Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16404064 times)

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20760 on: January 24, 2014, 05:24:21 PM »
Zeitmaschine: That quote was before I got into TK's face.
He uses make-break technique.
I told him that and he said, "Well what do you need me for?"
Same as Tito L Oracion, except Tito's stuck with the Tesla
controller.
We're all making too hard work of it.
So keep it simple.
Tesla's radiant energy and Tesla's circuit controllers.
It's all just make-break.
Let's not be side-tracked.
Tesla's magnifying RECEIVER is what I'm looking at.
Tesla's resonance has nothing to do with LCR resonance.

From other Planet

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 108
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20761 on: January 24, 2014, 05:33:21 PM »
here is another schematic posted by user v8carlo, didnt try this one yet... compare with kapanadze picture... could it be same circuit?

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20762 on: January 24, 2014, 07:04:56 PM »
Zeitmaschine: That quote was before I got into TK's face.
He uses make-break technique.
I told him that and he said, "Well what do you need me for?"
Same as Tito L Oracion, except Tito's stuck with the Tesla
controller.
We're all making too hard work of it.
So keep it simple.
Tesla's radiant energy and Tesla's circuit controllers.
It's all just make-break.
Let's not be side-tracked.
Tesla's magnifying RECEIVER is what I'm looking at.
Tesla's resonance has nothing to do with LCR resonance.


I'm not so sure. I think it's just LCR resonance but R is minimal and it's actually free resonance, not forced. Tesla had given one strict hint about that...

jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20763 on: January 24, 2014, 08:16:07 PM »
Zeitmaschine: That quote was before I got into TK's face.
He uses make-break technique.
I told him that and he said, "Well what do you need me for?"
Same as Tito L Oracion, except Tito's stuck with the Tesla
controller.
We're all making too hard work of it.
So keep it simple.
Tesla's radiant energy and Tesla's circuit controllers.
It's all just make-break.
Let's not be side-tracked.
Tesla's magnifying RECEIVER is what I'm looking at.
Tesla's resonance has nothing to do with LCR resonance.


 There are many kind of resonances. One of vibrational period for example. One of impedance and one of mass. All these resonances deal with vibrations of some kind.


 With mass it tends to get tricky but since there is sooo much of mass then why would it mater. Well Lets think about the tuning fork and mutual oscillations. Lets also think about the shape of the mass. Is it subdivided? As with a tuning fork if you change the geometry of the matter does this effect it's own resonant frequency? Yes but maybe in more subtle ways.


 When Tesla started to mess with the subdivided coils and geometry He figured out that objects like conical shapes really focused the field around it. He said that the sound of the brush like emission was wind like. When trying to measure the current through the conical coil in the e-field, that there was zero current in the coil. But the speed of the oscillator was most likely in the millions of impulses per second. Tesla concidered 1 million to be a moderate frequency or period. MODERATE.


 I got to pull up the notes from his experimenting with this stuff again. He said it reacted quite energetically when metal objects approached the exciter coil. Aluminum foil was vaporized in a flash. It's matter was not sufficiently dense enough for it to stay together. The static forces that built up in it's structure ripped it apart most violently. But like I said I got to find the notes again.


 Tesla like to deal in the extremes and did little in the lower power versions. He was thinking of a grand scheme for his new system and bigger was better coverage. I am sure this principle works even down to the smallest of scales.


 Let me go find the notes.. Think it was in the Book.. Secrets of cold war technology.

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20764 on: January 24, 2014, 08:17:22 PM »
Yes and no. The Tesla resonance I am referring to is the Magnifying transmitter free coil as per colorado springs.
Of course Tesla knew about tuning because he invented it. But tuning was also to individualize the receiver.
Tuning was also to grab harmonics, but the main one was the free coil which self resonated like a bell. If the bell was tuned to middle C it didn't matter how many times you hit it. It was always middle C.

From other Planet

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 108
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20765 on: January 24, 2014, 10:29:04 PM »
@a.king u should go see kurts videos on youtube he is very engaged in this TMT stuff
http://www.youtube.com/user/kdkinen/videos

jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20766 on: January 24, 2014, 10:35:18 PM »
Yes and no. The Tesla resonance I am referring to is the Magnifying transmitter free coil as per colorado springs.
Of course Tesla knew about tuning because he invented it. But tuning was also to individualize the receiver.
Tuning was also to grab harmonics, but the main one was the free coil which self resonated like a bell. If the bell was tuned to middle C it didn't matter how many times you hit it. It was always middle C.


 I won't bore you with too many details but get a copy of the book Cold War Secrets.


 " The most efficient Tesla Transformations were obtained only when the disruptive radiating wire line equaled the mass of the helical coil."


 "  Tesla transformers are not magnetoelectric devices, they use radiant shockwaves and produce pure voltage without current. No University High Frequency coil must ever be called a "Tesla Coil", since the devices usually employed in demonstrations halls are the direct result of apparatus perfected by Sir Oliver Lodge and not by Nikola Tesla. The Tesla transformer is an impulse apparatus and can not be as easily constructed except by strict conformity with parameters which Tesla enunciated. Tesla transformers produce extraordinary white impulse discharges of extreme length and pressure, which exceed the alternating violet spark displays of lodge coils."


 " While looking and seeming the same, each systems actually performs very different functions. Lodge coils are alternators. Tesla Transformers are unidirectional impulsers."


 these are some of the gems in the book...

 I am of the opinion that there are many thinking they have a true Tesla system. I highly doubt that claim in most situations. There are many that detract from the Tesla discovery by not showing the difference between the two systems. In fact most don't want you to have this and will quickly derail the conversation back to the known fallacy  that they are using Tesla technology(lodge coils).

 Might I ask a few quick questions?
 What happens when you impulse a bifilar pancake coil? Since the self induction is canceled by the capacitance what happens to the impulse?
 What happens if you use the conical form of the bifilar coil? Would it concentrate the flow around the coil?
« Last Edit: January 25, 2014, 02:12:28 AM by jbignes5 »

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20767 on: January 25, 2014, 09:36:29 AM »
Zeitmaschine:  This is right up your street: http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=GB&NR=2432463A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=&date=20070523&DB=&locale=en_EP
It's Harold Aspden's double 3 plate capacitor free energy system.  Maybe it's the Kapanadze secret.


Jbignes5: Don't know about conical, but the bifilar becomes a capacitor and stores the energy.

penno64

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 457
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20768 on: January 25, 2014, 09:51:23 AM »
A.king, have you looked at the Romanian Xhacks go at it -

http://www.overunity.com/14229/free-energy-device-romania/#.UuN6rmy4aUk

Love to hear your thoughts.

Penno

Farmhand

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1583
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20769 on: January 25, 2014, 10:02:50 AM »
Three coil Tesla Transformer/Transmitter/receiver. 760 Khz  Power factor of the coil is over 0.95.  ;)

Light lighting test. Lower power running
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Y1U1PSmAjQ

Spark run for fun. Higher power running. Still only a few hundred Watts.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nkJtrKCdFg

Test with smaller mirror coil, showing a higher voltage from the unpowered mirror coil.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rG_Rfqv6O0

Transformer. Picture attached

Circuit attached, notice no Terry filter, no big resistors to waste power. I do have regular line filters and the power meter behind those works just fine. No glitching, which is handy.

Under certain conditions it will produce double helix sparks. Attached.

Last I saw Mr Clean was doing some nice work on a similar arrangement. Not sure how far he went, maybe it's time I check, might be fun to see what he's done.

..





a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20770 on: January 25, 2014, 10:07:01 AM »
A.king, have you looked at the Romanian Xhacks go at it -

http://www.overunity.com/14229/free-energy-device-romania/#.UuN6rmy4aUk

Love to hear your thoughts.

Penno


It's too early to tell. Like most people I don't have the time to analyse it. I prefer patents.

Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20771 on: January 25, 2014, 02:40:05 PM »
Zeitmaschine: That quote was before I got into TK's face.
He uses make-break technique.
I told him that and he said, "Well what do you need me for?"
Same as Tito L Oracion, except Tito's stuck with the Tesla
controller.
We're all making too hard work of it.
So keep it simple.
Tesla's radiant energy and Tesla's circuit controllers.
It's all just make-break.
Let's not be side-tracked.
Tesla's magnifying RECEIVER is what I'm looking at.
Tesla's resonance has nothing to do with LCR resonance.

But Kapanadze's reference to Melnichenko (he came close to solving this problem) is still valid? ???

So keep it simple. Keep a resonant LC circuit oscillating, not by energy taken from a power supply but by energy taken from the environment. :)

Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4135
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20772 on: January 25, 2014, 03:49:08 PM »
But Kapanadze's reference to Melnichenko (he came close to solving this problem) is still valid? ???

So keep it simple. Keep a resonant LC circuit oscillating, not by energy taken from a power supply but by energy taken from the environment. :)


Yes, KISS and remember you only have a tiny 9V battery to get that baby rocking to that environmental beat!

semenihin-77

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 161
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20773 on: January 25, 2014, 04:56:40 PM »
But Kapanadze's reference to Melnichenko (he came close to solving this problem) is still valid? ???

So keep it simple. Keep a resonant LC circuit oscillating, not by energy taken from a power supply but by energy taken from the environment. :)

Installation is similar to Kapanadze thief enough faulted phase in the ground.

P.S. Melnichenko have never had anything.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-ZTgRDCwmM

Interesting? More will come later ......

semenihin-77

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 161
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20774 on: January 25, 2014, 05:35:48 PM »

Yes, KISS and remember you only have a tiny 9V battery to get that baby rocking to that environmental beat!

Ready to show such a device, starts from a 9 volt battery, the output of 105 watts, operates autonomously without grounding.