Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16406803 times)

T-1000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1738
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #9105 on: November 27, 2011, 01:38:59 AM »
T-1000,

looking at the last diagramm of Naudins Website:

Why didnt he continue and increased the frequency to the point of matching the cut-off point of the square-wave-puls  with the beginning of the "soliton"-undamped group ?

 Don't know but those "Soliton pulses" are where resonance occurs and need to be supported - just with AC signal. Also his Caduceus coil got 7 intersections, not 5..

 

MeggerMan

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 497
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #9106 on: November 27, 2011, 01:51:35 AM »
Hi T1000,
I have not followed all of this thread, but what happened to the TV deflection yoke idea?
Has this been superseded by the pipe former and ferrite core?
In the youtube video the 100watt bulb is being powered by the output coil, do you know what the input power was?
The input appears to be a pulsing of the TV HT transformer in series with a spark gap and the primary.


Is there a copper shield in the pipe core setup?


Meggerman

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #9107 on: November 27, 2011, 02:10:17 AM »
Floyd Sweet's coil arrangement (that he originally tried to show as his magnet conditioning set-up but is more likely the pickup arrangement) has a resemblance of what you have shown in your pictures.

This is the minimal arrangement of windings/coils that will create a rotating magnetic field when the currents in those windings are sine waves 90deg. out of phase to each other.
Also, because one coil, on that picture, has many more turns than the other, then this implies that the coil with less turns had a capacitor connected in parallel to it and both windings were driven from the same AC voltage source as described in methods 2c_ii or 2c_iii.

The method 2c_i, however, is much easier to tune and more efficient. It requires a Quadrature Oscillator, though.

I have seen an arrangement of such perpendicular windings spin a levitated spherical magnet to such angular velocity that it shattered.  There was nothing unconventional in this experiment.

I find it interesting that these crossed windings are enclosed in what seems like carbon-fiber box (an expensive material known for its strength).

Also, according to conventional theory, rotating magnetic field should "blow" any ionized gas or electrons through that box just like a fan blows air.  This is easily explained by Lorentz deflection of electric charges q(vxB).  This is conventional behavior, too, but I have never witnessed it firsthand.

If the box was capped off at its ends with metal caps (not shown on the photo), the Lorentz deflection of the rotating magnetic field should separate the positive and negative charges floating in that box (positive charges to one cap and negative to the other), thus creating very high voltage between those caps.
This is also predicted by conventional theory.

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #9108 on: November 27, 2011, 02:35:33 AM »
Hi T1000,
I have not followed all of this thread, but what happened to the TV deflection yoke idea?
Has this been superseded by the pipe former and ferrite core?
In the Youtube video the 100watt bulb is being powered by the output coil, do you know what the input power was?
The input appears to be a pulsing of the TV HT transformer in series with a spark gap and the primary.

I would like to know the answer to these 3 questions, too.
I asked two of them several pages ago, but they were ignored.

Also, after watching the videos, I am not sure what power source exactly, powers the TV Flyback
I have never seen simultaneous scope shots of the input current and voltage or anything that would give a good indication of the energy flowing into the device.  I have seen the power rating of one transformer (9V 600mA AC) but I don't have sufficient information to analyze what part of the input power flow limit that might represent.

Anyway what happened to the STAAAR's Yoke device ????

T-1000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1738
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #9109 on: November 27, 2011, 02:40:30 AM »

Anyway what happened to the STAAAR's Yoke device ??? ?

As we stated, there is problem with ferrite core becoming permanent magnet and getting decreasing efficiency after each degauss.
We will continue working on it and hopefully will overcome this obstacle.

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #9110 on: November 27, 2011, 04:14:37 AM »
As we stated, there is problem with ferrite core becoming permanent magnet and getting decreasing efficiency after each degauss.
We will continue working on it and hopefully will overcome this obstacle.

Is it the copper strip winding that is magnetizing the core?  Can there be another one wound in opposite direction, or reversing the polarity each cycle?

Mags

TEKTRON

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 300
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #9111 on: November 27, 2011, 05:20:18 AM »
my nik forum...
FreeEnergyInfo = ANTANAS
FreeEnergyLT = ANTANAS

Thanks for all your hard work Antanas ;D

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #9112 on: November 27, 2011, 09:03:24 AM »
Is it the copper strip winding that is magnetizing the core?  Can there be another one wound in opposite direction, or reversing the polarity each cycle?

Mags


 ;)   ;) ;)

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #9113 on: November 27, 2011, 10:25:28 AM »
Deleted
« Last Edit: November 27, 2011, 12:32:23 PM by verpies »

Jimboot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1407
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #9114 on: November 27, 2011, 10:32:41 AM »
@T-1000 @Stivep What is that ferrite out of? It's massive. Where do we scavenge or buy these?

baroutologos

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 918
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #9115 on: November 27, 2011, 01:52:57 PM »
As we stated, there is problem with ferrite core becoming permanent magnet and getting decreasing efficiency after each degauss.
We will continue working on it and hopefully will overcome this obstacle.

My piece of advice, do not give up ferrite yoke experiments if it indeed the results are actual. stick with it.
Finally in the same format, can you provide a video running the yoke at 1 Kw output (that means lighting flly 10 x 100w bulbs). Is it possible or just hype?

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #9116 on: November 27, 2011, 01:58:11 PM »
Quote
Anyway what happened to the STAAAR's Yoke device ?




nothing really happened.
I have choice spend my time of TK where potential might be over 100 KW or play wit 1 kW tricky ferrite. at the present time. But we playing with it.




1.Magnetization of the core is due to material quality and is more o less of importance!!!!!
depends on material used That must be some kind of addition to the ferrite from 60ties.


-READ  WHAT IS A FERRITE AND HOW IT REACTS, ALSO in 60ties  ferrite material  has had different  properties .




I just woke up and really can not  dig into  material... you will find everything in my  comments from the past.




2. We have been investigated Ferrite Yoke on Lithuania too.


3. Material from that scientific investigation is in our files. I can not jump in series of videos from subject to subject.That would be in consistence in targets These two technologies are completely different.
Ferrite is of NMR nature  it is important because we have discovered presence of strange  force of undetermined nature or to be more accurate of  unassigned as of yet force.And extreme power comparing to input signal.
That might be not only 1KW of energy more o less but much much beyond  and related to weaponry that rather is in use or might be in use.
Radiation  Alfa, Beta, Gamma,  was excluded during Lithuania investigation.
We tend to stay at the point that extra low frequency spectral components are responsible for it.
T-1000 is right
We have had problem with magnetization of that particular sample.
But it might be also possible that this is not so bad  at all.
We did not have  generators that could go over 2 MHz in Lithuania experiments


When  Ferrite becomes  magnetized ( partially ) as this is FERRITE and should  behave this way.
Than its self rezonance   spectral pick  that was of importance to us jump up over 2 MHz.
It is possible that  this particular ferrite will still work  as desired  with higher frequency  pick.


Based on Arunas recent  conclusion we might be on the  verge of something much  much bigger
than just energy or weaponry.
I love this guy approach, he is incredible.

I can not state the nature of this BIG BIG something because its sounds so futuristic but it is directly related to previously  known science (in denial.)

Wesley

PS: I can not make myself  to  become target of criticism of traditional scientists more that I already did.
They are not ready  for it. But I need  their help  ( scientifically directed and dedicated group , that I'm associated with) Some of these fellows have been , also in their past with number of government and/or military  projects as I was too.


I'm no longer in danger of losing my job and/or position  I'm independent.















 


jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #9117 on: November 27, 2011, 03:10:50 PM »



 You know really I think I need to say this stevi. Stop with all the theatrics ok. Tesla has done all of this discovery before. Go to to his work and read.. Everything has been laid out for you. The good the bad and the ugly. In all of Tesla's experiments with this pulse wave and public dissension of the information, it is all there.
 I can't stress this enough that the lower frequencies and or periods of these waves the more it has influence over gross matter. When you raise the frequency or Period of these waves they get stronger but only to finite matter. Think of it that you are messing with densities of network. The higher the frequency the finer the network you have to play with and coincidentally the less it effects larger condensed collections of the network. All life depends on the lower densities. Some matter is or can be aligned to channel this network. Some matter has condensed network connections, it turns out it should be the same density of network but it isn't. This condensation increases the networks alignment ability and is the exact process we use to form magnets.


 The yoke problem is because thats how we make magnets. Start looking at soft iron. Tesla said there was a certain iron that was better at these alignments. Also he said laminating the core would help but was not necessary! Iron is the key. Look at Leddskalnin and you will see why. The PMH (Permanent Magnetic Holder) is the answer. Stop messing with Ferrite cores and start using Iron. I'll start looking for the type of iron. It was in a book I read about Tesla's life.

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #9118 on: November 27, 2011, 03:28:14 PM »
Based on Arunas recent  conclusion we might be on the  verge of something much  much bigger
than just energy or weaponry.
I love this guy approach, he is incredible.

I cannot state the nature of this BIG BIG something because its sounds so futuristic but it is directly related to previously  known science (in denial.)

It does not matter if you stumbled upon some exotic accelerated time frames, time compression, etc... if nobody cannot replicate your first basic device and you suddenly change focus to another device.

Your (plural) Yoke tuning instructions were technically ambiguous and full of grammatical and semantic errors (even spelling), which is forgivable since English is not your first language, but becomes unforgivable when you reject help from others who can help you refine them.
Especially you Wesley since I know your native language as well as English and with our technical knowledge of the subject I could refine your instructions to perfect unambiguous English (I attempted to do this and wrote long revised instruction document to your team for approval and you (plural) just ignored it !!!)

You (plural) don't answer all the scientific/technical questions on this forum, and don't provide concrete data, e.g. never shown the I/O waveforms of the device, completely ignore phase relationships (current/voltage & current/current of the input windings), despite having appropriate equipment to measure them. 

Take an example from this guy:
Correct Input Power Measurements
...this methodology also works with non-sinusoidal waveforms.

To make things worse, you suddenly loose focus and switch to another device. 
Very unprofessional.


zhak

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 87
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #9119 on: November 27, 2011, 03:39:28 PM »
Good day to everyone reading this thread a long time, but yet do not add to what a lot of smart people.
Recently stumbled on the repetition of the scheme Mr SR
in YouTube while the ad did not find
http://video.yandex.ru/users/belvoin/view/48/ #