Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16505302 times)

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #18120 on: July 11, 2013, 02:50:29 PM »
Wesley

Can you email guy in China and determine if he is using MOT transformer or any HV HF transformer near motors?
I don't believe he is but please ask him.

Thanks
DonL
the guy from China is not the performer  in video.He lives in mountains and he is waiting  for lab instruments now. That is all I know.
I have never  expected that Chinese will pay any interest to myself personally :)


Wesley

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #18121 on: July 11, 2013, 04:00:08 PM »
Using a microwave oven transformer that I had milled the weld from to separate the windings.
I'd like to see how you milled the Microwave Oven Transformer (MOT) !!!

I placed this in close proximity to one of the motors and Presto, it ran even without a kick start. So, to conclude, I think that there is a directed alternating EM field not too far away, but far enough so that a kick is needed.
How far does the MOT need to be in order for the motor to start by itself?
...and how far to rotate with a "kick-start" ?

Also, does the orientation angle of the MOT relative to the motor/motors affect their behavior much?
Finally, was anything connected to the motor's windings when you did your experiments?

I think there would also be sufficient induction to light a bulb as well.
Did you try? At what distance between the MOT and the motor was the bulb lit at full brightness ?

Finally I also thought that if the footage was from different sources, how come the light bulb was the very same? Even down to the insulation tape!! :)
Stevep merely wrote that those two videos, he was referring to, were made by the same person but on different tables and bases.

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #18122 on: July 11, 2013, 04:04:08 PM »
    " [size=78%]Bohr realized that when an electron falls in towards the atomic nucleus it will lose[/size]
energy to radiation and become captured in different distinct orbits where the
frequency, energy and velocity of each orbit are determined by Plank’s constant
h. Thus, the energy of atomic orbits became quantized. "   And may I add it's momentum has been increased by the fall.  The particle was accelerated therefore it's mass/velocity increased.  Inertia was transferred from the nucleus to the electron.   This increase in momentum becomes apparent when the captured electron is freed and doesn't fall back into the nucleus but results in inelastic collisions in a target of negatively charged mass.   This randomly occurs in cathode ray tubes.   The electrons are donated by the grid metal.   The electric field extends through the grid and accelerates the free electrons from the grid to the phosphorescent coatings on the anode.  This malfunction of the picture tube is usually due to transient spikes showing up in the signal.   The grid becomes a free electron source and the electrons are accelerated by the cathode anode field.  The transient not only free's the electron from the bulk of the metal it accelerates it away from the bulk.   This allows the accelerating field between anode and cathode to increase the free electron inertia that then deaccelerates in the anode metal.   This emits hard xrays that are transparent to the flurescent coatings and bombard the viewer with ionizing radiation.

dllabarre

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 750
    • Portal Page
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #18123 on: July 11, 2013, 06:02:58 PM »
 ;D

Grumage

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1113
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #18124 on: July 11, 2013, 09:39:18 PM »
I'd like to see how you milled the Microwave Oven Transformer (MOT) !!!
How far does the MOT need to be in order for the motor to start by itself?
...and how far to rotate with a "kick-start" ?

Also, does the orientation angle of the MOT relative to the motor/motors affect their behavior much?
Finally, was anything connected to the motor's windings when you did your experiments?
Did you try? At what distance between the MOT and the motor was the bulb lit at full brightness ?
Stevep merely wrote that those two videos, he was referring to, were made by the same person but on different tables and bases.

Dear Verpies.

A gauntlet thrown, and picked up!!

First question answered here.............http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MdCkLMEv2E&feature=youtu.be

Second question. The motor has to be almost touching the core to self start and about an inch (25mm) for a kick. And yes the orientation is critical, I made sure that the center core and one of the outer limbs was facing the longtitudinal sections of one of the motors.

Now your final questions are a little harder to answer. I have noted that the 0.5 micro farad capacitor is not needed but the motors run up to speed quicker when conected. I am able to light a 60 W bulb but it is not bright.

As you and I am sure many others will be aware once the top is cut off the transformer it's AC impedance is greatly altered. I can only apply in bursts before the coil gets too hot, but I can get the motors spinning with just 75 Vac applied to the primary of the MOV transformer.

What I set out to prove is that a mutual coupling is possible but what method used, is open to conjecture! As is the wrapped up light bulb!! I know you like rigourous experiment. I also understand that for me to just say something to be taken as red would not sit well with you!! :) So I know where you are coming from!!

Finally, I am sorry I misunderstood Wesly's post, that is why I made the statement regarding the "very suspect" 60 watt light bulb!!

I hope you like the little video? Milling was performed on my 1930's 1 and a 1/2 ton  Knight Jig Borer made in the good old US of A.

Cheers Grum.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #18125 on: July 11, 2013, 09:51:20 PM »
    " Bohr realized that when an electron falls in towards the atomic nucleus it will lose
energy to radiation and become captured in different distinct orbits where the
frequency, energy and velocity of each orbit are determined by Plank’s constant
h. Thus, the energy of atomic orbits became quantized. "   And may I add it's momentum has been increased by the fall.  The particle was accelerated therefore it's mass/velocity increased.  Inertia was transferred from the nucleus to the electron.   This increase in momentum becomes apparent when the captured electron is freed and doesn't fall back into the nucleus but results in inelastic collisions in a target of negatively charged mass.   This randomly occurs in cathode ray tubes.   The electrons are donated by the grid metal.   The electric field extends through the grid and accelerates the free electrons from the grid to the phosphorescent coatings on the anode.  This malfunction of the picture tube is usually due to transient spikes showing up in the signal.   The grid becomes a free electron source and the electrons are accelerated by the cathode anode field.  The transient not only free's the electron from the bulk of the metal it accelerates it away from the bulk.   This allows the accelerating field between anode and cathode to increase the free electron inertia that then deaccelerates in the anode metal.   This emits hard xrays that are transparent to the flurescent coatings and bombard the viewer with ionizing radiation.


Let me rephrase it:

Quote
when an electron falls in towards the atomic nucleus  it will lose energy to radiation and become captured in different distinct orbits where thefrequency, energy and velocity of each orbit are determined by Plank’s constant
h. Thus, the energy of atomic orbits became quantized.
Yes   but ask yourself  why?
That must be something causing it to fall.( energy  lose is  always the manifest of  fall down)




Quote
It's momentum has been increased by the fall.  The particle was accelerated therefore it's
mass speed and velocity
Quote
increased.




 
Quote
Inertia was transferred from the nucleus to the electron.
no it was not if the speed  of acceleration is higher than attraction force of nucleus than electrons can bombard nucleus and exchange of energy is  than much more interesting.


 
Quote
This increase in momentum becomes apparent when the captured electron is freed and doesn't fall back into the nucleus but results in inelastic collisions in a target of negatively charged mass.


NO it not always take this path.
If energy of electron  now is causing not fall back but fly out than it can happened say due to the reason. and that reason might be external x-ray( xrf,edxrf, electron dispersion) neutron bombardment,
proton bombardment


atomic level of matter (molecules and atoms) and the subatomic (electrons, protons, and even smaller particles).
the simultaneous wave-like and particle-like behavior of both matter and radiation energy, is described in the wave–particle duality.


1.whenever electron under external influence fly out  say K orbit( the closest to nucleus) its place than is immediately attractive to electrons from higher orbit( higher energy level) so one or  two or more try to rush to the empty space in K.
There is however mutual attraction  as influencing factor from nuclei  is even more tempting.( presence of protons in large number say tungsten =74 protons)and presence of large mass.
But to do so electrons must  lose energy to get to the level of K


2. And manifestation of that energy is mostly in frequency band of xray photon.( but not always)


 The running out  or catapulted  electron does it in sort of   Hertzian  ( snake like) way.


in both instances we are dealing ( not always but   for the purpose of explanation we take this scenario) with:
  photon( xray  photon) - no mass  at first that is / or might be converted to mass when influencing or say pushing out
electron  from K orbit
Than electrons(- mass particles) from higher orbit while  falling down to K lose energy in mass-less
form as photon- again mostly x-ray photon.
and we know photon is energy  with no mass

So there  you go...


despite the fact of what is going later on ----------- it is the first place  where science stay that mass= energy+ losses
where losses are/is mass and/or energy not yet converted but who cares.




My Colman uses energy of mass-less radio-waves( electromagnetic  wave) to  create mass response in the Colman Compound.
THAT IS GUYS YOUR EXPLANATION!!

the same way  as outside implemented massless xray can catapult electron from K means kinetic response into mass of electron and structure of atom and bonding forses of an atom the only  question is how much of xray.................. or how good - much less of xray  is concentrated into a beam to affect  atom. The interesting fact is that  ejected electron does it at certain  angle of incident. :)


but  science? ??? ??? ??? ?? throw them  Colman in front  of their eyes and they will say   that  it does not work

So anything and  everything might produce x-ray in energy exchange process.






  This randomly occurs in cathode ray tubes.   as well as x-rays but  x-rays is more often.

 
Quote
The electrons are donated by the grid metal.
Who cares?


 
Quote
The electric field extends through the grid and accelerates the free electrons from the grid to the phosphorescent coatings on the anode.
yep in CRT.. nothing new
Actually CRT of old TV is your electron  accelerator like in big CERN and others all you need to do is to
collide it with something but not with yourself :)






     
Quote
This emits hard xrays that are transparent to the flurescent coatings and bombard the viewer with ionizing radiation.
Yes it is


Everything can be suspected to be Xray transmitter at the right condition including "radioactives" as well.
Even that small Chinese toy from my video
It is only the level of x-ray that matters.










http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/8454-i-found-gustave-le-bons-missing-book-called-synthetic-radioactivity.html
http://www.asdlib.org/onlineArticles/ecourseware/Palmer/ASDL%20Intro%20to%20XRF.pdf
 


I love this one from below it  explains so much:
http://archaeometry.missouri.edu/xrf_overview.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85peFIMURtk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=dttaxLJ4dgg&NR=1

watch  this and the  one below
X Rays - A Level Physics
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=nSivTK6Icu4&NR=1
A level Medical physics X rays - production - braking and characte
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=N32Jl0mdO2k&NR=1




by looking at this old video I wonder how much of xray is coming of tungsten light bulb at the "right" condition
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3s5HFQ2YME
and partial answer is here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=af8wnm2eGWw

You still not getting it?
Some or most of you?
Do you?

Colman is the  key to CREATION
got it?
no I think you did not


Think again:


Andrea Rossi converts in something that is  half Colman Nickel to Copper where both are fundamental particles.
And Colman is hundreds times less complicated than Rossi however is more demanding and more "moody" but is a lot more going on there.It is like to play with more  Card in your hands, or  more material to build- "whatever" in "whatever form" GOT IT?


you still did not:


think about  this:

Quote
http://www.attoworld.de/Mainpages/Home/Mission_statement/index.html

 most fundamental level electrons maintain and end life in biological systems and serve and save lifes via technical devices. Observation and control of their motion, when covering distances inside or between atoms at a speed of about thousand kilometres per second or generating brilliant X-ray and particle beams near the speed of light are our main goals. Meeting them will affect natural and life sciences and medicine and technology. This calls for a force that can exceed atomic forces in strength and be controlled on the electronic, i.e. attosecond, time scale. Our research provides this force via light with a few-cycle controlled waveform, and focuses on developing multi-octave light sources for its attosecond engineering and boosting to relativistic strengths.
This controlled light force enables us to reproducibly generate and measure isolated attosecond pulses of extreme ultraviolet and soft-X-ray light. (more…)
At high intensities, the attosecond light force can liberate electrons from their atomic binding and accelerate them to velocities approaching the speed of light within a single light oscillation period opening the door to high-field attosecond science. (more…)
We feel obliged to disseminate the knowledge and expertise we acquire and help our discipline to proliferate. (more…)





What is light?
 Light is electromagnetic wave





Wesley
« Last Edit: July 12, 2013, 03:13:57 AM by stivep »

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #18126 on: July 11, 2013, 11:10:02 PM »
A gauntlet thrown, and picked up!!
First question answered here.............http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MdCkLMEv2E&feature=youtu.be
That was mean!  I yield Sir.

Second question. ..
I'm very satisfied with all of your replies.
Gotta be curt - still traveling...

Grumage

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1113
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #18127 on: July 11, 2013, 11:38:59 PM »
I'm very satisfied with all of your replies.

Dear Verpies.

That single statement, coming from you, is all I could ask for!! :)

For me, this particular book is closed. Another volume awaits.

Best wishes to you,and all, Grum.

zcsaba77

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #18128 on: July 11, 2013, 11:47:46 PM »
First question answered here.............http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MdCkLMEv2E&feature=youtu.be

I separate it by flex cutter, and one friend veld together the 'E' and 'I'  ::), but with velding is too much free run consumption around 35-40 watts

xiaoke2727

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #18129 on: July 12, 2013, 05:59:39 AM »
大家好
卫斯理说的正确,你们看到的那段视频,作者不是我,2天前我从网上购买了4个“罩极电机”和一些其他材料,总共花费了103人民币
现在我在等待这些材料,然后复制它,就是这样


中国和美国不同,我们这里的劳动力很廉价,我从早晨7:20去上班,到下午6:00才能回家,每个月只能休息4天,每月薪水大概1000美元
而且大多数中国人的薪水,30%—40%用来偿还银行贷款,所以生活压力很大

china
Gang

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #18130 on: July 12, 2013, 08:18:14 AM »
大家好
卫斯理说的正确,你们看到的那段视频,作者不是我,2天前我从网上购买了4个“罩极电机”和一些其他材料,总共花费了103人民币
现在我在等待这些材料,然后复制它,就是这样


中国和美国不同,我们这里的劳动力很廉价,我从早晨7:20去上班,到下午6:00才能回家,每个月只能休息4天,每月薪水大概1000美元
而且大多数中国人的薪水,30%—40%用来偿还银行贷款,所以生活压力很大

china
Gang



Hello everyone
Wesley said is correct, you see that video, the author is not me, two days ago I bought four from the Internet "shaded pole motor" and some other materials, spent a total of 103 yuan
Now I'm waiting for these materials, and then copy it, that's it




China and the United States are different, our labor is very cheap here, I go to work from morning 7:20 to 6:00 pm in order to go home, rest only four days a month, the monthly salary of about $ 1,000
And most of the Chinese people's salary, 30% -40% for the repayment of bank loans, the pressure of life


china
Gang


Wesley

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #18131 on: July 12, 2013, 11:07:27 AM »
Gotta stick to science though.
« Last Edit: July 12, 2013, 02:46:18 PM by verpies »

Grumage

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1113
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #18132 on: July 12, 2013, 12:47:16 PM »
大家好
卫斯理说的正确,你们看到的那段视频,作者不是我,2天前我从网上购买了4个“罩极电机”和一些其他材料,总共花费了103人民币
现在我在等待这些材料,然后复制它,就是这样


中国和美国不同,我们这里的劳动力很廉价,我从早晨7:20去上班,到下午6:00才能回家,每个月只能休息4天,每月薪水大概1000美元
而且大多数中国人的薪水,30%—40%用来偿还银行贷款,所以生活压力很大

china
Gang

Dear all.

This post has really made my blood boil! This poor chap has been " duped" into wasting hard earned money on a scam, clearly placed by a prankster!!

There should be a law against it!!

Cheers Grum.

zcsaba77

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #18133 on: July 12, 2013, 12:54:49 PM »
In the old-times, the masters had to feed, clothe and house the slaves,
now the economic-slaves have to feed, clothe and house themselves,

...and be happy that the banksters gave them the loan and let them work it off, morning to evening.
In FRB, not enough money exists to repay those loans anyway - even in theory. 
Bankruptcies and reposessions are built into the system and someone always draws the "short straw".

new generation must erase from brain LOAN!!! If I have not money for something I will never for it! Mainly after loan!

once I was in our 'dear' bank. I must order something, but they offering me 'fantastic' loan and what I have money in bank transfer to investment, because I said them I need my money I what buy a house, but they want pull to the fantastic (shit) investment, they said it is good investment I can carry out up to 10% earn (or lost all money) and I can take loan just for 26% payback (its mean if I take 10.000euros I must 'just' payback with all twice)
I look like this:  :o
and they like:  ::)
I said Thank you offer I need just my saved money (because Im not stupid)

T-1000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1738
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #18134 on: July 12, 2013, 01:01:09 PM »
大家好
卫斯理说的正确,你们看到的那段视频,作者不是我,2天前我从网上购买了4个“罩极电机”和一些其他材料,总共花费了103人民币
现在我在等待这些材料,然后复制它,就是这样


中国和美国不同,我们这里的劳动力很廉价,我从早晨7:20去上班,到下午6:00才能回家,每个月只能休息4天,每月薪水大概1000美元
而且大多数中国人的薪水,30%—40%用来偿还银行贷款,所以生活压力很大

china
Gang

It is sad to see "slavery" for banks there, half of salary just for them and another part for taxes and survival..
For MG it is worth to try playing around, it only costs very cheap expenses and some time. Also the rotor could be modified with stronger magnets for generator so it would actualy produce more power. And if to keep in mind T.Heins regenerative acceleration stuff ( http://jnaudin.free.fr/dlenz/heinseffecten.htm is one of replications) the result might be possible to get with self runner.

Cheers!