Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 14761838 times)

Offline Jack Noskills

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 346
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21120 on: February 18, 2014, 12:09:52 PM »
I don't know of anybody who made a video with closed magnetic cores such as a toroid.


Is there anyone here who could do this simple test ? It will take at most 30 mins of your time. Any ferrite ring, any number of turns, any sized caps will do. Start using same amount of turns and same sized caps on both sides. 


If result is not positive, then at least we would then know what not to look for.


I have done it and it works for me but cannot do power measurements or get scope shots. I used nanoperm (80000) with 80 turns and 1000 nf caps. Resonance was about 11 kHz. For comparison, single coil having 20 turns and 1000 nf cap had resonant frequency below 1 kHz. Difference is over fourty times, ten for the frequency and four for difference in L, 20 turns vs. 80 turns.

Offline magpwr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1166
    • Youtube Channel
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21121 on: February 18, 2014, 12:47:46 PM »

Is there anyone here who could do this simple test ? It will take at most 30 mins of your time. Any ferrite ring, any number of turns, any sized caps will do. Start using same amount of turns and same sized caps on both sides. 


If result is not positive, then at least we would then know what not to look for.


I have done it and it works for me but cannot do power measurements or get scope shots. I used nanoperm (80000) with 80 turns and 1000 nf caps. Resonance was about 11 kHz. For comparison, single coil having 20 turns and 1000 nf cap had resonant frequency below 1 kHz. Difference is over fourty times, ten for the frequency and four for difference in L, 20 turns vs. 80 turns.

hi Jack,

I have already tested this around 2 weeks back on 3" toroid and selecting right capacitors from my stock which have the exact same matching value as verified using L/C meter.

The bifilar winding on my green toroid(Iron powder) is consisting of 45 turns which have around 28mH(around there can't recall fully now)."same inductance value"
I have already tried the series and parallel resonance on low voltage torchlight bulb.But doesn't light bulb.

I think i have figured this out i would need to use higher voltage around 20..30volts power source instead of using around 4volts battery connected to mosfet and gate connected to signal generator later on.


I do have a nanoperm cores as well which cost alot of money for 20 pieces.If you do a 1 wire turn on these toroid and use L/C meter you will find that the uH reading would be higher than the rest of the ferrite/iron powder toroid cores.Which means not many turns is required to achieve the same uH reading and lower loses due to lower resistance for low winding count.



 

Offline verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3480
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21122 on: February 18, 2014, 01:25:12 PM »
Grummage, you do not realize the damage all the false and mistaken claims do ?
I think Grum realizes that fake claims can form an effective smoke screen against real anomalies and he refuses to be discouraged in that manner.

People get hyped up and forget family to pursue the promise of free energy that never comes. It can break up family and cause severe mental anguish to those who spend a lot of money on a promise then end up with a bench full of stuff and no wife as well as other problems eg. kids.
FE pursuit can cause kids?
Do people really neglect their wives and suffer severe mental anguish due to this stuff?

My back is busted in several places, neck too and I cannot work,
Did you fall or have a car wreck?

I got caught by Bob Boyce and the self charger debacle,
What's that about?

This is when I became aware that the gurus do not even need to peddle their own rubbish anymore, there is a willing army of dupes to promote the rubbish for them for free.
Indeed. There is even a device called the DupDrive.

If we count up the consumed hours and money
Yes, replications motivated by false claims waste resources that could be applied to more realistic devices.
However, that might be the whole point of the scheme ;)

I've found that even if I try to post about something I think has potential to be efficient and useful, I get on one side people wanting it to be OU and on the other side I get people trying to prove to me it isn't even though i never claimed it was. People try to put words in my mouth that i did not say.
I'm curious.  Did I ever do that?

People also make claims for Tesla that he did not make, either by misunderstanding his words or ascribing their meaning to his words.
There is one guy on this forum that excels at that.  I even had to make an ad filter to relieve myself if his illogical posts but I still see them from time to time when other people quote him.

It is my opinion that if the false and bogus claims were minimized and more people tried to understand the basics of electronics, as well as power and energy measurement, then things would improve.
I think so too. That's why I started to design the 1GHz Watt to Volt converter.

The more outrageous claims allowed to go unchallenged the further the site/topic goes towards obscurity and the more knowledgeable people will withdraw followed by more people making more outrageous and baseless claims.
Yes, it would be a vicious circle.  That's why I persevere and oppose loose minds.  Not to change their minds but to educate others who might be swayed by them into illogical thinking.

I mean how many people post every day, things like " this is OU and that is OU" when they have actually no idea if it is or not because they lack basic power and energy measurement abilities.
Many.  That's why I think that a cheap and good Wattmeter is an essential instrument for those wanting to dabble in OU.

It's taken me some time to learn how to get fairly accurate measurements of different types of arrangements, and with that come the ability to know if something is making sense or not, and if something requires closer examination or not.
That's why I always ask for O/I power measurements when someone makes an extraordinary claim.  Instead I often hear: "it is a special device - trust me without any measurements or a self-runner."

If people do not want to discuss power and energy in real terms and drift into the realms of "cold electricity" and "negative energy" they ought to expect some flack and be able to explain what they say.
I have no proof that "cold electricity" does not exist, but the lack of prof for existence does not constitute a proof for non-existence, thus such proof cannot exist even in theory. 
I have to keep my mind open to such possibilities though.  I could accept that a new form of electricity defies the Ohm's law but I cannot accept that it defies observation and logic.

There ought to be a list of common things that trick the novice experimenter.
Indeed, there ought to be.
I'd start with 3 Volts AC * 4 Amps AC usually does not equal to 12 Watts of average power.

like "the input does not affect the output so it must be OU"...
...or even a better one: "the output does not affect the input so it must be OU"

Lets be realistic if someone was to post a circuit that actually did produce more energy than it took to run it. And showed it, how can anything any skeptic say make that "not be so".
It cannot.  Experiment always trumps theory.

Skeptics cannot make an OU device not be OU all they can do is point out folly or mistakes or be wrong themselves.
And that function of pointing out mistakes leads to good - not evil.  It is not negative - it is the truth.

Now I can learn and think for myself unmolested.
That is the positive aspect of dabbling in this field.  An analytical and logical mind can learn a lot.
This is also why I try to educate people here.  I hope that they will learn to experiment and think for themselves and one day they will be able to fish out a true anomaly out of the sea of illusions and conflations.

Just imagine a site like this with no skeptics, no one with power measurement skills and no one will the balls to say what they think. It would be chaos and fantasy wall to wall.
Yes, and no chance of progress :(

Offline Jack Noskills

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 346
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21123 on: February 18, 2014, 01:34:50 PM »
hi Jack,

I have already tested this around 2 weeks back on 3" toroid and selecting right capacitors from my stock which have the exact same matching value as verified using L/C meter.

The bifilar winding on my green toroid(Iron powder) is consisting of 45 turns which have around 28mH(around there can't recall fully now)."same inductance value"
I have already tried the series and parallel resonance on low voltage torchlight bulb.But doesn't light bulb.

I think i have figured this out i would need to use higher voltage around 20..30volts power source instead of using around 4volts battery connected to mosfet and gate connected to signal generator later on.


I do have a nanoperm cores as well which cost alot of money for 20 pieces.If you do a 1 wire turn on these toroid and use L/C meter you will find that the uH reading would be higher than the rest of the ferrite/iron powder toroid cores.Which means not many turns is required to achieve the same uH reading and lower loses due to lower resistance for low winding count.



This test needs amps and/or turns to magnetize the core. I am using audio amp it I guess it outputs only 5 volts, don't know exactly. See what you can do with nanoperm and at least 50 turns for each coil, preferably one layer and use all available core area. Input has to be pure sine wave for this to work.


I did one test using caduceous style winding, one part was primary and the other part was secondary. For this I did not found resonant frequency, at least it was not below 20 kHz.


Offline Acca

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21124 on: February 18, 2014, 02:55:52 PM »
 Dear Farmhand and Wesley !!
 
 Many thanks for your recent post with many pertinent arguments also from me !!
 
I am one who reads all post every 2 days or soo..
I am an application engineer with RF in plasma and radio.. and  I do experiments…
Here is may list of what I am working on now:
 
Coleman device
Akula0083 device
Plasma fusor
Papp cylinder device (here posted)
HHO water splitting (Stan Meyer method)
 
This is just a must list not including cold fusion, Floyd Sweet, Howard Johnson, John Bedini, etc.. Yes my life has NO TV and my time is “priceless” it’s been 30 years since I have been to a movie.. Wasted time is NEVER given back !! as one gets old time races you every day..
 
This forum is needed as I need to “hang” with my own subset for peers who like a family gets in to discourse sometimes…
 
Thanks to all, it’s been now 3 years here as well as other forums and no TV for me !!
 
Keep on !!!
Acca..
 
“Ignition is needed to make fusion energy a viable alternative energy source, but has yet to be achieved…”    this is  Bullcrap from official scientific Dogmatic Scientists..
 
… lack of understanding by most still believe that scientists are here to help humanity  !! 
 
 
THIS IS REAL  !! below !!!
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zWJNyoFgJM
 
Here is a link  to a valid example that is otherwise dis-information on the people through official scientific chanels.. I hope that all members here who understand the implications of the “Coleman device” as well as other type of effects,   just as is shown in this examples in the links posted,  that all is not right with the “world..”
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNSAXbZfnbE
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dS1MsymF8hc
 
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPY0skKjJU8
 
This is my old clip below of a magnetic pulse..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RnzWBCQDUXQ
 
 
http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue51/papp.html
 
Could the following reactions be taking place in Klostermann and Sanchez’s engine?
 O(16) + O(16) > He(4) + Si(28) 9.6 MeV
 O(16) + O(17) > He(4) + Si(29) 13.9 MeV
 O(16) + O(18) > He(4) + Si(30) 16.5 MeV
 N(14) + N(14) > He(4) + Mg(24) 17.2 MeV
 N(14) + N(15) > He(4) + Mg(25) 13.7 MeV
 
TPU is also an “enigma machine” new old clip !!

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=godczjvr2zc[/font]

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3352
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21125 on: February 18, 2014, 06:09:03 PM »
I think Grum realizes that fake claims can form an effective smoke screen against real anomalies and he refuses to be discouraged in that manner.


Fake claims : have been factor of motion, and always a factor of manipulation.
Example: Stagnation does not make Grum, Verpies,Wesley, Arunas, or anyone  to deliver, but fake claims will.
during  investigating  fake claims:  person gains in, knowledge, experience,understanding, and ideas.!!



Fake claims can be equal in power to legitimate claims.
Example of fake claims:
President Bush'es -never existing  Iraq'es "Weapons of Mass Destruction" have been able to create war in Iraq.Motion of people money and weaponry.Lose of life, more wealth for rich, and at the end  big recession.







Quote
FE pursuit can cause kids?
Do people really neglect their wives and suffer severe mental anguish due to this stuff?




Steady structure such as family can be created  not necessarily    because you want to heave  family but because  of use, of your    private part - mostly in association with  someone vagina.
( point of, origination or  creation of  obligation)
Without that that is only  voluntary junction of  male and female or.. ( in recent times variation of it: two male, 2 female  and so on),
However that  structure  can  be in contract ( marriage). And by that gain rights to request  on demand. From that point she can screw you up the way she wants. :)
 hee.
Kids are not effect of love because love does not heave anything that she can catch and hold you on.
She can not sue you for not loving her !!




So if one is doing his FE study, experiments ,( money spend) it is important  to understand that you have made your own move , and she might not be happy .
At that point it is her vision of safe stability. For me there is not "love' but  her contracting you as serving her needs life element. or  else!!. :)
heeeeeeeeeeeeee....


And because  she is not paying you for it, You may philosophically assign it to certain  form of " slavery". heeeeeee.
However she might compensate you for  your  performance "naturally" causing you to lose even more  energy
(That  usually  it is you who   heave been paying for the "fun" or for  maintenance of that "fun").
However, that happens mostly ,  not at time of your needs but at time of her moods  if any.She might be using you upon  her desire only or mostly.......... and you  better to be ready for it ... or else.
 :)

====================================================================================








Wesley
« Last Edit: February 19, 2014, 01:23:09 AM by stivep »

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3352
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21126 on: February 18, 2014, 06:32:52 PM »
Dear Farmhand and Wesley !!
 
 


WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


My friend................. Is it your  lab??????????


WOW............... I'm impressed.
Gush....................


I'm speechless






Wesley

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3352
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21127 on: February 18, 2014, 07:38:47 PM »

I think so too. That's why I started to design the 1GHz Watt to Volt converter.
 :(




Please can you tell me more Verpies.
It is fascinating.
-reason
-application
-concept
-voltage is function of power so? puzzling.
-voltage level is based on capacitive reactance in resonant circuit.If resonance frequency of circuit higher than frequency of generation- that there is the moment where you heave high voltage and low current,
 if is higher- than you heave inductive character  of resonant circuit and  low  voltage and high current.










Quote
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LC_circuit
An LC circuit can store electrical energy oscillating at its resonant frequency. See the animation at right. A capacitor stores energy in the electric field ]E between its plates, depending on the voltage across it, and an inductor stores energy in its magnetic field depending on the current through it.




Quote
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LC_circuit
A series resonant circuit provides voltage magnification
A parallel resonant circuit provides current magnification
Well this is limited way of Wikipedia explanation, of processes.
 In reality you take resonant circuit , connect  generator  and measure voltage  and/or current , at point in time, when  frequency of generator is slightly lower or higher from the frequency of resonance of resonant circuit ,
 despite  the fact of what kind of circuit it is: Series or parallel.
That factor is not  important or not always important.


 Series resonant circuit allows one frequency to  pass.
but
if parallel resonant circuit is grounded at one side and if it you connect  sweep generator (right next to the upper side )you will heave all frequencies  grounded and only one present ( voltage or current wise as you wish when, you slightly vary frequency of oscillator left  or right of bandwidth of the circuit)


so in both examples you are dealing with the same effect of single frequency extracted if we need  to use it " along the path"


Another  important factor to notice  is that resonance  circuits are in the essence , a filters.
There is no such  thing  as frequency of resonance!!!
The frequency in within the bandwidth of the filter ( resonance circuit) is always "from" -"to"
Example if resonance curve is at 7MHz than the main frequency of resonance will be 7MHz _+ or -  (bandwidth)
On spectrum analyzer depends from resolution you will see flat top "from" -"to"












Wesley
« Last Edit: February 19, 2014, 12:49:05 AM by stivep »

Offline Farmhand

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1583
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21128 on: February 18, 2014, 09:37:44 PM »
I think Grum realizes that fake claims can form an effective smoke screen against real anomalies and he refuses to be discouraged in that manner.
Yes I realize that now, and I don't want to stop anyone pursuing any line of experiment they choose. Just tired of being labeled a naysayer for being logical.

FE pursuit can cause kids?
Do people really neglect their wives and suffer severe mental anguish due to this stuff?

Yes I believe some do, going by some of the posts I have read, I think the same type of people who have trouble with addiction and impulse control can get carried away, The promise of OU and the search for it I think is like a drug for some.

Did you fall or have a car wreck?

Long story, it started with a horse fall at about 13 years old which damaged two discs in my neck then a lot of hard work and no treatment along with many car wrecks while racing speedway from 15 to 17 years old. All led to a operation to fuse three vertebra in my neck, but I have two more damaged discs in my neck now and also at least two ruptured discs in my lower back, problems with facet joins in most of my upper spine. And basically little to no belief from the medical system and no treatment until It ends up being emergency. I can't get medical insurance as the problems were caused many years ago.

What's that about?

The self charger setup presented on peswiki based on Bobs "controller" and toroid. It was a big learning experience. I learned that people need to speak up and speak thier mind regardless of the reaction.

I'm curious.  Did I ever do that?

Not that I can remember, I don't keep records on that.  ;)

There is one guy on this forum that excels at that.  I even had to make an ad filter to relieve myself if his illogical posts but I still see them from time to time when other people quote him.

It annoys me so. The same fallacies over and over again.

Yes, it would be a vicious circle.  That's why I persevere and oppose loose minds.  Not to change their minds but to educate others who might be swayed by them into illogical thinking.

Good work.

Many.  That's why I think that a cheap and good Wattmeter is an essential instrument for those wanting to dabble in OU.
That's why I always ask for O/I power measurements when someone makes an extraordinary claim.  Instead I often hear: "it is a special device - trust me without any measurements or a self-runner."

Yeah a wattmeter that measures the grid power consumed is very useful, even for non OU purposes.

I have no proof that "cold electricity" does not exist, but the lack of prof for existence does not constitute a proof for non-existence, thus such proof cannot exist even in theory. 
I have to keep my mind open to such possibilities though.  I could accept that a new form of electricity defies the Ohm's law but I cannot accept that it defies observation and logic.

Exactly if it does work then the work can be observed and so therefore measured.

Indeed, there ought to be.
I'd start with 3 Volts AC * 4 Amps AC usually does not equal to 12 Watts of average power.
...or even a better one: "the output does not affect the input so it must be OU"

It's so common it really is getting old.

It cannot.  Experiment always trumps theory.
And that function of pointing out mistakes leads to good - not evil.  It is not negative - it is the truth.
That is the positive aspect of dabbling in this field.  An analytical and logical mind can learn a lot.

Yep.

This is also why I try to educate people here.  I hope that they will learn to experiment and think for themselves and one day they will be able to fish out a true anomaly out of the sea of illusions and conflations.

Again good work.

Cheers

Offline jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21129 on: February 18, 2014, 11:57:58 PM »

 Wow now verpies the great educator has a new pal..


 No problem. Whatever.


 In all of the great distractors posts has he done anything to advance our search for overunity? Every example has led the good folks here down a dead end and not one original thought or experiment has been successful by this great educator, NOT ONE! They have been distracted to the point of being discouraged NOT Educated.


 Listen I don't make it like I know everything but what I do post is my ideas and my experiences both with doing good experiments and posting my understanding of others ideas and experiments from the likes of Tesla and subsequent experimenters.


 This is a thread about TK and TK clearly references Tesla as the source of his experiments NOT VERPIES And certainly not me for that fact. I am a researcher by heart and have always had the knack to do the work it takes to decipher hidden research and I have done my homework. I have always encouraged others to goto the source and open your mind to the fact that in this world there are a great many suckers who bought into the current problem we are facing. In fact these suckers went through all the training or brain washing and will never admit they could have been lied to by that training or even realized they were brainwashed in the first place.


 Really? Lets see what brainwashing is can we?


 "[size=78%]Mind control (also known as brainwashing, coercive persuasion, thought control, or thought reform) refers to an indoctrination process which results in "an impairment of autonomy, an inability to think independently, and a disruption of beliefs and affiliations. In this context, brainwashing refers to the involuntary reeducation of basic beliefs and values"[1] The term has been applied to any tactic, psychological or otherwise, which can be seen as subverting an individual's sense of control over their own thinking, behavior, emotions or decision making.[/size]
Theories of brainwashing and of mind control were originally developed to explain how totalitarian regimes appeared to succeed systematically in indoctrinating prisoners of war through propaganda and torture techniques. These theories were later expanded and modified by psychologists including Jean-Marie Abgrall and Margaret Singer to explain a wider range of phenomena, especially conversions to new religious movements (NRMs). A third-generation theory proposed by Ben Zablocki focused on the use of mind control to retain members of NRMs and cults. The suggestion that NRMs use mind control techniques has resulted in scientific and legal controversy."

 I would suggest that if anyone here wants to become a teacher then go do that. If anyone wants to teach what is taught in educational institutions the by all means join the EEE online and teach there. This however is an experimenters haven of free thought and ideas on the OverUnity subject and not education to the current dogma. I have always said that others should be safe in all experiments and safety can be learned with these subjects on the internet by looking up the hazards involved in these subjects.

 When we talk about experiments we assume the others interested in replicating the experiments know full well the dangers involved.

 You guys who think you are the thought police should just go to a regular EEE website and do your policing there. This forum specifically states we are looking for OU. It is our only goal. We need this for our world to survive and there is no reason we should not be able to attain this. I mean nature does this on a daily basis.

 In fact our current paradigm is changing actually if you look at the well respected scientists now forming world changing think tanks like the Thunderbolts project. They are changing the way our professional scientists think and our understanding of what is our Universe is and more importantly how it works.

 Maxwell was the first to actually work out the full physics behind this field. Isn't it funny that half of his equations got THROWN AWAY! We are being kept away from this answer because it would strip the ones who control us now of the very power they keep from us.

 In fact I have my own filter I have devised. It's called the BS meter and it rings very loudly when guys like Verpies comes into a forum that is LABLED OverUnity.com

 They are threatened by our pursuit and will do anything to dissuade and shame us with their insults and distractions. DON'T let them win.

 THINK for yourself and EDUCATE yourself!

 I also do not goto others posts and power pick it apart. A post is a contextual post. Not a single line but the meaning comes from the whole post. Sometimes in a field like this there is no real way to describe what is being done. It is a brand new field of study and we are struggling with defining it and how it works. Obviously if we think like the professionals then we are all f'd. We are doomed as a race to die on this planet from starvation and resource depletion, only a few will have it all and the rest will die. This is already happening on this planet, Ethiopia and Africa are pretty much the target so far and it is spreading.  But if we open our eyes and minds to new ideas then we just might make it as a race.

 Self education is the only way to beat these guys. If you are interested in this field then you should do some homework before going in to experimenting. Read.. Read... Read.. Then do the experimenting. Understand what the experiment is about and if there isn't enough written about the subject then learn who the experimenter is and his process to experimenting. On the subject of Tesla there is plenty to read and understand.

 Always know that these guys tend to distort and that is exactly what they did already. Just by reading all things about Tesla I have found huge discontinuities between what he wrote and his patents. Some made it through because the others are very unaware of this other half of energy. To be honest it is the most important other half as it is the genesis of energy flow itself. Understand voltage potential and you will have the keys to the Universe.

Offline cliff33

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21130 on: February 19, 2014, 01:45:50 AM »
Hi to all:
 I don't normally post on this thread but thought some basic info might help to get things back into perspective.

Would just like to remind people of one of TK's phrases. " It's so simple it'll make you laugh"
 Yes Tesla's setup with a big polished metal plate up in the air was also very simple.

The discussion here seems to be about everything except what we're trying to do.
  We know that the ionisphere has a surplus of positive ions , just as the earth has
a surplus of negative ions. Now it's common knowledge that opposites always attract
each other, whether it's the north & south pole of a magnet, the plus & minus terminals
of a battery, male & female etc.

  Our ambient surroundings are balanced in respect to charged radiant matter, so our problem
is to create an unbalanced condition to attract some of this energy into our system.
The negative earth which is right under our feet is just itching to bring in some of those
positive ions to balance things out.
 So the best way to do this is with a very high NEGATIVE voltage. The higher the better.
Once in our circuit, we then have to provide a low impedance path for them to get back to
some negative destination. We just have to make sure that the path they follow goes through
our "energy collection coil" before going to earth ground. I think proper pulse timing
is needed so that these things follow the right course to earth ground and not simply
join up with our original negative pulses. I also think that BEMF has a large part to play
here.

  Mother nature has no problem with balancing things out. She just creates a rain storm,
and the moisturized air forms a conductive path for those ions to get back to earth with a
big bang thus creating millions of watts of power.


   

Offline jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21131 on: February 19, 2014, 01:52:03 AM »
 www.tfcbooks.com


 "In colorado I succeeded one day in precipitating a dense fog.  There was a mist outside, but when I turned on the current the cloud in the laboratory became so dense that when the hand was held only a few inches from the face it could not be seen.  I am positive in my conviction that we can erect a plant of proper design in an arid region, work it according to certain observations and rules, and by its means draw from the ocean unlimited amounts of water for irrigation and power purposes."

 " Every Human Effort must of necessity create a disturbance.  What difference is there in essence, between the commotion produced by any revolutionary idea or improvement and that of a wireless transmitter?  The spectre of interference has been conjured by Hertzwave or radio telegraphy in which attunement is absolutely impossible, simply because the effect diminishes rapidly with distance.  But  to my system of energy transmission, based on the use of impulses not sensibly diminishing with distance, perfect attunement and the higher artifice of individualization are practicable."

 Just in these two statements we can Tell a bunch about what Tesla was upto.

 Impulses are the discovery. Impulses that are one way only in nature. They do not agitate back and forth, they start at a point and go forever. That is radiant energy. Now natural radiant energy does just that but it is of a lower potential but none the less there and flowing outwards into the environment around the object. All Objects have a radiant component. This is never more evident but by the experiments showing structured water by using Nafion. The radiative aura around the nafion is naturally high and orders the water molecules into a crystalline structure. But the water is not a solid it is a liquid crystal. This is just one example of the radiative component of all objects. Some more then others.

 Now how could an object have such power. Since Voltage potential by itself is known to us by the name static electricity one could see how this could seem to be powered forever by itself. If there is a medium we don't see and I'm betting it is there then the reason we can't detect it is it is very subtle yet very strong. It flows in pathways in virtual networks with a capability of over lightyears in size down to the smallest points ever imaginable. Smaller then the smallest real particle we can see with current technology. It flows through everything and connects everything within it's fractal network.

 Where does radioactive material get it's incredible energy output?

 This radiative nature to all objects sets up a network after a period of growth. This network connects all things in space, ALL. This is the spooky action at a distance that Einstein didn't like. That is why the experiments with seemingly unconnected particles do the things that they do in the experiment of quantum entanglement. It is not spooky if you know that all things are connected. What it is connected with is the issue. I'm of the opinion the elders were right, that the Aether is very real otherwise this would be spooky action at a distance and unexplainable by modern dogma.


 Like I have said many times before Since TK said this was due to Tesla that he could do what he did then wouldn't it be smart to look at what Tesla was up to. Now Tesla went through many many phases of his understanding of Electricity. The one example I have shown that closely describes any of TK experiments. It was a Transformer that he devised while experimenting with Very High Frequency electricity. After he failed to get the results he was looking for he went from AC frequencies to DC Impulses.

 Lets look at what he (Tesla) says:

"
 Before showing some of these curious effects I must, for the sake of completeness, give a short description of the coil and other apparatus used in the experiments with the disruptive discharge this evening.

 http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p171/jbignes5/Teslatransformer.gif

It is contained in a box B (Fig. 3) of thick boards of hard wood, covered on the outside with zinc sheet Z, which is carefully soldered all around.  It might be advisable, in a strictly scientific investigation, when accuracy is of great importance, to do away with the metal cover, as it might introduce many errors, principally on account of its complex action upon the coil, as a condenser of very small capacity and as an electrostatic and electromagnetic screen.  When the coil is used for such experiments as are here contemplated, the employment of the metal cover offers some practical advantages, but these are not of sufficient importance to be dwelt upon.

The coil should be placed symmetrically to the metal cover, and the space between should, of course, not be too small, certainly not less than, say, five centimeters, but much more if possible; especially the two sides of the zinc box, which are at right angles to the axis of the coil, should be sufficiently remote from the latter, as otherwise they might impair its action and be a source of loss.

The coil consists of two spools of hard rubber R R held apart at a distance of 10 centimetres by bolts c and nuts n, likewise of hard rubber.  Each spool comprises a tube T of approximately 8 centimetres inside diameter, and 3 millimetres thick, upon which are screwed two flanges F F, 24 centimetres square, the space between the flanges being about 3 centimetres.  The secondary, S S, of the best gutta percha-covered wire, has 26 layers, 10 turns in each, giving for each half a total of 260 turns.  The two halves are wound oppositely and connected in series, the connection between both being made over the primary.  This disposition besides being convenient, has the advantage that when the coil is well balanced—that is, when both of its terminals T1 T1 are connected to bodies or devices of equal capacity—there is not much danger of breaking through to the primary, and the insulation between the primary and the secondary need not be thick.  In using the coil it is advisable to attach to both terminals devices of nearly equal capacity, as, when the capacity of the terminals is not equal, sparks will be apt to pass to the primary.  To avoid this, the middle point of the secondary may be connected to the primary, but this is not always practicable.

The primary P P is wound in two parts, and oppositely, upon a wooden spool W, and the four ends are led out of the oil through hard rubber tubes t t.  The ends of the secondary T1 T1 are also led out of the oil through rubber tubes t1 t1 of great thickness.  The primary and secondary layers are insulated by cotton cloth, the thickness of the insulation, of course, bearing some proportion to the difference of potential between the turns of the different layers.  Each half of the primary has four layers, 24 turns in each, this giving a total of 96 turns.  When both the parts are connected in series, this gives a ratio of conversion of about 1:2.7, and with the primaries in multiple, 1:5.4 but in operating with very rapidly alternating currents this ratio does not convey even an approximate idea of the ratio of the E.M.Fs. in the primary and secondary circuits.  The coil is held in position in the oil on wooden supports, there being about 5 centimetres thickness of oil all round.  Where the oil is not specially needed, the space is filled with pieces of wood, and for this purpose principally the wooden box B surrounding the whole is used.

The construction here shown is, of course, not the best on general principles, but I believe it is a good and convenient one for the production of effects in which an excessive potential and a very small current are needed.



In connection with the coil I use either the ordinary form of discharger or a modified form.  In the former I have introduced two changes which secure some advantages, and which are obvious.  If they are mentioned, it is only in the hope that some experimenter may find them of use.

http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p171/jbignes5/magneticquenchedgap.gif

One of the changes is that the adjustable knobs A and B (Fig. 4), of the discharger are held in jaws of brass, J J, by spring pressure, this allowing of turning them successively into different positions, and so doing away with the tedious process of frequent polishing up.

The other change consists in the employment of a strong electromagnet N S, which is placed with its axis at right angles to the line joining the knobs A and B, and produces a strong magnetic field between them.  The pole pieces of the magnet are movable and properly formed so as to protrude between the brass knobs, in order to make the field as intense as possible; but to prevent the discharge from jumping to the magnet the pole pieces are protected by a layer of mica, M M, of sufficient thickness, sl sl and s2 s2 are screws for fastening the wires.  On each side one of the screws is for large and the other for small wires.  L L are screws for fixing in position the rods R R, which support the knobs.

In another arrangement with the magnet I take the discharge between the rounded pole pieces themselves, which in such case are insulated and preferably provided with polished brass caps.

The employment of an intense magnetic field is of advantage principally when the induction coil or transformer which charges the condenser is operated by currents of very low frequency.  In such a case the number of the fundamental discharges between the knobs may be so small as to render the currents produced in the secondary unsuitable for many experiments.  The intense magnetic field then serves to blow out the arc between the knobs as soon as it is formed, and the fundamental discharges occur in quicker succession.

Instead of the magnet, a draught or blast of air may be employed with some advantage.  In this case the arc is preferably established between the knobs A B, in Fig. 2 (the knobs a b being generally joined, or entirely done away with), as in this disposition the arc is long and unsteady, and is easily affected by the draught.

http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p171/jbignes5/teslacircuit.gif

When a magnet is employed to break the arc, it is better to choose the connection indicated diagrammatically in Fig 5, as in this case the currents forming the arc are much more powerful, and the magnetic field exercises a greater influence.  The use of the magnet permits, however, of the arc being replaced by a vacuum tube, but I have encountered great difficulties in working with an exhausted tube."

 This is verbatum

 Look at that last statement....

 The use of the magnet permits, however, of the arc being replaced by a vacuum tube, but I have encountered great difficulties in working with an exhausted tube.

 A pair of magnets and Vacuum tube... Hmmm...

 Now what can we use this for?

 http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p171/jbignes5/onewiremotor.gif

 This remind you of something TK did?

 So when you don't use a magnetic break what happens? AC of course and what the backyard video is about.

Offline Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4324
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21132 on: February 19, 2014, 09:31:08 AM »

Fake claims : have been factor of motion, and always a factor of manipulation.
Example: Stagnation does not make Grum, Verpies,Wesley, Arunas, or anyone  to deliver, but fake claims will.
during  investigating  fake claims:  person gains in, knowledge, experience,understanding, and ideas.!!


Wesley

Fake claims certainly improve our powers of observation and teach us that the urge to make false claims for financial gain and notoriety is very strong within the FE community. As for the notion that this practice in some way helps us towards gaining knowledge in the quest to discover free energy is IMO very contentious!

Its interesting that we have seen little fake video posting activity in recent weeks. Running out of new scam ideas I suspect. ;D

Offline Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4324

Offline Farmhand

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1583
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #21134 on: February 19, 2014, 10:19:53 AM »
This one wire motor consumes power and has a return path to the supply via displacement current. It is featured on page 234 of this book https://ia700302.us.archive.org/16/items/inventionsresear00martiala/inventionsresear00martiala.pdf

http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p171/jbignes5/onewiremotor.gif

An example of the power draw from a single wire connection and displacement return is below. Keep in mind that is a 30 amp meter so it's input is changing by a couple of hundred milliamps from a 12 volt battery.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXE7z6UAYSw

Cheers