Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16490785 times)

grizli

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 415
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6255 on: March 31, 2011, 02:57:23 AM »

Yes I did some experiments on that, if I did remember correctly and did not make mistake under measurements (what is quiet often, believe or not) polarity reverse prior to discharge. Answer to the question should be A and C (there are the same) providing very specific properties for B as a path, whatever it is.
Interesting to report under last youtube I was able to see tiny glow from my body in the dark attached to third coil, there was no current in my body I feel I just provide energy flow ionizing myself. Then it become clearer a report that top of the Tesla tower glow very bright and not sending sparks as many think. Thanks in advance if any have some more reference to the subject.

d.

Can you report any more data about TC you actually use for driving all that ? Frequency ?

p.s Very nice video :D

baroutologos

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 918
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6256 on: March 31, 2011, 10:24:58 AM »
Who is Buzz?

i enjoyed his writing style!

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6257 on: March 31, 2011, 02:18:15 PM »
Bart,
The Buzz is a supreme being!And He is COMPLELETLY absorbed in the study of all things "Suppressed" reguarding OU!

But he does Bite................................

Chet
« Last Edit: March 31, 2011, 02:53:07 PM by ramset »

baroutologos

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 918
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6258 on: March 31, 2011, 03:04:17 PM »
Hehe... nice.

i was reading the post re-puplication of yours of buzz sayings regarding Kapanadze and i found of interest there talking about a kind of transformer resembling Zatsarinia's one, being sinle turn or better a wire being house by a ferrite tube etc commonly know as coaxial transformers used in HF applications.

In regard to this, Buzz claimed that is possible to have a non inductive ??? transformer yet able to pass power from a wire to next to it being not reflected to the source? I have no little knowledge tot that. Can he elaborate what he meant by that? (the post was a bit messy in technical or replication terms)

dllabarre

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 750
    • Portal Page
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6259 on: March 31, 2011, 03:24:22 PM »
Well DonL then apparently you MUST think what was written above by ramset is not very relevant. Because if you did you would of saved it when you read it over here.


- Core
 

I actually saved the original post from TheBuzz.

And what is NOT relevant today still may have been relevant when it was originally posted.  So it's good practice to take a copy of posts that seem relevant when posted.

I have a file of your relevant posts also  :)

DonL


dllabarre

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 750
    • Portal Page
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6260 on: March 31, 2011, 03:32:01 PM »
Hehe... nice.

In regard to this, Buzz claimed that is possible to have a non inductive ??? transformer yet able to pass power from a wire to next to it being not reflected to the source? I have no little knowledge tot that. Can he elaborate what he meant by that? (the post was a bit messy in technical or replication terms)

TheBuzz: Correct me if I'm wrong. Preferably with a slap on the hand and not a lightening strike  :o


Bart:

I think he was referring to this:
http://www.semelab.com/rf/documents/Push-Pull%20Circuits%20and%20Wideband%20Transformers.pdf

DonL


dole

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 156
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6261 on: March 31, 2011, 04:54:33 PM »
Can you report any more data about TC

No problem, I use copper tub or/and twisted copper cable as a primary and an insulated
or bare copper wire as the secondary wound on a ferrite core tube of rings
or a paper tube.
But it will be more correct to take this from original text:

“by the proper design of a comparatively small and compact transformer. In carrying on tests
with a secondary in the form of a flat spiral, as illustrated in my patents, the absence of streamers surprised me,
and it was not long before I discovered that this was due to the position of the turns and their mutual action.
Profiting from this observation I resorted to the use of a high tension conductor with turns of considerable diameter
sufficiently separated to keep down the distributed capacity, while at the same time preventing
undue accumulation of the charge at any point.”

And then I use water/oil homemade leyden jar and lately Doorknob capacitors but
I must admit that I am back to the leyden jar since I can make small adjust in capacity to.
For those further interested I will copy this to, from the original writings:

"I have been asked by the ELECTRICAL EXPERIMENTER to be quite explicit on this subject so
that my young friends among the readers of the magazine will clearly understand the construction
and operation of my "Magnifying Transmitter" and the purposes for which it is intended. Well,
then, in the first place, it is a resonant transformer with a secondary in which the parts, charged to
a high potential, are of considerable area and arranged in space along ideal enveloping surfaces
of very large radii of curvature, and at proper distances from one another thereby insuring a small
electric surface density everywhere so that no leak can occur even if the conductor is bare. It is
suitable for any frequency, from a few to many thousands of cycles per second, and can be used
in the production of currents of tremendous volume and moderate pressure, or of smaller
amperage and immense electromotive force. The maximum electric tension is merely dependent
on the curvature of the surfaces on which the charged elements are situated and the area of the
latter."

So when this is understood, it become clearly obvious, that principally any combination is possible.

d.

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6262 on: March 31, 2011, 04:59:39 PM »
Dole

But I think you are not using spark gap at secondary side of circuit as printed in Tesla schematic.Right ?

dole

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 156
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6263 on: March 31, 2011, 05:18:15 PM »
Eh, I intended to say that but I already “stepped over my knowledge”, yes,
-> you may use condenser instead of spark gap, but you will still need this to ground <- Sorry this refers to primary sg,
Secondary, no sparks, it must be trapped inside secondary as much as possible, but
coincidently there is already answered below :^) and no needs for many turns there but rather geometry.


d.
« Last Edit: March 31, 2011, 08:58:44 PM by dole »

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6264 on: March 31, 2011, 05:27:32 PM »
Quote from:
http://www.cheniere.org/misc/ferroelectric.htm

"Now why would anyone wish to purchase a supposedly nonlinear capacitor for its very nonlinearity, and instead purchase one that has been altered to behave just as linearly as possible? Why would a company advertise such a nonlinear capacitor, then sell you one that is highly linearized? And considering the rather substantial literature on nonlinear capacitors with square S-curves, why do not the capacitor companies sell such?

We eventually found there is indeed a U.S. manufacturer of ferroelectric capacitors with precisely that S-curve hysteresis loop.  There was just one little problem.  They had an agreement with the U.S. Navy for all their production of those capacitors, and in that agreement they were not to sell any to private persons or companies.

Now why would the U.S. Navy wish to restrict a perfectly unclassified, open component from being sold on the open commercial market? Zounds! If one were a conspiracy buff, one might even try to connect this with the U.S. Navy's long suppression of the Kron negative resistor.  Do you suppose there could actually be some kind of connection between the two? Why of course not! Paranoia and all that, you know.  And still one wonders……

The literature continues to publish tests of just such ferroelectric capacitors, etc. Contacting several of the researchers who author those papers, we found that they (at least the ones contacted) were all making their own ferroelectric capacitors if they wished one with that square S-curve! No one seemed to know where we could just purchase one off the shelf.

Maybe all that is just coincidence.  And maybe not."


Please find more about construction of mentioned  device as it  looks like was principal determination of SR.

As TK the ferromagnetic core is NOT USED!! but... "Principia" of coil capacitor is maintained


Please also read section
quote:"A Possible Interpretation"

Wesley 

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6265 on: March 31, 2011, 07:44:52 PM »
Wesley

Thanks.You are on the right track I think.
Now we need to connect some unconnected effects, like longitudinal electricity.
I wonder how domains can react to the sharp demagnetization at 90 degrees to the currently established magnetic flux path ? I doubt the y can pass this flux and additional sharp flux both at the same time.

WindsorFarmer

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6266 on: March 31, 2011, 09:07:26 PM »
419 PAGES!  This is one huge thread!  :o

Two questions:

1.  Is there a schematic for this available?  I've downloaded a couple of 'schematics' recently and found they were seriously lacking.  More like diagrams at best.

2.  Is there a parts list and set of instructions available?  I'm guessing there is enough information in this thread, but how to sift through it all.  ???

Thanks

Mike

leo48

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 254
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6267 on: March 31, 2011, 09:29:54 PM »
 ;D
If you have a working pattern you are welcome
 :'(
Leo48

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6268 on: March 31, 2011, 10:54:43 PM »
Hey Mike,
This is called reverse engineering?
Except they're reverse engineering "The needle in the Hay stack".

We do this all the time around here! 400 plus pages?
Heck we're just gettin started!!

No working schematic!
No idea "how it works"?although every now and then there is a "Moment"!!
The "Moments" are getting closer together lately,But that could change at anytime![for the worse or the better].

Chet


scratchrobot

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 401
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #6269 on: April 01, 2011, 04:40:32 PM »
Just experimenting and this time i got some real change in brightness in bulb when injecting HV.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gexmHe56thM

scratchrobot