Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16407169 times)

xenomorphlabs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 923
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #210 on: July 05, 2009, 03:50:02 PM »
The hungarian replicator has replied to my email and this is what he wrote:

Quote
Dear Xenomorph

I'm already a member of the overunity forum. (as Ros-Co.)

The linked page is mine. I tied to collect all of the information about Tariel Kapaladze
The video is about my replication of the generator.  I built it based on the original video, and the "Donalda Smita"  drawing. http://www.hvlabs.hu/zpe/Gruz/kapanadze.jpg

The high voltage stage is different from the drawing.  I used my old TL494 driver
http://www.hvlabs.hu/inverter/inverter2.gif

You can show the whole circuit (in this very ugly drawing) :)
http://www.hvlabs.hu/zpe/Gruz/sajat/Kapanadze_replica.gif

You can show the flyback on the middle top.   The grey capacitor on the bottom right, is the 100nF/5KV.  On the bottom middle there are two rounded 10uF/1,5KV oil capacitors.
In front of the battery, you can show mosfets on the heatsink. The TL494 driver is not finished in the picture then.

************
Unfortunately, the device can't drive any load.  I tried it with smaller (5W) and bigger (100W) bulbs.  Something is missing....   BUT I found a very interesting effect.  When I touch the frequency control potentiometer (as an antenna)  it causes self frequency modulation.  The sparks are dramatically increased. I think this is one of the key, but it's not enough!
The output coils must be excited with increasing amplitude, to the critical level  (when the energy extraction starts)

*******

Please tell me some information about your research. How can you found me? Do you have any information which helps, step toward?
Regards
Farkas Rosko

As he is a member here already, he will hopefully jump into this thread and join forces  :)


Groundloop

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1736
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #211 on: July 05, 2009, 03:51:57 PM »
Stefan,

I will sure try that. I'm from Norway. We have 50Hz / 230VAC.

Groundloop.

>>Try to wind your transformer according to
>>resonate with external Cap at 50 or 60 Hz.

[EDIT] My small oscillator is not powerful enough. When I tune the coil (with capacitors) then
          the load is so big on the osc. that it "bugs down" and stop. My osc. is approx 1-2
          watt. As I see it I will need at least 10 - 20 watt to have something to play with.
« Last Edit: July 05, 2009, 05:32:04 PM by Groundloop »

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #212 on: July 05, 2009, 03:53:41 PM »
Hi Farkas,
did you use a real ground wire and try to sync onto the
50 Hz earth currents in resonance ?

jeanna

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3546
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #213 on: July 05, 2009, 06:46:51 PM »
All,

My first try did not work at all so I'm trying a different variant. The high voltage
oscillator was not powerful enough to fire the spark gap. I will make a diode
doubler and rearrange the circuit a little bit. But it looks very nice. LOL

Groundloop.
Hi groundloop,
Yes, it does look nice. I hope it soon works.

In your earlier reply to me you said that the output from the joule thief was pulsed dc.
(I may be not correctly understanding what part of the circuit you are referring to, but I think...)
I think you are referring to the part of the circuit after the first transformer. I am using that too and calling it the secondary.
It is actually the ends of the wires of many turns around the very toroid that produces the joule thief pulses.

I have never been able to capture anything at all in a cap from this secondary unless I used both a full bridge rectifier and 2 more diodes. I collected plenty and watchout for the sparks then!!

Please try this just to see that you have enough voltage.
I bet you do.
I believe this is the reason for the diode in the fuji ciruits, too.

If I am talking about a different part of your circuit, then

my apologies,

jeanna


Groundloop

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1736
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #214 on: July 05, 2009, 07:04:04 PM »
Jenna,

I was not talking about Joule Thief in general.

I was referring to the posted drawing.
The pulsed DC is after the diode.

Thanks for the correction. I should have stated that I was describing the posted
circuit and how a spark gap works.

Groundloop.

xenomorphlabs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 923
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #215 on: July 05, 2009, 08:44:33 PM »

I have never been able to capture anything at all in a cap from this secondary unless I used both a full bridge rectifier and 2 more diodes. I collected plenty and watchout for the sparks then!!

@Jeanna,
i might be misinterpreting the circuit, but it seems to be AC capacitors after the transformer.
Because the first capacitor before the transistor is explicitely marked with polarity, but the other caps are NOT . If i am not mistaken, they dont require rectification.
Have you used AC caps or CD caps when you have tried it?
Apologies if my thought is wrong.

@All:
I have an understanding problem with the images of Donald Smith and Kapanadze set-up.
They both seem to have all their coils on a single PVC tube.
Does this tube contain the different core materials in sections?
Would that not couple the transformers magnetically? (Maybe thats even intended ???)
I have not enough experience with transformers set up like this, that´s why i ask this question here.
« Last Edit: July 05, 2009, 09:56:45 PM by xenomorphlabs »

xenomorphlabs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 923
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #216 on: July 05, 2009, 10:09:53 PM »
@Stefan : My girlfriend has completed the translation of the Tesla Transformer video that you were interested in. She has translated it straight and has not tried to fix anything in the sentence structure, we thought its best that way.
Here it is and is hopefully inspiring to some ;)    :

Quote
Here we have the analogy of a Tesla’s transformer (converter?)

If we look at the construction of it, we will notice that it vaguely reminds of a transformer, because here there is pretty no inductive connection, repeated-primary winding, or how we call it, inductor, consists of only 3 turns (coils), but very thick, and here there are about 250-300 turns.

However the circuit works and gives a very powerful discharge, we call it фЕТТОННЫЙ [Phetonniy] (the translation to this word I didn’t manage to find, maybe it’s really their special term).
Also discharges happen all around us , if you look, here it is going. You also can notice that the discharge flows out of the screwdriver towards the coil.

Now we will change the circuit. We will connect one more coil to this coil. See what’s happening.
As a result, the second coil became a charge carrier too.

And we see that it also takes charges out of screwdriver. The lamp isn’t connected to anything. Just a sheet of paper and lamp’s wire is lying on the floor.
However the lamp is burning. It means that the space is excited to the state when the secondary current emission appears in surrounding metallic objects, it means that the object is not connected, but the emission appears.
And this means that there’s a transfer, no, not a transfer of energy, but the information about energy to the surrounding space, it is in excited state here, cause if we touch any object, we see how does the system work (that weird sentence).

This actually is electrostatic energy transfer. The capacity here is only about 15 Watt, but the effect can be observed. With the proper influence upon the surrounding space it provokes appearance of electromotive force like reaction in return.

By analogy if we put any metallic object here or even hold it in the hand, the lamp will burn, because the electrons will be induced, also there’s pretty no isolation from this current, it pumps out pretty from everywhere. So this is Tesla’s transformer (converter).

And if we look at the instrument, we see that it shows the presence of powerful field. The instrument isn’t connected, it reacts. We can observe where the intensity is the biggest, it is here near the receiver.
If we move the instrument away, we see that the intensity is falling down. Here are some more phenomenons that are hard to be estimated like the influence of body, of everything on the registration of the instrument.

It means that everything is so alive around, that it’s hard to imagine. So all the electrostatic transformers and generators originate in here.

And the next continuation of electrostatic machines is so-called “The pipe” plan. Here is similar winding plus one more external pipe is put in. The high-voltage potential is supplied on the pipes and it is taken off from the coils. But as a result of uncontrolled growth, the pipe is punched out (пробивать – I don’t know the exact translation of this word here).
This is more or less powerful version of Tesla’s transformer, that is closer to practical use.

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #217 on: July 05, 2009, 10:31:27 PM »
Xeno:

Thank you!  Please thank your girlfriend for us as well.  We really appreciate all of her efforts.

Bill

CRAY

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #218 on: July 05, 2009, 10:57:48 PM »
Hi ppl!

Unfortunately right now i'm not as cool as you in bringing free energy into masses, however i speak russian language and i want to help you.

So if anyone needs translation of docs, videos etc - tell me. I will be wery happy to do my bit ;)


Good luck!


Sony

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #219 on: July 05, 2009, 11:06:32 PM »
Sony:

Welcome and thank you for your kind offer.  We need all of the help we can get here.  I am sure you will be able to help.

Bill

Groundloop

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1736
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #220 on: July 05, 2009, 11:29:07 PM »
Sony,

Welcome, we need all the help we can get.

The last translation from xenomorphlabs made sense to me. I'm now able
to lit up one withe LED from my small tesla coil. The LED gets double the
brightness when I connect one wire to the coil to the led, and the other
wire from the led to ground. (I use the kitchen sink as ground.
Water pipes are made of copper.)

It is not much to light just one LED, I know, but it is a start. I shows me that
we indeed can have energy transfer with one wire only, and that the energy
transfer is GREATER when we connects to ground.

Groundloop.

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #221 on: July 06, 2009, 03:36:24 AM »
Looks nice groundloop.
Better put 2 LEDs in antiparallel so you see both polarity waves.

Also, Many thanks for the translation of the Tesla-transformer video
to the Russian girlfriend.
Does he say, that the metallic plate standing next to the second coil
is NOT connected to the glowing bulb ?

jeanna

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3546
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #222 on: July 06, 2009, 05:26:30 AM »
Hi everybody,
I did some more research today and found the source of the word "converter".
I will only provide the AC converter part, although if you want me to I can also provide the dc converter part.

Before I begin the quote, I will also give you this quote because I think it is the "punch-out"? from the translation above.

"That is the reason why the rate of change is
very much greater when glass, for instance, is broken through," [he is referring to disruptive discharge breaking through.]

now for the AC converter and the picture follows. ia is the bottom, iia the middle, iiia is the top drawing.

" Besides,
these transformers are expensive to build. It has been found by
experience that it is best to follow the plan illustrated at iiia. [top one]
In this arrangement a rotating transformer g, is employed to
convert the low tension direct currents into low frequency alter-
nating currents, preferably also of small tension. The tension
of the currents is then raised in a stationary transformer T. The
secondary s of this transformer is connected to an adjustable con-
denser c which discharges through the gap or discharger dd, placed
in either of the ways indicated, through the primary p of a dis-
ruptive discharge coil, the high frequency current being obtained
from the secondary s of this coil, as described on previous occa-
sions. This will undoubtedly be found the cheapest and most con-
venient way of converting direct currents.
   The three branches of the circuit A represent the usual cases
met in practice when alternating currents are converted. In
Fig. ib a condenser c., generally of large capacity, is connected to the
circuit L containing the devices L L, m m. The devices m m are sup-
posed to be of high self-induction so as to bring the frequency of
the circuit more or less to that of the dynamo. In this instance
the discharger d d should best have a number of makes and breaks
per second equal to twice the frequency of the dynamo. If not
so, then it should have at least a number equal to a multiple or
even fraction of the dynamo frequency. It should be observed,
referring to ib, that the conversion to a high potential is also
effected when the discharger d d, which is shown in the sketch, is
omitted. But the effects which are produced by currents which
rise instantly to high values, as in a disruptive discharge, are
entirely different from those produced by dynamo currents which
rise and fall harmonically. So, for instance, there might be in a
given case a number of makes and breaks at d d equal to just
twice the frequency of the dynamo, or in other words, there may
be the same number of fundamental oscillations as would be pro-


317

duced without the discharge gap, and there might even not be any
quicker superimposed vibration ; yet the differences of potential at
the various points of the circuit, the impedance and other pheno-
mena, dependent upon the rate of change, will bear no similarity in
the two cases. Thus, when working with currents discharging dis-
ruptively, the element chiefly to be considered is not the frequency,
as a student might be apt to believe, but the rate of change per
unit of time. With low frequencies in a certain measure the same
effects may be obtained as with high frequencies, provided the rate
of change is sufficiently great. So if a low frequency current is
raised to a potential of, say, 75,000 volts, and the high tension cur-
rent passed through a series of high resistance lamp filaments, the
importance of the rarefied gas surrounding the filament is clearly
noted, as will be seen later; or, if a low frequency current of several
thousand amperes is passed through a metal bar, striking phe-
nomena of impedance are observed, just as with currents of high
frequencies. But it is, of course, evident that with low frequency
currents it is impossible to obtain such rates of change per unit of
time as with high frequencies, hence the effects produced by the
latter are much more prominent. It is deemed advisable to
make the preceding remarks, inasmuch as many more recently
described effects have been unwittingly identified with high
frequencies. Frequency alone in reality does not mean anything,
except when an undisturbed harmonic oscillation is considered.
..."
Tesla

thank you,

jeanna
« Last Edit: July 06, 2009, 06:56:48 AM by jeanna »

justasm

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #223 on: July 06, 2009, 12:27:42 PM »
Hi ppl ;)

Does he say, that the metallic plate standing next to the second coil
is NOT connected to the glowing bulb ?

Yes He did :)

Regards,
Justas

Groundloop

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1736
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #224 on: July 06, 2009, 01:44:58 PM »
All,

I realized that I needed a bigger Tesla coil for testing so I have started
to design a new unit. The design goal is to get approx. 3000 - 5000 volt
output from the blue coil. I'm planning to run the coil from 12 volt DC.
So it will be a solid state design without any spark gap. Still a lot of work
to do. :-)

Groundloop.