Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16407281 times)

John M

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 65
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8955 on: November 22, 2011, 07:16:32 PM »
Many of you have probably read this before. If not, it is by far the best document I have seen. The latest research with a TV ferrite yoke seems far different then the Tariel Kapanadze device with some similarities. Perhaps this will offer insight into the simularities on why both of them work.
 
http://www.free-energy-info.com/VladimirUtkin.pdf
 

jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8956 on: November 22, 2011, 08:01:17 PM »
Many of you have probably read this before. If not, it is by far the best document I have seen. The latest research with a TV ferrite yoke seems far different then the Tariel Kapanadze device with some similarities. Perhaps this will offer insight into the simularities on why both of them work.
 
http://www.free-energy-info.com/VladimirUtkin.pdf


 Bingo. All in one place sweet!

wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8957 on: November 22, 2011, 08:38:45 PM »
@alll

I was not able to do testing later last night but will continue tonight. I found my fathers old degauss coil that he used way back and will try it, First I will check if the last effect is still possible after one day of "yoke rest" -lol, then do the degauss and test again.

One thing major about my last tests.

I was pulsing on the 50T and found at around 5.89kHz that the 150T would go up to around 70 volts. I then let that one run and added the 15T to find were the voltage would rise with both coils pulsing. The only range I found was at 7.43kHz were the voltage from both went up another 3-5 volts. Nothing major. But then I decided to just turn off the pulsing to the 50T and all of a sudden the 15T pulsed increased the voltage to the 150T to around 700 volts. This was all done without the LED load applied so we are talking voltage only.

So what was happening is that the pulse on the 50T was giving a good 70 volts but it also held back the pulses from the 15T from being exerted on the core. When the 50T was turned off, the 15t jumped up in voltage.

This means that at certain frequencies, the 50T is hindering the 15T and it must also be that in some frequencies the 15T could hold back the 50T.

So one thing I would suggest when pulsing two or more frequencies is once in a while turn one of the pulse generators off and see how the other is producing. You could have the 15T set at a frequency and then try for hours on the 50T and see nothing simply because the 15T was acting like a brake on the total output.

Anyways, things are getting more and more complicated as we progress. I hope to get my flyback in the next days so I can start really pumping some more juice into this coil. That is if the yoke holds all right. But this is not a problem since I can always revert back to the Caduceus Coil  (which I will do anyways).

@verpies

I went to my local EE shop and they did not have the IRFP220N that is in your circuit diagram. Also, they checked and there is no replacement listed. So I am wondering if what I already have on hand may be OK and if so, do I have to change the resistor and cap values.

I have on hand two or more of: TIP32C, IRF840, IRF640, IRF510, IRF9540 and some others that I cannot remember since I am presently at the office. Anyways, if it is possible please let me know. Also, my zener diodes are only 10 volts and I have also 18 volts and higher up to 50 volts zeners.

wattsup

T-1000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1738
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8958 on: November 22, 2011, 09:54:13 PM »

http://www.free-energy-info.com/VladimirUtkin.pdf

Not bad, it is full usage of coils placed in 90 degrees to each other. That needs further exploration because it creates pendulum analog from mechanics :)
Also when this is used with core resonance, it make even more effects.
« Last Edit: November 23, 2011, 12:05:18 AM by T-1000 »

Hope

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 701
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8959 on: November 22, 2011, 10:09:40 PM »
Many of you have probably read this before. If not, it is by far the best document I have seen. The latest research with a TV ferrite yoke seems far different then the Tariel Kapanadze device with some similarities. Perhaps this will offer insight into the simularities on why both of them work.
 
http://www.free-energy-info.com/VladimirUtkin.pdf

Thank you John,  this is an excellent document!!

Thanks for the explanation BIG,  I suggest you use magnets on each side of your spark gaps on one or both spark gaps with iron (large ground plane) attached to the magnets feeding the sparks.

LtBolo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 287
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8960 on: November 22, 2011, 10:56:46 PM »
Not intending to come across as skeptical...but...has anybody seen any of Utkin's devices demonstrated or replicated successfully? There are so many pictures of coils, somebody (presumably Utkin) has spent considerable time building. And yet with all of those coils, is there a single video anywhere demonstrating the devices? If not, I would be very cautious about jumping ship and building those devices. I can give you five explanations of free energy, and all might sound plausible, and all might be wrong.

One functional device is worth more than 100 books full of theories and pictures.

On the other hand, if he has successfully demonstrated free energy devices, then it is a very interesting document indeed, and his discussion about Mislavskij's transformer may have specific relevance to the ferrite yoke core device.

grizli

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 415
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8961 on: November 22, 2011, 11:39:33 PM »
@itsu,

Nicely made video.
 
The problem of the 274kHZ not riding on the crests of the 50Hz is exactly what Grizli and Baroutologos had been griping at. 
See their quotes below:
 
I have mentioned before, a signal generator with a p-p some 10 or 20volts output, being connected at that 15turns coil to any type of ferrite, without any other addition or effect will give at best milivolts p-p scope shots at its ends.

The very effect that a coil like this in 50 Hz (agree with verpies) can have a voltage rise (simulating resonance) as Aidas shown around 130Volts p-p, demands a new physics book on its own.


Indeed the above should not happen according to conventional physics even if we account for the resonant rise phenomenon.

Also, note that the Russians wrongly write "LF carries HF" instead of "HF rides on LF".
This is a grievous mistake in English language because the former expression is reserved for AM modulation that involves multiplication of two frequencies (the carrier and a signal) and the latter expression denotes waveform addition (which is what is visible on STAAAR's oscillograms).

I would venture that the HF will not start riding on top of the LF untill you enable the 1t Transverse Winding, either by:
1) energizing it from an external source, or
2) adding a parallel capacitance to it, or
3) increasing the surface areas of the copper strips (which accomplishes the same result as pt.2)

...as a side note, in order to maximize the capacitance in pt.3, the distance between the surfaces should be minimized. This means thin plastic tape layer and flexible strips that will "hug" the core closely....

Going out on a limb even further I speculate that the 1t Transverse Winding should resonate on one of the harmonics of the 50t Winding and be 90deg. out of phase to it, because that arrangement will certainly create a rotating magnetic field and possibly spin the magnetic domains in the ferrite. I hypothesize that spinning magnetic domains will increase the effective permeability of the ferrite and this will cause increase of the inductance of the 15t winding and the resulting increase of impedance at ~50Hz. 
More impedance means less current in the 15t winding circuit (e.g. light bulbs get dimmer).

PRACTICAL ISSUES:
Please remind us what kind of air gaps (paper gaps) you have now and whether you are using stranded or solid wire  (with skin effect).

Changing to a lower resistance bulb (or adding more of them in parallel) in series with the 50Hz transformer and 15t winding, would not hurt performance as long as the transformer does not overheat.

If you ever see that light bulb/bulbs getting dim, then you you'll know that you are getting closer

Hm,, if that all would resonate, than we have to expect MYSTEROUS EVENT, and that 50 hz signal FEELS very high impedance ? :o

grizli

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 415
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8962 on: November 22, 2011, 11:46:15 PM »
some of notes.


Deflection yoke. ferrite.
for those who want to play with this concept do not purchase generator that has maximum frequency of 2 mhz
After the while  main resonance frequency of ferrite changes.
One major problem that we have experienced is that when we sweep and/or delivered withe noise to U shape
and say 15 winds  was used to connect spectrum analyzer than pick resonance  expected to be  from 1.2 to 1.9 MHz with time  jumped up to 2.2MHz. That would not be a problem but my generator -Wavetek was damaged because of Chinese cheap voltage conversion transformer that show on its label 220 in and 110V out  but in reality was 220 to 220V
The  generators originally used  max 2MHz.
So  recommended generators are  less than 10 MHz max.


This part of test than was limited to measurement and working regimes investigation.
Demagnetization of  ferrite ring from deflection yoke  did help ,but with the time jumped again to 2.2 MHz.
Remember that second step would be to deliver 2.2MHz to U shape from generator and find  maximum pick on 10 winds again that one will be in within the range of kHz say 380KHz..


Because each ferrite is different that  these parameters are different as well.


Does not make  any difference if primarily you have connected withe noise to U shape winding but reading was done on 15 or 50 winds. result  of  reading  will  be the same  in regards of frequency 1.2-1.9 Mhz.


Repeating effect is not easy  even for us.


Group of 4 people  plus additional two at some moments was working approximately 20 hours a day for period  from Saturday till Wednesday  on two  concepts.


I kind of  think that even You and your team CANT replicate OU device any more ?!

why not making video that contains that also ,,.. the same video ,same core = setting resonance + working OU device with light bulb, the same one that was tunes using PC scopes..
hmm

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8963 on: November 23, 2011, 12:18:16 AM »
I went to my local EE shop and they did not have the IRFP220N that is in your circuit diagram. Also, they checked and there is no replacement listed. So I am wondering if what I already have on hand may be OK and if so, do I have to change the resistor and cap values.

The Power MOSFET should have a drain-source voltage max rating that is 4 times higher than the power supply voltage.
For 2x6turns primary the maximum drain current should be above 30A.   

For example: the IRFP260N has the maximum source-drain voltage of 200V and max drain current of 50A, so with this MOSFET you could power your circuit with up to 50V power supply and a high power flyback.

The toroidal choke L1 is there to protect the power supply from current surges.
The Zener diodes are there only to protect the gate of the MOSFETs.

For example: The gate of IRFP260N can withstand up to 20V so an 18V Zener diode should protect it adequately.

The capacitor C1 and the number of primary turns determine the oscillation frequency, as follows
f = 1 / (  2Ï€ * √(LC)) , where
 
 f  is the frequency in Hertz
 L is the inductance of the primary in Henries
 C is the capacitance of the capacitor in Farads (electrolytic capacitors will not work here)

The choice of the diodes and transistors does not influence the above oscillation frequency much.
The choice of transistors affects mostly the power level.
The flyback core should have an air gap, or it will not work with this circuit. Flybacks have this air gap by design. It is usually covered by the HV secondary winding.

jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8964 on: November 23, 2011, 12:29:42 AM »
Hm,, if that all would resonate, than we have to expect MYSTEROUS EVENT, and that 50 hz signal FEELS very high impedance ? :o


 I don't think anything should be 50hz when playing with these fields. Tesla warned that low cycles of this stuff from mono pulse to anything up to 2k cycles. At 2k they become more subtle of a pull. Things that have lower densities react less to this field it simply doesn't affect it much. but the average of the mass of this Aether which moves readily because they are smaller and react better to the stimulation of higher harmonics. Resonance isn't hard to see if you look for it in this process.




verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8965 on: November 23, 2011, 01:08:44 AM »
Not bad, it is full usage of coils placed in 90 degrees to each other. That needs further exploration because it creates pendulum analog from mechanics :)

No, two perpendicular coils create magnetic rotation, not pendulum-like back-and-forth magnetic oscillation.
See the animation of two orthogonal coil pairs below (click on it to see it rotate):

John M

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 65
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8966 on: November 23, 2011, 01:23:12 AM »
Not intending to come across as skeptical...but...has anybody seen any of Utkin's devices demonstrated or replicated successfully? There are so many pictures of coils, somebody (presumably Utkin) has spent considerable time building. And yet with all of those coils, is there a single video anywhere demonstrating the devices? If not, I would be very cautious about jumping ship and building those devices. I can give you five explanations of free energy, and all might sound plausible, and all might be wrong.

One functional device is worth more than 100 books full of theories and pictures.

On the other hand, if he has successfully demonstrated free energy devices, then it is a very interesting document indeed, and his discussion about Mislavskij's transformer may have specific relevance to the ferrite yoke core device.

I don't think anyone should jump ship either. Who knows, this could be miss information. It does however go into simple experiments to help verify the theory. It does make sense. I always believed that Kapanadze defeated Lenz Law to help get the effect he sees.
Using the yoke leaves me to believe that ferroresonance might be involved which negates Lenz Law also. It seems that once Lenz is defeated applying high voltage opens the door for electrons to flow in.

I personnaly will be experimenting with the ideas in this document. I think Kapanadze is the real thing and this document might come very close to explaining it.

John

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8967 on: November 23, 2011, 01:36:30 AM »
Also when this is used with core resonance, it make even more effects.

In the STAAAR device the magnetic H-field is 2-dimensional because it is created by perpendicular windings.
Your drawing below does not show that.

...but it does show correctly that the E-field created between the surfaces of the capacitor is perpendicular to one of the the H-Fields.
Actually the E-Field is perpendicular to both of the H-Fields but the drawing does not show that either.
 
This creates a 3-dimensional mutually perpendicular field vector arrangement (two H_vectors + one E_vector).

Of course if you are not paying attention to the phase difference of the two perpendicular H-fields then you might create the 2D rotating H-field by chance only.

T-1000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1738
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8968 on: November 23, 2011, 01:50:50 AM »
Of course if you are not paying attention to the phase difference of the two perpendicular H-fields then you might create the 2D rotating H-field by chance only.

Not by chance, but intentionally :)
The solution to that problem is..  the Caduceus coil when you put plates with 1/4 length of 1 coil turn on 2 coil places in coil ends where wires are intersecting in caduceus coil!

Explanation in Russian:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDXEC6GeGA0
« Last Edit: November 23, 2011, 02:52:14 AM by T-1000 »

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8969 on: November 23, 2011, 02:56:26 AM »
This is the link to new video one of series of videos  from experiments provided bu group of people for humanity  and by humanity.
I intend to get  with all of the material to you.  5 people are  capable of delivery of the same material.


If I will have any problems you will be notified by members of the group and asked for  your help, protest, action or more.


You  also will be told why I decided to  prepare you in case of problems.



Additional supporting material


 than will be presented as a support  of the case.

Wesley.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDXEC6GeGA0