Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16404332 times)

Bruce_TPU

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1437
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11205 on: March 18, 2012, 06:27:44 PM »
In oiginal TBC110 HV coils was used " Универсаль " wiring . ( In english I found Ing-Jang or Nets wiring ) . This
tipe of winding gets bigest inductance and lowest capasitance at the same lenght of wire . But I dont know does anybody
will made this type of wiring
Another way  if it is necessary to have capacitive connection between L12 and L13( Like T-1000 showed on diagram )  I doubt
that this method is good for us .
Regards
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIOocMoRsYQ&feature=rec-fresh+div-r-8-HM
Please look how it are making .
The type of winding you are looking for appears to be a "Brooks Coil".  The one in purple.  Highest induction coil because of the geometry.
 
Cheers,
 
Bruce


jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11207 on: March 19, 2012, 04:51:39 PM »
Sooo no one has tried the mag amp yet? You'd be surprised how well it works.


http://www.themeasuringsystemofthegods.com/magnetic%20amplifiers.pdf


 No problems with silicon limitations to current other then the wire gauge.

 There is a very interesting circuit on page 18

 Here is the other side of non linear amps:

http://www.capturedlightning.org/hot-streamer/pool/dielectric.htm
« Last Edit: March 19, 2012, 06:21:30 PM by jbignes5 »

captainkt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 262
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11208 on: March 19, 2012, 05:10:08 PM »
@jbigness, I think the reason no one bothers with mag amp is there is no amplification, it simply uses a small voltage to control a large voltage up to the max input but no more.
Regards
Keith

frantz

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 167
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11209 on: March 19, 2012, 05:32:06 PM »
Hi captainkt and Jbignes5,
I think captainkt have a right.
Its working "like" a transistor - similar on AC current.


Amplification of energy (OU) is not available on there.


Maybe we are blind men. Clarify this for us.


Regards
Frantz

T-1000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1738
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11210 on: March 19, 2012, 07:45:12 PM »
@wattsup
The primary:secondary coils ratio is calculated in conventional formulas.
Also, the BEMF we're running in flyback multiplies output voltage 10-20 times.
This is where it gets interesting with output voltages and capacitive links... :)

jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11211 on: March 19, 2012, 08:41:17 PM »
Hi captainkt and Jbignes5,
I think captainkt have a right.
Its working "like" a transistor - similar on AC current.


Amplification of energy (OU) is not available on there.


Maybe we are blind men. Clarify this for us.


Regards
Frantz


 The reason so many fail is that they can not control 1000's of volts without very special silicon. in fact most of the good transistors are very very expensive. This is a way to do it simplistically without the limitations that current silicon can attain. Have you even read the material at all that I posted instead of just saying bah there is nothing to this.


 What about page 18 that I pointed out? Can you say bipolar catcher coil? what would happen if you biased the core with a magnet instead of a battery? that would saturate the core into the realm they are talking about as well.


 why don't we ask the guys here what they use for signal generators and power supplies? Think people....

 "Silicon transistors typically do not operate at voltages higher than about 1000 volts (SiC devices can be operated as high as 3000 volts). In contrast, vacuum tubes have been developed that can be operated at tens of thousands of volts." And these mag amps can be controlled in the same manner but the limitations are removed. Think about being able to control millions of volts directly, much the same as a transistor and not like a spark gap. This would allow us to customize the signal then magnify it to whatever the caps are charged to. Finding a better valve control for the pulses is the key.

wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11212 on: March 19, 2012, 09:58:38 PM »
@wattsup
The primary:secondary coils ratio is calculated in conventional formulas.
Also, the BEMF we're running in flyback multiplies output voltage 10-20 times.
This is where it gets interesting with output voltages and capacitive links... :)

@T-1000

I suspected as much on the HV output effects but the main question we have is will the flyback HV coil survive having two wires that are not connected and just left inside the coil windings.

@ronotte

I will finalize the build specs and send them to Bob. His expertise in the matter will be the best to see if this has a possibility of working out and what type of modifications we must consider for the new HV coil, I will also ask him t o make the standard TBC-110LA as we know it from the last specs.

wattsup

aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1049
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11213 on: March 19, 2012, 11:15:08 PM »

T-1000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1738
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11214 on: March 19, 2012, 11:47:18 PM »
@T-1000

I suspected as much on the HV output effects but the main question we have is will the flyback HV coil survive having two wires that are not connected and just left inside the coil windings.

You need insulation of 30kV+ between those two coils. Then as long the dielectric is not in over voltage condition, it will survive. Please make sure those 2 loose wires between coils are not exposed to air gap because it would be very bad dielectric.

Hopefully you get idea.

wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11215 on: March 20, 2012, 03:47:39 AM »
You need insulation of 30kV+ between those two coils. Then as long the dielectric is not in over voltage condition, it will survive. Please make sure those 2 loose wires between coils are not exposed to air gap because it would be very bad dielectric.

Hopefully you get idea.

@T-1000 / @ronotte

OK, I have given the manufacturer the build spec so we will now see how it goes with them.
I asked for 5 of each Standard and Dual HV.
I asked them to consider increasing the Dual HV wire diameter from the original 0.17mm to any thicker gauge since there will be less winds.

@All

So while this is going on I will order their standard flyback and play around with other for a while since my flyback is now just toasting slowly from the inside so I am just trying out various primary winding methods to see their differences.

wattsup

Kator01

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 898
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11216 on: March 20, 2012, 12:45:54 PM »
Sooo no one has tried the mag amp yet? You'd be surprised how well it works.


http://www.themeasuringsystemofthegods.com/magnetic%20amplifiers.pdf


 No problems with silicon limitations to current other then the wire gauge.

 There is a very interesting circuit on page 18

 Here is the other side of non linear amps:

http://www.capturedlightning.org/hot-streamer/pool/dielectric.htm

Hi jbignes5,

I have studied and build transductor or magamp-controler for more than a year. The problem is to get access to the energy contained in iron ( spontaneous magnetisation ). This technique must be studied more in depth because it is the way to excite the ZPE to enter via Iron. Unfortunately my time is limited now to further explore this. The link sort of blocks my browser - there is no reaction and I have to shut my browser down via task-manager.

Regards

Kator01

jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11217 on: March 20, 2012, 01:02:52 PM »
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEEaAwwGTZM&feature=channel


 This is what I was getting at. Also the mag amp would replace most of the traditional transistors and you can make it so it will not back feed to the source signal through transformer action. There are circuits that allow for both positive and negative feedback as well and a sort of auto control for the transistor via that feed back from what I am understanding.

 I am betting also if we changed the input coil to bifilar it would be come very very sensitive and non reflecting to the source signal. On the other hand using a bifilar coil as the main power pathway hasn't been explored by me yet.

 This is the method that the jewel thief uses. The only difference is how you provide the input signal. In the case of the transistor we must provide the signal via internal coil. As with the Jewel thief it was designed to work via splitting and feedback. Think about this now. We could have a jewel thief that doesn't need the transistor via it's own input wind to the core. The standard jewel thief doesn't have that input winding and only works in a feedback mode via the transistor.

 I'm starting on research in this area.

wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11218 on: March 21, 2012, 05:21:17 AM »
@All

I just had to put this video here. This and the others are old jewels of EE that are just so great to see back then in their time frame and guys just may see something.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPT7Wtp3yoo&NR=1

No news yet.

wattsup

frantz

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 167
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11219 on: March 21, 2012, 08:33:50 AM »
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEEaAwwGTZM&feature=channel


 This is what I was getting at. Also the mag amp would replace most of the traditional transistors and you can make it so it will not back feed to the source signal through transformer action. There are circuits that allow for both positive and negative feedback as well and a sort of auto control for the transistor via that feed back from what I am understanding.

 I am betting also if we changed the input coil to bifilar it would be come very very sensitive and non reflecting to the source signal. On the other hand using a bifilar coil as the main power pathway hasn't been explored by me yet.

 This is the method that the jewel thief uses. The only difference is how you provide the input signal. In the case of the transistor we must provide the signal via internal coil. As with the Jewel thief it was designed to work via splitting and feedback. Think about this now. We could have a jewel thief that doesn't need the transistor via it's own input wind to the core. The standard jewel thief doesn't have that input winding and only works in a feedback mode via the transistor.

 I'm starting on research in this area.




Hi jbignes5
I have bad news in regard to movie which you put over.


This circuit is powered by pulsed DC current. In fact this is a sum of DC and AC current.
In fact, current in coil have only one direction - magnetic flux too.
In this point electric motor taking some power (current measurement on input of transformer).
when you put neo magnet to the core in first position, you are adding magnetic flux to constant pulsed flux and you are near of the saturation point of transformer.
Magnet i other direction moving flux in down and in fact constant part of flux from signal is removed by magnet flux. Finlay we have alternate part of flux in transformer.
F.ex.
if you remove transformer and connect directly motor to power source, you will have better solution or put AC on input of transformer without DC part.
There is no OU.
I'm sorry for this but I would like to save your time.


Frantz