Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16406758 times)

00

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13545 on: August 28, 2012, 07:15:22 PM »
Good point - thanks and easy to experiment with this idea.

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13546 on: August 28, 2012, 07:27:22 PM »
a.king

do you have any information if inside TK coil was any core or just air ?

00

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13547 on: August 28, 2012, 07:51:17 PM »


capacitor C2 can be charged either by avramenko or can be pulsed with hvdc through spark gap. the diode must be used after spark gap to pulse charge the cap.

we only have to charge one cap C2 only

TheCell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 285
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13548 on: August 28, 2012, 09:08:55 PM »
It seems to me these are the results achieved by an simulation program.
Anyone tried and would give it thumbs up?

Jon_sparky

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 31
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13549 on: August 28, 2012, 09:13:37 PM »
Re. Coax and cap-coils, what I believe is true is that an "asymetric capacitor" wont work without coax. It is also used in antenna and satellite but also, before WW2, was much more common use, when ambient, radiant or negative electricity was acceptable. So the car radiator IS the electron source, that may be pulled across the resonant circuit, by asymetric capacitor action. I want to see how the Inverter CDI idea ties in with this.

slapper

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 242
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13550 on: August 28, 2012, 11:17:53 PM »
Zeitmaschine and others re Lenz and back emf. THIS IS PRECISELY WHAT JACK NOSKILLS IS UP TO.
That's why I say he is close.

I am very sorry, but as a physicist I have to be blunt.
Lenz law has never been beaten in our part of the Universe.
Back EMF has never produced any extra energy.
However, this does not mean that back EMF cannot be used to invoke phenomena that convert energy from one form to the other. Energy must always come from somewhere. The fact that you do not see the source of energy, only means that the source is well hidden.

This is just a friendly reminder.

although i'm quoting yfree i am interested in anyones take on this video snip'it.

http://youtu.be/HBoZD2y_l6Q

thanks.

nap

Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13551 on: August 29, 2012, 01:10:41 AM »
Another »snip'it«:

Motor Damage - over compensation with CAPs can lead to the circulating currents exceeding the magnetizing current of the motors resulting in self-excitation. With USES®, because of the low correcting currents, there is no possibility of self-excitation or resonance.

Power Factor Improvement

Resonance - with USES® there is no possibility of destructive resonance due to the damping effect of the phase balancing. With CAPs voltage variation is caused by unstable resonances which form in the tank circuits with the motors. Harmonics in the tank circuits can reinforce the resonant frequency and damage connected loads. CAPs have lower impedance at the higher harmonic frequencies allowing larger currents to blow the CAP fuses.

Not to unleash the power of free electric energy is nowadays called »Improvement«!? :o 8) :o 8) :o

yfree

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 143
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13552 on: August 29, 2012, 02:03:32 AM »
...
although i'm quoting yfree i am interested in anyones take on this video snip'it.

http://youtu.be/HBoZD2y_l6Q

thanks.

nap

Good joke. Thank you.
The only other one that compares to this one is a question:
What is heavier, one kg of iron or one kg of feathers?

slapper

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 242
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13553 on: August 29, 2012, 02:31:09 AM »
Good joke. Thank you.
The only other one that compares to this one is a question:
What is heavier, one kg of iron or one kg of feathers?

depends, if there is a magnet in the ground. then if there is an up-draft - all bets are off.

thanks for the response yfree.

take care.

nap


wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13555 on: August 29, 2012, 03:27:32 AM »
@All

Question about the load being a heating element or if the load was a bank of blubs.

As you all have noticed, the spark gap has a definite visual pulsation. Now if the triple transformer was timed to the spark gap, because we all now know the spark gap is on the primary side of the triple transformer, then if the HV output is creating this same pulsation but at a high volts/amps, should we see the heating element pulsate as well. I know if the HV output was timed to the spark gap,and if the load was a bank of bulbs, we should then see those bulbs pulsate. But what about when you use a heating element. If there is a pulsation in the heating element, I am thinking that the element would not have time to react and we would never see that pulsation even though it was present.

So if the spark gap timing is the same as the timing on the tripe transformer primary, then they chose their tank capacitor size to match the best off/on time for the load. If they had only a few bulbs as a load, they could have used a smaller tank capacitor and pulsate faster (faster then we could see) but with less strength. But once you added enough bulbs to equal the watts of the heating element, they would have had to increase the tank capacitor size back to where it was to handle the same load and there we would have seen the bulb pulsating.

Does this sound logical to anyone?

This is important for me to wonder about because this would dictate how the hidden parts of the device would be used in a much simpler manner.

I still have not found a triaxial cable supplier. So now I am more then convince of why TK really needed his wire. They call is coaxial but it it triaxial.

I think his first devices did not have this wire. They must have used similar types of standard coax then gradually migrated to this type because they probably realized it worked the best. Or the best up to now.

wattsup


Free.Energy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13556 on: August 29, 2012, 05:05:50 AM »
So, the TK device does not always start to work straight away and can take up to an day to start working.

This is very interesting.

wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13557 on: August 29, 2012, 06:05:29 AM »
@all

A question about the TKc wire shielding.

When you look at the TKc wires that exit at the top sidewall of the plexiglass, there is an opening in the wire that I showed previously. Is it possible that the TKc wire shielding is connected to the center conductor at that point. This would make the shielding floating at the HV+ side but connected to the end of the coil as it leaves the box. If it is a shielding, to keep in pulses or to keep pules out, it is a containment and maybe he is using that to increase the output as it leaves the coil. This would mean the winding method is not important and only wire length would be a factor. But winding in a  nice coil makes people ask the wrong question. Ahhhhhhhh. Man, I have to stop thinking, but my spiders senses are tingling and I will have to add this to the tests. hehehe

wattsup


frantz

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 167
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13558 on: August 29, 2012, 08:11:41 AM »
capacitor C2 can be charged either by avramenko or can be pulsed with hvdc through spark gap. the diode must be used after spark gap to pulse charge the cap.

we only have to charge one cap C2 only


Hi friend,
could you show to us some movie with experiment. Not a simulation only real one?
As you see everywhere we have only a theory. ;)
Regards
frantz

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13559 on: August 29, 2012, 01:19:04 PM »
Kapanadze Free Energy Ac Generator.pdf (100.49 kB - downloaded 155 times.)

Aren't you forgetting that two capacitors after voltage equalization collectively possess only half the energy of the single capacitor before voltage equalization?

If C1=C2 , then:

Energy in capacitors before voltage equalization:
E1A=½C1*0 =0
E2A=½C2V2


Energy in capacitors after voltage equalization:
E1B=½C1(½V)2
E2B=½C2(½V)2

Thus:
E1B+E2B=½E2A
« Last Edit: August 29, 2012, 02:37:08 PM by verpies »