Title:Unusual behavior of Free Energy Device component
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9F6xqUwhZrUPurpose of Investigation:
Fallowing Investigation was provided by means of observing random effect noticed at the scope of NA. The investigation was not planed nor prepared.
Investigation is the documentary of event.
Duplicability of this documentary event is unconfirmed as of yet
Free Energy Device component
we will name it: DUT
(abbreviation : DUT - Device Under Test)
1 component description: TOROIDAL TRANSFORMER (DUT)
a. toroidal transformer consisting primary coil and 2 secondary coils
b. secondary coils are connected in series
c. secondary coils are winded in opposite direction
d secondary coils are at fixed position randomly chosen.
e. resonant point is not conformed as maximum energy transfered.
2. Testing Device description: Network Analyzer Advantest R3267
( abbreviation NA will be used)
3.Frequency range set for 10KHz to 150MHz
4.Connection description:
a. primary coil connected to Network Analyzer
connector used 2 short lids of coax 50 Ohm ( input A)
lids are calibration- compensated
b. secondary coil connected to Network Analyzer
connector used 2 lids of coax 50 Ohm (output1)
lids are calibration- compensated
5.Channels utilized;
Channel 1 of NA
Channel 2 of NA
6. Channel assignment:
a.
One channel was used to provide standard relation Line Magnitude versus Phase ( that characteristic was showing stable pattern)
selected display button input ports of NA: A/R
While another one was used with various of display modes
That characteristic was showing very unstable pattern)
selected display button input ports of NA: A
Explanation:physical connection of NA
-Output 1 (50ohm) connected to DUT
-Output 2(50ohm) connected to input R(ref.)
-Input A connected to DUT
b.
Both of the channels are of the same ports of NA and "watching" the same signal.
conclusion1:
The "network" behavior was unstable while observed on NA only on the channel that was switched to A
(selected display button input ports of NA: A)
conclusion2:
a The theory of Vladimir Utkin might be assigned to explain observed phenomenon
b. If statement from point (a) of (conclusion2) is to be accepted than we have evidence of correlation of capacitance of the coil (1a) with respect to
input / output signal. creating signal amplification
Mentioned signal amplification is NOT TO BE ACCEPTED BY OFFICIAL STANDARD SCIENCE
Message from the author:
I do not make any statements of OU. For me to make such statement much more of experimentation is needed.
