Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16407100 times)

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13140 on: August 17, 2012, 01:38:32 AM »
Well, maybe the cap gets charged from the input, before the transformer reacts to the input. Then the cap dumps into the transformer, as the impedance lets it. ;]

One other thing.
Run this coil without load, switch off circuit, wait
for 3-5 seconds and grab output and you will get
shocked just as you grabed ordinary cap which is full.
So, coils preserve charge after been switched off.

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13141 on: August 17, 2012, 01:50:05 AM »
Good night to all of you, well , where is night off course.

x_name41

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 254
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13142 on: August 17, 2012, 01:59:56 AM »
Thank you v8karlo, by tomorrow ;)

p.s.  i still online because my password is very complicated!

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13143 on: August 17, 2012, 02:05:42 AM »
@V8Karlo

Did you experiment with couple of winds of thick copper on top the transformer coil in order to increase amperage of the output?

Excelent question.
I found out that thick wire with less ohms is better then long thin with 50 or 100 ohm.
Actually my first coils were only 10-15 turns of thick wire with zero ohms for each coil.
Freq. goes up, Duty C. shorter but more amps were produced.
With fat wire you have more surface, more surface more capacitance, and this is
capacitive coil. With zero ohms means that it can faster discharge and it discharge
to zero in one cycle. If you have only few ohms in coils it wont discharge to zero,
and coil cap discharge full to zero, not like caps only to 30 % of their max capacitance.

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13144 on: August 17, 2012, 02:08:29 AM »
Excelent question.
I found out that thick wire with less ohms is better then long thin with 50 or 100 ohm.
Actually my first coils were only 10-15 turns of thick wire with zero ohms for each coil.
Freq. goes up, Duty C. shorter but more amps were produced.
With fat wire you have more surface, more surface more capacitance, and this is
capacitive coil. With zero ohms means that it can faster discharge and it discharge
to zero in one cycle. If you have only few ohms in coils it wont discharge to zero,
and coil cap discharge full to zero, not like caps only to 30 % of their max capacitance.


Without load of course

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13145 on: August 17, 2012, 02:31:44 AM »
Because it is rectified direct current at output,

Are you sure it is DC and not pulsating unipolar current (aka. Pulsating DC) ?
Any chance of seeing scopeshots of I/O waveforms?

Well , I did have Scope and I did attach it to output until i forgot
to attach output cap. When I switched on I realized what I have done.
My scope was gone. Without output cap voltage raises well over 2000 volts
in my setup in split second.
Second time I killed my hard drive through Pc Scope and scope stayed alive.
Until that day I didnt attaching my new PC scope to output of that thing,
but only to test my mosfets and signal gen.

But output looks like smooth cap discharges with very high and short voltage peaks
at the begin of discharge.


a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13147 on: August 17, 2012, 08:58:12 AM »
v8karlo:  In your second post you mentioned you obtained approximately 1 kw output from 3 watts input.
Can you post exact schematic of the circuit and a list of components used please?
 The most important thing in any thread is that the circuit is independently verified.
 Remember there have been many circuits posted and nothing came of them.

I happen to think that you've got something here. So fingers crossed.
You use the transformer in exactly the same way Jack Noskills does, except you've taken it further.
 It could be that Jack Noskills is also a capacitive effect.
Hopefully we can then collectively develop the circuit.

Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4135
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13148 on: August 17, 2012, 09:42:56 AM »
v8karlo:  In your second post you mentioned you obtained approximately 1 kw output from 3 watts input.
Can you post exact schematic of the circuit and a list of components used please?
 The most important thing in any thread is that the circuit is independently verified.
 Remember there have been many circuits posted and nothing came of them.

I happen to think that you've got something here. So fingers crossed.
You use the transformer in exactly the same way Jack Noskills does, except you've taken it further.
 It could be that Jack Noskills is also a capacitive effect.
Hopefully we can then collectively develop the circuit.


 v8karlo has stated that he had not taken a loaded output power measurement, so he presumably took the 900mA - 1100mA output short circuit current (with meter directly across output) and 1200V open circuit voltage stated in his post 13151 and came up with approx 1KW (P=VI). A true power measurement has to be taken with a load and the output power will likely vary with load and the output voltage will of course drop below the open circuit measurement.

Hoppy

4q

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13149 on: August 17, 2012, 09:52:01 AM »
Well , I did have Scope and I did attach it to output until i forgot
to attach output cap. When I switched on I realized what I have done.
My scope was gone. Without output cap voltage raises well over 2000 volts
in my setup in split second.
Second time I killed my hard drive through Pc Scope and scope stayed alive.
Until that day I didnt attaching my new PC scope to output of that thing,
but only to test my mosfets and signal gen.

But output looks like smooth cap discharges with very high and short voltage peaks
at the begin of discharge.


Karlo, didn't you do that the same what JNAudin did in the 90's: http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/tepv22.htm ?
Your coil setup and pulsing very-very similar for me like Naudin's setup. Please check TEP pages here: http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/scalwidx.htm
4q

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13150 on: August 17, 2012, 01:03:47 PM »
Capacitive coil patent:
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:N-xUR2S4xsYJ:www.overunity.com/11063/simulation-of-the-muller-dynamo/dlattach/attach/54455/+&hl=en&gl=uk&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESgZr95GM2cl2bvPlcbKA-GzRsorZwsj9SL1k7kkqMYbbHb5s_IvZRbXnBJRUeIJvIQzwsX9pdzsPsKEk4eD7iiQQiSuMydltnIHToCqwtkCyCp7tJH9XZl_b1rvGiiHFoAbq207&sig=AHIEtbSlIG_YtC0Rxgk6VHuIMO2ZBjLWgw


Outstanding..!


I didnt know there is patent on capacitive coil, and those are
for motors. If you wanna get power from them remove that
caps at the ends, they are killing process.

Wound 20 turns bifilar on ferrite rod and connect them like on
schematic below. Results will be more than fine, you'll see.
Lots of Voltage and amps. Another capacitive coil.

For a core I put 10-12 ferrite rings together as rod, and thats it.

Coils doesent have to be wound oposite directions, they can be
plain bifilar, but I wound it like Kapanadze did because I
wanna discover what he is doing, thats the point.

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13151 on: August 17, 2012, 01:10:54 PM »
Hoppy: Yes I agree. But the figures are so outrageously favourable that we've got to look into it, I think.
Even if it's out by half that would still be 3 watts in and 500 watts out.
So it seems very promising.
What I want to avoid however is this business where some people cannot replicate
due to insufficient data:
others cannot, because they don't have the equipment. Then the
nay sayers can come in and everyone gets discouraged.
I've seen replications fail just because of faulty/wrong diodes for instance.
If this is the real deal then it has to be managed "super well".
As an example, I found the term "backfeed" hard to understand at first. I now realise
 v8karlo means "feedback"  as in "feedback loop".

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13152 on: August 17, 2012, 01:34:57 PM »

Karlo, didn't you do that the same what JNAudin did in the 90's: http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/tepv22.htm ?
Your coil setup and pulsing very-very similar for me like Naudin's setup. Please check TEP pages here: http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/scalwidx.htm
4q


I did watch his work, and I respect the man, but he was going
in other way at the time.
I discovered this when I was reading about Marks TPU 3 years ago.
I connected 2 laminated trafo together in that way that second
winding of first trafo is conected to first winding of second trafo.
second winding of second trafo was in the air, no connection.
Then I pulsed first winding of first trafo.
Later I realised that they were connected in capacitive way.

After a while I broke down this to one trafo and connection with
one diode, and after that bifilar windings on rod, .. and so on.

When I was watching old videos from MagnaCoaster, in one video
he was showing scope shots and they were exactly like mine, and
he was filling HV 2 uF cap to 1200V in second or two just like I do.

But something is missing here, they both (TK and Maagna) found a
way to further enhance this and gain lots of amps.

That is my goal, to find what component is missing.
Yesterday I suspected that capacitive coils when operate in the field of
nearby HV strong Capacitor can yield much more amps, but I didnt try that, yet.

They both using capacitive coils, for sure, because its better than
classical induction, and more powerfull.


v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13153 on: August 17, 2012, 01:41:10 PM »
Imagine this,

Only 20 turns bifilar litz from cable on ferrite rod (its a trafo!!)
With change only to freq. and Duty Cycle I was able to
get on output any voltage from 0-2000V and more, and any desired
amperage from 0-max output.

What classical trafo can do that?

Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4135
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #13154 on: August 17, 2012, 01:58:12 PM »
Hoppy: Yes I agree. But the figures are so outrageously favourable that we've got to look into it, I think.
Even if it's out by half that would still be 3 watts in and 500 watts out.
So it seems very promising.
What I want to avoid however is this business where some people cannot replicate
due to insufficient data:
others cannot, because they don't have the equipment. Then the
nay sayers can come in and everyone gets discouraged.
I've seen replications fail just because of faulty/wrong diodes for instance.
If this is the real deal then it has to be managed "super well".
As an example, I found the term "backfeed" hard to understand at first. I now realise
 v8karlo means "feedback"  as in "feedback loop".

As it is clear that a considerable level of power is available from the TK device, no special test equipment should be needed to test replications. An analogue meter can be used to measure the voltage across a load resistor, which in turn can be used to calculate current being taken by the load, assuming that both the waveform and frequency fall within the range of the test meter. Open circuit voltage will vary with load, so its important to log the power curve for a variety of resistances to get a good idea of device performance. If a test meter can be applied directly across the output of a device without its internal fuse rupturing, then clearly there is very little power available from the device for consumption by the load. For test replications to be managed 'super well', its vital that these basic electrical principles are fully understood by the replicators, otherwise the blind could lead the blind!

Hoppy