Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 14949703 times)

Offline Hope

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 701
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8085 on: October 28, 2011, 11:45:27 PM »
I read a report recently and I WILL find it and post it.   They made a IRON pipe react with a center rod with high voltage on it.  They slowly ramped up the HV to the reactance level of the iron particles and gained over 1082% output over input in 1957 (or around then).  So it would seem perhaps the coil is the antenna and the iron reactance is the generator.   When I find this article again I will post the link.   It seemed like the frequency was around 14,220 K


Offline TEKTRON

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 300
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8086 on: October 29, 2011, 03:20:48 AM »
I am interested in the question - How safe are my experiments?
I felt a physically ill when this device has worked…
To verify the  presence of radiation, I brought a solar panel to the lamp. In sunny weather, it gives a maximum of 6 V DC, I saw the 1200V ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrK6SgHlAZA

Now, that was very interesting! What type of radiation do you think is being emitted? And is that a real voltage being generated by the solar cell or HF noise screwing with the meter? Do you have an analog meter you could try and redo the experiment? Thanks for sharing! 8)

Offline DimaWari

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 108
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8087 on: October 29, 2011, 06:08:07 AM »
Good Day Guys.. I think you should put your spark gap inside the glass, this may help suppress the radiation

Offline From other Planet

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 108
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8088 on: October 29, 2011, 06:16:36 AM »
Yes measuring radiation is a very important point to not harm humans or animals near the device, including yourself.
I am also very interested in your solarcell radiation measuring experiment. Can you explain it little bit?

As we are dealing with OU devices, we dint really know about percentage of "wasted" energy emitted as different radiations or sideeffects of these phenomena producing harmful radiations, or even extreme spacedistortions bad for health.   
Think most people have no possibilities to measure this, we need a solution here and to be careful.

Offline Hope

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 701
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8089 on: October 29, 2011, 08:27:27 AM »
Found lease costly radiation detectors at Goldmine Electronics. 

Comment if you can read this????

Offline TEKTRON

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 300
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8090 on: October 29, 2011, 08:35:29 AM »
Found lease costly radiation detectors at Goldmine Electronics. 

Comment if you can read this????
got a link?

Offline Jury1

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 49
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8091 on: October 29, 2011, 10:10:32 AM »
Quote
….Concerning your experiment, i guess i should look into it more, but it
more or less reminds me of this old series (2008) of experiments (Simple transistor/coil oscillator with inductance and interwinding capacitance ) :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8pUR9R9Sd4&feature=channel_video_title
and originally from here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lx5En4Yv9iY....
@xenomorphlabs
I agree with you. Is the capacitive effect of the primary and secondary coils HV transformer.
IMHO important role to play the Miller effect and piezoelectric effect in the base of the transistor. This is the engine of the process.
 HV transformer - capacitive resonator ...
Electric circuit of the device is disconnected. In this circuit there is no electric current. If you use an analog ammeter, then you it will not see anything ...
Welcome to the "open system"!
Here does not work Ohm's law. This law is working in closed circuit ...
Modern equipment measures the current process inside the wire, but it is useless for measuring the electrostatic induction ... Why?
Because the static potential is perpendicular of the electric field of power supply ...
How does "open system"? The answers I find in the patents of Nikola Tesla ...
He was “The Last of the Mohitsans”,  who were engaged in "open systems" ..
When I realized this, I began to get interesting experiments ... I discovered a Terra Incognita.
An important quality of "open systems" is the ability to interact with the environment through capacitive coupling
Quote
… I am also very interested in your solarcell radiation measuring experiment. Can you explain it little bit?....
I think that the radiation source is a plasma. Plasma is the result of skin effect on the surface spiral lamp.
 [IMHO] I think,  that the electron out of atom exist in form of quantum wave...
At the lamp is fed the sine 150 kHz.
In the  lamp   power circuit I connected the  starter from a neon lamp.
 http://www.elektro-planet.com/shop/catalog/images/7905-z002.jpg
After heating the contact,  the circuit is broken.
We have an electrostatic impulse.
The potential electrostatic impulse   is much higher,  than the potential in the closed lamp circuit.
So after closing the circuit there is "braking radiation" or "deceleration radiation".
The p-n transition of the solar panel to absorbs this radiation.
[/IMHO]

« Last Edit: October 29, 2011, 01:24:15 PM by Jury1 »

Offline energia9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8092 on: October 29, 2011, 01:17:22 PM »
i find it tricky to replicate device....    i find that its not going to be easy, if i would have made such device, i would took photographs of every corner of the device, showing all in clear, also explaining why where and how we need correct capacitance adjustment for setting resonance,  and the ferrite bit. i cant even imagine how they have it,  how do we adjust it etc.  i did not quite understand how are we actually getting (cold) electricity that doesnt burn through paper...   i know you have shared plenty of info,  but i feel, that when a person masters this knoweledge, it will be extremely difficult for the other person to replicate because of the way we understand things completely different.
masters of the device :  Aidas and Arunas,  we need to find a way to implant the ***exact*** knoweledge and ***logic pattern*** in our heads to accomplish the magic


btw , im sure some of you have seen this before, and i wonder if the idea has something to do with this:
and this could be the reason why we see wries going through tariels device alll the time. he might not use ferrite, but plain copper!

To shake atoms so they render the energy they contain, you must send via a high frequency oscillator (in the order of 173 kHz) a wave that is in resonance with the vibration of the copper electrodes. This is via an oscillating magnetic field thanks to the coil winding that is connected to the oscillator and that covers the copper. One part of the feed current is used to polarize the metal that restitutes (gives back) up to 30 times the energy consumed by the oscillator.
http://www.rexresearch.com/meyernmr/meyer.htm
this person claimed he generated 40 watts from 1 watts input by resonating a copper rod,    i will try to send hv oscillations to the copper tube and adjust, see what happens.
« Last Edit: October 29, 2011, 03:26:11 PM by energia9 »

Offline forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4021
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8093 on: October 29, 2011, 03:25:18 PM »
energia9

According to Meyer-Mace schematic that would imply ferrite flyback core connected electrically to the output ???

Offline xenomorphlabs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 923
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8094 on: October 29, 2011, 03:26:17 PM »
@xenomorphlabs
I agree with you. Is the capacitive effect of the primary and secondary coils HV transformer.
IMHO important role to play the Miller effect and piezoelectric effect in the base of the transistor. This is the engine of the process.
 HV transformer - capacitive resonator ...
Electric circuit of the device is disconnected. In this circuit there is no electric current. If you use an analog ammeter, then you it will not see anything ...
Welcome to the "open system"!
Here does not work Ohm's law. This law is working in closed circuit ...
Modern equipment measures the current process inside the wire, but it is useless for measuring the electrostatic induction ... Why?
Because the static potential is perpendicular of the electric field of power supply ...
How does "open system"? The answers I find in the patents of Nikola Tesla ...
He was “The Last of the Mohitsans”,  who were engaged in "open systems" ..
When I realized this, I began to get interesting experiments ... I discovered a Terra Incognita.
An important quality of "open systems" is the ability to interact with the environment through capacitive couplingI think that the radiation source is a plasma. Plasma is the result of skin effect on the surface spiral lamp.
 [IMHO] I think,  that the electron out of atom exist in form of quantum wave...
At the lamp is fed the sine 150 kHz.
In the  lamp   power circuit I connected the  starter from a neon lamp.
 http://www.elektro-planet.com/shop/catalog/images/7905-z002.jpg
After heating the contact,  the circuit is broken.
We have an electrostatic impulse.
The potential electrostatic impulse   is much higher,  than the potential in the closed lamp circuit.
So after closing the circuit there is "braking radiation" or "deceleration radiation".
The p-n transition of the solar panel to absorbs this radiation.
[/IMHO]

May i suggest to you since you want to discuss/present you experiments that you

1) Briefly describe, for each experiment, what you intend to show
2) Name the components/elements used
3) Provide a schematic
4) State what is measured and where and interpret the measurements

Scientific experiments are always extremely documented for a reason, so
anybody could replicate them

It is very hard to understand an experiment from a youtube video with not a single word of description. It might be all obvious to you, but not to people who see it for the first time.

You were mentioning that "Electric circuit of the device is disconnected".
I don't understand this statement, the battery is connected with both wires ?!



@Energia9: I agree with you, unfortunately the schematic provided is insufficient and should be unambiguous. Common features of a schematic were omitted like supply voltages and component specifications.

It's a standard problem, when a person is too involved into his/her own experiment, then it all seems so easy and clear and that's probably the reason
why some schematics tend to be without much detail.
But it is their choice, they chose to present it like that. Nothing else to do than respect that.

Concerning the Meyer experiment you posted.
I personally think that it is a bit closer to what TK is doing, because exactly of what you are saying, that the copper wire  goes through the coil former of his devices. In the green box it's the earth cable, in the new device it is possible that the output cable to the lamps runs all the way through.
In the Aquarium device the core is a BRASS ROD !!! (NOT iron or ferrite)





Offline energia9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8095 on: October 29, 2011, 03:45:59 PM »
i had experiments with copper rods before, i made plenty of coils with copper underneath, before i was 100 percent sure that it is the main principle behind it, and somehow days passed i have lost the original idea..  but now...  as i  see the copper rod being impressed with oscillations of low voltage,  and impressed with high voltage oscillations at the same time,  and there is a 3rd coil which is interconnected with rod somehow and being the output.  this is how i imagine the whole process, also i have posted a pic earlier being my dream that we have to set resonance between oscillator- the hv transf- and the output coil with rod.
have a read back on what i said on rope and water waves.

Offline wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8096 on: October 29, 2011, 04:34:07 PM »
@all

This weekend I will make the Caduceus Coil (CC) but I am wondering about the specs. It calls for 2mm wire which is 12 AWG, so 1 metre lengths. This seems very thick for such wire. Anyways I will make it a close as possible.

The standard flyback will not work with the AV plug. I think it just cannot produce high enough voltage. I will take out my high voltage probe and do some measuring.

If anyone has the time, we need someone to go back on this thread to when the Wesley gang started and produce a compendium of posts so that @members do not have to wade though so many pages.

I am looking for the company that sells the flybacks and cannot find it. Someone put a link on the thread but I don't know where.

I can run my flyback just like the TheKultus youtube and have tried several coiling schemes in series with the spark. I tried a MOT primary and then the secondary in series with a bulb as load and nothing.

Time to make the CC.

wattsup

Offline Jury1

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 49
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8097 on: October 29, 2011, 04:35:51 PM »
Quote
…You were mentioning that "Electric circuit of the device is disconnected".
I don't understand this statement, the battery is connected with both wires ?!...
In this device, I consider the transistor as a variable capacitor ... I understand that this strange to hear, but true. the transistor is capacitive coupling between the collector and base, between emitter and collector, base and emitter between. For me important is the capacitive coupling between the collector and emitter. To start the device must be submitted to the base of a short positive pulse (for n-p-n transistor).
In base the piezoelectric effect is present .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piezoelectricity
The change of dielectric properties of the base, leads to a change in electrical potential on the collector and emitter. But the electric current in the circuit does not go! The base of the transistor is closed!

Offline viny

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8098 on: October 29, 2011, 05:26:13 PM »
Talking again about the spark gap problem, have to remember how J L Naudin managed it with tungsten rods. He reports the spark is very quiet and weak compared to the previous version (cooper rods).
http://jnaudin.free.fr/kapagen/spgv33.jpg

Offline wings

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 750
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8099 on: October 30, 2011, 09:10:30 AM »
Talking again about the spark gap problem, have to remember how J L Naudin managed it with tungsten rods. He reports the spark is very quiet and weak compared to the previous version (cooper rods).
http://jnaudin.free.fr/kapagen/spgv33.jpg

one side with oxide copper like a diode effect?
see also copper carbon effect "Using Carbon rod and Copper for the spark gap lowered my input power usage by 55 watts.":

http://jnaudin.free.fr/kapagen/images/don_kapagen3.jpg