Language:
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.
 Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here: https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

Custom Search

### Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 15827651 times)

#### Zeitmaschine

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1267
##### Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20025 on: November 06, 2013, 12:57:25 PM »
Wikipedia: »A Faraday cage is best understood as an approximation to an ideal hollow conductor. Externally or internally applied electromagnetic fields produce forces on the charge carriers (usually electrons) within the conductor; the charges are redistributed accordingly (that is, electric currents are generated). Once the charges have rearranged so as to cancel the applied field inside, the currents stop.«

»If the cage is grounded, the excess charges will go to the ground instead of the outer face, so the inner face and the inner charge will cancel each other out and the rest of the cage will retain a neutral charge.«

What is the meaning of this?

In a (completely closed) Faraday cage there is no electric field. The Earth's electric field surrounds that cage but it isn't inside that cage. The cage is empty.

1) Now we open that cage (by removing its walls).
2) The Earth's electric field can now flow into the space of that former cage.
3) We close that cage so again there is no electric field inside.

Question: Where did the electric field go that was in the space of that cage while the cage was open?
Answer: It was converted into an electric current (going to the ground) when the cage was closed.

Therefore, if we have a Faraday cage and we open and close it in rapid succession (high frequency) then we should be able to generate a continuous ground current of noticeable magnitude. So -as I see this- simply closing and opening a Faraday cage will convert the electric field (of the Earth) to an electric current which can be used to drive a load.

Thus the next question: How to open and close a Faraday cage automatically without using a lot of energy in order to do this?

Hmmm ....

#### anandml

• Full Member
• Posts: 107
##### Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20026 on: November 06, 2013, 01:34:20 PM »
@Zeitmaschine OK fine. I have one doubt whether your assumption may applicable in Tk's Aquarium device because it is totally insulated....

#### captainkt

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 262
##### Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20027 on: November 06, 2013, 02:04:55 PM »
@Zeit, I think you should look at the inside of a capacitor as inside of faraday cage more like Don Smith Idea. High frequency-capacitor-Earth. To me that would make more sense as most devices do not seem to use a faraday cage as far as I can see.
Regards
Keith

#### Zeitmaschine

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1267
##### Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20028 on: November 06, 2013, 03:20:25 PM »
Suggestion to electrically disable a Faraday Cage

»You can't disable a cage, but you might be able to make a switchable "leak" in the cage.

You might need to do some fancy shielding around the hole and switch, to prevent leakage when the switch is off.«

Hmmm ....

Is that shielding around the hole fancy enough?

#### jbignes5

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1281
##### Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20029 on: November 06, 2013, 03:48:55 PM »
Yes, it is pressurized, but we need an unpressurized room to let the pressure flow in. And we have to assure that this unpressurized room stays unpressurized. Hence the idea with that pumping is to constantly pump out the room (by consuming the energy in it) so the flow from the outside keeps coming in.
Can I build my own device after watching this (instructable) video, or is this just another small talk to keep people busy?
Thinking more ... What does it matter if the electric field around the Earth changes with elevation?

If it is not the electric field, what field is it then?

The magnetic field? The gravitational field? Or the mysterious Aether?

The unpresurized room is inside the ground. This is the sink. All we are doing is injecting a conduit into the lack of pressure or vacuum of the earth and using that form of negative pressure to pull in the field around the earth.

300kv Ionosphere
------------------------ (Pressure)
.
.
.
.
.
.
-------------  0 v surface (balanced)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.-----    -300kv core   (Vacuum)

What goes in the Earth is distributed evenly across the Vacuum and converted to a magnetic field+heat by the core ferrite crystal. This crystal grows like Ice does. It expands exactly the same. This crystal is made much like diamonds are made through enormous heat and pressure. Except in this case carbon is not the composition of this crystal it is molten Iron. The patterns we see on the surface of our earth of lay lines is guided by the formation of this crystal and is locked onto the suns magnetic influence via the poles. Since there is a viscous fluid of molten material between the core crystal and mantle there is some slippage and this continues the heat generation as well. The expansion of the heated material creates a pressure of it's own and this is volcanic activity we see.

Now to get back to the point I was making. The out flow of magnetic field is caused by the electric field that this mass creates when exposed to the vast electric field of the sun. Both inside and outside because nature always seeks a balance. The balance point is the surface due to static laws and the inside is negative and the outside is positive because of this Yin and Yang type of mechanism. The positive aspect is reinforced by the sun's output of positive electric field. It is the very same process we see here on earth but very much bigger in scope. The Solar wind is telling of the flow that is created. But that in your face proof as another inward direction. We see it as gravity but that is just the effect we see and not the total makeup of the flow structure. There are many aspects to the flow. Take all radiation that is emitted by the sun and it should neatly equal the negative potential inside of the sun. And as we have a graduating field going out of our planet so does the sun and so does every large body in our solar system, just varying in strength the further you go from the sun.

When you have an open capacitor what happens when you increase the space between the plates?

The potential(voltage) difference increases right? Hmmm...

Here is an interesting question. How much does the Earth weigh? From space it weighs NOTHING. Weight is a matter of perspective and so is a potential difference.

Now you are asking yourself what does this all have to do with these types of devices.... Well if we do not understand the system we live in then how can we design a way to take advantage of that system. This is the fundamental problem we have. We focus too much and too closely to the system we live in to see that energy could be harvested from the larger system and used any way we choose through the mechanism Tesla designed in the transmission of energy. I now understand this better. Do you? I now realize that he was right in designing a transmission system of the scope he thought about. All of his energy was trying to take an already established flow and harnessing it to enable us to live without toil. In Tesla's case and perspective he was dealing with Niagra Falls. From our point of view a better system would be to deal with the EARTH and the flow I just detailed. If we increase the flow into our planet then we would see vast changes in our environment. It would strengthen the magnetic field through that process as well and this would increase our protection from the radiation of space and the sun. Major storms would stop and our planet would become livable again. Plus we would be able to get huge amounts of energy from this method as well.

All of this other crap is just that. CRAP. They hold back valuable information to try to extort money from us. Why? TK is one of the worst offenders. Although Akula is more forth coming I don't think he is being honest with us.

The inverter-battery loop is a way to get apparent power but it is doing this in a very active method. Creating a higher voltage field has it's issues if it is based on AC or RF technology. The agitation on our cells can be very harmful and especially at 50-60 hz. The emf field at that level is affecting our mentality and most people will break mentally in High emf situations. Impulse Technology has no such affect on us if it is above 2k cycles. In fact Tesla reported great effects on the human including a feeling of well being, healing properties, spontaneous light production, hot and cool breezes and most importantly an increase in the focusing ability of the mind. This is because it is an energizing field. It does not have a forced back and forth agitation. The avramenko plug is a way to tap this field for work in our systems that we currently have. It allows a circular flow to develop and a DC like current is created from that loop. This energy is seen in one wire applications and has been experimented with for quite some time. We have the means to do this. Others have already done the work but since they are holding us hostage we have to do this on our own.

This is my last plea. I will be absent for quite some time till I can put this all together and experiment with it. I suggest that you do the same.

#### captainkt

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 262
##### Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20030 on: November 06, 2013, 03:53:38 PM »
@Zeit,I think it is just a soldered tag and nothing special, also the copper box does not leave much room in side itself due to the row of either transistors or diodes circling the lower half, which also have to be wired up I guess inside. The switch that is flicked to get spark going is the other side just out of your picture.
Regards
Keith

#### baroutologos

• Hero Member
• Posts: 918
##### Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20031 on: November 06, 2013, 04:37:15 PM »
Wikipedia: »A Faraday cage is best understood as an approximation to an ideal hollow conductor. Externally or internally applied electromagnetic fields produce forces on the charge carriers (usually electrons) within the conductor; the charges are redistributed accordingly (that is, electric currents are generated). Once the charges have rearranged so as to cancel the applied field inside, the currents stop.«
Thus the next question: How to open and close a Faraday cage automatically without using a lot of energy in order to do this?
Hmmm ....

#### stivep

• Hero Member
• Posts: 3544
##### Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20032 on: November 06, 2013, 05:10:20 PM »
one side or opening from the faraday box is a ferrite that is your valve.

Quote
Wesley:
(as magnetic field and any current is associated with electric one (creating electromagnetic one), at 90 degrees both are inseparable in energy transfer).

Note:
( steady state magnets are used to accelerate electrons in  accelerators...... do they give out any energy  at all- no they not.?)

or
ferrite rod inside box

or

Tesla coil with rod inside,
what is the sides of coil? metal? cage?

so what that you have opening from up and down.

electrostatic field does shielding.

Well with  faraday box it would be better as less energy needed to open the valve.

Wesley

#### a.king21

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1653
##### Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20033 on: November 06, 2013, 05:11:29 PM »
Thank you Akula.

#### a.king21

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1653
##### Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20034 on: November 06, 2013, 05:27:48 PM »

In a (completely closed) Faraday cage there is no electric field. The Earth's electric field surrounds that cage but it isn't inside that cage. The cage is empty.

1) Now we open that cage (by removing its walls).
2) The Earth's electric field can now flow into the space of that former cage.
3) We close that cage so again there is no electric field inside.

Question: Where did the electric field go that was in the space of that cage while the cage was open?
Answer: It was converted into an electric current (going to the ground) when the cage was closed.

Therefore, if we have a Faraday cage and we open and close it in rapid succession (high frequency) then we should be able to generate a continuous ground current of noticeable magnitude. So -as I see this- simply closing and opening a Faraday cage will convert the electric field (of the Earth) to an electric current which can be used to drive a load.

Thus the next question: How to open and close a Faraday cage automatically without using a lot of energy in order to do this?

Hmmm ....

Use a rotary Tesla switch.
Cost of switch:- 2 aa batteries.
Switching ability: hundreds of killowatts.
Cost of manufacture: 1 pound from the pound shop or 1 dollar from the dollar shop.

#### Hoppy

• Hero Member
• Posts: 4135
##### Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20035 on: November 06, 2013, 06:29:51 PM »

Use a rotary Tesla switch.
Cost of switch:- 2 aa batteries.
Switching ability: hundreds of killowatts.
Cost of manufacture: 1 pound from the pound shop or 1 dollar from the dollar shop.

LOL

#### Acca

• Hero Member
• Posts: 563
##### Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20036 on: November 06, 2013, 09:29:35 PM »

Wesley, Roman,    Thanks  !!!

The Ferrite Anomaly Solved.

Electron activity constitutes circular charge flow around the coil;  this generates an alternating electro-magnetic field within the ferrite rod;  which subsequently energises and aligns the unpaired electron spin gyros within the ferrite.  Hence a ferrite does no more than concentrate the alternating magnetic field, as generated by photon induced electron flow within the coil, into aligned electron spins within the ferrite, and via its concentrating permeability, 'Q' magnifies the voltage transduced by the coil with an improved circuit efficiency through phase shifted oscillation of resonant energy exchange

Ferrites are not magnetised by any magnetic component of electromagnetic radiation, and the coil is the only provider of external alternating magnetic field lines entering the ferrite. And thus inducing an electron spin coupling within the ferrite, then the electron spin alignments within the ferrite.

When a coil is wound over a ferrite it does not matter whether that winding is electrically energised by a radio-frequency signal generator or via electromagnetic radiation;  either way there will exist an associated alternation of magnetic field lines entering the ferrite.

We can imagine half toroidal (doughnut like) shaped field lines coming up from outside of the coil winding, rolling over the coil end and linking into the end of the ferrite rod.  As before these coil induced magnetic field lines must generate related electron spins around them within the ferrite, these being concentrated where the external field lines turn around to enter the end of the rod just inside of the edge of the coil.  Now at the end of a rod these coil induced electron-spins within the ferrite are axial, and hence electrons possess the same direction of angular rotation as those within the ferrite just inside of the coil winding, however, they are all alternating at radio-frequency, and have greatest intensity and alignment closest to the wire coil turns.

Thus any magnetically induced alternating electron spins at the outside edge ends of a ferrite rod cored inductor, cannot fail but to parasitically induce a 'Q' reducing central vortex of counter directional electron spin interference from the end, and into, the centre axis of the rod within the winding.

Hence any ferrite rod physically 'too long' with respect to the desired frequency of operation or the length of resonant coil wound upon it, simply cannot homogeneously develop co-axial electron spins (magnetic domains).

Also any 'too thick' a ferrite rod will parasitically energise its own axial end interference vortex zones due to centre electron orbits becoming spin reversed and increasingly lossy with increasing frequency with respect to those which are more strongly energised and aligned by the alternating electromagnetic field lines entering the rod around the outer end and edge much closer to the field generated by coil winding itself.

(1) at medium/high frequencies do not use a ferrite core very much longer than the coil overwind itself;
(2) obviate the development of an energy sapping axial interference vortex by using a hollow ferrite;
(3) wind a larger diameter of tuned coil in order to increase the alignments of photon transduction activated electron orbits within the hollow ferrite.
A 100mm long ferrite core Inductor having a much larger diameter and longer coil than is usual in order to increase field/ photon transduction.

The spin precessing are like little gyroscopes due to resonantly alternating energy oscillating between the charge on the tuning capacitor plates acting upon electron motion, and thus their orbital alignment, via the tuned winding induced alternating magnetic field, such that that magnetic field (acting just like gravitity does upon the spinning mass of a gyroscope) attempts to topple electron orbit spins within the ferrite, first one way and then the other.  Thus I could imagine the axes of electrons spin precessing within the ferrite sleeve instead of linearly oscillating like a pendulum would though zero, with the electron orbits gyroscopically storing plus returning more energy, and that gyroscopic electron orbit precession possibly becoming an alternating magnetic wave, which could explain the very high degree of resonant field amplification quite literally generated around these ferrite hollow cores…

After reading these pages above and realising (or experiencing via construction as so many people already are) what it is we have all been cheated out of for so long, you might better understand my stated disdain.

There are no 'transverse magnetic-voltage field' components associated with the propagation of electromagnetic radiation, and magnetic fields are the result of electron motion;  also magnets or materials rendered magnetic via magnetic field lines passing through them, as may be induced by electron flow though a coil overwind, are concentrations of aligned atomic sized electron spin orbits, which when acting in the same sense throughout a body of magnetised material are effectively - electron gyroscopes.

For I believe the certificated 'Professionals' have been wilfully duplicitous, and won't come clean until we point out that keeping the real theories as if 'Official Secrets' and thus away from those of us who pay their wages and pensions, is both dishonest and disrespectful of the whole of humanity.  What is so difficult about speaking the Truth?

• Full Member
• Posts: 159
##### Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20037 on: November 06, 2013, 09:37:09 PM »
Thank you Сергей В, but is this schemathic from the author of the device? (I don't think so)
By the way, who is the author of the device?

Dann

http://realstrannik.ru/forum/temy-atom/134569-qgenerator-na-nelinejnoj-induktivnostiq-rekonstrukcziya-sxemy-i-pechatnoj-platy.html?start=288

• Full Member
• Posts: 159
##### Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20038 on: November 06, 2013, 09:41:29 PM »
Hi Zeitmaschine! Where did you get that schematic from?

Dann

And fish cannot feel earthquake under the water.
Maybe it is that one:

#### verpies

• Hero Member
• Posts: 3473
##### Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #20039 on: November 06, 2013, 10:18:34 PM »
The Ferrite Anomaly Solved.
...and have greatest intensity and alignment closest to the wire coil turns.
Do you have any illustrations or diagrams to go along with your essay?
e.g. such as the one below: