Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16506804 times)

27Bubba

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 177
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10890 on: February 20, 2012, 03:24:53 PM »
@ spikeyvoltage

"So much speculation….so little intelligence applied."

.. and certainly you cannot be accused of being intelligent judging by your post. Just because you haven't been successful at your experiment that doesn't  mean everyone in the whole world including Kapanadze failed. Think about it before you post again!
My2¢




verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10891 on: February 20, 2012, 04:12:02 PM »
You are not going to want to hear this.  THERE IS NO OVER UNITY.
How do you know?
What is your definition of OVER UNITY ?

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10892 on: February 20, 2012, 04:15:52 PM »
Anyone else make out the distinct hum at 27:05 in the full video where tk coonects
the battery without motor or panel of lights connected.
 
50 or 60 Hz like the hum from a large transformer.
 
Garry
Not from large transformer but from inverter transformer.
but that information is valuable Thank You


Wesley




PS: and later addition to subject discussed
Please look for more I appreciate it.
I will give you another one:


 at the bottom of the heav beam structure there is the metal covering space inside  T beams..
TK elevate it to show that there is no wires  ...
but he show
 that by reasoning of philosophy


there is no 'signification" and no "motivation" to cover bottom of metal base of TK rotary device


That supports "reasoning"






Conclusion:
- that space  might of be used  for hiding batteries in big amount of them.
- that space  might of be used for area under the discs to be controlled by driven mechanism operating   on Lorenz law  and/or utilizing Faraday disc principals  at modernized version


for that to happened than


- part of metal  sheet underneath of  discs should be made of nonmetallic material.(none magnetic flux blocking material)


or


- elevated  supports for brackets holding shaft  (gorizontalnyj stierzen , osku,)
 from inner side facing disc have had the same  kind of covering material
 that  is why TK used Foam to prevent visual inspection
 









verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10893 on: February 20, 2012, 04:20:24 PM »
.. and certainly you cannot be accused of being intelligent judging by your post. Just because you haven't been successful at your experiment that doesn't  mean everyone in the whole world including Kapanadze failed. Think about it before you post again!
My2¢

Maybe SpikeyVoltage did not read about the Yoke device from page 550 of this thread. 

The tube and disk devices discussed afterwards were never reliably measured thus he is correct in stating that OU claims cannot be made for them.
...but this argument is not applicable to all of the devices out there.

scratchrobot

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 401
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10894 on: February 20, 2012, 05:10:26 PM »
I think spikeyvoltage made a good post, and the reason for him posting here is maybe for us to open or eyes and see reality!
I mean the people posting here like they know it all are all telling different stories, CosmoLV who tells us we have to
use the gravitational field and T1000 who knows to get OU from cascade effect, now Bold also knows the answer and people in
the Muller Dynamo thread are still struggling because of the fake Romero Video.

I want to believe in OU but you guys don't make it easy for me  >:(
If someone wants to see more fake OU video I make one.

btw, I already have and use OU at day time when the sun shines but a different source would be nice.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10895 on: February 20, 2012, 05:26:59 PM »
Not from large transformer but from inverter transformer.
but that information is valuable Thank You


Wesley




PS: and later addition to subject discussed
Please look for more I appreciate it.
I will give you another one:


 at the bottom of the heav beam structure there is the metal covering space inside  T beams..
TK elevate it to show that there is no wires  ...
but he show
 that by reasoning of philosophy


there is no 'signification" and no "motivation" to cover bottom of metal base of TK rotary device


That supports "reasoning"






Conclusion:
- that space  might of be used  for hiding batteries in big amount of them.
- that space  might of be used for area under the discs to be controlled by driven mechanism operating   on Lorenz law  and/or utilizing Faraday disc principals  at modernized version


for that to happened than


- part of metal  sheet underneath of  discs should be made of nonmetallic material.(none magnetic flux blocking material)


or


- elevated  supports for brackets holding shaft  (gorizontalnyj stierzen , osku,)
 from inner side facing disc have had the same  kind of covering material
 that  is why TK used Foam to prevent visual inspection




==========================================================


Perception of TK  (PTK) analysis versus  "perception of analytic party" PAP)
analytic party = person, device and/or mechanism of controlling and verification and validation of TK devices and technologies  ( in our case)=AP
TK perception is  assigned at "level 1" PTK=L1
Level 1= stage of recognition manifesting its presence and its "domination".( in our case) L1
Domination stays for level of difference  to the " level 1" could be
 =,
<  >,
in "motion of constant change",




motion of constant change- is dependability of "domination" ( in our case) =MCC
from analytic party " AP"

level of certainty is in our case delay factor at  delta T time delay)= LC

word "or" is in our case - logic manipulator



Simplified Analysis:

PTK =L1  or MCC
PAP =L1 or >or< or MCC




if PAP  equal  PTK  than = L1
if PAP < L1 than PTK is in control of  MCC  and LC
If PAP> L1 than  TK is loser or he might be paid for his invention but based on MCC depending on LC ( in any scenario right or wrong , his  device and/or secrets are known to  AP)


if (at certain  delta T ) LC is dominator of  MCC than


PAP>L1 than MCC =LC> L1
or if
TKP>L1 than MCC=LC>L1
by equation TKP>L1 we understand increased  ability of TK to understand and perform comparing to any  earlier given period of time. Than there is a need to place L1 in time frame.


So because till today
PAP is <L1
than
TKP is=L1
than
PAP<TKP
than
TKP=L1=MCC=LC
Conclusion: I this case TK is in control of motion( that means he can make any motion >=< than Zero.)


Statue of limitation : Motion depends on  driving mechanism= energy of motion( in our case)= SOL
In TK case the motion is based on money from shows.
That says that TK has no other income known to us.
That stays that TK do not want to  give up his control over the device.
 If than
PAP = L1
than
PAP=L1=MMC=LC

what is than the reason that AP stay quiet?


factor of gain (in our case) = FOG
-Factor of gain should be understand as  present of future  gain based on  MCC and LC
-Factor of gain of AP ,should be analyzed based on past gain versus of lose of  gain ( say investor made commitments with oil guys and got money from them to  deal with TK.... verification of technology  and  level of danger estimation )

(tendency) vector of AP is of FOG>0
(tendency) vector of TK is of FOG>0

if FOG of AP>0  based on L1 and PAP=or>L1
 than
FOG x infinity-SOL=PAP=FOG-SOL
word "infinity" is used as  multiplier 1x,2, ....100000... and so on.

That means
That
PAP=FOG-SOL


There you go...
That is  explanation why TK is/was not being denoted, denominated, disintegrated( murdered),Put into the trash,named liar,and prosecuted for fraud  , imprisoned, and so on...
They are all in fear of   
 TK hidden files









Wesley
 :) :) :)
« Last Edit: February 20, 2012, 09:46:54 PM by stivep »

27Bubba

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 177
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10896 on: February 20, 2012, 06:21:46 PM »
"I'm still working on it"

OK, keep working on it. Meanwhile I get another Tylenol pill, my head hurts.. ;D ;D :D ;)

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10897 on: February 20, 2012, 06:56:41 PM »
I think nobody here likes to think clearly, but everybody tries to think deeply.

“The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane.”
ʉۥ Nikola Tesla

Kapanadze in one of videos (green box) mentioned Melnichenko, and said that that guy is very close. That should point all of you to correct path I think. Just my  2 cents.

nightwind

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10898 on: February 20, 2012, 06:59:23 PM »
@ Verpies

Would the following work as a method of power measurement?
Measure the heat output of a bulb with a infrared non-contact thermometer ($30) under normal power and then measure the bulb heat output being powered by the OU circuit.  This should directly correlate with output watts in percentage terms.  The only drawback I see - will the light spectrum of the bulb screw up the infrared reading?  Thanks

Edit: Use a power resister or heat coil instead?

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10899 on: February 20, 2012, 07:42:35 PM »
@ Verpies

Would the following work as a method of power measurement?
Measure the heat output of a bulb with a infrared non-contact thermometer ($30) under normal power and then measure the bulb heat output being powered by the OU circuit.  This should directly correlate with output watts in percentage terms.  The only drawback I see - will the light spectrum of the bulb screw up the infrared reading?  Thanks

Edit: Use a power resister or heat coil instead?

Almost. The problem with measuring temperature instead of the radiant flux is that hot air accumulates in closed boxes. Without an insulating enclosure the influence of the embient temperature is just too unpredictable.
So the cheapest and most accurate way is to measure the radiant flux of an incandescent light bulb (or even a portion of it, e.g. visible or infrared portion) in a dark box with some kind of a monotonic radiation sensor, such as a common photodiode, phototransistor, photoresistor or a solar cell (photovoltaics) or even a photographic luxmeter.

To use such a cheap wattmeter, first the electrical power input would need to be correlated with e.g. light sensor output.  Such as shown below:

nightwind

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10900 on: February 20, 2012, 08:35:37 PM »
Almost. The problem with measuring temperature instead of the radiant flux is that hot air accumulates in closed boxes. Without an insulating enclosure the influence of the embient temperature is just too unpredictable.
So the cheapest and most accurate way is to measure the radiant flux of an incandescent light bulb (or even a portion of it, e.g. visible or infrared portion) in a dark box with some kind of a monotonic radiation sensor, such as a common photodiode, phototransistor, photoresistor or a solar cell (photovoltaics) or even a photographic luxmeter.

To use such a cheap wattmeter, first the electrical power input would need to be correlated with e.g. light sensor output.  Such as shown below:

I would agree on the lux reading.  Only problem I see with it would be the heat buildup (it need to be either a small bulb or large enclosure).  With a temp gun,  you could measure the load device surface heat in the open air and also take a measurement of the ambient air temperature under both source conditions.  I thought of this because so many people have these lying around.

equityboost

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10901 on: February 20, 2012, 09:32:02 PM »
Unfortunately, incandescence of a bulb is a affected by the applied frequency. So bulb brightness isn't telling you anything conclusive about OU power being generated. The fact that a high frequency output can light 100w bulbs does not mean 100w was used to light it. If you're stepping the frequency back down to 60hz, that would be apples to apples. Otherwise you're misleading yourself.

Acca

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 563
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10902 on: February 20, 2012, 09:53:25 PM »
To :  Wesley, 
below is a link to    E&H type of ham antennas that have a capacitance in the center and voltagecomponent.  It is very similar to center loading coil by Valdimir Udkin.             http://www.eh-antenna.com/EH_HZ.pdf
 [/font]TO: spikeyvoltage    You must must go elsewhere if "you" want to "PREACH" that free energy is Crap !!GO ELSE WHERE !! TROLL ...



Acca..

spikeyvoltage

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10903 on: February 21, 2012, 01:16:17 AM »
To :  Wesley, 
below is a link to    E&H type of ham antennas that have a capacitance in the center and voltagecomponent.  It is very similar to center loading coil by Valdimir Udkin.             http://www.eh-antenna.com/EH_HZ.pdf
 [/font]TO: spikeyvoltage    You must must go elsewhere if "you" want to "PREACH" that free energy is Crap !!GO ELSE WHERE !! TROLL ...



Acca..

Nah...I will stay right here and do whatever I want.  Seems like you poor saps can't handle the truth.  LOL  The truth is what it is...get a life!

Nobody bothered to answer a reasonable question - Why would Tesla end his career with energy collecting device patents from atmosphere if he already knew how to 'make' an excess of energy with a machine????

Seems you have all been watching too much TV.

You can always count on rednecks and buffoons to sway away from science.

Later losers!

spikeyvoltage

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10904 on: February 21, 2012, 01:19:41 AM »
@ spikeyvoltage

"So much speculation….so little intelligence applied."

.. and certainly you cannot be accused of being intelligent judging by your post. Just because you haven't been successful at your experiment that doesn't  mean everyone in the whole world including Kapanadze failed. Think about it before you post again!
My2¢

Poor redneck Bubba.  Somebody has injected some reality into your world and you would rather live with the delusion.

Im sure you have gone far in life with that outlook.  LOL

Carry on