Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16406350 times)

wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10260 on: January 25, 2012, 07:12:38 PM »
@all

Maybe this variable capacitor will do the job. lolololol Nice pocket size.

http://www.ebay.ca/itm/JENNINGS-VARIABLE-VACCUM-CAPACITOR-2000pF-15KV-/130627744852?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item1e6a053454

@ronotte

Looking back again at your image of the multiple waveforms (mix-2 annotated.gif) I have added the pulse frequency in each of the waveforms. (Hope they are right if not I can re-do it and re-post here).

We can see that the HV frequency is 15kHz all the way into the CC so there is no increase in frequency happening between the spark gap and the CC. I noticed you did not point to the variable capacitor, so can you say if there was a VC in your set-up when these waveforms were taken.

wattsup

John M

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 65
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10261 on: January 25, 2012, 07:16:43 PM »
@ronotte

Thanks for your post. There is something I have to mention myself about frequencies.

So far with the HV applied to the CC there is nothing really special happening on the output coil. Adjusting the vertical position of the CC relative to the output coil or adjusting the inner ferrite rod relative to both the CC and the output coil, I cannot see any subtle changes at the spark gap frequency ranges (SGFR). That is to say the actual SGFR is a very narrow range going from 1Hz (with high enough amplitude) to about 20Hz after which there is a small range around 35kHz and then higher up I have not been able to generate a spark at SG1.

Applying a higher pulse frequency on the flyback primary is not possible because the flyback itself just cannot respond fast enough. I was hoping to pulse in the MHz range but this is doing absolutely nothing to the flyback.

The most puzzling thing abut all this is the following.

When is connect one of my frequency generators with a measly 16vdc at very few milli-amps directly to the CC and scope off of the output coil, now I can see exactly the effects of moving the CC and ferrite relative to the output coil. I can see the nuances in the waveform changing which is impossible to see when working under the SGFR. The real C effects are happening above 1MHz and closer around 6MHz. I should make a video of this to show you what I mean.

So this is telling me that in the TK patent where he is talking about frequency filtering or some other effect, the way I see it is that it is great to have a good working SGFR but it is useless to the CC since it is not then transformed to a higher frequency before it hits the CC. The CC is basically five times 1 metre long wires all in parallel so the actual resonant frequency of the CC will be extremely high range that is not possible with just working in the SGFR.

When I was looking to have direct control of the pulsing frequency applied to the flyback, it was to impart the same high frequency and HV to the CC. But this is not possible with the flyback as it just cannot respond to such high frequency pulses. So TK must have had the same problem.

This is where my one missing component to the WNYg devices comes in. The variable capacitor that goes across the CC. This is have not yet used since I have not found one yet to do the job. But my question is will the variable capacitor being across the CC increase the frequency of the HV. I wonder if @stivep has anything to say about the variable capacitor (VC).

In building the CC with moveable inner/outer coils and ferrite, I though this would do away with the need for the VC. But I am now inclined to think the VC is not only used to do some type of coil matching but also to increase the applied HV frequency. If the VC cannot increase the HV frequency, then what I believe is required is a direct testing method of the CC with a HV and variable HF signal but a signal that is much stronger then what I can generate with only my FG. BUT HOW. Both the HV and the HF are kind of at opposite parts of the universe of physical capabilities. How can you produce a good HV at HF? I think TK figured that out in one way or another to make his coil sing out, OUUUUUUUU, Ouuuuuuuuuuu, O O UUUUUUU.

@stivep

At least you won't need any lubrication. lololololololol (Could not resist.)

Can you say anything about the variable capacitor. Are you using one in your set-up as I could not clearly see it in your last video?

@Hope

Thanks for the post but those components are not the ones I need. I have found HV diodes and caps on eBay from a company in China so I am considering ordering from them enough to do the work and have a few spares (lol). The only one I am still stuck on is the VC.

wattsup

Wattsup- Excellent question! I was thinking the CC has magnetic cancellation and is not resonant to the fundamental frequency. Also that it might be used only for electrostatic coupling. The secondary would be resonant to the harmonic frequency (3mhz) but don't know for sure.
Stevip - Please let us know and also which schematic your success resulted from.
John
 

wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10262 on: January 25, 2012, 09:38:33 PM »
@ronotte

About your last waveform, I just was driving my system and put my round scope sensor coil over the spark gaps and could see a waveform rising for first 4-5 points then drop for the next 15 points on the waveform. I was driving without the diodes but the flyback was too great for my power supply and now it is toast. I'll try to fix it, if something is overly evident otherwise I need another one. Or, maybe I should just make a small battery bank and see what happens. The flyback was sending the PS readings or amp and voltage through the roof so I guess it took one too many.

What's incredible is the mosfet and flyback seem to have survived, thus far, so it is not a total loss. lol

wattsup


forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10263 on: January 25, 2012, 11:30:13 PM »
http://www.overunity.com/2300/bruces-tpu-theory-and-experiments-ver-1-2/msg310741/#msg310741
What if caduceus coil is here to create big magnetic field impulse, like intermodulation of 3 frequencies in tpu ?
Anyway, evry power generated has origin in magnetic impulse or great strenght or speed.

Khwartz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 601
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10264 on: January 26, 2012, 08:11:24 AM »
BECAUSE MANY PEOPLE HAVE CONCERNS ON OUTPUT VERSUS INPUT AND FEAR BUYING EXPENSIVE THINGS JUST FOR A MEASUREMENT ERROR:

What if you use an electrical motor as a source of energy and turn it by hand feeding the apparatus and see how much energy is taken out at the same speed you turn it without the coil device and with the coil device.... this is the most easiest to see what is true and whats not....
 probably stepping up the voltage to 30 volts if needed.
Wesley can you perform this simple experiment
This will Surely tell Everything  since a motor can not be tricked like meters and stuff...  you will know the exact power going in because you measure the amount of energy that comes out of it, if its too much you slow down, if not enough speed up,there needs to be some adjustment in fluctuations,   

 but for sure, from a 50 watt motor  you will not get out 200 watts,   FOR SURE!
Yes, we can, but only for breath period of time because the mechanic is not design to support the speed for example, but we can speed ten times a DC motor just with concentrating the magnetic flux of the stator in it (avoiding to get out), and this with the half of the voltage. Of course, speed is not torque, but with ten times speed, well surely we get a very increased power ;)

-----

For measurement: you talk about a true problem! I've already proposed to Wesley a very simple way. it's to make an etalon of brightness in the same conditions of environment lightning and sensibility of cam, feeding the bulbs without the device with the same voltage (I've forgotten to tell him too for the frequency :/ ) that he feeds the bulbs with, to provide the comparison.

An other way I've forgotten to propose him, is to just use a Luxmeter! lol but one has to know that the brighting value is not really linear compare to the voltage and that the resistance at 3,000°C/3,500°C is 15 times more than at 20°C! and that because the filament has not the time to cool itself like with low frequencies, that the eyes has a tendency to make an average of the brightness, it is very difficult to evaluate accurately the real lightning power of the bulbs.

An other point who worried me much:

The formula of power for alternative current is not: P=U*I but more like P=U*I*f, with f as the frequency. Of course because it's the integral of the curve that correspond mathematically to the energy, and divided by time (or multiplied by frequency, same thing) equals to the power.

So, we have to very very care about the interpretation of the values on the power supplies, because if only Amp + Volts, it's not sufficient to give the input power, cause it is not U*I!

I mean if we give 20V*1A*50Hz we have P1 but with 20V*1A*100Hz we have P2=2*P1!! So, of course, if you put a bulb with double frequency it will glow much brighter! but will never mean that device between gives the 100% more, but the power-supply does yes!

So that why we really have to be careful about what we measure, and the base of measurement is comparison, and the good question about comparison is: to what to what, we compare! (or "Watt to Watt" if you want  ;) )

That's why I've many times proposed this process to put series of bulbs directly out of the power supply after the experiment with the device, with the remaining values of voltage and frequency used for the experiment with the same series, and then, if it glows less than with the device that will prove by comparison with no doubt, the overunitiy; as simple as that! ;)

Aren't you agree with that?

ronotte

  • elite_member
  • Sr. Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 417
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10265 on: January 26, 2012, 11:51:11 AM »
@stivep,
 
HEY, you really setup a nice way to QSO It does remember me the old times when I connected all the world using hand made low/medium power transceivers operating with Morse, AM, SSB and finally RTTY and computer assisted...now everything is to be considered almost lost even if experience gained remains intact. My XYL is to be considered my best supporter as she is fascinated by technology best if coming by myself. I still have my original QSL cards...nice to remember. At the end I left for the same reasons you pointed out! Of course still in front of me I see the last remnants: a FT-277E Yaesu-Musen AM/SSB 200W transceiver, YAESU MUSEN FT-2100B 2KW SSB linear amplifier, YAESU MUSEN FT-236 VHF/UHF 50W transceiver, o-777 Tono Communication terminal, PACKRATT-232 comm terminal, antenna coupler, CDE remote antenna direction control, etc.
 
@wattsup
 I'm sorry you are not having much fun from your replication. I think that I may help you in some way, listen:

1 - I see a basic  error in your Caduceus/pickup coil implementation. Basically your idea on the sliding tubes is good: but NOT in this case. The stivep's design works on establishing a minimum fixed inter winding capacitance that MUST be met: not less than about 140pf, better if 170pf. It is via said stray capacitance that the device operate The HV signal closes on that stray cap. This in turn dictate that the pickup coil must be wound strictly over the caduceus and using only a thin insulation foil- best is Kapton. And do not forget to isolate each Caduceus crossing!

 2- Spark gap setting is fundamental. It must be set according to the amount of HV you are using. For example in my case I provide for SG1 a max of 1.3 - 1.5KV so I am using a silent & sealed 1KVDC arrestor OR a simpler two brass screws with 1mm gap. The arrestor gives better work...but goes easily berserk if flooded with too much voltage (easy seen on scope). Normally you see always at least a 10-15%  jitter on the waveform. In your case you have an excess of voltage probably 6 - 9KV or more so you have to use a 2mm spark gap or more...but cautions if you exceed than too high voltage build up and everything fries. The output SG2 generally must have equal or less gap than SG1.

 3 - I am not using a VC to tune the Caduceus  because is too expensive to gather the correct unit. That is the reason why I did the tuning injecting only a 1V signal into the AV plug and picking the output on load directly.  It turns out that it works so I put the correct fixed 1nF/10KV cap.

 4 - You are not watching the correct waveform. That is probably because of what I reported in point 1. Again, just moving the ferrite rod you should easily see the big effect: you should see the normal cup like wave, the trumpet like wave, only spikes OR a continuous sinusoidal wave like found on your TBC output. Ha, I forgot  to say that in order to allow a good scope view I connected the pickup coil center tap to home ground. A last observation: it is also easy to hear, while moving the rod, the ferrite ‘singing’.
 
@ all,
 I want to share with you another new full design that I'm playing with. May be that it could allow to gather additional useful info on how this class of devices does operate.
 I'm seeing that you probably missed the main points of my previous post:

 1 - I AM NOT USING THE TBC oscillator as HV 15-35KHz sinusoidal signal source.
 2 - I have now scaled up everything to run @ 3MHZ


 Why I did that? well, I just wanted to see if possible to improve stivep's design applying same stivep's indications but using a true Tesla approach coupled to an higher operating frequency and hence a smaller form factor. YES, it turned out that it is possible as I obtained very similar if not better results. Please consider also that the big difference with Stivep's design lays in the fact that pickup coils are auto resonating on common 3MHz frequency.
 
My new device (the one that I am now perfecting, see pic ) consists simply of 3 coaxial small pancake coils: The Kacher, a bifilar pancake link coil, 2 pancake  pickup coils all designed to resonate at the same frequency (in this case 3 MHz but it could be anything else).

 The first pancake is the PRIMARY connected to AV plug. The pancake is a standard bifilar serially connected as per Tesla indications. It has only few turns (1/4 -1/5 of secondary)  but spreaded onto the full available surface ('surface' is just a CD -disk plating removed- to make it steady support form). Here it is important that Cu weight is equal to secondary coil. It does replace the Caduceus coil used by Stivep. Purpose is the same: the cancelling field coil does develop a strong magnetic wave that is directed (magnetically) toward the secondary. Best would be to put such coil in between the two interconnected secondary but due to a wrong big terminal support (glued on coil's surface) for the moment is simply put on one side. Of course its natural resonance is in the >20MHz region and as the Caduceus case is not used in standard mode but it is only a means to properly excite/drive the special secondary. So there is still a tuning cap (the CV indicated by Stivep) as it does anyway match the impedance with the AV plug. Its effect on signal is great hence its value must be set exactly. I used 1nf/10KV...but each case is to be considered apart. Vacuum Jennings CV are the best...but expensive!
 
The 2nd & 3rd pancakes (not bifilar wounded) are the PickUp SECONDARY. They are equal and designed to auto resonate at 3MHz, hence no tuning caps are provided. They replace the center tap pickup coil on the Caduceus version. Of course they are also set with the 'inversion' at the center tap.
 A ferrite rod (9-10mm) can easily be inserted coaxially in order to: provide for tuning and changing the device's operating mode. The ferrite rod (a single 10mm diam radio tuning ferrite) has a big effect because it couples the 3 pancackes togheter and changes the whole set resonant requency so you have a unique way to fine tune the device.
 Distance (gaps) between the pancakes is very important. After several hours of tests I found that the primary must be set to at least 2cm far from the secondary coils. On the contrary the 2 interconnected secondary must be set with a gap of only 5mm or less.
 The overall setup  (look at the pic)checked to resonate at 3 MHz.
 
The source. In this case I used a Kacher Look at the pic). So only a 5turn primary, a 'solenoid like' secondary designed to 1/4 wave resonance at 3 MHz  and a single low power transistor able to operate at said frequency (MJE1530D). The output taken directly from a slotted Cu tube with a small ferrite rod inside. The complete project is on DELAMORTO thread just have a look there. Said setup efficiently delivers about 1 - 1.5 KV and I found it able to drive directly the AV plug. I have run many, many hours of work without a glitch...never have had any failure or trouble. HV magnifier coil is wound onto a 16mm PVC tube while primary (connected to transistor collector) is just a 5turn linear coil. You can see it on pic.
 
My state-of -art now is that to find the correct way to take out the output. Stivep is right as for itself it is not a big problem. In my view it depends on what is better to seek:

 - Convert output to DC and charge a cap? In this case I've already seen that I can charge quickly 0.1uF at 1KV via the output SG2 (thin 1KV duration=200nsec spikes @ 1-2-5KHz rate). Then what to do? If I load the cap with a fixed 100K resistor it does not recharge to 1KV. This means that the device output impedance is high. Indeed the HV diode on output has an high resistance! so the only way to go that way could be to switch on and off the load charging for example a much bigger 10 - 100uF cap useful to drive a standard DC/AC inverter.

 - Use directly the output Trumpet waveform. I have documented that such output , while using a 1KV spark gap may well reach the same level. So there should be only an impedance match problem. In such a case the standard approach is to make a tap on pickup coil, or to drive another step down air transformer or simply use a Pi  or L-C adapting network.
 
A final consideration. I think that the next step could be to image a usable way to get a MUCH DIVERGING TRUMPUT WAVEFORM: does it means positive feedback use or there are other methods as well? Stiveo, what do you think about?
 
Have fun

 Roberto
 

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10266 on: January 26, 2012, 05:46:43 PM »
GUYS i HAVE few minutes now  SO QUICKLY:


so far  I have published 3 videos of series


the newest one from 3AM in the morning of today  is




first light of hope in 2012 part #3 OF VIDEOS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrRc-xieWjE






all 3 links are




First Light of Hope in 2012 investigation of OU PART#1 OF

videos
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mn8TLBsR3r0




Spark Gap tubes evaluation for project part #2 OF VIDEOS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDcITQ7gtaI





first light of hope in 2012 part #3 OF VIDEOS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrRc-xieWjE






In the recent video I haave concentrated on structure of Glen's transformer.
This transformer is only for purpose of measurement and testing.
Use of this transformer  happened  to be impossible  due to Fluke limitation.
It was designed and calculated by one of most brilliant engineers say 15% of  best of the best in the world.
25 winds primary flat copper tape
250 secondary 24AVG wire.
ratio 1:10
freq of operation 10khz to 1Mhz
spec of that transformer with all data is published on the last video.
If one fallow the concept and wind transformer with bigger ratio say 1:100 than similar results
might be obtained but that might be more distortion.
This transformer gives  the same signal at output as was delivered in input in   wave shape.
 


Originally this transformer was to be powered by Fluke 5205A
Generator  of 1 to 10V at frequency  from 10KHz to 1MHz was to be delivered to input of fluke


Fluke 5205a is tricky and if you read its  spec  you will find limitations


http://www.buy17.com/FLU/pdf/FLUKE5205A.pdf




look at the section
overload protection;


Also  the power of fluke can not over come magnetization current of Glens transformer
primary factor is design of Fluke to handle
look at section :Maximum capacitive load
Glens transformer is in nature inductive load.


All data if experiment and  calculation including frequency bandwidth utilized   was explained at page 686




Wesley











John M

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 65
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10267 on: January 26, 2012, 07:26:14 PM »
@stivep,
 
HEY, you really setup a nice way to QSO It does remember me the old times when I connected all the world using hand made low/medium power transceivers operating with Morse, AM, SSB and finally RTTY and computer assisted...now everything is to be considered almost lost even if experience gained remains intact. My XYL is to be considered my best supporter as she is fascinated by technology best if coming by myself. I still have my original QSL cards...nice to remember. At the end I left for the same reasons you pointed out! Of course still in front of me I see the last remnants: a FT-277E Yaesu-Musen AM/SSB 200W transceiver, YAESU MUSEN FT-2100B 2KW SSB linear amplifier, YAESU MUSEN FT-236 VHF/UHF 50W transceiver, o-777 Tono Communication terminal, PACKRATT-232 comm terminal, antenna coupler, CDE remote antenna direction control, etc.
 
@wattsup
 I'm sorry you are not having much fun from your replication. I think that I may help you in some way, listen:

1 - I see a basic  error in your Caduceus/pickup coil implementation. Basically your idea on the sliding tubes is good: but NOT in this case. The stivep's design works on establishing a minimum fixed inter winding capacitance that MUST be met: not less than about 140pf, better if 170pf. It is via said stray capacitance that the device operate The HV signal closes on that stray cap. This in turn dictate that the pickup coil must be wound strictly over the caduceus and using only a thin insulation foil- best is Kapton. And do not forget to isolate each Caduceus crossing!

 2- Spark gap setting is fundamental. It must be set according to the amount of HV you are using. For example in my case I provide for SG1 a max of 1.3 - 1.5KV so I am using a silent & sealed 1KVDC arrestor OR a simpler two brass screws with 1mm gap. The arrestor gives better work...but goes easily berserk if flooded with too much voltage (easy seen on scope). Normally you see always at least a 10-15%  jitter on the waveform. In your case you have an excess of voltage probably 6 - 9KV or more so you have to use a 2mm spark gap or more...but cautions if you exceed than too high voltage build up and everything fries. The output SG2 generally must have equal or less gap than SG1.

 3 - I am not using a VC to tune the Caduceus  because is too expensive to gather the correct unit. That is the reason why I did the tuning injecting only a 1V signal into the AV plug and picking the output on load directly.  It turns out that it works so I put the correct fixed 1nF/10KV cap.

 4 - You are not watching the correct waveform. That is probably because of what I reported in point 1. Again, just moving the ferrite rod you should easily see the big effect: you should see the normal cup like wave, the trumpet like wave, only spikes OR a continuous sinusoidal wave like found on your TBC output. Ha, I forgot  to say that in order to allow a good scope view I connected the pickup coil center tap to home ground. A last observation: it is also easy to hear, while moving the rod, the ferrite ‘singing’.
 
@ all,
 I want to share with you another new full design that I'm playing with. May be that it could allow to gather additional useful info on how this class of devices does operate.
 I'm seeing that you probably missed the main points of my previous post:

 1 - I AM NOT USING THE TBC oscillator as HV 15-35KHz sinusoidal signal source.
 2 - I have now scaled up everything to run @ 3MHZ


 Why I did that? well, I just wanted to see if possible to improve stivep's design applying same stivep's indications but using a true Tesla approach coupled to an higher operating frequency and hence a smaller form factor. YES, it turned out that it is possible as I obtained very similar if not better results. Please consider also that the big difference with Stivep's design lays in the fact that pickup coils are auto resonating on common 3MHz frequency.
 
My new device (the one that I am now perfecting, see pic ) consists simply of 3 coaxial small pancake coils: The Kacher, a bifilar pancake link coil, 2 pancake  pickup coils all designed to resonate at the same frequency (in this case 3 MHz but it could be anything else).

 The first pancake is the PRIMARY connected to AV plug. The pancake is a standard bifilar serially connected as per Tesla indications. It has only few turns (1/4 -1/5 of secondary)  but spreaded onto the full available surface ('surface' is just a CD -disk plating removed- to make it steady support form). Here it is important that Cu weight is equal to secondary coil. It does replace the Caduceus coil used by Stivep. Purpose is the same: the cancelling field coil does develop a strong magnetic wave that is directed (magnetically) toward the secondary. Best would be to put such coil in between the two interconnected secondary but due to a wrong big terminal support (glued on coil's surface) for the moment is simply put on one side. Of course its natural resonance is in the >20MHz region and as the Caduceus case is not used in standard mode but it is only a means to properly excite/drive the special secondary. So there is still a tuning cap (the CV indicated by Stivep) as it does anyway match the impedance with the AV plug. Its effect on signal is great hence its value must be set exactly. I used 1nf/10KV...but each case is to be considered apart. Vacuum Jennings CV are the best...but expensive!
 
The 2nd & 3rd pancakes (not bifilar wounded) are the PickUp SECONDARY. They are equal and designed to auto resonate at 3MHz, hence no tuning caps are provided. They replace the center tap pickup coil on the Caduceus version. Of course they are also set with the 'inversion' at the center tap.
 A ferrite rod (9-10mm) can easily be inserted coaxially in order to: provide for tuning and changing the device's operating mode. The ferrite rod (a single 10mm diam radio tuning ferrite) has a big effect because it couples the 3 pancackes togheter and changes the whole set resonant requency so you have a unique way to fine tune the device.
 Distance (gaps) between the pancakes is very important. After several hours of tests I found that the primary must be set to at least 2cm far from the secondary coils. On the contrary the 2 interconnected secondary must be set with a gap of only 5mm or less.
 The overall setup  (look at the pic)checked to resonate at 3 MHz.
 
The source. In this case I used a Kacher Look at the pic). So only a 5turn primary, a 'solenoid like' secondary designed to 1/4 wave resonance at 3 MHz  and a single low power transistor able to operate at said frequency (MJE1530D). The output taken directly from a slotted Cu tube with a small ferrite rod inside. The complete project is on DELAMORTO thread just have a look there. Said setup efficiently delivers about 1 - 1.5 KV and I found it able to drive directly the AV plug. I have run many, many hours of work without a glitch...never have had any failure or trouble. HV magnifier coil is wound onto a 16mm PVC tube while primary (connected to transistor collector) is just a 5turn linear coil. You can see it on pic.
 
My state-of -art now is that to find the correct way to take out the output. Stivep is right as for itself it is not a big problem. In my view it depends on what is better to seek:

 - Convert output to DC and charge a cap? In this case I've already seen that I can charge quickly 0.1uF at 1KV via the output SG2 (thin 1KV duration=200nsec spikes @ 1-2-5KHz rate). Then what to do? If I load the cap with a fixed 100K resistor it does not recharge to 1KV. This means that the device output impedance is high. Indeed the HV diode on output has an high resistance! so the only way to go that way could be to switch on and off the load charging for example a much bigger 10 - 100uF cap useful to drive a standard DC/AC inverter.

 - Use directly the output Trumpet waveform. I have documented that such output , while using a 1KV spark gap may well reach the same level. So there should be only an impedance match problem. In such a case the standard approach is to make a tap on pickup coil, or to drive another step down air transformer or simply use a Pi  or L-C adapting network.
 
A final consideration. I think that the next step could be to image a usable way to get a MUCH DIVERGING TRUMPUT WAVEFORM: does it means positive feedback use or there are other methods as well? Stiveo, what do you think about?
 
Have fun

 Roberto

Ronette - (It does replace the Caduceus coil used by Stivep. Purpose is the same: the cancelling field coil does develop a strong magnetic wave that is directed (magnetically) toward the secondary.)
In the above statement are you referring to the magnetic wave as a scaler wave which is different from a standard magnetic field generated by a solenoid type of electromagnet?
John
 
 

energia9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10268 on: January 26, 2012, 10:06:26 PM »
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMYiC6xBzWE 

if replicating this spark gap tube alternative be very careful and dont use your finger anywhere near like he did.  block the way of air with silicon.
recommend you to jump to 0:56 in the video.

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10269 on: January 26, 2012, 10:43:14 PM »
The essense is  IMHO to create very strong electromagnet  without Lenz influence , and then pulsing it as fast as possible. Just that is enough. Then wind secondary and tap energy. ;D stiveip proved it by using caduceus coil. It's my personal opinion.

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10270 on: January 27, 2012, 12:03:57 AM »
Hi Wesley,
would be great, if you could produce your needed input wave with a selfmade oscillator circuit and
power all with a 12 Volt battery.

This way you could also measure the DC power input via a low pass filter.
So before the low pass filter directly at the battery you have a pure DC power input
which could be easily measured via a DC amperage meter and a voltmeter directly at the battery.
If your LC lowpassfilter is 0.001 Hz or so, this will be good enough to show almost pure DC input power.


Okay, here is a good Flash animation explanation to get familiar with VSWR technology.

http://www.fourier-series.com/rf-concepts/flash_programs/Reflection/index.html


Regards, Stefan.

Kator01

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 898
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10271 on: January 27, 2012, 01:12:53 AM »
Hello all,

whe I saw Wesley´s vid about the sparkgap-evaluation a memory came alive from a time I was evaluating tungsten-electrodes for a project not related to this subject here. The reason for my reseach then was to find an no-radioactive material with a very low work-function. May I introduce to you this electrode-material here

http://www.multistriketungstens.com/

Attention to the paragraph "science a bit" will give you the clou of why I post this here.
Its for those of you who are able to manufacture a DIY-sparkgap.

Regards

Kator01

ronotte

  • elite_member
  • Sr. Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 417
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10272 on: January 27, 2012, 03:31:59 PM »
@John M,
please read the forest's answer. Tanks
@all,
That's what I was looking for...FINALLY...I GOT IT...it speaks for itself
Roberto

Kator01

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 898
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10273 on: January 27, 2012, 04:32:21 PM »
@ronnote,

Quote
The complete project is on DELAMORTO thread just have a look there.

Where do we find this thread ?

Can you post a schematic of the whole setup of yours ,please ?

Regards

Kator01

Khwartz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 601
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10274 on: January 27, 2012, 07:02:29 PM »
The essense is  IMHO to create very strong electromagnet  without Lenz influence , and then pulsing it as fast as possible. Just that is enough. Then wind secondary and tap energy. ;D stiveip proved it by using caduceus coil. It's my personal opinion.
Hi Forest! What is IMHO please? :)