Notice one interesting thing - in Don Smith circuit output from priamry coil is negative HV. Is that possible to obtain such from car ignition coil ?
Is there a way to measure the length of wire inside car coil by using a signal generator and a scope ? it is needed to create primary coil length match exactly 1/4 of input wavelength. The rest seems easy.

it's not about telluric currents at all, those are only remnants of real power
because if Earth rotate in own static magnetic field then every metal would have free electrons at high potential=high electric pressure but we would be unable to see them

yes in sense of creating high tension spikes whicih will discharge from ignition coil to the primary, but you can go with it only to letsay about 100khz or lower, because you need to keep pulses enough long, to create enough large spikes, inductive reactance of primary ignition coil will not let flow more curent for particular(shorter) pulse lenght. And next,...for that frequency is hard to create secondary resonant coil without conecting paraller capacitor. Of course, you can wind a bifilar coil, which can have resonant frequency about 100khz with no problem. But then forget to have wire lenght of 1/4 lambda. And ...these resonant HV transformers seems works best, when use earth capacity more than capacity betwen turns, or classicaly connected capacitor. But that all does not matter, because without capacitor discharge, you will not have needed current on primary. No magneticaly field, and thus that, you will do better, when you directly place a antene, or just some foil around secondary, and feed the secondary only by capacitive coupling. Like this:

http://www.google.cz/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CD0QFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.overunity.com%2Findex.php%3Faction%3Ddlattach%3Btopic%3D7669.0%3Battach%3D36608&rct=j&q=capacitive%20transformer%20testatika&ei=7bLxTKyICYztOa_HuZsK&usg=AFQjCNGSWqikCoHRIZGRtwYUD0TOJSWz5g&cad=rja

@barautologos - I checked out your thread and I believe the direction is correct and I wanted to point out a few things that were also pointed out by amigo. Tesla's wireless system was based on several concepts which I see many misunderstand or misinterpret still today - but this is off topic. In the case of ground power transmission he used the earth as a one wire conductor. He wanted to pump the pulses from the Wardenclyffe in the earth at it's resonating frequency (he said in an article that wavelengths of 6000meters were acceptable and 12000 meters would be ideal (50 and 25kHz) so these could be picked up in any place with the equivalent equipment. He wasn't mentioning any OU but very high efficiency (enough to keep the oscillations running and cover the losses). However Tesla also stumbled onto some additional discoveries (after Colorado Springs) which he mostly cryptically mentioned in his various articles, interviews (new use for iron, self acting oscillator etc) and especially announcements. These are the ones that most interest me and which I have tried to correlate for the last decade - it appears easy, but I assure you it's not, especially with the different views and opinions "modern science" (that is after 1930) offers. The wireless power system Tesla "officially" offered was alternative to the ordinary wire system and cheaper as already pointed out but this is not related to this research. What is, is his let's say "electrostatic" research that interested the later part of his life which is what is evidently (re)emerging lately with these experiments. It is the combination of HV coils and charge induction or transfer or "electro kinetic" effects as sigma put it that must be investigated. The way I see it is that we must use this effect to leverage a natural law for our advantage (create a "sink" for these currents to rush in etc) however I am not sure that telluric currents are really enough for these effects though they may be involved.

   I must however suggest to everyone the Tesla article collection by Ratzlaff called "Tesla said".

  Good effort everyone!

@ Icewellwer,

I am not familiar with Tesla's work on electostatics, but i can understand wireless power transmision via earth.
I fully agree with you, the Low frequency typical 20 or 40Khz will limit the Hertzian EM losses. Moreover an arbitrary choosen ground projection frequency will not go very far. As Tesla repeatedly said, there are frequencies that the earth "responds".

He argued in one of "Tesla Said" articles that he can maintain a huge oscillation of earth's potential at the expense of few horsepower losses at the correct frequency.
I do not take those words as misinterpretation. Making a HF oscillator that excites the earth and hence transmits energy with little losses worldwide is a possibility for me. No OU there btw as Tesla said.

The point is, HOW you can know who is draining power? Your destined clients or your rivals? A global energy transmision systems, even perfectly made and unless energy is for free, will not work ever. All will intercept and steal the power projected. Plain and simple.

.........
The point is what if the earth creates electricity of herself that Tesla has not discovered. At what frequencies? (Telluric currents)


This research is well beyond my present capabilities.

I think we should return back to the basic questions about Earth.
Do you really believe that Earth is producing magnetic field opposing Sun solar wind simply by rotation of core ? Then how we can explain the rotation ?
However  if magnetosphere is a byproduct of Sun and Cosmic current then Earth is a generator - a metal ball in insulated space connected to the electric circuit.
Then everything seems to match - small magnetic field is a reason for rotation and while rotating giant magnetic field is generated opposing external electric current.
Newton's third law. I'm sure somebody can explain it better.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2f6RD1hT6Q

This is a great forum, everyone working together to achieve some greater purpose. Trying to create solutions. Although i am new, i am glad to be a member!

@above,

AMEN my friend. If the surrounding macro environment creates waves (standing or not) of considerable frequency then there should a way to tap them i guess.
Waves by definition are energy. Either ocean or electrical ones.

Can you suggest any way, to scan through earth frequencies, some how to discriminate from EM frequencies, and suggest "earth channels" ?

Any apparatus in order to measure that must have a "ground" reference.
Since the ground we are investigating, we must have another reference. The only one i can think of is an air-terminal capacity. e.g. an elevated metal ball. (Tesla like)

The huge problem would be in identifying which electrial propagation is coming from earth (ground) to air terminal (capacity) and which from human or natural EM radiation, becoming electricity in the metal terminal. (acting as an antenna)

Notice, EM radiation can deliver as much energy as its its intensity and the intercepting medium size (antenna or metal terminal in this example) Whereas the ground, being as a single conductor can deliver huge large amounts of energy via "one wire principle" depending on resonance parameters