"Anyways, I wanted to know the length required so I made an excel sheet starting with a 1 1/4" dia. open center and considering the wire would be about 1/4" in diameter, the final result, (shown below) is 122 feet. Then add the extra lengths of about 8 feet maximum and you get a length of 130 feet required to make the TKc."

@wattsup

I appreciate the chart. Great idea.

So based on .25 dia wire *64 turns=16 inches of wounded width . That seems allot longer than TK "blue"coil
 Plus add another 2 inch for the "coily" coil that's 18" = 0.457 2 meter for our metric friends..

Or I'm I wrong

I think - you are describing "asynchronous resonance" is a key to "over unity",
that sees the circuit as a resonant valve and converter not a generator.
The energy can be pulled through the circuit to load only when, it is blind to back emf, and sets up pulsed resonance with the background environmental source, which in this case is via the earth-braided rad. The only way I imagine to do this is with a three plate or coil cap combination. One plate maintains or matches resonance, the other two are loading and discharging like a pump. Maybe otherways? Ideas are fast converging here

To tell the truth, I have never heard of "asynchronous resonance." I have no idea what it means. Is it two tuned circuits that don't operate on the same frequency?

Here is a factoid that may apply to "asynchronous resonance", what ever it is.
If you take two identical tuned circuits, each one, taken separately, will resonate at the same frequency. Once you magnetically couple them together  neither of them will oscillate at the frequency that they are built to operate at. Instead, one will operate at a slightly higher frequency and the other at a slightly lower frequency. The degree of movement from the designed resonant frequency is said to depend on the degree of coupling of the two circuits.

Cool huh?

For some reason I had thought that this would happen with any kind of coupling but I just looked it up, to confirm what I was saying was true, and it is only with magnetic coupling.

Here is the quote; RCA RADIOTRON DESIGNER'S HANDBOOK, Fourth Edition, 1953 Chapter 9, Section 8, page 418
"(i) Mutual inductive coupling
As already emphasized, when the mutual inductive coupling between two tuned circuits is increased above a critical value, kt, two peaks appear in the response curve, symmetrically situated with regard to the resonant frequency f0. No other types of coupling possess this useful property."

I happen to have the printed book but you can get a scaned PDF from this link:
http://www.nj7p.info/Common/Manuals/Tube_Manuals.php

This brings something else to mind. I have been thinking about Tesla's obscure "Shuttle theory", that I think my grandfather had some how been hinting at by the things he gave me when he was alive, several books on Tesla and a book about the space shuttle. My grandfather was a professor and no dummy. He had intimated that free energy does exist but we would only get it if society was ready else we would end up destroying ourselves and or the planet.

I keep wondering about the picture below. Why is Tesla looking so intently at the coils in his hand? Note that they are at right angles to each other and therefore not magnetically coupled. Does this have to do with his "Shuttle theory"? If the coils are not magnetically coupled then they could be electrically coupled. This could be a indicating a later design than his Magnifying Transmitter, which was both magnetically coupled and electrically coupled. Note the big ash tray looking thing behind him. I think that might be his "Death ray".

Sorry, this has little to do with the topic of this thread. Just a nostalgic trip down memory lane for me.

@wattsup
So as I understand it... TK stripped the braided wire and the sheathing and wound the coil using inner insulator w center conductor? If that the case the inner dielectric insulator measure less than 3/16"..

Zeitmaschine and others re Lenz and back emf. THIS IS PRECISELY WHAT JACK NOSKILLS IS UP TO.
That's why I say he is close.
Anyway some important information next:

I looked it up. There is a whole lot of nonsense given when I Googled it. I'm not talking about a "counter EMF" or "an induced back EMF" I'm talking about a Back EMF from a coil.

A magnetic field acts much like mass does. It opposes change. It doesn't like to be created, in fact it produces that "counter EMF" in the things around it that oppose it's creation. Once it's created it doesn't like to stop. If the current has been flowing for a while the "counter EMF" is no longer present in the things around it because it has died down and that "counter EMF" only appears when the magnetic field changes. If you try to stop your current flow, the magnetic field that it is creating will start to change and produce another "counter EMF" in the things around it that will oppose it's change, i.e. will try to keep the current flowing. That trying to keep the current flowing is what I have been taught is called "back EMF".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSmMFog10D0
MIT Physics Demo -- Back "emf" in a Large Solenoid
The description states;
"A large solenoid is connected to DC power through a knife switch.  When the switch is closed, the current builds up to approximately 30 amps. When the switch is opened, the solenoid attempts to keep the current flowing, creating a huge emf which ionizes the air in a huge spark."

Note "keep the current flowing" and "huge emf". That is MIT!

I'm not sure you guys are thinking of back EMF in the right way. You do know that back EMF flows in the same direction as the original current? It doesn't flow backward to the voltage you apply to a coil. It flows in the same direction.

For example, you take a battery and connect it to a coil. It takes a while for the current to start flowing. Now you disconnect the battery the current stops flowing but before it stops completely you get a back EMF that flows in the same direction as the current that the battery was producing.

The reason it's called a back EMF is because it's at the end of the flow of current you applied. Kind of like what they call a "Back porch" in a video signal is at the end of a scan line.

     If your pulse width is such that just at the moment when current is going to flow through the circuit you disconnect the coil of high impedance there is no forward current drawn. what happens instead is a sudden collapse of the magnetic field (which was causing the impedance of the coil)  and "flyback voltage" is produced which is thousands of times higher than the input voltage. In a television set this collapse occurs during that portion of the cycle when the deflection plates are making the electron gun flyback and down to the next video line. The high voltage pulse is rectified and maintains the charge on the capacitor formed between the anode and the cathode of the picture tube.   This is the principal behind the ignition transformers Tesla designed for Henry Ford to replace the magneto.   It is like taking a piece of wire and moving it through a permanent magnet field at near the speed of light.  Induced voltage is directly proportional to the rate of change of the magnetic field surrounding a conductor.  It matters little if the conductor is attached to a load or a capacitor. 

Just for Wattsup and Hoppy.

Just for Wattsup and Hoppy.

Thanks, that clears it up.