Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16406820 times)

baroutologos

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 918
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11025 on: February 28, 2012, 10:07:43 PM »
@all
..
wattsup

PS: Sorry to be off topic.




After having spent a great deal of time in researching kapanadze's Tech (both experimentally as well as theoretically and from reviewing work of others') i have come to the conclusion that nothing good holds this tech and no one should expect anything good from this guy.


In fact those recent videos are adding nothing to the case rather than exposing it. Now.. you can flame me :)


27Bubba

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 177
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11026 on: February 28, 2012, 10:30:13 PM »
"In fact those recent videos are adding nothing to the case rather than exposing it. Now.. you can flame me :)"

Nobody in the right mind should flame you. You are entitled to an opinion just like everyone else. In fact opposing opinions are just as valuable. It won't keep you in rut.  Somehow I do believe there maybe an answer hidden somewhere. I know thru life experience often simple thing are overlooked because simplicity of it...  IMHO ;D ;)

andrea76

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 125
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11027 on: February 28, 2012, 10:37:02 PM »



After having spent a great deal of time in researching kapanadze's Tech (both experimentally as well as theoretically and from reviewing work of others') i have come to the conclusion that nothing good holds this tech and no one should expect anything good from this guy.


In fact those recent videos are adding nothing to the case rather than exposing it. Now.. you can flame me :)

all conversion devices like hendershot,testatika,TPU,kapanadze and other have in common a dc pulsed output.when connecting at the output an electric motor (inductive load)  this burn out.WHY? ALL device have the same characteristics....think about that! all is a fake? i m not sure but the answer is NOT!
the problem is that we don t know exactly how  they are made.but it is only a matter of time.....






twinbeard

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11028 on: February 29, 2012, 01:31:09 AM »

~40 miles line of sight with use of re-purposed dumpster dive dish network antennas. (FROM MOUNTAINTOP TO HORIZON)
The record is close to 300 clicks, I think.
~11 Miles on flat ground with towers & dishes.
I was able to make two radios talk at about 30 clicks, which was the largest separation between radios that I had.
IMHO 50 clicks would have been no challenge with that setup.

~2-3 miles on flat ground with just dishes.
This depends on what you have in between, how clear your fresnel zone is, in band noise in the area, whether its raining or not, etc.  That said, anything under 5 clicks is almost dummy proof with modern gear.

The hacked up sat dish with a can of corn feedhorn is not the most efficient setup... there are several vendors making tuned antenna in this range which work much better, and quite often we wind up integrating the radio to eliminate cable losses.

Also, regarding the torrent I posted, I have not seen any traffic lately, so I will pull down the tracker in 24hours if nobody tells me they still want to download it.

Cheers,
Twinbeard

d3x0r

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1433
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11029 on: February 29, 2012, 01:53:23 AM »
Some people wanted it; someone is downloading at 30kB at 18%... probably take them a while.  I have 15x shares :) 

twinbeard

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11030 on: February 29, 2012, 01:58:12 AM »
Some people wanted it; someone is downloading at 30kB at 18%... probably take them a while.  I have 15x shares :)

ahh.  we must have some good torrenters seeding after they download, so my primary seed sees no traffic.  very good.  i will leave it up for a while then.

John M

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 65
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11031 on: February 29, 2012, 02:22:52 AM »



After having spent a great deal of time in researching kapanadze's Tech (both experimentally as well as theoretically and from reviewing work of others') i have come to the conclusion that nothing good holds this tech and no one should expect anything good from this guy.


In fact those recent videos are adding nothing to the case rather than exposing it. Now.. you can flame me :)


I have some doubts about Don Smith's devices as well. I won't say neither works because of some replications that apparently have been done. For those replications done on this forum or others I am waiting for someone to show proof without a doubt, showing considerably much more output then input (Self Runner).
Wesley may be at that point already, but 6 or more one hundred watt bulbs at full brightness with 50 watts or less input would be nice to see.

John

grizli

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 415
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11032 on: February 29, 2012, 02:47:37 AM »
CAN ANYONE translate THIS from russian ????????


http://www.freeenergylt.narod2.ru/mustafa007/

THIS IMAGE needs to be translated... VERY important

http://www.freeenergylt.narod2.ru/mustafa007/MUSTAFA_frodo_2012-02-28.jpg

PLEASE ; FREE ENERGY INFO !!!

TRY TO TRANSLATE ALL images to english.. IMAGES are useless.. GOOgle translate cant do that !!!
THANK YOU!

teslabuilder

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11033 on: February 29, 2012, 04:13:14 AM »
CAN ANYONE translate THIS from russian ????????


http://www.freeenergylt.narod2.ru/mustafa007/

THIS IMAGE needs to be translated... VERY important

http://www.freeenergylt.narod2.ru/mustafa007/MUSTAFA_frodo_2012-02-28.jpg

PLEASE ; FREE ENERGY INFO !!!

TRY TO TRANSLATE ALL images to english.. IMAGES are useless.. GOOgle translate cant do that !!!
THANK YOU!

LOL

yes quick...I dont have a clue what I'm doing but this looks mildly interesting therefore PLEASE please..somebody waste THEIR precious time translating this so I can lose interest 2 seconds after I start reading it.  O...M...Goodness...get a grip already!

You guys stick to no single theme for longer than a page...its no wonder this thread is hundreds of pages long and you are totally clueless.


teslabuilder

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11034 on: February 29, 2012, 04:26:02 AM »

I have some doubts about Don Smith's devices as well. I won't say neither works because of some replications that apparently have been done. For those replications done on this forum or others I am waiting for someone to show proof without a doubt, showing considerably much more output then input (Self Runner).
Wesley may be at that point already, but 6 or more one hundred watt bulbs at full brightness with 50 watts or less input would be nice to see.

John

Well done John.

One of the very few posts of intellect in this whole nonsensical thread.

I too spent 18 months methodically 'perfecting' a circuit that I would call a solid state tesla switch.  It is a thing of pure beauty.  After reading all of teslas patents, studing the works of Don Smith, I was able to build an 'amplifier' that gives the the illusion of OU.

Input 2 watts
Loaded output 4 watts.

The more load you apply the LESS the circuit uses! 

If I wasnt honest with myself and had not tirelessly shredded the numbers on it, I would be kidding myself that it is OU (and I did for awhile).  IT IS NOT.

Tesla was all about efficiency and so were many other builders at the turn of the century.  All regenerative circuits (which is what they were called back then) were attempts at cutting the fat more and more.  It is only the uneducated and deluded that thinks these are OU circuits that run on nothing.

It is simply not possible.

Tesla built things (and Don smith too) that make the LOAD part of the circuit, so rather than using the energy from source once you RECYCLE it.  Of course you cannot recycle all of it but you do a large portion. 

Understand these BASIC concepts.

Without resistance (somewhere) you cannot light a globe (if there is no resistance the fialment wont heat up)
Cold electricity is a phenomenon that has only a few uses
Talk of lenzless generators is stupidity (I repeat...without Lenz and resistance you cant do useful work)  Wake up!!
All you can do is recycle
Losses are everywhere...heat, light, magnetic, electric, gravitic

Tariel Kapanadze has NEVER once stated it was OU and yet you all put the words in his mouth.  He remains quiet and doesnt argue it because it would be better to let fools think it and they hopefully give him money for his Tesla rehash.

Anyway whatever.

twinbeard

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11035 on: February 29, 2012, 05:03:51 AM »

Without resistance (somewhere) you cannot light a globe (if there is no resistance the fialment wont heat up)
Cold electricity is a phenomenon that has only a few uses
Talk of lenzless generators is stupidity (I repeat...without Lenz and resistance you cant do useful work)  Wake up!!
All you can do is recycle
Losses are everywhere...heat, light, magnetic, electric, gravitic


Anyway whatever.

I am going to take you to task on the Lenz.  If you phase modulate the field created in the generator coil such that the current does not appear until the exciting pole has already passed, then you can not only negate the Lenz related drag, but you can invert the effect so that you actually get higher frequency of rotation with less prime mover input.

I could expound upon other mentioned topics, but apparently you came to tell us what farking morons we are, so cast not pearls before swine, and all that. 

teslabuilder

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11036 on: February 29, 2012, 05:10:14 AM »
Well done John.

One of the very few posts of intellect in this whole nonsensical thread.

I too spent 18 months methodically 'perfecting' a circuit that I would call a solid state tesla switch.  It is a thing of pure beauty.  After reading all of teslas patents, studing the works of Don Smith, I was able to build an 'amplifier' that gives the the illusion of OU.

Input 2 watts
Loaded output 4 watts.

The more load you apply the LESS the circuit uses! 


BTW, before anyone gets pedantic about my numbers let me clarify -

Obviously if it were REALLY 4 watts out and 2 watts in it would be able to self run.  I already stated it does not.

the 2 watts input is REAL value.
4 watts output was the READING from the scopes and various meters HOWEVER...as you should all know if you truly build...Tesla tech is all about sharp on/off switching with decaying resonance.  Meters are fooled by the massive voltage spikes and cannot keep up with accurate averaging.  Modern meters are meant for reading slow sine wave and even the best RMS gets bamboozled by the Mhz high freq tesla switching.

The reality is this.  By honest experiments with batteries and capacitors at both the input and output, I was able to calculate the input at 2 watts and the output about 1.96 watts.

The very specific waveform that this setup generates is something lead batteries love...you can charge a 12volt battery to 18 volts or higher on only 12 volt input.  When you cease charging it settles back to about 13.5 volts.  The charge is very real and very dense.  The batteries never sulphate and the run time on them is huge.

Another thing you will see is that this charger will automatically adjust to different battery capacitances.  whether 6 volt, series, 12 volt, whatever.  Additionally, this being the case it makes an excellent HHO generator.

You can light 15 watt rated led lights with the circuit and fool urself with that but this is not accurate as you may one day find out if you experiment rather than drivel nonsense.  You can also light 6 watt bulbs (filament) and the draw on the input goes down because of factors I wont discuss here.  Its all part of the makeup of circuit and when you see it for what it is...you understand why and how it works.

Sadly it is not OU...but it does have plenty of uses.

Tariel has no OU and neither did Don Smith.  Rosemary Ainslie, I will say has no OU either.  If she was honest with it rather than being in love with the circuit, she would be able to see that there is no OU even with all the silly heat output statements.

teslabuilder

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11037 on: February 29, 2012, 05:15:39 AM »
I am going to take you to task on the Lenz.  If you phase modulate the field created in the generator coil such that the current does not appear until the exciting pole has already passed, then you can not only negate the Lenz related drag, but you can invert the effect so that you actually get higher frequency of rotation with less prime mover input.

I could expound upon other mentioned topics, but apparently you came to tell us what farking morons we are, so cast not pearls before swine, and all that.

I am aware of that.

At the end of it all, what you just stated is wanky.  My circuit wouldnt have less draw on input when loaded down if I didnt understand what you were stating.  But be that what it is ...it just doesnt matter.

Whether you try and lift a 1 ton rock with ur bare hands (and break ur back) or whether you decide to use a block and tackle for 2 days ...it all equates to METHOD of shuttling energy.  Either be efficient...or dont be efficient.  However, you have still expended a certain amount of energy and you wont get it all back.

So when you have settled down and got your knickers out of a twist, look at it honestly.

I just dont give a crap

frantz

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 167
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11038 on: February 29, 2012, 09:20:59 AM »
Update of mustafa device:


twinbeard

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #11039 on: February 29, 2012, 11:32:51 AM »
I am going to take you to task on the Lenz.  If you phase modulate the field created in the generator coil such that the current does not appear until the exciting pole has already passed, then you can not only negate the Lenz related drag, but you can invert the effect so that you actually get higher frequency of rotation with less prime mover input.

I am aware of that.

Then why would you say this?

Talk of lenzless generators is stupidity

Its plainly not.  You just agreed with a technique I described to achieve it.

At the end of it all, what you just stated is wanky.

Well, to be fair, what you just said is either a)hypocritical or b) male bovine feces.

My circuit wouldnt have less draw on input when loaded down if I didnt understand what you were stating.  But be that what it is ...it just doesnt matter.

Perhaps, perhaps not.  depends on your load, and if your load is going to effect the Q of your circuit.

Whether you try and lift a 1 ton rock with ur bare hands (and break ur back) or whether you decide to use a block and tackle for 2 days ...it all equates to METHOD of shuttling energy. 

I would rather do it like Leedskalnin did it in the middle of the night.

Either be efficient...or dont be efficient.  However, you have still expended a certain amount of energy and you wont get it all back.

This is true.  Efficiency in loads is an excellent engineering goal, for sure.  Doing just that is what keeps me in the particular business that I am in, but that is irrelevant.  The less loss in your circuits, the better all around.  But what if you set up your circuit to create a condition that allows nature to give you some energy for free?  Maybe it gives you more than you expended in the process, plus what your circuit recycled once it was done with it?

So when you have settled down and got your knickers out of a twist, look at it honestly.

I do look at it honestly.  Watch the clear box video.  Maybe the 9V runs a small oscillator that tops off a cap till the potential is high enough to start the main device.  The device then runs with no obvious external input... just an earth connection.  Either that is a receiver circuit for a soviet magnifying transmitter, or it is a permutation of the transmitter itself, plasma arc reactor included, that tops off its own drive cap with part of the output.

I just dont give a crap

Good.  If I wanted any crap out of you, I would just squeeze your head.

Cheers,
Twinbeard