Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 84213
  • *Latest: Lazyk

  • *Total Posts: 897702
  • *Total Topics: 15820
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 2
  • *Guests: 14
  • *Total: 16

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 13743882 times)

Offline Acca

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20445 on: December 28, 2013, 03:12:44 PM »
Here is the latest Russian forum translated posts by Akula0083 below and an extra diagram.

 http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Frealstrannik.ru%2Fforum%2F48-temy-freeenergylt-antanasa%2F134551-akula0083-obshhaya-tema-1.html%3Fstart%3D1116&act=url
 
Also there is the Brovin patent (below link) (Ketcher) and the Very hard to find waveforms from that patent as described in the latest

videos by Wesley.

http://www.findpatent.ru/patent/244/2444124.html[/font]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHc4kqVgWGU[/font]

[/font]
 Here is a patent that has Tesla flat coils in it's application... VIP !!

https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pdfs/US7973296.pdf
 

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1613
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20446 on: December 28, 2013, 03:57:30 PM »
ElementSix: Thanks for the info.
I too am working with Tesla switching methods.
100 years later and they are still the best.
Look at the ignition patent 1896. It will help you.
Read what Tesla says about discharge from circuit of high self induction
into a circuit of low self induction.
In another patent Tesla's smart enough to use an electric motor as part
of both the switching and inductive loop. The benefit is that if
the motor stops you don't get a short because the inductive loop moves the Tesla switch
on. (Ozone patent).
I use it and it works.

Offline Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20447 on: December 28, 2013, 09:11:11 PM »
Convert Static Voltage to Any Amount of Electrical Power Required

Program I will be the conversion of a static voltage (available world wide) from a simple static source to furnish (freely) any amount of electrical power desired. It is simple and very cheap to provide a static voltage source—indeed, one may take the necessary “source static voltage” directly from the earth-electrosphere vertical voltage gradient anywhere and everywhere on Earth. This “charged earth-to-electrosphere” voltage gradient averages about 300,000 volts {64}. When standing, its voltage difference between one’s head and one’s foot may thus reach about 250 volts or even more.

As a “source” for the proper asymmetric circuit or system, a static voltage can be made to potentialize the charges in a briefly-connected external circuit (or a great number of them) without drawing current.

The freely-potentialized external circuit can then be disconnected from the source (with circuit charges still pinned and zero current), and its gap recompleted (as, e.g., by adding a diode and a resistor in series, with the diode oriented in the “current pumped around the loop” direction). This makes the freely potentialized external circuit complete again, but as a separate system entirely separated from the original static voltage source.

Once the separated external circuit is recompleted, its charges are allowed to come unpinned and current will flow in it, powering the load while the freely-potentialized circuit dissipates its potential energy. Then the process is iterated; the gap is re-opened and the static source is reconnected with the charges again pinned, to again freely potentialize the external circuit.

So one potentializes freely and statically with original source connected, and then dissipates the collected excess potential energy dynamically and separately from the original source.

In this manner the static voltage source will iteratively furnish all the electrical power in a specific circuit that one wishes, literally without limit, and without having to do work just to continue having the source. If one uses only voltage input from the static voltage source to one’s external circuit, then no change in the source’s static voltage occurs, because no current flows from or through it, and hence no electrical power is drawn from it or used to destroy it.

Use of a static voltage source in this current-free fashion is beyond simply repeating the WW II use of the known difference of potential (between a jungle treetop and the earth’s surface) to draw sufficient power (both current and voltage) to power a small radio in the South Pacific. There the troops used only the standard symmetric EM circuit, which has to draw power (both voltage and current) from the earth-electrosphere voltage difference source utilized and thus has to do work in getting the radios powered.

The overall power that can be drawn directly from a segment of the static earth-electrosphere capacitor’s voltage and charge is very small, but if one draws only voltage (with dq/dt = 0) and uses the proper asymmetric circuitry to collect and flow (shuttle) that voltage onto pinned charges q in a collecting circuit, then one can take and use just the voltage. Using this free static voltage to potentialize the external circuit will produce the desired amount of free potential energy W in the asymmetric collecting system (on those pinned charges q) that one requires, by the simple equation W = Vq. If we do not allow any current from the external circuit and load to flow back through the dipolar voltage source, then all we continually need from the source is the voltage V itself. That can and will be sustained indefinitely by the source. Freely! Forever!

“Static voltage” is actually a dynamic set of ongoing bidirectional EM energy flows (longitudinal waves), as rigorously shown by Whittaker in 1903 {65}. Hence so-called “static” voltage will indeed flow (without doing work) onto a “statically connected” collection circuit containing pinned charges q, “potentializing” that receiving circuit so that stored potential energy W = Vq appears in it.

This “statically potentialized” (excited) collection circuit is then separated from the static voltage source. The gap left by the disconnected primary static source is recompleted (say, by a resistor and diode in series across the gap) as a separate external circuit and system, and then this separated circuit’s freely collected EM potential energy is dissipated in its loads to power them. This results in delivering a fixed amount of free power to the loads to power them, completely independently of the primary static source (the electrosphere, in this example) {66}. Any convenient and very cheap static voltage source can be substituted.

This type of asymmetric system and circuitry is a part of the Heaviside model equations that Lorentz {59} deliberately discarded in 1892 by arbitrarily symmetrizing the equations for the specific purpose of eliminating all such systems, insuring that electrical engineers build only COP<1.0 power systems insofar as taking the energy from the local vacuum potential is concerned. Since then, EEs have always built and used only symmetrized power systems, thus directly generating the world’s present energy crisis.

Rapid and Decisive Solution of the World Energy Crisis

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20447 on: December 28, 2013, 09:11:11 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline d3x0r

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1417
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20448 on: December 29, 2013, 03:52:15 AM »
Convert Static Voltage to Any Amount of Electrical Power Required

Program I will be the conversion of a static voltage (available world wide) from a simple static source to furnish (freely) any amount of electrical power desired. It is simple and very cheap to provide a static voltage source—indeed, one may take the necessary “source static voltage” directly from the earth-electrosphere vertical voltage gradient anywhere and everywhere on Earth. This “charged earth-to-electrosphere” voltage gradient averages about 300,000 volts {64}. When standing, its voltage difference between one’s head and one’s foot may thus reach about 250 volts or even more.

As a “source” for the proper asymmetric circuit or system, a static voltage can be made to potentialize the charges in a briefly-connected external circuit (or a great number of them) without drawing current.

The freely-potentialized external circuit can then be disconnected from the source (with circuit charges still pinned and zero current), and its gap recompleted (as, e.g., by adding a diode and a resistor in series, with the diode oriented in the “current pumped around the loop” direction). This makes the freely potentialized external circuit complete again, but as a separate system entirely separated from the original static voltage source.

Once the separated external circuit is recompleted, its charges are allowed to come unpinned and current will flow in it, powering the load while the freely-potentialized circuit dissipates its potential energy. Then the process is iterated; the gap is re-opened and the static source is reconnected with the charges again pinned, to again freely potentialize the external circuit.

So one potentializes freely and statically with original source connected, and then dissipates the collected excess potential energy dynamically and separately from the original source.

In this manner the static voltage source will iteratively furnish all the electrical power in a specific circuit that one wishes, literally without limit, and without having to do work just to continue having the source. If one uses only voltage input from the static voltage source to one’s external circuit, then no change in the source’s static voltage occurs, because no current flows from or through it, and hence no electrical power is drawn from it or used to destroy it.

Use of a static voltage source in this current-free fashion is beyond simply repeating the WW II use of the known difference of potential (between a jungle treetop and the earth’s surface) to draw sufficient power (both current and voltage) to power a small radio in the South Pacific. There the troops used only the standard symmetric EM circuit, which has to draw power (both voltage and current) from the earth-electrosphere voltage difference source utilized and thus has to do work in getting the radios powered.

The overall power that can be drawn directly from a segment of the static earth-electrosphere capacitor’s voltage and charge is very small, but if one draws only voltage (with dq/dt = 0) and uses the proper asymmetric circuitry to collect and flow (shuttle) that voltage onto pinned charges q in a collecting circuit, then one can take and use just the voltage. Using this free static voltage to potentialize the external circuit will produce the desired amount of free potential energy W in the asymmetric collecting system (on those pinned charges q) that one requires, by the simple equation W = Vq. If we do not allow any current from the external circuit and load to flow back through the dipolar voltage source, then all we continually need from the source is the voltage V itself. That can and will be sustained indefinitely by the source. Freely! Forever!

“Static voltage” is actually a dynamic set of ongoing bidirectional EM energy flows (longitudinal waves), as rigorously shown by Whittaker in 1903 {65}. Hence so-called “static” voltage will indeed flow (without doing work) onto a “statically connected” collection circuit containing pinned charges q, “potentializing” that receiving circuit so that stored potential energy W = Vq appears in it.

This “statically potentialized” (excited) collection circuit is then separated from the static voltage source. The gap left by the disconnected primary static source is recompleted (say, by a resistor and diode in series across the gap) as a separate external circuit and system, and then this separated circuit’s freely collected EM potential energy is dissipated in its loads to power them. This results in delivering a fixed amount of free power to the loads to power them, completely independently of the primary static source (the electrosphere, in this example) {66}. Any convenient and very cheap static voltage source can be substituted.

This type of asymmetric system and circuitry is a part of the Heaviside model equations that Lorentz {59} deliberately discarded in 1892 by arbitrarily symmetrizing the equations for the specific purpose of eliminating all such systems, insuring that electrical engineers build only COP<1.0 power systems insofar as taking the energy from the local vacuum potential is concerned. Since then, EEs have always built and used only symmetrized power systems, thus directly generating the world’s present energy crisis.

Rapid and Decisive Solution of the World Energy Crisis


Two things;
1) Lasersaber has an electrostatic engine that he can run from a kite...
 (and prior videos)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMK0dEKWJdY
2) igor muniz just posted a 'long runner'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPiUSCQIKC4


Built it in a sim... works pretty interesting; not sure if I really grasp it but...

Longrunner model

to start; reset, close the ground switch, close the power switch, open the ground switch, open the power switch.  Output is in the center in watts.... it's got a long wind down.  I added ressitances; {Without resistance, the parts beheave as their ideal part, so if one needs a complete model, addtional parts need to be added for the characteristics... otherwise, without resistance, something like 18KW was the input.... for lots of pulses of 18W.... added a loss resistor in circuit, which helps stabilize it)
... basically if it was given a impulse of high voltage it would run a long time....

Offline elementSix

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 349
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20449 on: December 29, 2013, 05:32:07 AM »
Its a static energy for sure.  Think of running a cloth down a plastic pipe for a static charge.  Except you are using a combined positive and negative energy together, running a single impulse down a copper wire with resistance and diode to keep it from spreading out and ruining the static formation.  I would use HV pots to adjust the rise and tail of the impulse.  That could help the output. Steven Mark used bailing wire on one of his 4" TPU's.  I wounder if the resistance and magnetism of the steal wire can magnify the output?...hint hint?   or maybe he just used it to hold it together, which would be dumb.  If you run this lightning energy into a bank of batteries and use a converter, you could have no problems running cpu's and tv's.  The batteries might help change that static energy into useable for our tech. society.  I did an experiment using two wall transformers with a bridge rect. off one and run it thru a cap and connected one side directly to the other transformer and ran the other side thru a few neo magnets that i stacked so as to quench the spark gap.  Without the neo's I couldn't hope to create a spark gap but with them I could hold the wire at certain areas one the magnets and get a large ball of sparks and by holding it at different distances from the magnets I could get more out than in.  I had the second transformer running to at antenna and the other thru a cap. with one side to ground.  I would touch the ant. and the ground with my arm and run the wire to certain parts of the neos and I would get a large electrocution from the ground wire and ant. wires.  Its very primitive I know but I was just messing around.  The input was 12V from rectifier.  Which I could never get a shock from.  I didnt measure anything, cause I was just trying different magnets for use with a spark quenching.  It is the basic same thing that magnacoaster does.

I was thinking of what akula used for his newer device.  I think Wesley said he used one transistor.  What if he used a square wave to drive that on and off, like 10 or 20 time a second.  would it be that easy.  10Hz driving his device but not ac, just make and breaks with the positive on constantly with the diodes and resister and spark gap between them.  Any thoughts that is what he is doing.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20449 on: December 29, 2013, 05:32:07 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Cap-Z-ro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20450 on: December 29, 2013, 05:54:06 AM »
Once again it seems about time for a few words from Ed Leedskalnin:


" I made a lot more electricity with steel than I ever made with copper."


Regards...



Offline Haan

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20451 on: December 29, 2013, 10:44:27 AM »
ElementSix: Thanks for the info.
I too am working with Tesla switching methods.
100 years later and they are still the best.
Look at the ignition patent 1896. It will help you.

What is the patent number?.

Read what Tesla says about discharge from circuit of high self induction into a circuit of low self induction.
In another patent Tesla's smart enough to use an electric motor as part of both the switching and inductive loop. The benefit is that if the motor stops you don't get a short because the inductive loop moves the Tesla switch on. (Ozone patent).
I use it and it works.

What is the patent number?.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20451 on: December 29, 2013, 10:44:27 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Grumage

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1114
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20452 on: December 29, 2013, 02:09:11 PM »

Offline Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20453 on: December 29, 2013, 06:30:25 PM »
Connecting some dots ...

Dot #1:

Quote from: T. E. Bearden
if an EFTV inventor really “has it” and knows what he is doing, then all he has to do is run down to Radio Shack, get some standard parts (fitted to the “self-enforced symmetrical system” case only) and whomp them together, and then he’s ready to put his system or systems directly into production and marketing. That entire prevailing viewpoint is a colossal joke. If it were that simple, our sharp young doctoral candidates and post doctoral scientists at our leading universities would have done all this about 80 years ago. They didn’t, and they haven’t done it since then either.

That statement sounds as if at least one »out of the ordinary« asymmetrical electronic component is needed in order to get a COP>1.0 EM system. Now what about an asymmetrical capacitor? An asymmetrical capacitor like this one perhaps, consisting of an aluminum foil and a thin wire. It is called a EHD thruster and works due to the Biefeld–Brown effect.

Dot #2:

T K was looking into FE from a young age with three childhood friends. The three became physicists, he became an architect.
The three physicists are now dead. Maybe now you will understand Wesley's cryptic message about a fairy story. TK was also looking into anti - gravity.

So, TK was looking into anti-gravity? Isn't it interesting that a EHD thruster (which works with high voltage and is in fact an asymmetrical capacitor) creates something like anti-gravity? Even if it is not real anti-gravity (not sure about that), it seems that experimenting with it led TK to his FE device.

Dot #3:

My money is on a coil capacitor.
The one thing that has been bothering me is the lightweight construction of his devices.
We now have lightweight power supplies and phone battery chargers.
Common denominator? capacitors. My money's on capacitive induction with the coil shaped like a toroid or doughnut.
Anyway Tariel makes his mistake. He shows us a section of it. It looks like it's made of copper.
That would explain his metal working equipment.
In discussions with me he always said that he would have to make one component himself.
That is the secret.

OK, what about an asymmetrical capacitor NACAP made of copper as »the self-made secret«? Wouldn't that be a nice candidate? :)

Therefore: We should look for an electronic part »so simple you'd laugh« but nevertheless not available at Radio Shack.

And yes, we should strictly avoid sparking and arcing because this would draw an unwanted current from our high voltage source.


Regards

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20453 on: December 29, 2013, 06:30:25 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3949
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20454 on: December 29, 2013, 06:49:52 PM »
Zeitmaschine


He he he ... tell us when your circut would escape due to antigravity effect  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Offline Farmhand

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1583
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20455 on: December 29, 2013, 07:25:23 PM »
Convert Static Voltage to Any Amount of Electrical Power Required

Program I will be the conversion of a static voltage (available world wide) from a simple static source to furnish (freely) any amount of electrical power desired. It is simple and very cheap to provide a static voltage source—indeed, one may take the necessary “source static voltage” directly from the earth-electrosphere vertical voltage gradient anywhere and everywhere on Earth. This “charged earth-to-electrosphere” voltage gradient averages about 300,000 volts {64}. When standing, its voltage difference between one’s head and one’s foot may thus reach about 250 volts or even more.

As a “source” for the proper asymmetric circuit or system, a static voltage can be made to potentialize the charges in a briefly-connected external circuit (or a great number of them) without drawing current.

The freely-potentialized external circuit can then be disconnected from the source (with circuit charges still pinned and zero current), and its gap recompleted (as, e.g., by adding a diode and a resistor in series, with the diode oriented in the “current pumped around the loop” direction). This makes the freely potentialized external circuit complete again, but as a separate system entirely separated from the original static voltage source.

Once the separated external circuit is recompleted, its charges are allowed to come unpinned and current will flow in it, powering the load while the freely-potentialized circuit dissipates its potential energy. Then the process is iterated; the gap is re-opened and the static source is reconnected with the charges again pinned, to again freely potentialize the external circuit.

So one potentializes freely and statically with original source connected, and then dissipates the collected excess potential energy dynamically and separately from the original source.

In this manner the static voltage source will iteratively furnish all the electrical power in a specific circuit that one wishes, literally without limit, and without having to do work just to continue having the source. If one uses only voltage input from the static voltage source to one’s external circuit, then no change in the source’s static voltage occurs, because no current flows from or through it, and hence no electrical power is drawn from it or used to destroy it.

Use of a static voltage source in this current-free fashion is beyond simply repeating the WW II use of the known difference of potential (between a jungle treetop and the earth’s surface) to draw sufficient power (both current and voltage) to power a small radio in the South Pacific. There the troops used only the standard symmetric EM circuit, which has to draw power (both voltage and current) from the earth-electrosphere voltage difference source utilized and thus has to do work in getting the radios powered.

The overall power that can be drawn directly from a segment of the static earth-electrosphere capacitor’s voltage and charge is very small, but if one draws only voltage (with dq/dt = 0) and uses the proper asymmetric circuitry to collect and flow (shuttle) that voltage onto pinned charges q in a collecting circuit, then one can take and use just the voltage. Using this free static voltage to potentialize the external circuit will produce the desired amount of free potential energy W in the asymmetric collecting system (on those pinned charges q) that one requires, by the simple equation W = Vq. If we do not allow any current from the external circuit and load to flow back through the dipolar voltage source, then all we continually need from the source is the voltage V itself. That can and will be sustained indefinitely by the source. Freely! Forever!

“Static voltage” is actually a dynamic set of ongoing bidirectional EM energy flows (longitudinal waves), as rigorously shown by Whittaker in 1903 {65}. Hence so-called “static” voltage will indeed flow (without doing work) onto a “statically connected” collection circuit containing pinned charges q, “potentializing” that receiving circuit so that stored potential energy W = Vq appears in it.

This “statically potentialized” (excited) collection circuit is then separated from the static voltage source. The gap left by the disconnected primary static source is recompleted (say, by a resistor and diode in series across the gap) as a separate external circuit and system, and then this separated circuit’s freely collected EM potential energy is dissipated in its loads to power them. This results in delivering a fixed amount of free power to the loads to power them, completely independently of the primary static source (the electrosphere, in this example) {66}. Any convenient and very cheap static voltage source can be substituted.

This type of asymmetric system and circuitry is a part of the Heaviside model equations that Lorentz {59} deliberately discarded in 1892 by arbitrarily symmetrizing the equations for the specific purpose of eliminating all such systems, insuring that electrical engineers build only COP<1.0 power systems insofar as taking the energy from the local vacuum potential is concerned. Since then, EEs have always built and used only symmetrized power systems, thus directly generating the world’s present energy crisis.

Rapid and Decisive Solution of the World Energy Crisis

If a capacitor is charged from the atmospheric potential then there was a current that took place when it was charged. Then when the capacitor is discharged through the load there is current again. Any capacitor that is charged is the result of a flow of charges which is current. No current means no flow of charge which means no energy.

It is the energy density that make atmospheric systems difficult, the current to charge the capacitor from the atmospheric potential is feeble so the actual energy able to be utilized is limited in that way.

...

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20455 on: December 29, 2013, 07:25:23 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20456 on: December 29, 2013, 09:45:25 PM »
Any capacitor that is charged is the result of a flow of charges which is current. No current means no flow of charge which means no energy.

Charging by induction? Current flows only from ground not from the (not connected) static HV source.

Thinking asymmetrically: Is this another asymmetrical capacitor? One plate brass the other steel and a coil between. So is that TK motor an asymmetrical LC circuit perhaps? And why is it that Steven Mark was going through that trouble with his power unit in making it toroidal shaped? There are obviously no wires in that toroid as one can see when it is cut apart. Hence this is not a toroidal shaped coil, but what we can see by looking at the cross-section is that it is composed of some different materials which could work as an asymmetrical capacitor. Inclusive the electrical tape outside isolating the high voltage connected to that capacitor. And as it seems the TPU is still working although a piece is cut out of it.

Hence, happy asym-cap building ... :D
(thanks to T. E. Bearden)

Offline a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1613
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20457 on: December 29, 2013, 11:49:58 PM »
What is the patent number?.

What is the patent number?.

568177


609250

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2910
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20458 on: December 30, 2013, 02:15:00 AM »
Connecting some dots ...

Dot #1:

That statement sounds as if at least one »out of the ordinary« asymmetrical electronic component is needed in order to get a COP>1.0 EM system. Now what about an asymmetrical capacitor? An asymmetrical capacitor like this one perhaps, consisting of an aluminum foil and a thin wire. It is called a EHD thruster and works due to the Biefeld–Brown effect.

Dot #2:

So, TK was looking into anti-gravity? Isn't it interesting that a EHD thruster (which works with high voltage and is in fact an asymmetrical capacitor) creates something like anti-gravity? Even if it is not real anti-gravity (not sure about that), it seems that experimenting with it led TK to his FE device.

Dot #3:

OK, what about an asymmetrical capacitor NACAP made of copper as »the self-made secret«? Wouldn't that be a nice candidate? :)

Therefore: We should look for an electronic part »so simple you'd laugh« but nevertheless not available at Radio Shack.

And yes, we should strictly avoid sparking and arcing because this would draw an unwanted current from our high voltage source.


Regards

do not forget to look at page 11 as well.


http://www.distinti.com/docs/the_secrets_of_qvxb.pdf




Wesley

Offline pepsimaxzu

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20459 on: December 30, 2013, 03:31:19 PM »
i think the key is in 2004 vid. but i cant found any translated video.

in TK motor i totaly agree with mister jbignes5. this motor based on fig 17 on this page:
http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1892-02-03.htm

 

OneLink