Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16404373 times)

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #14145 on: September 26, 2012, 09:05:19 PM »
;D
The TK says it's a simple thing to make people laugh then we try to make us laugh this,
we see the device 2004, about 350 watt transformer and the secondary suppose to give
12 volts then the output current is 29 amp, 220 volt input to the 1.6 amp current will be less
than about 1 amp feedback 0.5 ampere is the current measured in consumption.

 Suppose that TK was able to discover a method to mix the 220 ​​volt with 12 volt 29 amps,
232 volts and obtaining output 30 amps less losses, the problem would be solved.

 Are you okay? no I do not know any method of mixing 220 volt and 12 volt 29 amp and
maybe this is the way to solve this puzzle.
 ;D

Leo48


yes,the magic trick.... the dream of every electrician....   ;D I think truth is in plain visible but nobody is interested... hey , that's impossible, right ? ::)

27Bubba

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 177
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #14146 on: September 26, 2012, 09:09:28 PM »
To Anyone:
Also Attached is a picture of the actual setup for the 2 transformer experiment.

I want to try your setup. Can you mark exactly the placement of your scope probes? Thanks.

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #14147 on: September 26, 2012, 09:09:44 PM »
nobody is interested in explaining the underlying princeples of some curious effects.... like Steven Mark said ... we seems to not perceive many effects , accepting the laws we were taught , without questioning....


jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #14148 on: September 26, 2012, 09:13:28 PM »
 This is what I think this transformer is for.


 "Because the primary circuit has no DC connection to the secondary circuit, ground loop noise between the primary and secondary circuits is eliminated. The secondary circuit is able to amplify, filter or otherwise process only the AC signals passed to it through the isolation transformer."[/size]

[/size]
 Most non sine sudo inverters are based on square wave synthesis which has huge spikes on the output if the output filter is bypassed this becomes out of hand. We know he already modified the inverter from the plug he plugs into the wall that goes to the back of the inverter.[/size]

[/size]
 So the output of the inverter is very noisy and this is used to stimulate the grounds into a ground loop type of runaway. The isolation transformer is to prohibit DC coupling and pull the ground loop current back into the control circuitry which would burn it up.[/size]

[/size]
 So one is very clean AC signal and the other is very dirty signal. The isolated signal is then rectified and filtered for the control circuitry While the other AC (Dirty) signal is used for the stimulating signal or what is in the can. [/size]

Black_Bird

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 81
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #14149 on: September 26, 2012, 09:55:05 PM »
@br549

Probably what you are getting is true parametric amplification. The magnets "polarize" the core close to the knee of the magnetization curve. The high voltage pulse forces the core into the low permeability region of the curve ( saturation), changing the inductance of the transformer.

crowclaw

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 327
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #14150 on: September 26, 2012, 11:00:24 PM »
@bass



PS: In the Aq2, we can see two transformers in the back section.

Take a closer look at the top of the left hand transformer in the photo... that appears to be a bridge rectifier with a central mounting bolt, has anybody else noticed?

br549

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #14151 on: September 26, 2012, 11:47:04 PM »
QUOTE: I want to try your setup. Can you mark exactly the placement of your scope probes? Thanks.

27bubba
I used a high voltage probe. It is connected to the wire going to the light bulb. You can also connect a 4 watt light bulb to the unused coil on transformer T1 and get the same effect. The transformers that I used (T1 and T2) are both the same. They have two 120 volt primary's  and one 12 secondary. I just connected T2 backwards.

br549

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #14152 on: September 27, 2012, 12:29:44 AM »
QUOTE form Black_Bird:
Probably what you are getting is true parametric amplification. The magnets "polarize" the core close to the knee of the magnetization curve. The high voltage pulse forces the core into the low permeability region of the curve ( saturation), changing the inductance of the transformer.

Black_Bird: Sounds reasonable:
1. Are you thinking that once the high voltage pulse occurs at the right point on the signwave, the core is
    pushed into saturation, and if another HV pulse occurs at the right point on the signwave, the core
    stays in saturation (as long as the signwave continues to pump it), but if another HV  pulse occurs at
    any other point on the signwave, the core drops out of saturation and the effect stops.   
2. In your opinion, is there a reasonably straightforward test to determine if this is what is occurring.

jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #14153 on: September 27, 2012, 02:37:45 AM »





 I highly doubt the core gets saturated when the HV hits it. HV doesn't have current so to speak. Plus the coil is really a current choke. It's sole purpose is to resist current. All the evidence is pointing to that effect. You could compare the coils effect on current to the flow in a pipe that constricts the flow. With the voltage equaling the speed of the fluid through the pipe which is increasing. The more turn of the wire in the coil the less current wants to flow and the more the voltage gets raised.


 So if you are talking about transients causing the core to saturate I think that is a misnomer in this case.


 I think in this case the magnet raises the cores ability to bounce back after a transient hits it. Like tightening the surface of a trampoline. The tighter the surface the higher it will rebound anything that hits it.


 Here might be a better view of this:
  [size=78%]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atUTu8sg94w[/size]

Vortex1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 518
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #14154 on: September 27, 2012, 02:52:53 AM »
Br549:

What I find interesting about your test setup is the rise in voltage for several cycles does not decay normally but seems to snap to the previous lower level (test #2 image, previous image shows normal decay). It also seems it is reset to the lower level when the pulse possibly hits out of phase with the peak positive, i.e. on the peak negative.

The questions that must be asked:

1) How much energy is transferred by the HV pulse?

2) Does it explain the  number of cycles of increase power to the lamp. (or is it an anomaly)

3) How close is the transformer / capacitor system to resonance? (line resonance or other)

4) Will a hit with just one HV pulse sustain the increase? If not then:

5) Can the HV pulses be gated e.g. with a timer/counter so that pulses only are allowed every "x" number of cycles of resonance, and always at the peak of the waveform rather than random or asynchronous. Conversely the HV pulse generator can be gate triggered only at the positive peak of resonance.

Black_Bird

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 81

wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #14156 on: September 27, 2012, 04:10:34 AM »
@kooler

Thanks for the in. It confirms the choice of stud diodes for the pulse.

@all

Possibly some more out of the box TK thinking. hehehe

In the 2004 device you have two black heat sinks with only TWO WIRES going to each. There is no black wire we cannot see. Only two wires.
 
The closest heat sink component has a wire going to center and another going to the right of center. What could be so off center? The component is square with a center hole to hold it onto the heat sink using a mounting screw. I was wondering what type of component he used and it dawned on me. The square is turned 90 degrees to have one corner point towards the incoming wire pair.

So here is a big question.

If you had a full wave bridge rectifier and could only use two connections that have to be next to each other and provide some useful function along with its second of same, how would you connect it? BIG QUESTION?

The image below is exactly what I think is on the heat sink using only two wires so only two pins of the FWBR are used and they are one next to the other, meaning you cannot use it with opposing connections. The two non used connections were just curled back and left open or one or two of the remaining are grounded to the chassis of the heat sink using the sink metal as a third action, possible. But it is another fwbr.

It is also possible that once the wires of the two heat sinked fwbrs enter the tin can, they are paralleled to double the amperage rating and halve each heat dissipation. Combining both can also be either for simple DC or AC half wave correction.

Hmmmmm.

Very close.

wattsup 

PS: @Black_Bird

Can you please modify your post and put the url length you posted in two or three lines. You long url is stretching out this page and make reading posts more difficult. Thanks.


Black_Bird

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 81
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #14157 on: September 27, 2012, 11:18:43 AM »
@wattsup
@all
Sorry for that. I was not aware that my post caused that. I'll be careful next time.

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #14158 on: September 27, 2012, 11:22:31 AM »
The high voltage pulse forces the core into the low permeability region of the curve ( saturation), changing the inductance of the transformer.
Wait!  Core saturation would not last for several cycles after the pulse.
IMHO the core "remembers" too long that it has been hit with that high voltage pulse.

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #14159 on: September 27, 2012, 11:40:32 AM »
As I said or not .... the solution is in Steven Mark notes....