Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 15116296 times)

Offline NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5213
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16995 on: April 17, 2013, 12:40:56 AM »
   Grum and All:
   Thanks for your concern, well taken.  Yes, after I turn off my device at night the Cfls, and myself stay somewhat lit.  I know it must be some kind of decay... mental I think...

   One thing that comes to mind. The Edison battery with it's chemical compounds and metal powders goes into a Alfa/Betta/Gamma decay, which may be somewhat similar to a regular galvanic reaction. But, How would the materials in the tube (those elements) last for 70 years while putting out 10kw?  Really???  Why aren't the many battery hi-tech manufacturing plants using this technology. They don't know about it?   I don't think so...

  There definately is a polarity present from an ambient source, such as a positive and negative flux. regardless of material substance. Energy is not dependent on matter, matter is dependent of energy for its existence. Field energies, and such...
  What I'm trying to say is that this electrical output (beta decay) may not be due to the decay from the breakdown of the elements, but from the ambient that TK is also mentioning. The polarization process makes this possible, for an hour at a time, then equilibrium set in, and the process stops, until another bump charge is given. Or not?
   Yes, the yokes can also produce this same or similar effect, Barrium, or not. But do they?
  I'll repeat myself at the expense of boring all of you: All electricity comes from the ambient.  An electric generator will never run out of energy, no matter if it produces or manufactures it for a million years. Or a solar cell.  Even a galvanic reaction, is a by- product of the produced output, not the cause of it.  We are in the middle of a field of energy, That is what Tesla, Kapanadze, Moray, and many other great men have been trying to tell us, for years. It is this field that needs tapping, not the breaking down of matter.
No wonder that Tariel gets so upset.


Offline verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3480
Re: NMR Experiments. Different approach
« Reply #16996 on: April 17, 2013, 01:04:41 AM »
Present coil is 14 micro H   20 turns   on 2" dia cardboard former using    4mm squared   7 strand  PVC insulated copper wire.
With or without the copper core ?
Anyway, at 175kHz this coil will have an impedance of 15.4Ω.

I have not measured the DC resistance but I could be fairly certain it's under an ohm.
I think so, too.

I do not quite understand why you ask PDC? The output is derived from DC yes, but you have 2 mosfets in a sort of push pull. Creating what I would term AC.
Just by looking at the Y-offset knobs on your scope.  Royer oscillators often have unsymmetrical outputs because the center-tap is not in the middle of the primary and the transistor gains are unmatched.
You know your scope better, so if you're sure the output is pure AC then disregard my words about the DC offset of your waveform.

PS. Do you have a special keyboard for your electrical notation?
I use the ALT-NNNN numeric keyboard shortcuts.  If you don't know them, then you can use copy→paste with the attached text file.

Offline NETIKS

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16997 on: April 17, 2013, 01:20:57 AM »
NickZ
You need to ask Your self this question!
Where's the energy coming from!




Offline NETIKS

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16998 on: April 17, 2013, 01:33:57 AM »
NMR is the key

Offline NETIKS

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16999 on: April 17, 2013, 01:39:02 AM »

Solar flares are teleconnected to earthly radioactive decay:

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/08/23/teleconnected-solar-flares-to-earthly-radioactive-decay/

Strange, Unexplained Solar Influence Over Earth's Radioactive Material Could Herald Solar Flares

http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-08/strange-unexplained-solar-influence-over-earths-radioactive-material-could-herald-solar-flares

Offline verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3480
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #17000 on: April 17, 2013, 01:40:17 AM »
The energy can not come from nowhere!
The energy must come from somewhere!
Yup, it is much more likely it comes from particles, matter or even air, than from nothing/vacuum.

Solar flares are teleconnected to earthly radioactive decay:
I know and I even added that factoid to the Wikipedia. See here.
It is one of the pieces of evidence illustrating that nuclear decay is not as constant as mainstream physics thinks.

Offline NETIKS

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #17001 on: April 17, 2013, 01:42:38 AM »
Transmutation of elements by NMR

Offline NETIKS

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #17002 on: April 17, 2013, 01:44:03 AM »
NICE  ;)

Offline Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #17003 on: April 17, 2013, 02:10:21 AM »
NMR is the key!

This is the neutrino power from cosmic rays!

Neutrinos interact with matter when NMR is induced in some materials and that neutrinos interaction induce radiation decay in matter!

Then how to get it to work practically? :(

Offline NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5213
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #17004 on: April 17, 2013, 02:11:40 AM »
    Netiks:
    I've already answered it.  So, have others, many others. Field energies..
  Field energies, not matter. You can't have a chicken without first having the egg.
  Even suns need a source to be what they are. What is their input source???  Nothing in heaven or earth will give off eternally (comparatively)  without being replenished.
The Big Bang?  It all came from nowhere, in an instant?  Ok, Right!  Einstein never got off his butt, ever.
  Does current science satisfy your appetite?   Well, not mine.
  The only reason I mention this subject, is to try to redirect in what I feel is the proper direction.
 You don't need to believe or argue the point, the only reason that I even mention this point is due to all this talk of nuclear breakdown, decay, fusion, etz... Is this the answer that we have been looking for? Really.  No one else knows about it?
  My dear friend Wesley has not proven anything, yet. Only talks of revolution, saving the world, etz...  Isn't this a little before the fact?  Or, is he also holding out??? He says he's going to tell all, and hold back nothing. I hope so... I know we all do. 
  My little bird tells me that beta decay won't even get out of its own way. Time will tell...
 


Offline NETIKS

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #17005 on: April 17, 2013, 02:16:15 AM »
 NickZ
For Your Information SUN IS LOSING MASS to give ENERGY! FUSING THE MATTER!
So Its MASS to ENERGY Conversion On the Sun!
THE SUN IS LOSING MASS TO GIVE ENERGY!

Offline verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3480
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #17006 on: April 17, 2013, 02:16:18 AM »
Then how to get it to work practically? :(
Perhaps the same was as Grumage.

Wesley my dear friend has not proven anything, yet. Only talks of revolution, saving the world, etc...  Isn't this a little before the fact?  Or, is he also holding out??? He says he's going to tell all, and hold back nothing. I hope so... I know we all do.
Wesley has proven that nuclear decay can be induced artificially.
As far as I know he is not holding out - he is waiting for new Colman tubes.

Offline NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5213
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #17007 on: April 17, 2013, 03:12:20 AM »
    quote:
   "Wesley has proven that nuclear decay can be induced artificially".

   How has he proven this? He has not shown an output, from his device. Even a tiny one.
Even a Cfl gives off radiation, so do cell phones, Tv, microwaves ovens, etz.. so what? This does not lead to an electrical output, per se.

  I will be patient, as always, but mark my words, there will be no electrical output from beta decay. If I am wrong, I will be the first to acknowledge it.
Do you really think that the best of the worlds scientist and the best labs know about this, but aren't doing anything about it.  They could be make billions, but no, they aren't.

  We can say that "Sun light comes from the Sun", but it does not. Again, mark my words.
  We can attribute this so called beta decay to whats producing an output. But, that may not really be the cause of this output, but a consequence of it, instead.
 We must look at the cause of causes.
 Who has lived for 70 years to test the continual output of an Edison battery?
  I'm not trying to be negative about this, even though it may sound like it, I'm trying to be real. The proof is in the pudding.
   I suspect that you Verpies are correct, that the waiting for his chemicals will not give any better expected results.
  I have nothing but time. so... My best to Wesley, I am on his side, as well.
Team effort...  We don't all need to agree, in any case. We just need to get somewhere with all this.


Offline NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5213
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #17008 on: April 17, 2013, 03:23:08 AM »
  Netiks:
  And for your information: Where do you think that the mass that the sun is supposed to giving off came from in the first place. Big Bang???  Again, from nowhere, in a second...
  Who has mentioned that Light has mass?  Does a spark have mass?


Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3540
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #17009 on: April 17, 2013, 03:28:44 AM »
to Verpies and others:



I got to certain assumption today but I must  put all of it  together to have clear picture


It strike me that high voltage with small radioactive component(* source)
 near  vicinity of say coil capacitor
where source  is on negative charged   plate
 attracts - influenced Alpha particles and these are   very  heavy and very very energetic
Whats more alpha is not harmful as much ...could be stopped by skin or paper.


that avalanche is loud and pretty much spectacular.
What is more.
The source of radioactivity does not have to be alpha source.


could be beta  or gamma
but reaction is seen only on plates especially if we take  capacitor that has insulation medium -  air

What puzzle me is  shiny object inside of coil  capacitor of TK right in the middle ( aquarium)
I could see in there  Colman glass tube or any other  possibly radioactive source.
I ask few times  if someone has the picture of it.
It  was definitely posted here on this forum   long time ago  but I could not find it.



Quote
Alpha particles[/font] have a typical kinetic energy of 5 MeV (that is, ≈ 0.13% of their total energy, i.e. 110 TJ/kg) and a speed of 15,000 km/s. This corresponds to a speed of around 0.05 c. There is surprisingly small variation around this energy, due to the heavy dependence of the half-life of this process on the energy produced (see equations in the Geiger–Nuttall law[/font]).
Wesley