Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16407989 times)

xenomorphlabs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 923
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8070 on: October 28, 2011, 04:25:55 AM »
While it is necessary to avoid, the experimental effect of a vaporizing ferrite core sounds good.
He seems to have managed to hypersaturate it.
Ferrite is a classname for several materials containing either Barium or Strontium, some might work better others might not work at all for a particular set-up.
T-1000 has a good link, i think the effect seems to be connected to electron spin converting into magnetic oscillation.

Cap-Z-ro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8071 on: October 28, 2011, 06:45:44 AM »

If Barium and Strontium, 2 toxins found in chemtrails, are also found in ferrite, would the destruction of these ferrite core's in the process not be detrimental to ones health ?

Regards...


T-1000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1738
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8072 on: October 28, 2011, 06:54:55 AM »
If Barium and Strontium, 2 toxins found in chemtrails, are also found in ferrite, would the destruction of these ferrite core's in the process not be detrimental to ones health ?

Regards...

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrite_(magnet)#Soft_ferrites

The most common soft ferrites are:
Manganese-zinc ferrite (MnZn, with the formula MnaZn(1-a)Fe2O4). MnZn have higher permeability and saturation induction than NiZn.

Nickel-zinc ferrite (NiZn, with the formula NiaZn(1-a)Fe2O4). NiZn ferrites exhibit higher resistivity than MnZn, and are therefore more suitable for frequencies above 1 MHz.


Shokac

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 378
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8074 on: October 28, 2011, 08:27:15 AM »
Wesley, T-1000, Aidas

I thought this team was duplicating Tariels device?

Tariel didn't use ferrite core in his coil on the Green Box device and he got 22amps on the ground wire going to the bulbs (load).

I don't understand?  ???

DonL

This is replica of SR Device

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8075 on: October 28, 2011, 08:42:20 AM »
I hope there is no neutron radiation ?!

"Because the neutrons that strike the hydrogen nucleus (proton, or deuteron) impart energy to that nucleus, they in turn will break from their chemical bonds and travel a short distance, before stopping. Those protons and deuterons are high linear energy transfer particles, and are in turn stopped by ionization of the material through which they travel. Consequently, in living tissue, neutrons have a relatively high relative biological effectiveness, and are roughly ten times more effective at causing cancers or LD-50s compared to photon or beta radiation of equivalent radiation exposure."


"Neutrons also degrade materials; bombardment of materials with neutrons creates collision cascades that can produce point defects and dislocations in the materials. At high neutron fluences this can lead to embrittlement of metals and other materials, and to swelling of some of them"

Source : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_radiation

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8076 on: October 28, 2011, 08:57:49 AM »
http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/Chapter3.pdf page 15 and further for more advanced device on the same principle. Floyd Sweet VTA. Read carefully , find resemblances...
I wonder if Steven Mark  knew what Floyd did  ? I think not, because he could avoid heat generation ...

energia9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8077 on: October 28, 2011, 12:39:37 PM »
I hope there is no neutron radiation ?!

"Because the neutrons that strike the hydrogen nucleus (proton, or deuteron) impart energy to that nucleus, they in turn will break from their chemical bonds and travel a short distance, before stopping. Those protons and deuterons are high linear energy transfer particles, and are in turn stopped by ionization of the material through which they travel. Consequently, in living tissue, neutrons have a relatively high relative biological effectiveness, and are roughly ten times more effective at causing cancers or LD-50s compared to photon or beta radiation of equivalent radiation exposure."


"Neutrons also degrade materials; bombardment of materials with neutrons creates collision cascades that can produce point defects and dislocations in the materials. At high neutron fluences this can lead to embrittlement of metals and other materials, and to swelling of some of them"

Source : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_radiation
this is what i have said also, it might, but might not, only way to see is to buy a alpha beta gamma ray counter ,  put a metal object near the device,  if it becomes radioactive, stop what you doing immidiately.,   health is far more expensive than operating such thing...   It is not only responsible for making metals radioactive,  but if you are close to such thing, your bones become affected.  we do not want that.

xenomorphlabs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 923
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8078 on: October 28, 2011, 02:15:25 PM »
If Barium and Strontium, 2 toxins found in chemtrails, are also found in ferrite, would the destruction of these ferrite core's in the process not be detrimental to ones health ?

Regards...

Don't worry about this.
First T-1000 is absolutely correct, the cores are made out of soft ferrite.
I just had these elements remembered, but they are used in hard ferrites
which are basically permanent magnets.
Soft ferrites are magnetizable and contain Manganese-zinc ferrite or Nickel-zinc ferrite.
So even if you break a barium-based magnet, the barium is not isolated but part of the compound.

Concerning the radiation issues.
Neutron radiation is hopefully unlikely, it could be beta radiation accompanying the massive liberation of electrons from the nuclei, but that could be measured and most of all shielded with aluminum and maybe acrylic outside.
Best bet is to put that thing in a shielded boy anyway especially if it operates above 100kHz.



Jury1

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 49
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8079 on: October 28, 2011, 02:28:45 PM »
I am interested in the question - How safe are my experiments?
I felt a physically ill when this device has worked…
To verify the  presence of radiation, I brought a solar panel to the lamp. In sunny weather, it gives a maximum of 6 V DC, I saw the 1200V ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrK6SgHlAZA

energia9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8080 on: October 28, 2011, 03:53:51 PM »
Don't worry about this.
First T-1000 is absolutely correct, the cores are made out of soft ferrite.
I just had these elements remembered, but they are used in hard ferrites
which are basically permanent magnets.
Soft ferrites are magnetizable and contain Manganese-zinc ferrite or Nickel-zinc ferrite.
So even if you break a barium-based magnet, the barium is not isolated but part of the compound.

Concerning the radiation issues.
Neutron radiation is hopefully unlikely, it could be beta radiation accompanying the massive liberation of electrons from the nuclei, but that could be measured and most of all shielded with aluminum and maybe acrylic outside.
Best bet is to put that thing in a shielded boy anyway especially if it operates above 100kHz.
if there is alpha or beta radiation involved, there is neutron radiation too. if we are able to measure radioactivity on nearby metal parts, we have to stop

baroutologos

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 918
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8081 on: October 28, 2011, 05:11:06 PM »
@ The TK replication team

Is that possible so far to assemble a sectioned pdf (for adding info later) with hyperlinks to youtube vids and various sources with your replication work so far?
I mean a schematic is good, but totally inadequate. This might be your legacy if the whole story proves true.

E.g 1

You have a resonating HV flyback transformer that charges one via wire avramenko plug caps. What is the charging voltage, capacity and rate of discharges (while in operation) per second?
- Case A while one wire no "cold" wire to TT connected
- Case B while the "cold" wire to the opposite TT winding connected.

E.g. 2

Can you elaborate on this frequency mixing and ferrite hammering process?

Those are just few inquiries in my mind.

Thanks
« Last Edit: October 28, 2011, 09:51:48 PM by baroutologos »

Jdo300

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 682
    • The Magnetic 90 degree rule Theory
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8082 on: October 28, 2011, 08:31:37 PM »
I am interested in the question - How safe are my experiments?
I felt a physically ill when this device has worked…
To verify the  presence of radiation, I brought a solar panel to the lamp. In sunny weather, it gives a maximum of 6 V DC, I saw the 1200V ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrK6SgHlAZA

Hi Jury,

Interesting experiment but I would suggest that you NEVER use a digital meter to take measurements near any kind of HV pulsating system. Digital meters can get scrambled even if you just have them sitting on the table close to your test setups. I suggest you repeat that same experiment with an analog meter to confirm that what you are seeing is correct first.

- Jason O

viny

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8083 on: October 28, 2011, 08:53:20 PM »
General info on ferrite cores:

http://www.intl-magnetics.org/pdfs/SFG-98.pdf

Hi Masterplaster: What a great document !
 

MasterPlaster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 530
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #8084 on: October 28, 2011, 11:40:28 PM »
Hi Masterplaster: What a great document !

You are welcome. Here is more:

Resonant Amplification of Magnetic Domain-Wall Motion by a Train of Current Pulses:
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/315/5818/1553.abstract


Also:
Magnetic Field-Induced Superconductivity in the Ferromagnet
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/309/5739/1343.short