Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16406682 times)

conico

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 292
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10500 on: February 04, 2012, 11:35:55 PM »
Thank you, Cosmo
 In Delamorto device it is no coil inside ferrite, should I use a coil inside ?  Will be more energy out?

Alena

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10501 on: February 04, 2012, 11:43:54 PM »
I don't understand the way this thread is going.
Wesley has replicated the Lithuania experiment.
Looks like 30 watts in 200 watts out and probably even better than that.
Why don't those with the equipment simply replicate this and post some results?
That way we can probably design a circuit, instead of using expensive
signal generators etc.
Or am I missing something? :(

The device is in the process of repetition. While not getting a charge on Avramenko plug. Monday will continue. + Obviously a bad ground.

woopy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 608
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10502 on: February 05, 2012, 12:54:52 AM »
Hi all

going on my testing

here some results

hope this helps

and good luck at all

Laurent

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gz8GkK1tygQ

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10503 on: February 05, 2012, 02:19:17 AM »
I don't understand the way this thread is going.
Wesley has replicated the Lithuania experiment.
Looks like 30 watts in 200 watts out and probably even better than that.
Why don't those with the equipment simply replicate this and post some results?
That way we can probably design a circuit, instead of using expensive
signal generators etc.
Or am I missing something? :(
no you not
 We do not know the mechanism that is ruling it
it is not major to get gain it is major to get  self looping
at no external power supply


Based on right principals.


Donald Smith got  gain and what?.... no progress.


Caduceus is tricky as you have to wind it exactly as Aidas did.
Ferrite yoke is even more.
Till now I do not  think I can give you something  that TK  presented with no need of any prove.
That is what NYW  is trying to achieve.
That is what  cosmoLV said he already has.
It is not even important   do we believe this guy..


TK did not used caduceus so mechanism is the most important . That is why TK presented big  power in Turkey


Wesley





cosmoLV

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 252
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10504 on: February 05, 2012, 03:32:08 AM »
Thank you, Cosmo
 In Delamorto device it is no coil inside ferrite, should I use a coil inside ?  Will be more energy out?

Not always, you can do modifications as you wish – this thing is "big experiment" :)
Device is simple and there are no too complicated to modify something.

The most important thing is to organise HV impulses – the most simple way is to use Blocking generator in right arangment
Example is here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Sm-xKiStXBQ#!

"This is first step" you can make a simple Mini tesla coil – If you remember whyle ago i say importance of "Andrey Melnichenko" works
"The essence of the physical effect of generation of the free energy of the secondary field of the ferromagnet"

http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=ru&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fferromagnetic-energy.ru%2Farticles%2Fsut_fizicheskogo_e_ffekta1%2F

http://freeenergylt.narod2.ru/delamorto/kacer_delamorto.jpg
http://freeenergylt.narod2.ru/delamorto/DELAMORTO_2.jpg

P.S. Don't listen others here, they want not let you know about this – they are not interested in Free Energy, mostly is interest of self importance.

duff

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 298
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10505 on: February 05, 2012, 07:10:00 AM »
Kapanadze Quote from "presentation tariel kapanadze eng.avi":
Quote
I have simply found a resonance and a method which automatically adjusts a resonance between primary and secondary coils. I f there will be no resonance, here how recently I read. From a computer has pulled out the information about such person... Its sur name Melnichenko.The unique person, unique material with which I hav had time to familizrize for last year. Who decided exactly this question. It speaks: hold a resonance and all will turn out. As he said, it has not reached transformer Tesla, and has already begun work, to make this installation. But, he will make this device, to my mind, still it is not fast, but... he is very close. And probably our government should take it into consideration.

Andrey Melnichenko website:

http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fizob.narod.ru%2F

Alena

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10506 on: February 05, 2012, 08:56:06 AM »

TK did not used caduceus so mechanism is the most important . That is why TK presented big  power in Turkey


Wesley

Wesley, you called Tariel Karanadze friend. However, he does not share your beliefs? He has for a long time does not reveal its secrets. And you as a friend, forced to act contrary to their views? Wait, when will the world Tariel secret is useless, he did not open.

Alena

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10507 on: February 05, 2012, 09:13:20 AM »


P.S. Don't listen others here, they want not let you know about this – they are not interested in Free Energy, mostly is interest of self importance.

And you say some hints. What is your contrast to the other?
The impression that you are concerned about self-importance and constantly maintain your own price.

blocki

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10508 on: February 05, 2012, 09:38:25 AM »
Dear CosmoLV,

I'm still very new here, but I saw your video posted in April 2011.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Urdotg_CPJo&feature=related

It seems that you have a working device, or is there anything wrong with this one?

My Russian is не очень хорошо, so I don't understand everything you are saying there.

On the previous page you posted the links to the Delamorto schematics.
Is the device in the video above based on the Delamorto schematics?

Большое спасибо, blocki :)

FreeEnergyInfo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 501
    • FreeEnergyLT
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10509 on: February 05, 2012, 10:10:31 AM »
Dear CosmoLV,

I'm still very new here, but I saw your video posted in April 2011.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Urdotg_CPJo&feature=related

It seems that you have a working device, or is there anything wrong with this one?

My Russian is не очень хорошо, so I don't understand everything you are saying there.

On the previous page you posted the links to the Delamorto schematics.
Is the device in the video above based on the Delamorto schematics?

Большое спасибо, blocki :)

VIDEO = FEIK ,BAD , MELAS , NO FREE ENERGY  !!!!
HISTORY DELETE VIDEO DELAMORTO ...
ANTANAS
LITHUANIA

blocki

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10510 on: February 05, 2012, 10:16:59 AM »
VIDEO = FEIK ,BAD , MELAS , NO FREE ENERGY  !!!!
HISTORY DELETE VIDEO DELAMORTO ...
ANTANAS
LITHUANIA

ok, Thanks

@FreeEnergyInfo, how about the schematics that I posted last week, can I try to build this one:

http://www.overunity.com/7679/selfrunning-free-energy-devices-up-to-5-kw-from-tariel-kapanadze/msg310981/#msg310981

I'm really interested in building a device, but if it is proven bullshit, I won't start building it.

Thanks, blocki

itanimuLLi

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 43
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10511 on: February 05, 2012, 10:41:04 AM »
Hi all

going on my testing

here some results

hope this helps

and good luck at all

Laurent

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gz8GkK1tygQ

WOOPY (Laurent)  You are great, ;)

conico

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 292
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10512 on: February 05, 2012, 10:46:30 AM »
 This is my little Tesla coil.  The input is 20.2V ,1,13A DC . The output is 54.5V RMS, 0.54A RMS at 462.6KHz.
 I use 0.6mm thin plastic tube for the coil of 300 turns. The copper tube inside must be close to this coil.
 I believe in need a bigger coil with 500-600 turns.

aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1049
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10513 on: February 05, 2012, 12:08:50 PM »
Hi aether22

<snip>

Very interesting viewpoint, could you develop? I mean, what makes you think that is like that, and if you have equations of this to predict it by calculation?

<snip>

See you eather22.


Hi Khwartz.
I have been studying Free Energy, Antigravity and various other unusual areas of physics for about 15 years.
By making the assumption that the majority of Free Energy devices and Antigravity claims and similar that had witnesses and other evidence are real I have then searched for correlations.


These correlations draw an increasingly clear picture.


On the subject of invisability, there are accounts in one or both of Gerry Vassalitos's books. (invisability from welding, arc welding I think)
Then there was a guy who made a scramble wound high voltage transformer (hmmm, caduceus like) and found that if he tossed steel screws near the arc they would disappear.
Then I was told by a friend how someone he knew stuck a steel coat hanger across a car battery and it got read hot, white and then started to go invisible.
Then I read about a guy who made a suit of steel coils that made him invisible and was showing it off.
Then I read a thing about someone who made a paperclip go invisible inside of a ring energized by a flyback.
I heard that Philo T. Pharnsworth (inventor of the TV) noted that steel parts in his fusor would become invisable.
and I heard from people I was on a list (Bill Beaty's Vortex) with and one of them had witnessed metal vacuum tube plates when run over powered going transparent or invisible.
Another (or the same) guy from that list reported a super thin waffer of gold became invisible when heated.
I was talking to someone, I forget who but someone in the US, when I was visiting there and he reported that he had seen/heard (I forget which) that when huge power system electrical generators don't supply energy to the grid they have been known to become invisible/transparent.
I read an account on Keelynet that again involves steel: [size=78%]http://www.textfiles.com/bbs/KEELYNET/UNCLASS/center1.asc[/size]
Troy Hurtubise (there was an old article about a similar invisibility ray I read once)
David Hudson, monatomics (invisibility of this substance has been reported)
I can think of a few others, but enough to show my point.


And for what it's work, the Philadelphia Experiment.


Now this is a slew of examples, but I believe that some of these have very good pedigree, some of them could be made up but then again no reason to believe they are.


Do they paint a consistent picture? Are correlations apparent?


In almost all of these we have metal, most often steel and some intense form of EM.
Now this just gives you a tiny look into how I gather and correlate info, other correlations that I'd stake my life on tell me there is a medium to space, and dollars to donuts it is involved in this invisibility effect. (there is other evidence to believe this)


Now it kinda makes sense doesn't it?
Light is an EM wave, if you overwhelm the electrons with energy (including electric, magnetic or heat) the electrons may find themselves unable to response (absorb) incoming photons.


Now effects from steel seem to be from the iron and what it does to the aether when the aether moves through it.
Antigravity, Teleportation and time travel and inducing lightening strikes have been reported multiple times and that is without bringing in the Philidelphia Experiment.


Now I can't do justice to 15 years worth of research, that is why I have just picked the cases for invisibility, it is up to you to decide if these show a correlation, point to a truth or not.


Different people have different ways of weighing up evidence, my method won't suit everyone, but it is designed to extract useful information from the leading/bleeding edge and if you accept the form of analysis it shows remarkable evidence.


What it doesn't do it tell you precisely reliably how to generate a given effect, it just creates a rough outline.


Do I think I know how TK's device works? Yes.
But I don't want to lead anyone up the garden path, I don't know if it is correct in this case. (though it is defiantly possible)
And no, I have not yet shared it as I doubt anyone will care.


But I don't want to distract from the important work being done by Wesley and his team, by Roberto, Woopy, Wattsup. Too much distraction lately.


Trumpet waveforms, that's what I am currently interested in!
note: Earlier I suggested a caduceus could resonate at 50hz, clearly the cap required would be insane, I didn't think the statement through.


BTW Roberto, or anyone, how much voltage is across the tank cap? More than 1000v?

T-1000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1738
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10514 on: February 05, 2012, 01:43:59 PM »
The device is in the process of repetition. While not getting a charge on Avramenko plug. Monday will continue. + Obviously a bad ground.

"Период колебаний 10.4 мкс, то есть частота резонанса 96.153 кГц.  The oscillation period 4.10 microseconds, that is, the resonance frequency 96,153kHz."

The capacitor on flyback is missing. So frequency of  96.153kHz is way too high..
Please see http://freeenergylt.narod2.ru/lithuania_experiment/schematic_of_device_with_caduceus_coil_and_pickup_coil.jpg on where flyback transformer capacitor is. It is important for this circuit to work with Avramenko plug over capacitive loop between Tesla coil primary and secondary coils.
You need to really understand about why there is capacitor in flyback making LC resonant circuit connected in series with high voltage coil.. :)