Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16406253 times)

baroutologos

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 918
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8145 on: October 31, 2011, 08:38:16 PM »
Quote
NEW INFO FREE ENERGY......

http://freeenergylt.narod2.ru/aidas/

This is another attempt to explain the methodology followed by the TK replication group in order to guide us in their steps. Personally i find it still difficult to understand the how...

1) what is the primary frequency selected from white noise that corresponds to ferrite alleged self resonance (1.64 Mhz)
2) What kind of frquency correspond to the other 51 windings' coil lower end spectrum one? 382Khz

1+2) how those frequencies relate to each other?

3) Carrier wave is the energy carrier as i see it. It has a relation of 382.000 / 50 or 7640 / 1 cycle ratio. What is the importance of tuning one wave to the other?

4) The spark gap emulates the first 1.64 Mhz fundamental ferite resonance frequency?

5) How unloaded (even with a piece of paper separated the ferrite parts) the output winding can have as much as 1 Kv (no load) voltage and the wave generators to work without being burned?

Few questions...  soon more :P

ps" pls people quit trolling, relating to other OU devices, "i told you so" comments , Jesus told me etc

Goat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 640
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8146 on: October 31, 2011, 08:52:11 PM »
@All

Please take a look over @ energetic forum for tuning and build info:

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/9673-wesley-stivep1-video-high-voltage-frequency-ou.html#post164613

"Originally Posted by dragon View Post
Thanks T-1000, can you re post it here? Also, what is the proper procedure to find the natural resonance of the ferrite ring?

T-1000:  That's correct and you need to support it in all time.

First you use those 2 copper plates after generator and generate white noise to it.  When doing that you check where are peaks on spectrum analizer and apply correct resonant frequency. No matter what type of signal is, the output should be sinus wave on secondary coil. In our case the resonance was 1,66Mhz

Now, when you put resonant frequency in, attach frequency analizer into primary coil of 51 turns the other 16 turns are on first primary). Select highest peak from lowest frequency range. So it will be resonant frequency for that coil. In our case it was 382Khz.

After doing this, you need carrier wave, in our case it is 50Hz. When you attach 50Hz to 16 turns coil and ferrite resonant on 51 turns coil, you need to synchronize pulses between in way you get large sinus 50Hz wave carring small high frequency pulses inside. For this we used TV set's horizontal and vertical lines sync circuit and adjusted its parameters to needed frequencies.

For each coil you need to make LC circuit acting as filter on needed frequencies. So you calculate capacitancy values in conventional way and test it.

If you manage get working circuit until this step, you should have OU already.

The paper between 2 pieces of toroid acts as insulator.

If you start discharging HV capacitor over spark gap to copper plates, it will make strong scalar magnetic wave impulse and amplifies output power while lowers needed input power from generators. Just be cautionous about this step, in our experiment the ferrite gone into pieces with load of 600W (150W is without sparks) after 15-20 minutes.
Last edited by T-1000 : Today at 04:42 PM.

@T-1000 my apologies if I'm stepping on your toes as I'm sure you're a busy man... :) but sometimes links to other sites vanish...the text posted above should help the people here trying to replicate your team's device.

Edit: Sorry everyone the text is all parsed out, I'll try and correct it :P

Regards,
Paul



grizli

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 415
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8147 on: October 31, 2011, 10:52:35 PM »
Guys after Tbilisi I have got extra careful... and extra suspicious that all :)


Look at the video at the end there is schematic of the coil and during the movie several times it was posted that one half of ferrite has two winds 50 and 15... at my  particular example it was 51 and 16

second one  should have bifilar 2x 150winds ( in my particular setup it was 81)

The number of winds is not critical..hmmm......good question..
Critical seems to be ferrite by itself...
Definitely has something to do with frequency of nuclear spin so to say ferromagnetic.

Arrangement's of the coil are two opposite magnetic fluxes one  from copper strip the other from  set of two coils... 16 and 51... NMR utilize set of coils in similar pattern..


Wesley

Hmm, do you have any idea of exact ferrite type "name" in TV CRT screen coil ?
What ferrite type has been used in second part of video , originally one that was not cut by half, and what kind of cutting machine was used to cut so brittle materiajl to half

Ane one more question : Experimenter in fist part of video use TV CRT ferrite core: Has he tried to use HV SPARK gao to that TV crt type of ferrite to get even more energy out, or in the other words , will there be video that gives that spark gap operation

Thank you

cosmoLV

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 252
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8148 on: October 31, 2011, 11:00:08 PM »
NEW INFO FREE ENERGY......

http://freeenergylt.narod2.ru/aidas/

Извини, но это уже дебилизация народа! Ну сколько можно врать? Это простой импульсный сём! Где тут чудо? всё это делали а вот тут пришел чувак завернул это самое в другой чехол и "Еврика"

и то что феррит разваливается от импульсов Мы тоже знаем и проходили.

*особенно это касается stivep - ёсли ты благом делом занимаешься, то дай людям чтото ценное и хватит херной заниматся!

*especially stivep - if you are doing good business, then give people something of value and be engaged enough garbage!

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8149 on: November 01, 2011, 12:01:02 AM »
Извини, но это уже дебилизация народа! Ну сколько можно врать? Это простой импульсный сём! Где тут чудо? всё это делали а вот тут пришел чувак завернул это самое в другой чехол и "Еврика"

и то что феррит разваливается от импульсов Мы тоже знаем и проходили.

*особенно это касается stivep - ёсли ты благом делом занимаешься, то дай людям чтото ценное и хватит херной заниматся!

*especially stivep - if you are doing good business, then give people something of value and be engaged enough garbage!
That is a good one :)
time will show...
I do not have fame, money, benefits or name to share with anyone in exchange for his/her approval.
THERE IS NO BENEFIT I CAN THINK ABOUT THAT WOULD BE  REWARDING ME IN ANY POSSIBLE WAY..
APART FROM ME THERE ARE 5 PEOPLE THAT  STATE THAT IT WORKS..
ARE WE ALL DECIDED TO HOAX ANYONE?

These individuals do not benefit from that anyway..and they are long time in the field of free energy...
So I do not care.............. I was in the shadow and will stay in the shadow....
After all when free energy will become obvious and  present nobody will remember me so what I have to lose.... no gain as well...
Is than not the best reason to say true and real achievement?

That is my response!!!!!

Wesley

PS:
Quote
especially stivep - if you are doing good business, then give people something of value
I'm not doing any business NONE!!!!!!!!!NO MONEY.... apart from tremendous expense I carry on myself trying to help others. Show me the reason that I will become  obligated  give you "Mr Russian fellow" anything...at all...
I'm giving to everyone  not to  Russian individual in particular...
So do not take it if you  do not feel like..

Did he pay $3000 for my trip to Tbilisi?
Did he risk his life( poison) to get  information delivered to others?
What was my gain giving  info about Tariel Kapanadze device to the people?
What did he (Russian Fellow)deliver apart from complain?
That is what Russian fellow can not understand....He simply does not get it...
:)
So let it be.



Do not forget to report it  to Russian K.G.B. They may throw you few rubles for that :)
And definitely they can  not send me to Siberia to Concentration Lager known as Concentration Camp for that as well.

very similar device from 
tiger2007 реплика3 .flv  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fu5cZ2Xyh5M&feature=player_embedded#!

information with scope shoots: http://freeenergylt.narod2.ru/aidas/
« Last Edit: November 01, 2011, 01:26:24 AM by stivep »

Goat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 640
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8150 on: November 01, 2011, 12:40:16 AM »
Hey Wesley & Team

I've really enjoyed seeing your progress but there is a lot of questions being asked about you're progress between the first working circuit and now you're 2nd (working?) circuit in the last video at the end. 

Is it your theory that the #2 cct should work as the #1 cct?  Or has it been proven to operate as the #1 cct?  Hope that makes sense :)

Is there a difference between the #1 cct and the #2 cct other than the copper plates substituted for coaxial cable shielding instead of the copper plates in the #1 cct?

Regards,
Paul

energia9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8151 on: November 01, 2011, 12:58:42 AM »
im very close to replicate, the pressure will be soon off from wesley and others shoulder.  everything will be clear,   
and people.
Never forget
Life is nothing without love. 
without love: life would be violent for all.
So strenghten it. and we can make this place all harmonious.
positive feelings are your best tool to defend yourselves from any negative energy.
Peace

Goat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 640
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8152 on: November 01, 2011, 01:14:57 AM »
@energia9

I hear you and I agree with you, let's return to this experiment one piece at a time and make it work for the betterment of mankind.

If we are divided we fall.

There's been alot of changes so it would be good to straighten out cct#1 and cct#2 as individual ccts to clear up any changes to the original cct that worked, then proceed to the next, wouldn't you agree?

In any scientific experiment the original project should be "Frozen" and then replicated, this is not the way this project is progressing and it's confusing people, but I don't want to stop progress just want to clear things up for onlookers.

Regards,
Paul

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8153 on: November 01, 2011, 01:35:13 AM »
Wesley
Nobody ? nothing?
Mister don't even try to think that way!!
My language does not seem to have the words to tell you how wonderful you are!!

??
All our children and their children will maybe come up with those words??

Wesley ,You show us selfless Love, for total strangers at great personal cost ,asking for no return??

Energia has it right............... and so do you !!

Chet
 

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8154 on: November 01, 2011, 01:37:15 AM »
Hey Wesley & Team

I've really enjoyed seeing your progress but there is a lot of questions being asked about you're progress between the first working circuit and now you're 2nd (working?) circuit in the last video at the end. 

Is it your theory that the #2 cct should work as the #1 cct?  Or has it been proven to operate as the #1 cct?  Hope that makes sense :)

Is there a difference between the #1 cct and the #2 cct other than the copper plates substituted for coaxial cable shielding instead of the copper plates in the #1 cct?

Regards,
Paul

Two of the concepts are different in nature both of them works, both are capable of 1KW of output.
schematic from first  video uses TK like concept..
schematic from second video uses ( possibly)not TK concept  but both are related to Tesla concept.

Both of the schematics uses spark gap  (at least one.)

second schematic is theoretically  less expensive and seems to be easier to replicate. but ferrite core properties are of very importance. Not every ferrite will works and it may  have to do with geometry of the core.. Suggestion use ferrite from old CTR tube.. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We do not know as of yet what  material of the core is the best Ma Zink looks to be the right one.

Wesley


You want to understand how the device work????
educate yourself as I did!!!!!!!!!!!

And message to  some of Russian KGB agents go and F..k yourself trolls
http://www.intl-magnetics.org/pdfs/SFG-98.pdf
http://www.chinadmegc.com/chinadmegc/english/web/about3_202.asp
http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=DTPSDS000029000001000343000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes&ref=no
http://www.fdk.co.jp/laboratory/ce_hon-e.htm
http://www.esuppliersindia.com/b-l-k-ferrites-pvt-ltd-/deflection-yoke-core-pr255703-sFP-swf.html
http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/REPAIR/F_tvfaq6.html#TVFAQ_001
http://magnetism.vfedtec.com/Overunity.htm
http://magnetism.vfedtec.com/FieldDensity.htm
http://magnetism.vfedtec.com/Overunity.htm
https://www.dmt-nexus.me/doc/Ether%20Physics.pdf
http://www.ux1.eiu.edu/~cfadd/1360/29MagFlds/HmwkSol.html
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/public/etd-543273119623370/etd.pdf
http://www.studyphysics.ca/2007/30/08_atomic/46_chambers.pdf  you might think this has nothing to do with it ?  well it does

dole

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 156
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8155 on: November 01, 2011, 01:42:22 AM »
Hi,
This is another attempt....
ps" pvls people quit trolling, relating to other OU devices, "i told you so" comments , Jesus told me etc

Yes, it would be nice to get some exact properties, measurements and requirements, thanks

"Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it, we go nowhere." -- Carl Sagan

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OX77Qv66qw

:)ole

Goat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 640
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8156 on: November 01, 2011, 02:18:04 AM »
Thank you Wesley for your time, I'll try to ask one question at a time in order to clear up build specs between cct1 and cct2 so people can follow your progress.

As you stated: "Two of the concepts are different in nature both of them works, both are capable of 1KW of output."

Now all that people need is to differentiate between cct1 and cct2.

In cct1 T-1000 mentioned copper plates and in cct2 in the video you show video cable shielding instead of the copper plates, is that correct.

Thanks,
Paul

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8157 on: November 01, 2011, 02:25:52 AM »
Thank you Wesley for your time, I'll try to ask one question at a time in order to clear up build specs between cct1 and cct2 so people can follow your progress.

As you stated: "Two of the concepts are different in nature both of them works, both are capable of 1KW of output."

Now all that people need is to differentiate between cct1 and cct2.

In cct1 T-1000 mentioned copper plates and in cct2 in the video you show video cable shielding instead of the copper plates, is that correct.

Thanks,
Paul

No... the use of copper or shielding  tape or aluminium is not important.
When I was talking about two different concepts I was talking about difference

between schematic from video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJBpNKSsdqw

and schematic form video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbeseiPPCeM

Other than that there is no difference in any material related to  last video
It is not important or it seem to be not important  what material you use for the latest video replication but it is of  greate importance what core you use as ferrite. !!!!
try yoke ferrite from old CRT

Wesley

AbbaRue

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8158 on: November 01, 2011, 05:41:53 AM »
Now if we could find a supplier of Ferrite cores that work well, then we could all get the same. 
Maybe a common brand name that is available all over the world.

Jimboot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1407
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8159 on: November 01, 2011, 06:11:07 AM »
Ok wound my ferrites. Got the yoke out of a 1982 TV. now I just have to work out the circuit. Still not sure whether I need my FB transformer, HV diodes, AV plug or where the SG should go. Could I impose on someone for a complete circuit diagram for us noobs based on Wesley's latest vid please :)