Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16407121 times)

energia9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12075 on: June 19, 2012, 03:33:55 PM »
The capacitors on battery react in same way as capacitors near Tesla coil. So high voltage spikes there too I guess.
Also when you use ferrite please be careful, it is quite easy to cause NMR in it with katcher and field surrounding coils on 90 degrees when you put ferrite in coil on horizontal position inside of grounding choke near vertical Tesla coil.
If you would like to make intentional cause, wind selenoid transformer on ferrite and put HV capacitor with spark gap then connect wire inside of ferrite core over length of selenoid. Then see how transformer consumed current drops when spark gap fires... ;)

Cheers!
i dont exactly understand how you mean it
But recently i did an experiment where my current dropped by 150 miliampers and my lightbulb glowed brighter.

I was winding directly on to 2 pieces of ferrite in the middle,  the ferrites had gap between.
the current drops and light increases only if the two ferrites are in right place and the coil is shorted.

The ferrite also heats up very much..
i dont know what is going on but somebody may explain



jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12076 on: June 19, 2012, 04:27:25 PM »
 This is the NMR they are talking about. Whenever you use ferrite or iron it slows down the frequency and increases the magnetic portion. Both ferrite and iron convert to magnetic. You know it is NMR because the ferrite or iron gets very very hot because it is resisting the movement of the field within the main coil. Any use of a core besides copper or aluminum is a no go situation. Try copper or aluminum instead of the ferrite of iron. Each metal reacts in a very different way. Copper is current based and aluminum is voltage based. If you are using a high voltage field then use aluminum as the core. If you are using a heavy current field or want to convert to a very heavy current then use copper core.


 Iron or ferrite must only be used to convert to the magnetic spectrum like in motors. Remember it acts like a sponge and condenser for the magnetic portion. This I suspect is a transformation from electric to magnetic.

 This brings me to the real experiment I wanted to try. Copper inside of aluminum! So copper core inside of aluminum sheath. This could also be done via pipes. My experiments will be of different weights of each and you could slide one inside of the other to see what effects this will cause. Added* Make sure they have a slit in the tube to make a one turn coil. If you do the hook up points must be from one corner to the opposite corner(commonly called kitty corner) to be able to use the one turn properly. Let me be clear about this if the tube is verticle then hook from upper left of slit to lower right of slit. This will pickup better or even transmit better that way.. Could hooking up the pipe in different directions change the outcome? Like in on upper left to in on upper right with the corrisponding lower change as well to keep the turn right.

 The standing potentials of aluminum is -1.67 and copper is +.34. This would create a diode of 2.01 volts by itself. With the energizing field this might be a boon.

 My point here is to create a battery with the electrolyte being the electric field that we are getting. This ties in with my work on crystal batteries. It is the same concept but with zero galvanic response because even though the metals are connected via the electric field they are not physically connect at all hence zero galvanic damage to the metals but still has a battery like effect.

 I have been working on another avenue as well with a kind of insulation that is active. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyvinylidene_fluoride

 This is also very interesting. Read the first paragraph... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferroelectric_polymers
« Last Edit: June 19, 2012, 06:08:36 PM by jbignes5 »

itsu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1845
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12077 on: June 19, 2012, 09:19:05 PM »

@ T1000,

thanks for the warning, i noticed no frequency change when "tuning" with the ferrite just an increase in the voltage as can be seen on the scope in the video.
The 2e part of your post i will have to read some more times to understand what you mean   :o


@ Jbignes5,

I have fixed the link in my post, thanks

The reason for the ceramic caps on the battery is to minimize the RF on its terminals so i can take reliable input power measurements in the DC range when needed.

I will try a 1 turn primary, thanks.

I can try copper and/or aluminium pipes in the coil, will let you know.
I think there is aluminium foil in the motor start/run caps, the micro oven caps have an aluminium casing.

Concerning the used kacher setup, please take a look at one of my earlier videos where i explain
this setup:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wjS7yPmb8o&list=UUdJ2A-075yx9y4bKqu_8Q8A&index=10&feature=plcp

Only difference is the transistor which presently is a MJE3055T, the primairy coil which is 2 turns, and the copper pipe (12 cm long) as a pickup coil inside the kacher.

I have used some metal as a (virtual) ground attached to the open coil end, but that only degrades the performance, one item was a bronze lamp pedestal about 25cm diameter, but i will try some aluminium too.

No strange effect noticed when the kacher coil is operating

Sorry for the telegram like style, but i like to keep my posts small.

Regards Itsu


jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12079 on: June 19, 2012, 09:44:54 PM »
@ T1000,

thanks for the warning, i noticed no frequency change when "tuning" with the ferrite just an increase in the voltage as can be seen on the scope in the video.
The 2e part of your post i will have to read some more times to understand what you mean   :o


@ Jbignes5,

I have fixed the link in my post, thanks

The reason for the ceramic caps on the battery is to minimize the RF on its terminals so i can take reliable input power measurements in the DC range when needed.

I will try a 1 turn primary, thanks.

I can try copper and/or aluminium pipes in the coil, will let you know.
I think there is aluminium foil in the motor start/run caps, the micro oven caps have an aluminium casing.

Concerning the used kacher setup, please take a look at one of my earlier videos where i explain
this setup:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wjS7yPmb8o&list=UUdJ2A-075yx9y4bKqu_8Q8A&index=10&feature=plcp

Only difference is the transistor which presently is a MJE3055T, the primairy coil which is 2 turns, and the copper pipe (12 cm long) as a pickup coil inside the kacher.

I have used some metal as a (virtual) ground attached to the open coil end, but that only degrades the performance, one item was a bronze lamp pedestal about 25cm diameter, but i will try some aluminium too.

No strange effect noticed when the kacher coil is operating

Sorry for the telegram like style, but i like to keep my posts small.

Regards Itsu


 The reason I suggested the 1 turn is because of the hairpin circuit. Strange nodes will pop up on the turn which I think having the inner coil so close tends to mirror. Having 2 winds lowers the ability for it to turn those nodes. If you need more Surface area just parallel the wires. This will also lower the resistance and allow a greater flow to happen. Just keep them perfectly on top one of another. The more you add the bigger the bang will be. Bifilar is another method but then you need two to lower the resistance so I wouldn't bother with bifilar right now. It is much easier to just parallel those thick wires. But remember this is gonna lower the resistance of the path and your transistor might fry. I might also add that you use coax like cable coax to connect to the 1 turn. The only thing you need to do is cut the shield and let it be a floating ground shield. This will keep the emissions from the 1 turn in the wire till it gets to the 1 turn. You might want to move the katcher away from the batteries or statically shield them as well.. This might be what those metal boxes are in the Turky  Kapandze videos are for. To protect the circuits and batteries. You might be able to have the batteries in the shield and take the caps off entirely from the batteries.


 I'm glad to hear there is no strange effects on you. That makes me feel safer about this tech then. Tesla said that he could go as high as 88 million cycles a second and get extreme performance out of this system. The faster it goes the better the output or more pressure. We are merely scraping the surface of this tech at 1.2 million...


 The copper or aluminum termination might have to be used when we start going higher in frequencies. I'm not sure. Telsa's oscillator was very advanced and did not have any iron in it at all. This was to let it run as fast as possible. But remember also that this field changes the resistance of anything in it. It might even go into the negative side, again this is something I have not tested yet..


 Also please don't apologize for short responses. Any response is better then nothing.

 Hmm Tesla says to use thick stranded wire for the primary.

 http://www.teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla-article-high-frequency-oscillators-for-electro-therapeutic-and-other-purposes?start=130

 I know it says electrotherapy but just read it anyways. It has a lot of good stuff in there.

energia9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12080 on: June 20, 2012, 12:20:30 AM »
My new video..
And part1 for my way of Kapanadze device

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MpTeEP6zi0&feature=plcp
carefully read what i say on the end bit

thank you all
Peace

jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12081 on: June 20, 2012, 12:42:22 AM »
 excellent video...


 I was reading more about tesla and this came up..


 "One of the most interesting experiments was the conversion on open circuit. A transformer was taken and the current passed through the high tension winding in such a way that only one terminal was attached to the source of the rapidly alternating current. In spite of this there was a current passing through the primary as though the other terminal was actually attached to the source like an ordinary return circuit. This open circuit transformer contained a secondary low tension winding, and the minute currents passing through the primary were transformed into currents capable of following the ordinary electric wire and lighting up brilliantly an ordinary lamp. It was pointed out that under certain conditions, indeed, such a conversion was quite practicable and that it can be practised with high economy. It was further pointed out that any kind of device such as motors, etc., may be operated in this manner, with one wire or circuit only."[/font][/size]

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12082 on: June 20, 2012, 02:56:31 AM »


Preamble:
 Longitudinal wave is the first and only tool of Tesla and Marconi energy transfer over the distance without the wires. in  presented material.

Marconi happened to  copy Tesla's original experiment.
And he got damaged by say "oil power." as well.

But not only that.
Copper industry will be done if wires are not needed.
It would be approx 2% of it needed for energy utilization.
So if we would be able to  get this part done we creating apocalypse but to banks,
and all of the  wealthy people around the world.
By   making food cost 30% of its original price yet still preserving  today's profit.
Any other energy needed  area of life will  go to the same mechanism of costs elimination.

Are we going to make humanity happy?
No we will not. Yet we may make them happier.

The suicides of all of the looser  will become day to day reality...................
   
I do not  understand why you want former  president Mr B..h to lose his  oil empire, "he is so charming",
He has so "beautiful facial expression",
" So intelligent smile," :) :) :)
An yet he "did not kill people, " :) :) :) 
And "he is not responsible" for 9/11 :) :) :)  mass murder .


   
==============================================================

some of You guys put doubt to caduceus device presented by me  and Aidas  and Arunas.

Here is the prove that that  apparatus of Marconi was utilizing caduceus.
Yes it does not stand about OU but we always stated that even OU is just utilization of energy from ambient.
The energy can not be created  nor destroyed.It always comes from somewhere it is just employed or coupled to the device.

One more  thing.. Longitudinal wave  has no speed and  delta T.
Outrages as it sounds, it is explained in  material attached below.

minute 022:10

The Tesla Marconi Wireless System
http://www.youtube.com/watch?list=ULUGOTJ0SZN70&feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=bUFaSGg_efY

=======================================================================




 Here is rest of  material.
If I have  time I will try to present longitudinal wave ultimate weapon theory that can   get to any point of the earth using Shumann effect.
where one single  lightning  creates series of the lightnings around the world.
By that token any target building ,structure, town,person,car,
  is  to be affected by longitudinal wave directed beam that only triggers phenomena.
of destruction and possible dustification in association of NMR -(if the last one is a part of the package).
I'm not trying to implicate "HAARP " at all ............heeeeee. :) 
Also talking about towers I'm" not implicating 9/11" :) :) :) :)


Upper part of atmosphere acts as mirror and wave guide.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schumann_resonances
Play interactive video on the right side up.


Quote
The Schumann resonances (SR)] are a set of spectrum peaks in the extremely low frequency(ELF) portion of the electromagneticresonances excited by lightningdischarges in the cavity formed by the Earth's surface


Earth and the conductive ionosphere acts as a closed waveguide The limited dimensions of the Earth cause this waveguide to act as a resonant cavity for electromagnetic waves in the ELF band. The cavity is naturally excited by electric currents in lightning.

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message162830/pg1
Quote
Here´s how the weather engineering is usually accomplished:First, take two scalar potential beam transmitters, separated on the necessary baseline to form a beam interferometer. Let them interfere at a distance. Now in that distant interference zone (IZ), there is an ambient vacuum potential (spacetime potential, or spacetime stress). If the electrical circuit grounds of the interferometer transmitters are biased ABOVE the ambient potential in the IZ, then scattering EM energy (heating) emerges in the IZ. This is the exothermic mode of operation. If the electrical circuit grounds of the interferometer are biased negatively below the ambient potential in the IZ, then convergent EM energy (cooling) emerges in the IZ. This is the endothermic mode of operation.So by merely biasing the electrical grounds of a scalar potential interferometer, one can produce heating or cooling in the distant IZ. If one just "radiates," one produces distant steady heating or steady cooling. If one sharply pulses the interferometer, one produces a distant hot explosion or a distant cold explosion.One can also, of course, form various forms of energy at a distance, including particularly hemispheric shells of energy and spherical shells of energy. Hundreds of these have been observed worldwide, from testing by the KGB weapons in Russia.


How about destruction of the towers/
Longitudinal  wave is pressure or compression  wave.
Than When you step  with your leg on the cardboard box it will be squashed faster than free fall of an obiect dropped from the top of it.
So  that might  explain controversy that towers  went down faster than the stone dropped from its roof.


And additional information  hurricane   level 3 was waiting for few days in the coast of  NY (LE) prior to the event than mysteriously went away and there was no news about it  anywhere ( I think ) :)


Additional material:

Longitudinal wave history and practical, devices presentation by Eric Dollard Ham.
Material by  order:



1.
Part 1 of 6: Eric Dollard Tesla Longitudinal wave Energy SBARC Ham Radio with Chris Carson
a.history and introduction of electromagnetic  longitudinal waves.
b. differentiation between various waves by its origin and its type.
c. mathematical properties of calculation and  descriptive properties. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhuSn6sc7sc&feature=channel&list=UL




2.
Part 2 of 6: Eric Dollard Tesla Longitudinal Wave Energy SBARC Ham Radio with Chris Carson
a. basic  differences between  transvesal and longitudinal waves ( sine, square, pulse)
    at this point  we have assignment to LW as DC based.
b.Presentation of practical device utilizing LW and explanation (  basic elements and modules.)
c.Eric practical algebra and formulas attached to math of LW.
d. impedance, wavelengths and properties of ground part of apparatus.
e. at minute 8:50 fundamental parameters of LW, and differentiation to  transvesal wave
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64yKW9FSsBY&feature=channel&list=UL



3. 
Part 3 of 6: Eric Dollard Tesla Longitudinal Wave Energy SBARC Ham Radio with Chris Carson
a.continuation scientific support data
b. back to the table with practical apparatus.
c. controversy over sun light
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5ZWrjcrPl4&feature=channel&list=UL



4.
Part 4 of 6: Eric Dollard & Chris Carson Tesla Longitudinal Wave Energy SBARC Ham Radio
a. Chris Carson controversy over transformer


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lqMiZPO9TM&feature=channel&list=UL




5.
Part 5 of 6: Eric Dollard & Chris Carson Tesla Longitudinal Wave Energy SBARC Ham Radio
a. short speech of
Chris Carson
b. Eric Dollard  minute 5:16  controversy over sun light
c. expression of :Repression from government and local AUTHORITIES  to Eric Dollard and Borderland
confiscations, evictions, discrimination and so on
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsrbaCJo3Qw&feature=channel&list=UL





6.
Part 6 of 6: Eric Dollard & Chris Carson Tesla Longitudinal Wave Energy SBARC Ham Radio
a. Questions form audience:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwu8rspxQWE&feature=channel&list=UL






7.
 Eric Dollard (1988)
The Tesla Marconi Wireless System
a. explanation  and presentation of place where  Marconi Longitudinal Wave power station once stood and reminding fragments of it.
b. LITERATURE AND SOURCE ATTACHED TO THIS  PLACE
c. theory  and practical apparatus schematic of  above.
d.expression of:Political pressure and decisions leading to confiscation of site and closure of facility.
e.analysis of the structure and its basic functions .


http://www.youtube.com/watch?list=ULUGOTJ0SZN70&feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=bUFaSGg_efY






=======================================================================



Longitudinal Waves in traditional  understanding:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLAB-d8VnZ8&feature=BFa&list=PLF71B362214423F9D



Waves - A Level Physics
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gycff144mHw




Longitudinal waves in a spring in slow motion
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubRlaCCQfDk



Wesley
 
« Last Edit: June 20, 2012, 01:51:32 PM by stivep »

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12083 on: June 20, 2012, 04:02:42 PM »


ADDITION TO MATERIAL FROM POST ABOVE;
Eric Dollard 2007 

Misconceptions of Electricity and More
PLEASE LOOK FROM
0:49:50 MINUTE
TO SEE ESSENTIAL PART OF IT.




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GObB67ETvRQ


and this:
Longitudinal Waves
http://montalk.net/notes/longitudinal-waves






Quote
longitudinal waves fluctuate in the direction of propagation. A common example would be sound waves, which consist of an alternating series of displacements in air where the displacement points in the direction that sound travels. So for longitudinal EM waves, the vector potential fluctuates in the direction of travel rather than perpendicular to it.
There are numerous methods to generate longitudinal EM waves, but only one will be discussed here. Consider a large flat metal plate charged to a steady high voltage:
Quote
This gives rise to a steady electric field pointing out and away from the plate. If its voltage were instead made to uniformly oscillate, the electric field would likewise oscillate and radiate away. But since the field already points in the direction of radiation, the resulting wave will be longitudinal. The vector potential diagram would then look like this:


Aside from current flows, a changing voltage field can also give rise to vector potentials. As the voltage on the metal plate oscillates, concussive waves of vector potential are radiated away. The fluctuations in this diagram are longitudinal rather than transverse. Notice also that there is no vorticity in this field, and therefore no magnetic field. Some call it a “curl-free vector potential.” This is seemingly in direct violation of the Maxwell equations that state there must be an induced magnetic field for every change in the electric field. Not so in this case, and that violation turns out to be the norm for all longitudinal “E/M” waves because it is mathematically and geometrically impossible for a longitudinal wave to have both electric and magnetic components simultaneously. I put a slash between E and M to signify “one or the other, or neither.”
In actuality, longitudinal waves do not violate Maxwell’s equations, rather they are what Maxwell termed displacement current. Usually current is defined as a flow of charges. But across a capacitor consisting of two conductors separated by an insulator that allows no charge to pass, oscillating energy can still transfer. Physicists aren’t sure precisely how to explain displacement current other than that the changing electric field from one conductor induces a magnetic field that induces another electric field on the second conductor. However if the conductors consist of one spherical electrode inside another, all the magnetic fields cancel and yet there is still a displacement current. This proves that the displacement current is nothing more than a longitudinal E/M wave in some cases. In other cases a magnetic field might indeed play a role, but the Maxwell equations allow for either possibility.
Longitudinal E/M waves are just as real as transverse EM waves but are more difficult to detect. Modern mainstream technology has been optimized to deal solely with transverse waves and is therefore largely incapable of measuring, let alone detecting, longitudinal waves. For this reason physicists dismiss the possibility of longitudinal E/M waves, though more out of intellectual oversight and materialistic bias than reasonable justification; they confuse objectivity with tangibility. The assumption that “what cannot be measured does not exist” fails to take into account that the shortcoming might be with technology rather than reality.


It takes specialized antennas to intercept longitudinal waves, ones that, in some applications, point in the direction of the wave and maximize the cross-sectional area. In nature these appear as the array of rod-cells populating the retina of our eyes, which aside form being suited to see in low-light conditions are also structured to be functionally capable of detecting longitudinal emissions. Consider the idea that each color we can see has a longitudinal counterpart that our neural systems have not been trained to interpret.



WESLEY
« Last Edit: June 20, 2012, 08:06:29 PM by stivep »

jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12084 on: June 20, 2012, 05:09:43 PM »

ADDITION TO MATERIAL FROM POST ABOVE;
Eric Dollard 2007 

Misconceptions of Electricity and More
PLEASE LOOK FROM
0:49:50 MINUTE
TO SEE ESSENTIAL PART OF IT.




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GObB67ETvRQ










WESLEY


 Finally someone is seeing the truth of the situation. This is exactly what I have said all along. If we understand that the electric field lines must be initiated before the magnetic results. We need a simulator that maps these fields and can track them to see how this works in detail. I'm assuming that the lines are rotating as well like a guitar string. The nodes or anti-nodes are the crux for the magnetic lines condense into. I am also very sure that both lines are of the same makeup but since they are out of angle to each other they provide different forces at different angles.

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12085 on: June 20, 2012, 05:31:52 PM »
  This is something to think about before you get rid of the spark gap whose effects were magnified by the Tesla oscillator.  Crookes and Tesla were teacher and student.  Tesla was a practical applications scientist.  Crookes was a teacher/scientist.  http://www.photonmatrix.com/pdf/Magnetic%20Self%20Compression%20No%201.pdf

T-1000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1738
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12086 on: June 20, 2012, 07:08:24 PM »
The 2e part of your post i will have to read some more times to understand what you mean   :o

Ok,one time to see is much better than 100 times to hear:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVAeyouWs5k
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNuoyPr4_NA

P.S. It is my b'day today... :)

Cheers!

energia9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12087 on: June 20, 2012, 08:31:37 PM »
@Stivep

will you be practical on your theory?

Many of us have different ways.. 
i know many of us will eventually make it.
may be one of us even today?  tomorrow? a week later or even in the next hours....
anything is possible....
But if we dont experiment.......   then...none of us will.
we will not...
It would be Beautiful if each of us could follow their own pattern and publish their own results.
 (Practical Results) -of experiments
Im heading this way now.

i will try to proove that this kapanadze device is most simplest way of all that has been theorized.
If i cant proove that it is.  It will be a Tick , job done,  and most others can and will learn from it. and i will move on.

I like your theorizing. it may help anyone and get inspired, but at the same time many will not understand and just dismiss, Because they need allready tried out practical proof.
Man i would love to see experiments performed by you,  because you are a great experimenter.
a wonderfull mind.

 if you would take videos of your experiments it would be so great.
i think we would be much closer to Teslas secret
Thanks for all your sharings.

Peace


@T1000  HAPPPY BIIIIRTHDAY! LIVE +100 YEARS :)

jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12088 on: June 20, 2012, 08:54:02 PM »
Ok,one time to see is much better than 100 times to hear:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVAeyouWs5k
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNuoyPr4_NA

P.S. It is my b'day today... :)

Cheers!


 Happy birthday my friend! I wish you many happy events in the coming years.

@energia9 I too agree with your appeal to stivep. We need to cover all the basics and one person isn't gonna be able to cover that much territory. With 100's of us going in all directions someone is gonna hit pay dirt and then we all win. There is no me in this. If we start going the me route then nothing gets accomplished and we all loose.

 I am not sure what Kapanadze has done because he is interested in only the money. It's not about having the answer for him it is only how much he can get from holding out on this critical information. That to me is counter productive. If Kapanadze is holding onto a new method of power and keeping it for the highest bidder then how does that help us as the human race?

 If it was a sound method then why the secrecy? Why hold it back from the whole of the human race for a few thousand bucks? Why He won't just tell us the method for the benefit of the whole of our planet makes me a little wary that either it doesn't work or does but isn't the author.

 If this worked as stated why does he need not just release it for the benefit of all human beings?

 Just my two cents.

dllabarre

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 750
    • Portal Page
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #12089 on: June 20, 2012, 09:04:33 PM »
Ok,one time to see is much better than 100 times to hear:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVAeyouWs5k
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNuoyPr4_NA

P.S. It is my b'day today... :)

Cheers!


Happy Birthday!!!