Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16501526 times)

iceweller

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 135
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #5040 on: January 11, 2011, 10:23:58 PM »
@ core: I tried to follow the live interview today and some users translated some stuff for me. Anyhow the interview should be available shortly, even if in Russian. You are correct, he did demo some pretty interesting stuff and it's all available on his site for free for now:

http://ferromagnetic-energy.com/core_of_the_physical_effect/

There are theories about reactions at an atomic level for ex. but in any case the setup is pretty basic if you look at the circuit and it's not a problem to reproduce it (at least it appears so).

   They also said that TK said he was on the right track though missing some concept and that yes they wanted to meet up.

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #5041 on: January 11, 2011, 11:25:16 PM »
I doubt Melnichenko can patent process. Only actual implementation I think yet still it is possible to void implementation too by previously published material.
Anyway, Tesla was first who described process and there was also author of doc "kak pabotaet kapanadze"

MasterPlaster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 530
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #5042 on: January 12, 2011, 12:31:15 AM »
See post by Hryunov Morzhov in:

http://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&u=http://www.offtop.ru/energy/v19_688600_2_.php%3Fof781%3D01bc04275d2b911e1633de4c5ad20e09&ei=eOYsTc_CLNDq4Ab4ip3iCw&sa=X&oi=translate&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CCMQ7gEwATgK&prev=/search%3Fq%3D2002110131%26start%3D10%26hl%3Den%26newwindow%3D1%26sa%3DN%26prmd%3Divns


Melnichenkos patent

(WO/2003/061110) METHOD FOR ENERGY GENERATION BY MEANS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES AND DEVICE FOR CARRYING OUT SAID METHOD (VARIANTS)


So can some one translate it please?
« Last Edit: January 12, 2011, 01:01:42 AM by MasterPlaster »

the_big_m_in_ok

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2087
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #5043 on: January 12, 2011, 02:21:11 AM »
Quote from: MasterPlaster said:
[quote
Melnichenkos patent

(WO/2003/061110) METHOD FOR ENERGY GENERATION BY MEANS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES AND DEVICE FOR CARRYING OUT SAID METHOD (VARIANTS)


So can some one translate it please?
That might be nice, but I downloaded the address above, and there is no wiring schematic to accompany the text.
(At least in the 14 pg. initial application for the international patent.)

--Lee

wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #5044 on: January 12, 2011, 03:04:39 AM »
@guys doing translations

Please keep in mind that the parts about seaside, his problems with legal aspect and all other such diverging topics are not that important to us. I don't really care about the story or his legal problems. All guys with OU devices that look to make money on it will have problems from day one of signing a contract with money guys. What else is new.

What is only important here is any more news on the device.

And related to that, from what I can understand from your translations, with thanks to all, is that my last post on how the device works is very very close indeed. Some slight changes needed. I am glad about that.

It's too bad this Denis guy did not have the smarts enough to get TK to crack open some more.

Some major points I took down are as follows;

I will comment inside them also.

START

First video: nothing new.

Second video:

TK: Ground is not needed.

wattsup: I'm worried he's not telling the truth. Each time he talks about making juice, his device is grounded. TK is just playing with the guy.

Denis: I can envision how it works. It's like with Tesla, there is a need for impulse. The spark and we have to tap this. There is a need for a mechanical pulsing device.

TK: And we are using electrical ones. But Tesla was able to achieve 2 millions of pulses per second. But so far, we were using only 50% of that speed. That means 1 million of pulses per second.

Third video:

Denis: So we should not have the BEMF right. We should avoid it.

TK: Yes, Yes. If you don't get rid of it you are going to have so much mess.

wattsup: Again here I differ and believe that if Denis knew enough about that question, he would not have responded with the following dumb ass comment.

Denis. Yes, well I was learning about Tesla technology only after I saw your video. I've heard about Tesla Tesla but who is Tesla. What he did. I have no idea.

TK: Tesla is a genius.

Denis: That green box you have, there are no ferrites in this device right.

TK: No, there is no way. Just look, where you see in Tesla ferrites?

Denis: Well there is iron but not ferrite flame treated.

TK: Yes because at that time there was no ferrites.

Denis: The metal that he was using was serving the same purpose. Right?

TK: No. No. No. No..... No. Absolutely not. People who are saying resonance is needed, not needed, bifilar, yes, you can use bifilar, but you can do it without it, I don't know.

wattsup: All this is very confusing, right.

TK: Well I just presented and I only presented the spark and how do I get this into the point of spark. And how do I transfer the forces of that coil. And I was showing devices sitting here and taking from over there and there is a glass box. There is one coil, a second coil, a little bit smaller coil and from that how did i took that energy that I got.

Denis: So you meant that there is the white spark that you have there is the nergy that you have from the surrounding ha ha ha field.

TK: Yes.

Denis: That means that this spark it change to current.

TK: Yes Yes, this goes to the power coil and then is being transformed to electrical energy.


Video #4:

Denis: Well ahhh flame treated iron, did you use that?

TK: No I did not. I never used it. When others says that resonance is needed, not needed, use bifilar coils, we can do it with it, without it. I don't know. I know what I was able to achieve.

Some time later......

TK: You know that pure induction is transmission. Using wires, in these transformers....


Some time later......

TK: OK I showed them a big coil and the second one a little bit smaller coil and I how did I take from over there and how did I make this. Yes I did take this energy from the surrounding environment.

Denis: Well the white spark is the surrounding energy from the environment, right?

TK: Yes. It is.

Denis. It looks like from that moment we have the conversion to the current.

TK: Yes. We are transforming the energy to the power coil and then this is being converted to the electrical energy. And, I was using four square mm thickness wires. 3 wires. They were connected from four square mm three wires and they were outgoing.

END

So we learned a few things with thanks.

Now to make a build and do some testing of my ownie.

wattsup

MasterPlaster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 530
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #5045 on: January 12, 2011, 03:55:09 AM »
That might be nice, but I downloaded the address above, and there is no wiring schematic to accompany the text.
(At least in the 14 pg. initial application for the international patent.)

--Lee

Hello Lee. A patent is not a blue print to replicate a device. Even if there was a schematic, it would be deliberately misleading or incomplete. All I am looking for is the description of a technique used. One thing is for sure and that if someone goes through
the trouble and expence of a world wide patent, he has something real.

Sad truth of the matter is that we will never see a commercial OU device. The product
is doomed to be moth balled the moment the inventor comes to the attention of the
oil industry. How does this stupid fool convince Putin to dismantle his gas pipeline?

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #5046 on: January 12, 2011, 04:30:24 AM »
The next video is already done I did not post it  as of yet I need some of time.My wife  was flying to Poland today,most of my time I have spend  on the trip to Kennedy Airport. If nothing happens I will try to post it tomorrow but after video is posted I will include post-quotes.that  may take me few days.
I do apologize for "translation" being  so nonprofessional.I did it  for the first time real time with no stops in the middle. I have very decent knowledge in Russian.I have  learn Russian in USA.
My problem is that I'm dealing with two foreign languages  Russian and English .
If it was Russian to Polish ......It would be done with easiness ..but I'm getting better.


Wesley   

 

monolower

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #5047 on: January 12, 2011, 07:34:33 AM »
Omm.really?

cosmoLV

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 252
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #5048 on: January 12, 2011, 08:07:59 AM »
we are starting to give technology - if everything going like now, then on start of summer - this technology start to come public.

http://www.umbrellatech.lv

TheCell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 285
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #5049 on: January 12, 2011, 08:22:00 AM »
What will it cost?

monolower

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #5050 on: January 12, 2011, 08:46:56 AM »
It's nice. ;D

baroutologos

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 918
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #5051 on: January 12, 2011, 12:55:13 PM »
Quote
we are starting to give technology - if everything going like now, then on start of summer - this technology start to come public.

http://www.umbrellatech.lv


From so far accumulated experience, what you say its a wish. Highly improbable if not impossible.

penno64

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 457
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #5052 on: January 12, 2011, 01:33:20 PM »
Hi Barout,

have you been following MISHAIL1971 at all ?

he posts on matrix site.

Regards, Penno.

p.s. what do you think of Lasersabre's ringer unit ?


MasterPlaster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 530
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #5053 on: January 12, 2011, 02:04:22 PM »

Denis: I can envision how it works. It's like with Tesla, there is a need for impulse. The spark and we have to tap this. There is a need for a mechanical pulsing device.

TK: And we are using electrical ones. But Tesla was able to achieve 2 millions of pulses per second. But so far, we were using only 50% of that speed. That means 1 million of pulses per second.




From Wikipedia :

Special purpose, high-energy triggerable spark gaps can be used to rapidly switch high voltages and very high currents for certain pulsed power applications, such as pulsed lasers, railguns, fusion, ultrastrong pulsed magnetic field research, and in the triggering of nuclear bombs. Commercially available devices can be divided into two classes: positive pressure and triggered vacuum gaps. Positive pressure triggered gaps have a limited operating voltage range (for instance, from 1/3 to 2/3 of the self breakdown voltage). Triggered vacuum gaps offer a wide operating voltage range (400 V to 90 kV is achievable). Both classes can switch higher energy levels than any thyristor, thyratron, krytron, or sprytron. Triggered gaps are popular for single shot and low repetition rate applications. One such switch is known as a trigatron. The Ignitron and Crossatron could be considered a triggered gaps. The latter is unique in that it can be turned back off by the control electrode after conduction begins. The xenon flash tube is another common triggered gap. Various schemes have also been devised to trigger open air gaps on command. A set of spark gaps are a key element of a Marx generator, used to generate high-voltage impulses; the spark gaps allow a chain of capacitors to be slowly charged in parallel and then rapidly discharged in series.



lasersaber

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 179
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #5054 on: January 12, 2011, 02:08:16 PM »
@penno64
Quote
p.s. what do you think of Lasersabre's ringer unit ?

Hi I just started reading over these pages and I think there may be a connection to the experiments that I have been doing.  I will start trying to move my "Joule Ringer" in this direction and see what happens?  Has anybody tried doing the experiments listed here: http://ferromagnetic-energy.com/

Here is a picture and video link for those who may not know what a Joule Ringer is:   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiaxDJuw4-Q