Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16407435 times)

Dom Tesla

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13650 on: September 01, 2012, 11:20:18 PM »
The main curcuit has to have a resonance frequency of 7,83 Hz. The load is grounded, and connected to the maincurcuit. The earth then resonates to the curcuit and high frequency resonance currents develope.  . The load is the Puller of higherdimensional/Ether energy wich manifests as current. The higher the voltage of the maincurcuit the more electron pull is possible in the same time.

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13651 on: September 02, 2012, 05:37:48 AM »
The main curcuit has to have a resonance frequency of 7,83 Hz. The load is grounded, and connected to the maincurcuit. The earth then resonates to the curcuit and high frequency resonance currents develope.  . The load is the Puller of higherdimensional/Ether energy wich manifests as current. The higher the voltage of the maincurcuit the more electron pull is possible in the same time.
I note what you say. Do you have any experimental evidence to back up your claims? Where did you obtain your information from?

wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13652 on: September 02, 2012, 04:28:29 PM »
@all

OK, now I know it is extremely important not to have an aluminum layer in the coax. It is just totally isolating and cannot work in any way. Standard coax will never do because that aluminum layer is killing the effect.

I pulsed the center conductor with high voltage and got nothing on the shield. Nada. Completely dead. I have done this hundreds of times to know what to expect as a minimal result but the aluminum layer is really bad news. I was sweeping up to 1 mHz and nothing. TKc before and after load to ground and nothing. Regular coax is bad news.

So technically any wire that has a center conductor, a non-conductive insulation layer, then only a shielding wire (without the aluminum sheathing), then an outer layer, will do. That's why the triax cable with the outer layer removed and the first shield wire slid off will provide both the shielding ground wire and the proper coax to wind the TKc.

My local supplier may have a wire that fits the bill (except the shield wire may be straight and not woven) so today I will get some and wind a new one and test again.  If there is a response on the shielding, then I can continue.

Basically the wire TK is using does what? Well you have a center wire that will attract, with the right pulsing, an ether flux around the wire and the outer shielding is catching it. In the regular coax case, it is killing it because the aluminum is just keeping the center wire away from the outer world. (Exactly what it is supposed to do.) This explains why TK was so insistent on getting the right wire. Plus, he probably read SMs best-selling book entitled "Wire is Important". lol (Have to joke around here man).

More basic is that the TKc is a type of transformer with center primary and outer secondary all wound lengthwise. Why not? That is simple enough to understand. This way your coil is not bunched up in a primary first wind layer, and a secondary wind method that are both separate by their wind distances, or even mixed up in a bifilar arrangement. Your wire is wound one single primary lead that is always completely surrounded by the secondary not matter where the wires are located in a winding.

TK made a big mistake when he made the Aq2v, thanks to @a.king21 and gang. This design corners his mystique into well segregated smaller sections (like follow the on/off switches and battery start wires) that can be tested separately. The physical proof is undeniable that his build is one or two ways, but not endless ways like we have thought before.

Just one step forward at a time. Work out the variables and move forward.

wattsup


sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13653 on: September 02, 2012, 05:22:08 PM »
From where come from "Legs" growing ?? From Tesla. Look this Tesla's setup for Lightning bolts (picture attached) !!

From the way Tesla described them, they just seemed to bubble from his machine.

----------------
READ THIS SEVERAL TIMES AND TRY TO UNDERSTAND WHERE COME FROM LEGS GROWING ?

Tesla's "MISSING" chapter 34 - Colorado Springs Notes:

"...it became apparent that the fireballs (read Free Energy) resulted form the interaction of two frequencies, a stray higher frequency wave imposed on the lower frequency oscillations of the main circuit.... This condition acts as a trigger which may cause the total energy of the powerful longer wave to be discharged in a infinitesimally small interval of time and the proportionately tremendously great rate of energy movement which cannot confine itself to the metal circuit and is released into surrounding space with inconceivable violence. It is but a step, from the learning how a high frequency CURRENT can explosively discharge a lower frequency CURRENT (for example 50Hz), to using the principle to design a system in which these explosions can be produced by intent."

    -N. Tesla

Was it a puzzle to us?

Draw an V-I diagram of λ/4 TT. (Secondary Tesla transformer). Draw another V-I diagram of smaller λ/4 TT . (Secondary pick-up Tesla transformer - Tesla bifilar). We have 2 Standing waves here. We need to impose bigger Standing wave on smaller one. How to impose ?? THE BACK EMF is what we need. THE BACK EMF is in fact counter act of AETHER on our disturbance !! BACK EMF is PURE OVERUNITY !! How to utilise tens thousands of stress and many KAmpers of current. The SPARK GAP. Tesla TT isn't EM technology(Vector type of energy flow) but scalar Technology. Tesla tech is Energy transfer without lose. No back scatering, no S-parameters. 100% energy transfer in pure Scalar Transformer. Same Tesla Technology in Floyd Sweet VTA or Stiven Mark TPU or Don Smith's board !! VTA was in fact Secret Nazi Ahnenerbe's project called "Silver Bell".
Extraction energy from AETHER for nazi UFOs. Again "Legs" growing from Tesla. Ottis Car UFO technology - Ottis Tesla's protégée!!

And what about Tariel Kapanadze. He can't be pictured among above mantioned.  I have informations but i can't proof them 100% so i don't public them that TK tech was "come" from some RAN (Russian Academy of science) projects made in Tbilisi from 1970 ...

My advice don't give a money to Kapanadze. Soon (on earth) will be much Free Energy and many FE devices so forget investment to Kapanadze and his "back side" team !!
If you want to make a good job give money to kids orphanage or better buy food (not genetically modified) or computers and give it to kids. Will be much much better than investment in Tariel Kapanadze "secret desease".

ps. I think one kid LIFE is WORTH MUCH than kapanadze life !!

   Tesla at the time of this writing had no idea about electrons.  In an electron cascade event (lightning bolts) a simple conversion of potential energy stored in every atom into kinetic energy is achieved.  In order to trigger an electron cascade event all that is needed is the proper pulse.  The best pulse would be in the ultraviolet light range and repeated at an interval determined by the resonance of your secondary.  The electrons slam into your anode and set the secondary into sloshing or oscillating "to and fro."  The secondary oscillations are then damped by the resistance of the secondary to drive the load. 
  @Dom
     The Schuman resonance describes a piece of coax.  It can be used to transmit elf but it's parameters do not imply there is any large amounts of electromagnetic potential energy scources to be tapped at this frequency.
 

Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13654 on: September 02, 2012, 06:30:33 PM »
Quote
If it did then the coil would dissipate 6.3kW of heat.

these equations are OK but incomplete.

Our whole electrical knowledge is based on magnetic induction (for AC current) - transformers, electric motors, etc, why we omit electrostatic induction. I think, this is a missing part of equations which is not used to this day.
It's time to use it. Some simple equations of mine:

1V on 1Ω = 1A, 1V × 1A = 1W, 78V on 78Ω = 1A, 1A × 78V = 78W, 78V × 9 = 702V, 702V on 78Ω = 9A, 702V × 9A = 6.318KW

As a logical consequence this coil does not dissipate 6.3KW of heat but rather is capable to collect 6.3KW of energy from the environment (ether). The question is, how? Perhaps 6.3KW of BEMF by electrostatic induction?

What we know:

a) The blue coil can't be the source of the 9 amps of current because (at least) of the missing back loop at the output.
b) The 78Ω coil of the transformer can't run 9 amps through it, hence the transformer coil itself must be the source of the 9 amps.
c) One pole of the output (to heater) is connected to ground (like the lamps in 2004 video).

Given the Kapanadze way of secrecy this is pretty much of knowledge so far.

For me BEMF is some kind of magnetic resistance. Question is: for electrostatic have we this kind of resistance (maybe only ordinary resistance, which is negligible for small resistance and is independent from frequency)?
Help me to think, please. Maybe you will have better point of view.
What is magnetic resistance? A resistance of the ether? So BEMF is oscillation of the ether. Could there be a difference in the kind of BEMF whether it is a result of low voltage or of high voltage?

I have this Kapanadze aquarium trans  8)
Could TK foresee this? No (because it is 30 years of age)? So he also couldn't foresee that everybody will know the transformers pin layout. That's a huge advantage.

The blue output cable goes to pin 1 of the 78Ω coil. What is connected to pin 2? Nothing? Or is it shorted with pin 1? Then could it be (lacking a better explanation) that this coil works as a capacitor plate only? The second plate would then be one of the other coils. 50Hz transformer and capacitor made out of one piece? Could this work? Or is this just one more Kapanadze »secret« that never will work?

If someone could provide a higher resolution photo of the area in the red circle, it would be much appreciated ...

we must start thinking self. Not still analysing TK pictures...
Sorry, I can't let it be. :D

Collapsingfield

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 45
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13655 on: September 02, 2012, 06:41:13 PM »
@Zeitmachine and @a.king, this is why I am waiting for the higher resolution video, or parts of it.
Regards
« Last Edit: September 02, 2012, 08:57:32 PM by Collapsingfield »

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13656 on: September 02, 2012, 10:04:06 PM »
1V on 1Ω = 1A, 1V × 1A = 1W, 78V on 78Ω = 1A, 1A × 78V = 78W, 78V × 9 = 702V, 702V on 78Ω = 9A, 702V × 9A = 6.318KW
This is only true for:
1) pure DC, or
2) sinusoidal AC
    a) with current and voltage ideally in-phase, and
    b) measured with rms averaging voltmeter and ammeter, and
    c) measured with voltmeters and ammeters capable of handling the tested frequency.

Are those conditions satisfied in Kapanadze's experiments?

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13657 on: September 02, 2012, 10:08:24 PM »
What is magnetic resistance?
"Magnetic resistance" is called reluctance and is a factor in the Hopkinson's equation.

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13658 on: September 02, 2012, 10:28:19 PM »
Could TK foresee this? No (because it is 30 years of age)? So he also couldn't foresee that everybody will know the transformers pin layout. That's a huge advantage.
I doubt TK could forsee this but he might not even care if the green transformer is just an electro-junk for show.

The best explanation of TK's devices I have read so far (see here) suggests that the big tubular coil is just an output filter and the energy generating component (copper or brass ring/disk) is well hidden in a black box.

According to this article, the rest of the visible components, with non-sensical connections, is just junk designed to mislead the observers.

Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13659 on: September 02, 2012, 11:00:37 PM »
Are those conditions satisfied in the Kapanadze experiments?
If the second pin of the coil is NC then surely the conditions are not satisfied.

I doubt TK could forsee this but he might not even care if the green transformer is just an electro-junk for show.
But the load's only visible connection goes clearly to the »junk«, thus the minimum condition of that »junk« is to conduct the power required by the load. But I can't see how?


yfree

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 143
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13660 on: September 02, 2012, 11:20:14 PM »
I doubt TK could forsee this but he might not even care if the green transformer is just an electro-junk for show.

The best explanation of TK's devices I have read so far (see here) suggests that the big tubular coil is just an output filter and the energy generating component (copper or brass ring/disk) is well hidden in a black box.

According to this article, the rest of the visible components, with non-sensical connections, is just junk designed to mislead the observers.

I am glad you are noticing these things. I expressed a similar view in my Reply #13654.
Although, according to the quoted article, this visible 'junk' may still be useful, only it is not responsible for energy conversion, but fulfills standard functions, like filtering, voltage transformation, rectification or modulation. Of course, there may be some senseless  connections left to spice the game.

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13661 on: September 02, 2012, 11:30:55 PM »
But the load's only visible connection goes clearly to the »junk«, thus the minimum condition of that »junk« is to conduct the power required by the load. But I can't see how?
Neither do I.
9A going through a 70Ω winding would dissipate 5670W in it
9A going through a 0.5Ω winding would dissipate 40W in it, so that's a little more plausible.
9A going through the core metal itself is even more plausible.

If the voltage supplied to the heater is much higher than 230V then the current would be proportionally smaller than 9A for the same power level, but that trick would require a step-down transformer (or inductive buck converter) INSIDE the heater.

isn't a hidden/invisible wire an another possibility on that video?

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13662 on: September 02, 2012, 11:54:59 PM »
I am glad you are noticing these things. I expressed a similar view in my Reply #13654.
Although, according to the quoted article, this visible 'junk' may still be useful, only it is not responsible for energy conversion, but fulfills standard functions, like filtering, voltage transformation, rectification or modulation. Of course, there may be some senseless  connections left to spice the game.
Yes, I share similar views.
I dislike the wording "energy conversion" although it is technically correct as it denotes conversion of nuclear energy into electric energy.
In lieu of it, I would prefer the term "energy generation" despite it being technically incorrect and implying energy from nothing.

The secondary voltage/current conversion is also a form of "energy conversion" that casual readers confuse with the primary "energy conversion/generation" process. 
The output regulation, filtering, rectification and modulation can also be viewed as a form of waveform conversion.

The latter wording just rings better with casual readers.

Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13663 on: September 03, 2012, 12:10:32 AM »
isn't a hidden/ivisible wire an another possibility on that video?
We should ask this the spectators which were on site and watched the event with their own eyes. In blurry images and videos there could always something be hidden.

What about the grounding braid next to the blue cable? If this is a coax cable with removed jacket then there could be a center wire which conducts the current for the load (the prominent blue wire would be fake). This braid goes somewhere from the center of the coil to the black boxes. Can't see this based on these photographs and video footage.

But if all visible parts are fake and the whole real thing is hidden in black boxes, then what's the point in watching these photos and videos anyway? Then we are back to square one, means the 2004 video. >:(

Regards

yfree

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 143
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13664 on: September 03, 2012, 01:03:32 AM »
Yes, I share similar views.
I dislike the wording "energy conversion" although it is technically correct as it denotes conversion of nuclear energy into electric energy.
In lieu of it, I would prefer the term "energy generation" despite it being technically incorrect and implying energy from nothing.
...

Yes, I do not like this term, either. But all we do here is just converting energy from one form to the other. We do generate electric current, for instance. But we would not argue about this here and now.

...
But if all visible parts are fake and the whole real thing is hidden in black boxes, then what's the point in watching these photos and videos anyway? Then we are back to square one, means the 2004 video. >:(

2004 video also has a box.
No, we are not back in square one. Not everything is fake. Watching the available videos carefully and applying logic and physics, we can get very far.
Tracing every connection in the device on the other hand, although sometimes useful too, can proove very misleading. Though, the biggest mistake of ours is disregarding the laws of physics.