@Wattsup and Verpies. I am grateful for your information.

@Ghazanfar_Ali

No problem.

@all

Hmmmmm. That last drawing posted by @FreeEnergyInfo showing the TK Green Box (GB) is the most logical one I've seen so far. We know about the grey and brown wires coming out the GB and going to the TK Coil and it is very possible that the dark green (DGW) wire from the spark gap is also going to the TK Coil although there was never a good visible angle to see it. Although it does seem more then logical that if the DGW was also going back into the GB, why not just pass it like the other side of the spark gap blue wire that goes directly into the GB. Logic would have it that the DGW is not going into the GB and that the above diagram is more then plausible.

@ronotte

Thanks for your last post. Last night I was running the system and had connected up the output stage with the diode-cap-and a car spark plug but no spark on the second one. I tried with and without the HV ground connected to the output.

Then a bad thing happened. I stopped getting sparks on the first one. I will be checking the HV diodes and capacitor train to see if there is anything that is broken but no visible sign. How can I check the HV diodes. I tried with my volt meter on diode but there is nothing from either direction. So I am worried that maybe the flyback HV blew again. It would not be the first time especially now with variable frequency-width-amplitude the flyback is being driven most probably way out of its performance parameters.

The HV coil on these flybacks only has a very very thin wire that most likely cannot take the hammering I am giving it. I think it will be best for me to just wind my own HV coil using a thicker AWG wire that will be able to withstand my brutal driving habits. lol

I had just placed a nice coil under the main spark gap (image below) and put my scope probe only on one side of the coil the see how the spark was generating its waveforms. I also post an image of my completed set-up with output made. Damn flyblack I can here some fizzling sound in the HV coil. Probably has an internal short that is bypassing a portion of the wind since now I am getting a very weak spark.

Anyways, I will try to see if there is something else wrong that I have overlooked.

wattsup

Here is an interesting clip on copper saturation of energy...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MZv7DhxpX8

and my latest clip on magnets..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdXMnq1OzjU

Al....

PICTURE ...

LOL    I have to laugh about an half hour wasted trying to learn a simple cad program (double cad xt).  I better just draw it and scan it.   I have been out of the loop years and though I knew Velleum well enough, I am not able to make a line not jump into the center of the circle on this cad program.   

Yes I will make you all a schematic.   The printer I use is wireless and the friends are sleeping just now (12:15AM PST) so I will draw it out tomorrow and post it.    I thought my words were clear, if you want to use just a 12vdc battery and connect it to 5 magnets and measure the flow then reverse the leads you will see the arc (plasma) jump across, then a no flow condition will be measured.   This is interesting effect and can be worked in to what I described tomorrow. 

Use 9 magnets and the flow will be lessened but the spark on no flow will be like a small lighting bolt but bright blue.

PS  After studying the research original documents Andre got his E= Cat CF ideas from.   An educated guess about the secret catalyst is in order.   If Andre used fine iron particals magnetized (like copier toner) within the chamber the magnetic field would be unable to be held within the iron when heated enough and that field would have to go somewhere...   Then the first company he partnered with ,said "they found another way to produce catalyzed effect" so their effect is to use electro magnets pulsed perhaps.

Edited     please use neo magnets if you have them,  I don't know if regular types will work this way.
E-Cat   may be a cleaver elude to electronic catalyzer and the only electronics in his first device was the heating coil (or could be the action of the magnetics being transfered while heated)

Hope,

I miss your schematic of the magnetic diodes so much... 

Kator01

@Verpies and Wattsup

Dear Friends
I was studying your OU devices schematics along with my 80% successful replication of STAAAR device. I was also scrutinizing data pertaining to Steven Mark's TPU. and after three sleepless nights in my Lab at home I was able to design a circuit which is a mixture of all of your hard efforts and my idea. And I found very interesting results. It is to remember that this device is almost a self running OU device. The only thing which we have to drive with a small power supply is the Pulse Generator and I think 555 Timer will fulfill this need.

Points of Consideration.
1. Frequency is 1KHz pulse with Vmax = 5V to 9 V. (I used minimum values to drive MOSFETs)
2. Duty cycle should be strictly 50%.
3. Rise and fall time of the pulse must be greater than or = 1nsec.
4. 4700uF electrolytic cap should be charged to 24 V DC before starting pulse gen and connecting load.
5. Load must be greater than 150 Ohms. Otherwise it will shutdown the device in a few seconds.
6. 345uH L1 is a ferrite toroid with windings. U have to make L1 using LRC meter.
7. Current drain from 4700uF cap is -9.116mA. From Pulse Gen it is 12.058 uA
8. Output with 150 Ohms load or above, I found so far is 200 V Pulsed DC (1KHz) with 6.4 Amps approx. Hence we got 1200 Watts with an input of 0.06mW.
9. I have tested its simulation so far using National Instruments MultiSim v11. (simulation files are available on demand).

I need your comments if you have suggestion.
I think we r close to a revolution in the field of free energy if we all share our thoughts and efforts.
This device is for all of u to be optimized. But do remember me in your prayers.

Waiting for your comments.
Kind Regards
Ghazanfar Ali
Pakistan

@Ghazanfar_Ali

I will need some time to respond but @gyulasun has brought  up some good questions.

@ronotte

Thanks for the heads up on these diodes. I set-up an 110 to 117 AC transformer rated at 1 amp and put a FWBR to get my DC and can get 121vdc. So I put the diode in series with my volt meter to get some readings. To explain this I am using the ">" to indicate the direction of the diode and + and - on each side of this to show how it was connected and the voltage reading.

Diode A

+>- 120.5vdc
->+ 102.1vdc

Diode B

+>- 69.6vdc
->+ 0.037vdc

Sorry for being so numbskullish but HV diodes are not my forté. Hmmmmm. So by the above I would presume my B diode is shot, but what about the A diode? Why am I getting such readings from both sides. Usually one side will provide a reading while the other side will provide none or are HV diodes different?

Since I took off these diodes I connected the flyback HV+ directly to the spark gap that is in series with the Caduceus Coil and the HV- to the Caduceus Output Coil and saw some pretty good sparking but not in the spark gap. It was happening between the inner and outer Caduceus coils as I am showing in this video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Qttilc7ie8

I think I now know why Wesley was putting some good insulation between the two caduceus coils.

Anyways, I will have to order some more diodes but this time they will be the real ones and also a few HV capacitors would not hurt as well.

wattsup


Added:

In that short video where you see the space between the inner and outer coils, I am thinking that maybe if there was a third coil wound between the inner and outer coils, maybe this is how TK went about it. Put a HV- inside, HV+ outside and a pick up coil in between. Hmmmmmmm again.

@ Gyula
A good question. I am in process of building this circuit in my lab. This is my initial simulation in NI Multisim. I know unlike LTSpice, Multisim and ORCAD are professional simulators and I always design my schematics before I start deigning the PCBs. Well the circuit is in Oscillation state and 4700uF Capacitor is charged to 24 V DC as an initial charge.The Berkhaussen Criterion is optimally set that u will see the capacitor initially dropping its charge in a few mVs but than back emf from the L1 will keep it charged without any discharging. In other words the rate of discharge = or slightly < than rate of charge for this capacitor so it is acting like a battery which is helping in producing back kick offs from L1 on falling edge of each pulse. Q1 to Q3 are used to provide load sharing and avoid heating up of MOSFETs.
I am sorry for one more thing I wrongly calculated the input and output voltages. In fact Ammeters are set on DC it should be on AC. Then we give  just 5V and 4.3mA to drive the pulse generator and at the output we get 200V with 230mA drain across 150 Ohms load. Thus 45W is the Output and 0.215mW is the Input. I think its not bad.
I have not used Air core L1 its toroidal Ferrite Core. I did not get any simulation errors and I kept its simulation running for 2 hours. 4700uF is not discharging gradually that is a good sign.
Kind Regards
Ghazanfar