Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16408188 times)

catalyst

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4005 on: October 06, 2010, 02:20:37 AM »
The "exotic" part and the claimed OU from Smith design seems to be the squared gain. For this he operates the outer 4 turn coil (Tariel has 6) at 8KV and 35KHz at low ampere. The inner coil, due it's higer count of windings, starting from center, then produces more flux lines the more you go to ends of the coil and these flux lines as he says disturb new electrons from the surrounding and add them as usable.

Cosmo or SR design use total different winding for L-1. Why is Tariel's L-1 coil so similar to of Smith's ? Jean Louis Naudin's replication attempt is a missed shot (although L-1 coil looks same), it consumes vast amount energy from the input. Also it run from MOT, which deliver 2KV and divided by 6 turns at very low 50 Hz is opposite what Smith requires to start with. I respect everyone mentioned here very much, as all contributed so much. A big Thanks to every one btw.
All mentioned L-2 coils seem center tapped, except Naudin's.

Now, SR coil design's "exotic" part is where everybody right now is banging their heads on. And it seems it has to do with ferrites. Some round donuts and some rods perhaps. Do we now try to replicate Tariel's design as of the topic subject, or the SR design ? If cosmo says, Smith has no OU, then why do you use 150W bulb only? Did you have any improvement by now (goal 5 KW). Smith uses large capacitor banks, in accordance to carry the large loads. Smith does not seem to depend on ferrite, only the mere disturbance and involvement of more electrons due L-2 coil's size.

What is SR or cosmo's HV details; once was said 4KV and @ which frequency ? Note this is not schematic asked.

I hope Tariel or you or anyone who has working device makes some kind of "insurance". Who gets involved with those military folks, being in front of the cannon, if they don't get how device works, that's bad. Going public would be best option to take away the heat. Yes, they may benefit from this technology, also the normal guys like us will. I see that the OU effect (which is not written in any book as claimed) is immense, can lead up to levitation, anti-gravity and will change the course of technology and everything so dramatic as i understand from cosmo's replies. If the claim is true that Tariel or you hold a too important secret, what can you do, it's already reality and exists. That's why we're gathered here, to learn, to multiply and carry the heavy load and to spread it. Same as with a torrent file. They will have no means to silence the knowledge if we can share it now.

Just give a better hint. Nobody ask for direct schematic for dummies to get a switch on/off device (which will anyways be done by someone at some time). Isn't what Tariel try to do is this with some Turkish money hungry guys ? Do you cosmo ask for mid 2011 so that the business arrangements with Turks are sealed by then ? What is here more different than Utkin's secrets, or the Tesla drawings on Reply #3891 etc ?

As Smith explain in his Youtube videos from 1996, "Tesla" coils were being used by many people while Tesla was a child yet. What is the bigger picture here, other than how excellent Smith's explanations are? Did anybody follow Smith's design ? He makes a very good point how the powers manipulated and let us forget truth, with their academia, patent offices, to push their low freq (50/60Hz) purchasable power. It's a common schema, let the bright heads figure out reality, let them patent it, by that they get notified and themselves can use the discovery to further strengthen their powers.

Rodin as example seems to be of different kind, one of us...

cosmoLV

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 252
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4006 on: October 06, 2010, 02:33:21 AM »
Rodin as example seems to be of different kind, one of us...

ou, yes... This is the most important design of the century and has important role for peoples of the third generation

LtBolo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 287
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4007 on: October 06, 2010, 03:43:51 AM »
1. No - it comes from changing parameters of ferrite medium

Oh my gosh Cosmo...a direct answer. You're slipping, my friend.  ;)

LtBolo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 287
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4008 on: October 06, 2010, 03:44:54 AM »
Nice toroids.

Free energy nerd pickup line... ;D

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4009 on: October 06, 2010, 04:55:40 AM »
Free energy nerd pickup line... ;D

Ha ha, good one.

Bill

core

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4010 on: October 06, 2010, 06:15:03 AM »
Core:

Nice toroids.  Hey if the Kapanadze device experiments do not work out, if those are high permeability toroids, you can make some very powerful Joule Thief circuits out of them.  Probably close to 2,000 volts from a single AA battery.
I look forward to seeing your results.

Bill

If Kapanadze experiments don't work out expect to see a box of toroids at your doorstep.


Respectfully,

Core

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4011 on: October 06, 2010, 08:13:44 AM »
1. No - it comes from changing parameters of ferrite medium
2. yes, but not so critical
3. i do not have info on this - (can you provide link on that information?)
4. No

1. you are talking about a method ? does it have a relation to this http://www.greenoptimistic.com/2008/02/06/the-isotopic-electricity-generator/ ?
but again it may be just a additional effect imho, like carbon brushes against copper brushes
2. thanks
3. from 1897 till probably around 1920 Tesla patented many circuit controllers to get fastest possible make&break then stopped  ::)
4  Edison etheric force, McFarland Cook patent and many forgotten patents, not directly the same but hey that was different times  ;D

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4012 on: October 06, 2010, 08:42:23 AM »

exnihiloest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 715
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4013 on: October 06, 2010, 08:59:11 AM »
...
So if we modulate this dc voltage with the nmr frequency of the iron should this enable the nmr effect (nuclear magnetic resonace).
Is this frequency 21 MHz ?
...

A nmr frequency is depending on the static magnetic field which must be very uniform in the whole material. Otherwise the frequency is spread on a very large band (tens of Mhz) and no resonance can be observed.
http://rmn.iqfr.csic.es/guide/eNMR/chem/Fe.html


broli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4014 on: October 06, 2010, 09:05:32 AM »
@Cosmo

In the magnetic amplifier article the author mentions a trick to get rid of transformer action in the setup by using two transformers out of phase in series. Is this trick very important?

broli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4015 on: October 06, 2010, 09:47:45 AM »
I also like to ask another question if you don't mind.

I know the HV has its own kHz range frequency but is it exciting the coil in a continuous manner like case number 1 in the attached image or is there an underlying frequency that controls the width of the pulse train so to speak like case number 2?

cosmoLV

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 252
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4016 on: October 06, 2010, 12:08:45 PM »
I also like to ask another question if you don't mind.

I know the HV has its own kHz range frequency but is it exciting the coil in a continuous manner like case number 1 in the attached image or is there an underlying frequency that controls the width of the pulse train so to speak like case number 2?

i don't know - i'm not using osciloscopes i'm not understand these graphs /i don't have a osciloscope/ - all is simpler that it looks (if you wan't find free energy in these graphs, then forgot about free energy

broli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4017 on: October 06, 2010, 12:46:16 PM »
i don't know - i'm not using osciloscopes i'm not understand these graphs /i don't have a osciloscope/ - all is simpler that it looks (if you wan't find free energy in these graphs, then forgot about free energy

Ok I understand but if it was simple then this thread would have been much smaller than almost 270 pages long. I'm performing small experiments to see what you want us to see.

Something is bothering me about the high frequency vs the low frequency. If they are sine waves and If the high frequency is 50 000Hz while the low one is only 50Hz. Then it means 250 spikes will have occurred when the low frequency reaches it's first maximum voltage (quarter period). Why that many?

ElectricGoose

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 196
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4018 on: October 06, 2010, 12:55:50 PM »
Ok I understand but if it was simple then this thread would have been much smaller than almost 270 pages long. I'm performing small experiments to see what you want us to see.

Something is bothering me about the high frequency vs the low frequency. If they are sine waves and If the high frequency is 50 000Hz while the low one is only 50Hz. Then it means 250 spikes will have occurred when the low frequency reaches it's first maximum voltage (quarter period). Why that many?

...because it doesn't actually work that way.


broli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4019 on: October 06, 2010, 01:04:15 PM »
...because it doesn't actually work that way.

I hope his answer will be more constructive than that. Or we'll be stick in limbo forever.