Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 15125801 times)

Offline Acca

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22110 on: January 12, 2016, 12:44:11 PM »
Wesley... is the TV yoke made of IRON as a product ??

of course it is silly ....


and that TV yoke is shaken like cavitation which what  the Italians discovered in 2007 'piezzo nucleare" reactions gamma ???  emissions ....
which is very bad ??

which can make neutrons, it's like shaking it with sound waves ???  22khz....very bad ... indeed ..

no wonder you got sick....

So Don't shake iron fast and you will not get electrons.. Wow...but first you get gamma..  you have to have a lead apron ...!!!

Acca..


Offline Acca

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22111 on: January 12, 2016, 12:48:36 PM »
 
BRIEF NOTE[/font]
ON PIEZONUCLEAR CAVITATION[/font]

EDITED BY Fabio Cardone, Giovanni Cherubini, Roberto Mignani, Walter Perconti, Eliano Pessa, Andrea Petrucci, Francesca Rosetto, Guido Spera.
 
WITH THE ASSENT OF Antonio Aracu, Giovanni Albertini, Claudio Bertoli, Alberto Carpinteri, Andrea Dodaro, Giuseppe Lacidogna, Amedeo Manuello, Andrea Manuello, Francesco Mazzuca, Massimiliano Monti, Fabio Pistella, Filippo Ridolfi, Valter Sala, Emilio Santoro, Massimo Sepielli, Sesto Viticoli.
 
The results on Piezonucler Cavitation have already been published on peer reviewed journals like Physics Letters A, International Journal of Modern Physics B and E, Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, Annals of the Foundation of Louis de Broglie (at the end of this Note you can find a list of these papers including the book on the theory foseeing these new phenomena).
 
This fact indicates that our work is not made of mere conjectures or inventions. However, the subject of our investigation is indeed new and like anything new (in physics above all) encounters more frowns than
approvals. Nonetheless, some referees deemed convincing our reports and evidences in the papers.
 
We would like to stress that every characteristic of the experimental set-up, from which we obtained emission of neutron bursts, is crucial for achieving compatible results. It is impossible and even wrong to imagine that any equipment for producing cavitation may generate this new type of nuclear reactions and produce neutron bursts as some research team hypothesised. The statement about the criticality of the design of the experimental set-up should not sound strange, since having to do with something completely new to our physical knowledge, it is up to us to understand how we can produce the effect first and then detect it and not suppose that, by the cavitation equipment at one's disposal, the effect will show up anyway.
 
We have been dealing with three main subjects: cavitation of bi-distilled deionised water in which we found out anomalous changes of concentration of elements; cavitation of solutions of Iron from which we obtained bursts of neutrons without gamma emission above the background level; cavitation of solutions of a radionuclide, from which we apparently obtained a decrease of radioactivity more quickly than it would happen through natural decay. As to the first and second subjects, we performed many experiments with 100% of compatibility and the only remark from the referees was about neutron emission. Every time they frowned on the passive bubble detectors that we used to detect neutrons.
 
They suggested using Boron Trifluoride active detectors instead.
 
We followed their suggestion and performed many experiments by this type of detector and achieved evidences of neutron bursts absolutely compatible with those obtained by bubble detectors. All of this can be found by comparing the papers "Neutrons from piezonuclear Reactions" and "Piezonuclear Neutrons", where you will find also that a third type of passive detector (polycarbonate CR39 screened by Boron) was used as well and that the evidences obtained by CR39 were compatible with those of bubble detectors and Boron Trifuoride. No other objections or remarks on cavitation of iron solutions and neutron emission have been put forward since then.
 
Let us move now to the results obtained with solutions containing a radionuclide (Thorium-228).
 
We performed this type of experiments only once due to the technical difficulties of dealing with radioactivity and the obvious concerns about health, anyway we used not less than 12 samples in order to get enough confidence with the results.
 
One experiment with either positive or negative evidences is absolutely far from being conclusive due to the lack of sufficient statistics of results. The only purpose of this paper was to let people know that apparently cavitation affects radioactive nuclei too and that this open new perspectives of research. Thus, the comments by anybody do not add anything new to what everyone of us would say about these early stage results.
 
As long as the remarks are made without performing new experiments, they will hardly say anything new or point out any shortcoming of our paper that we are not aware of.
 
However a Canadian research team published on Physics Letters A a paper entitled "Measurement of the thorium-228 activity in solutions cavitated by ultrasonic sound" in which they report experimental evidences that they claim to be against our evidences about thorium.
 
We give you here the reference for your convenience (Physics Letters A 374 (2010) 701-703, R. Ford, M.Gerbier-Violleau, E.Vázquez-Jáuregui).
 
Their experiment is the perfect example of how these kind of experiments MUST NOT be done in the sense that we mentioned above i.e. the criticality of the equipment. If you read our papers and theirs, you will soon become aware of the huge differences and that their equipment does not apply cavitation to the
solution containing thorium-228 because they enclosed this solution in small cylinders that prevent ultrasound from suitably affecting thorium.
 
Here is the link to Arxiv (http://arxiv.org/abs/1001.5391) where you can find our remarks on this Canadian experiment and suggestions about how to perform experiments of piezonuclear reactions.

Offline John.K1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 679
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22112 on: January 12, 2016, 01:41:55 PM »
Wesley... is the TV yoke made of IRON as a product ??

It is made of Oxide of Iron+ some extra metals. But you are right about emitting extra electrons- and the reason why is because the oxide of Fe has  extra free electrons. This is what that lunatic Atom93 was right about , when he was talking about rusty cores. There are also some  patents on Free energy device based on transmutation of  Fe56-Fe54  (file:///C:/Users/John/Pictures/CZ284333.pdf  )

When you speak about some Gamma rays, how intense is it? Is is stronger than natural background from cosmic rays?

regards,
   

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3558
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22113 on: January 13, 2016, 06:51:28 AM »





Quote from: Acca on January 12, 2016, 12:44:11 PMWesley... is the TV yoke made of IRON as a product ??[/font]

It is made of Oxide of Iron+ some extra metals. But you are right about emitting extra electrons- and the reason why is because the oxide of Fe has  extra free electrons. This is what that lunatic Atom93 was right about , when he was talking about rusty cores. There are also some  patents on Free energy device based on transmutation of  Fe56-Fe54  (file:///C:/Users/John/Pictures/CZ284333.pdf  )

When you speak about some Gamma rays, how intense is it? Is is stronger than natural background from cosmic rays?

regards,
 


Yes that is how ferrites are made.
 small paricles of iron filing are placed in  ceramic rotating cylinder  with water and/or solvent added .
After say 24h  particles becomes rusted and by that rust is an electric isolator.
Than particles are  mixed with  bonding compound
Than green stage product with particular  shape is produced  using form and press.
Than it goes to oven
Than you have it,
There  are some of  additional components  in that ferrite,


...
The magnets known also as ceramic magnets are done similar way
The ceramic  can be bonding compound fired in the oven.
The difference is that  in magnets   process of sintering is being used.
sintering is also used in many other products made form different metals.
...
So when domains( iron particles are partially connected  or close in proximity such that the could act as oriented domains ( less rusted  and touching each other)
or sintered  lightly  than the domains  are able to retain  their magnetic orientation for longer ( permanently)
...
Yes lunatic atomm has said something interesting about rust.
The thing is that  people mentally unstable, known also as limited operates  with the same   amount of  brain -
only that their  concentration  in certain areas can but not often makes them  uniquely progressive( talented)
Most of achievements have been  made by people  almost  impossibly  limited, (less fitted) in very simple areas of life.
That space in their brains  have been   not preoccupied by  other distractive tasks or functions.
Typically  people who are retired  have time and  determination to passionately  do things  they could not do  or accomplish during their work years of life.
Their children  are mostly on their  own.
That group of people although perfectly normal  is  in some sort   very similar to  state of comfort of  many  of people with mental problems.
Life  without duties. So now they can( but not  often  they do)  concentrate  without distraction  on say Free Energy research.
Plenty of mentally  unstable  people only  differ with their inability to handle  additional tasks  and when given a comfort of next day free time can perform  very well in just given   and narrow area of life.


So conclusion is  plenty of famous physicist  are  very much limited  in other directions   than physics.
Unfortunate is that atomm  is showing  not only lack of suitable determination    in any progressive science but also  inability  to  progress any logical direction  that matters to us.
It is like dealing with  very much unhappy, alienated   individual who  wants to be noticed, elevated  in value  and/or adored.


What can you  expect from lazy, uneducated , brain  dealing with perception problems, and wrongly  asserting.
But for him   it is impossible to get along with public criticism.
From lack of better alternative he  starts to see Aliens now , Cosmic orchestra , Gods, and Russians Everywhere. and yet he needs really to be inventor.
Unfortunate is  as well that at his  level  everything was already invented and there is not much left for him any longer.


Wesley
 


 
« Last Edit: January 13, 2016, 04:21:57 PM by stivep »

Offline Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4324
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22114 on: January 13, 2016, 02:44:32 PM »

What can you  expect from lazy, uneducated , brain  dealing with perception problems, and wrongly  asserting.
But for him   it is impossible to get along with public criticism.
From lack of better alternative he  starts to see Aliens now , Cosmic orchestra , Gods, and Russians Everywhere. and yet he needs really to be inventor.
Unfortunate is  as well that at his  level  everything was already invented and there is not much left for him any longer.


Wesley

Hopefully he will find solace in another place.

Regards
Hoopy

Offline Acca

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22115 on: January 13, 2016, 05:23:57 PM »
 Here is production of gamma radiation from year ago of the Harold Coleman patent from the 1950’s …
SCIENCE SAYS THAT IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO DESTABILIZE THE ATOM WITH LOW 100 W RF.. BOY IS THAT WRONG !!!
Gamma is here being made by Rf 100 w applied to carbon, copper, zinc, calcium metaphosphate...




THANKS and THANKS For WESLEY… Thanks for changing my view of standard science as a bunch of “chickens” who cluck and peck outsiders…
 
It takes a Rooster to shake them up !!!!
 
Acca…
 
Ps
 
 READ my PREVIOUS POSTS REF..as well as WESLEY’s posts REF..in this thread..
 
RADIATION AND TRANSMUTATION IS REALLY REAL AND IT TAKES LOW POWER RF>>> WATCH IS VIDEOS FROM LAST YEAR TO ALL THE NEW PEOPLE…..
 
 
 
 
 Published on Mar 30, 2013
  FROM WESLEY: This technology is 100% repeatable, no secrets, Could power, house, car,
 , could be replicated within few hours by anyone. And it is FOR FREE My Lithuania experiment with ferrite has now explanation- I presented extraction of energy from ferrite of 1 KW at maximum
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mk3ku_dBzBM
 

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3558
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22116 on: January 14, 2016, 02:23:19 AM »

 READ my PREVIOUS POSTS REF..as well as WESLEY’s posts REF..in this thread..
 
RADIATION AND TRANSMUTATION IS REALLY REAL AND IT TAKES LOW POWER RF>>> WATCH IS VIDEOS FROM LAST YEAR TO ALL THE NEW PEOPLE…..
 
 
 
 
 Published on Mar 30, 2013
  FROM WESLEY: This technology is 100% repeatable, no secrets, Could power, house, car,
 , could be replicated within few hours by anyone. And it is FOR FREE My Lithuania experiment with ferrite has now explanation- I presented extraction of energy from ferrite of 1 KW at maximum
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mk3ku_dBzBM


Acca thank you very much for all of your contribution  you have made.
We need it all. Make even more.
Field of nuclear science is my  most favorite one


Wesley

Offline Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4324
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22117 on: January 14, 2016, 09:10:40 AM »
Wesley, Acca,

Discussions on Coleman tech should be continued in separate thread as its not related to Kapa tech.

Offline captainkt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 262
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22118 on: January 14, 2016, 10:43:42 AM »
Hi Hoppy, are you sure about Kapa gen what is inside the copper box in bedroom vid and what is inside the green box.

Regards
Keith

Offline Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4324
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22119 on: January 14, 2016, 11:05:31 AM »
Hi Hoppy, are you sure about Kapa gen what is inside the copper box in bedroom vid and what is inside the green box.

Regards
Keith

Hi Captain,

I'm only sure that its something "so simple that it will make you laugh" and that statement IMO does not apply to Coleman tech.

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3558
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22120 on: January 14, 2016, 10:17:50 PM »
Wesley, Acca,

Discussions on Coleman tech should be continued in separate thread as its not related to Kapa tech.
Actually is COLMAN not COleMAN
I have made the same  mistake  in my early days of Colman too.
That  thread is  no  longer TK only.
If there is any slight   chance that by someone   from you any additional ideas could be populated or similarity in processes faoud i suggest  to stay with  Nuclear Response of the matter including  NMR  to be posted here.
This thread is very much popular for others to visit.






Wesley
 

Offline Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4324
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22121 on: January 15, 2016, 09:52:05 AM »

That  thread is  no  longer TK only

Wesley

Fair comment, given that this thread lost its direction many pages ago.

Offline AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22122 on: January 15, 2016, 09:59:06 PM »
Silly question but !  how do you start a new thread ?

Offline John.K1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 679
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22123 on: January 15, 2016, 11:22:09 PM »
Go to:  Community/ select the appropriate room/ On the top is a button "Create new topic"

Offline Dog-One

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 848
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #22124 on: January 16, 2016, 02:24:29 AM »
Can you ban certain people at thread creation?

If not, that feature is sorely overdue.