Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16407693 times)

grizli

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 415
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6270 on: April 01, 2011, 07:33:15 PM »
Hehe... nice.

i was reading the post re-puplication of yours of buzz sayings regarding Kapanadze and i found of interest there talking about a kind of transformer resembling Zatsarinia's one, being sinle turn or better a wire being house by a ferrite tube etc commonly know as coaxial transformers used in HF applications.

In regard to this, Buzz claimed that is possible to have a non inductive ??? transformer yet able to pass power from a wire to next to it being not reflected to the source? I have no little knowledge tot that. Can he elaborate what he meant by that? (the post was a bit messy in technical or replication terms)

http://home.earthlink.net/~christrask/TraskTLTTutorial.pdf

Transmission line transformer,
Lower frequencies works like classic one (ferrite) , higher like transmission line

grizli

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 415
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6271 on: April 01, 2011, 07:41:30 PM »
No problem, I use copper tub or/and twisted copper cable as a primary and an insulated
or bare copper wire as the secondary wound on a ferrite core tube of rings
or a paper tube.
But it will be more correct to take this from original text:

“by the proper design of a comparatively small and compact transformer. In carrying on tests
with a secondary in the form of a flat spiral, as illustrated in my patents, the absence of streamers surprised me,
and it was not long before I discovered that this was due to the position of the turns and their mutual action.
Profiting from this observation I resorted to the use of a high tension conductor with turns of considerable diameter
sufficiently separated to keep down the distributed capacity, while at the same time preventing
undue accumulation of the charge at any point.”

And then I use water/oil homemade leyden jar and lately Doorknob capacitors but
I must admit that I am back to the leyden jar since I can make small adjust in capacity to.
For those further interested I will copy this to, from the original writings:

"I have been asked by the ELECTRICAL EXPERIMENTER to be quite explicit on this subject so
that my young friends among the readers of the magazine will clearly understand the construction
and operation of my "Magnifying Transmitter" and the purposes for which it is intended. Well,
then, in the first place, it is a resonant transformer with a secondary in which the parts, charged to
a high potential, are of considerable area and arranged in space along ideal enveloping surfaces
of very large radii of curvature, and at proper distances from one another thereby insuring a small
electric surface density everywhere so that no leak can occur even if the conductor is bare. It is
suitable for any frequency, from a few to many thousands of cycles per second, and can be used
in the production of currents of tremendous volume and moderate pressure, or of smaller
amperage and immense electromotive force. The maximum electric tension is merely dependent
on the curvature of the surfaces on which the charged elements are situated and the area of the
latter."

So when this is understood, it become clearly obvious, that principally any combination is possible.

d.

Image would be nice?

So this is not classic TC if you use ferrite? Ferrite lowers natural resonance frequency very much, and there is no standing voltage wave across TC secondary wire, like tesla says?

I am confused why many experimenters use ferrite core, this limits all that related to standing wave, and classic behaviour of Tesla coil.

This is Tesla original text quoted? can you link original source of text quoted

Thank You!

grizli

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 415
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6272 on: April 01, 2011, 07:56:38 PM »
Just experimenting and this time i got some real change in brightness in bulb when injecting HV.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gexmHe56thM

scratchrobot

Can you make schematics, what you did ?

So we can understand whats going on, thank you !

scratchrobot

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 401
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6273 on: April 01, 2011, 07:58:54 PM »
Still waiting for my ML566 to arrive  >:(
Some pdf on the chip.

link

link

TEKTRON

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 300
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6274 on: April 01, 2011, 08:47:22 PM »
Still waiting for my ML566 to arrive  >:(
Some pdf on the chip.

link

link

Scratch, I think it was said 566 was a misprint. I think it should be 556???

leo48

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 254
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6275 on: April 01, 2011, 09:08:54 PM »
Quote
Scratch, I think it was said 566 was a misprint. I think it should be 556???
The 556 is an double 555 in one chip in 14 pin
http://www.datasheetcatalog.org/datasheet/philips/NE556-1F.pdf

the 566 is an similar 555 but to operate up to 1 Mhz
http://www.datasheetcatalog.org/datasheet/philips/NE566D.pdf
 ;D
Leo48

scratchrobot

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 401
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6276 on: April 01, 2011, 10:36:38 PM »
Can you make schematics, what you did ?

So we can understand whats going on, thank you !

I used schematics CosmoLV posted on page 261 of this thread, without the 2 transistors. Instead i pulse at 50 hz. HV i took from plasma globe, dont know frequency.

Regards, scratchrobot

Goat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 640
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6277 on: April 02, 2011, 12:34:15 AM »
I used schematics CosmoLV posted on page 261 of this thread, without the 2 transistors. Instead i pulse at 50 hz. HV i took from plasma globe, dont know frequency.

Regards, scratchrobot

Thanks @ scratchrobot

@ All, the link to schematic is at http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=7679.0;attach=47977;image and the post on page 261 is http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7679.msg259292#msg259292

Regards,
Paul

scratchrobot

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 401
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6278 on: April 02, 2011, 01:27:55 AM »
Thanks @ scratchrobot

@ All, the link to schematic is at http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=7679.0;attach=47977;image and the post on page 261 is http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7679.msg259292#msg259292

Regards,
Paul

I will try to do it with two transistors and some capacitor tomorrow.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6279 on: April 02, 2011, 04:26:47 AM »
of course ! 
...........................................................
isn't that a probable assumption ?

Find my previous post from few days ago.Read it.!!!

Yes I confirm it Take it for 100% accuracy and at no doubt at any kind.
The reason for that was " fight". Turkish  request.
Quote:
" You do not believe it does...You want it you got it... now you believe it ................can you?, you do not?...I can show it to you, -I can cut this....... (fu..en wire = jobanyj provod)...... bliadz, swolocz,nu..... wy siejczas dostali mienia."
Pust dumajut...... bliadz..( all of this words are just TK disappointment)
 suki"
 

This video is showing misleading  configuration. That what you see  WORKS
but does not work the way you see it
[/sub].

Wesley
Do not ask me how do I know !! but I KNOW as if I was TK.
« Last Edit: April 02, 2011, 02:52:53 PM by stivep »

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6280 on: April 02, 2011, 07:42:16 AM »
Wesley
Quote:
This video is showing misleading  configuration. That what you see  WORKS but does not work the way you see it
----------------------------

Sir ,
Which Video are you referring to ?
Thank you
Chet

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6281 on: April 02, 2011, 02:42:53 PM »
Wesley
Quote:
This video is showing misleading  configuration. That what you see  WORKS but does not work the way you see it
----------------------------

Sir ,
Which Video are you referring to ?

Thank you
Chet


video from Turkey 
Quote I have mentioned is NOT a PART OF THIS VIDEO  but is approximate relation of what was happening behind if scenes.

Wesley

grizli

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 415
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6282 on: April 02, 2011, 05:29:52 PM »

video from Turkey 
Quote I have mentioned is NOT a PART OF THIS VIDEO  but is approximate relation of what was happening behind if scenes.

Wesley

Kapanadze Turkey video or ?

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567

core

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6284 on: April 02, 2011, 07:58:09 PM »

As seen on diagram, pin #1 of IC556 appears to be connected to a common ground together with the negative rail on split psu.

If negative rail is grounded itself (other filter cap is useless), ................

   -- Pinoy_Tech --

I agree this is a useless setup that makes no sense. With Pin 1 grounded that capacitor off the PNP's collector is always shorted and becomes non-functional. A more practical spot for that capacitor may be between Pin 1 and ground.

Even with that capacitors in series with a center tap ground it is still shorted and this should neither subtract or add to the capacitance.

Respectfully,

Core
« Last Edit: April 02, 2011, 11:17:41 PM by Pirate88179 »