announces_Emerging_Generators_Galore/

For those of you into Ionizing air energy, theres a video of a de-ionizing generator.  Doesn't show much thoe..

Thanks for the Link, BASE.  Does anyone else think the translator sounds sexy??

bass

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15400 on: December 20, 2012, 08:59:22 AM »
People are amazing creatures. They were told that "it works"  they are looking for how it works. They were told that "it does not work" they stop to looking for.  :)

27Bubba

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 177
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15401 on: December 20, 2012, 01:51:32 PM »
"WOW, MagnaCoaster has finally shipped out a bunch of orders.  How about that.  I mean 4 years to get the "kinks" out.  Or they were buys shitty Chinese parts. They are using huge magnets and specially positioned coils, using Quantum Tunneling effects for the power increase. "

Give a year, and then look for the feedback. The real truth will come out eventually..

Jack Noskills

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 346
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15402 on: December 20, 2012, 03:09:49 PM »
I think I have figured it out, how to take power from tank circuit without destroying resonance. First we need to understand why resonance is destroyed in a trafo when power is taken. Most of you know the answer to this question, secondary induces energy to primary (back EMF) which causes inductance to change which in turn moves system out of steady state/resonance and more current will flow. Utkin explains how shorting a secondary has no effect on primary side and it is true, but you need to have high freqency so less wire is needed for coil and DC resistance is zero. All power circulating when secondary is shorted but the second you put the power through resistance balance is destroyed.
 
So this fact made me think that solution is to create a second back EMF that is the exact opposite of the first one. When they meet in the primary they will cancel each other out and resonance is not destroyed. Reactive power into real power. There needs to be two primaries and two secondaries, so atleast two cores are needed. First primary is CW in first core and second primary is CCW in second core, secondaries can be what ever. Their poles need to be connected correctly so that output power does not cancel. I have stuff available and I can do some high frequency experiments to seek for resonance easily.
 
I have done three core test using grid almost a year ago, and I was able to get 200 watts out using 100 watts but it was too low power and it did not have resonance. But before going into new experiments, I want to ask what do you think about the idea in general ? Has anyone done any experiments like this ?
 
Anyone laughing yet, lol ? Sparks will ruin this as cancellation needs to be exact, so don't think this has anything to do with TK.

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15403 on: December 20, 2012, 03:50:56 PM »
I think I have figured it out, how to take power from tank circuit without destroying resonance. First we need to understand why resonance is destroyed in a trafo when power is taken. Most of you know the answer to this question, secondary induces energy to primary (back EMF) which causes inductance to change which in turn moves system out of steady state/resonance and more current will flow. Utkin explains how shorting a secondary has no effect on primary side and it is true, but you need to have high freqency so less wire is needed for coil and DC resistance is zero. All power circulating when secondary is shorted but the second you put the power through resistance balance is destroyed.
 
So this fact made me think that solution is to create a second back EMF that is the exact opposite of the first one. When they meet in the primary they will cancel each other out and resonance is not destroyed. Reactive power into real power. There needs to be two primaries and two secondaries, so atleast two cores are needed. First primary is CW in first core and second primary is CCW in second core, secondaries can be what ever. Their poles need to be connected correctly so that output power does not cancel. I have stuff available and I can do some high frequency experiments to seek for resonance easily.
 
I have done three core test using grid almost a year ago, and I was able to get 200 watts out using 100 watts but it was too low power and it did not have resonance. But before going into new experiments, I want to ask what do you think about the idea in general ? Has anyone done any experiments like this ?
 
Anyone laughing yet, lol ? Sparks will ruin this as cancellation needs to be exact, so don't think this has anything to do with TK.

Jack oh Jack.... ;D Now you know. It's all because of Lenz law which is magnetic interaction. If we imagine magnetic fields like magnets there is very hard to set, position when all magnetic fields are counteracted and there is no resistance to movement... The setup/ embodiment can be various shaped. Working on slightly different setup  right now....

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #15404 on: December 20, 2012, 06:04:55 PM »
  Tesla did patent a power distribution scheme that I find interesting.   Basically the plan was to excite local tank circuits where the inductance was a stepdown transformer and in parallel with a capacitor.  The input to the tank was from a high voltage power scource.  The load was fed from the ringdown of the local tanks which were set into oscillation by low duty cycle high voltage pulses back at the power scource.  This is a really confusing patent as he mentions that a return wire is not shown yet the power scource capacitor is connected to the load tank via two conductors interrupted by a spark gap.  I believe Tesla used his spark gaps as variable capactiors more than actual conductors.  As the plasma grows from each contact it is like a moving set of points getting closer  or screwing the plates together on the variable capacitors you find in old radio receivers.  The plasma still carrys the charge state of the load and line circuits but the electric field emanating from the plasma leader starts effecting the load and line circuits without actual current bridging the contacts.