Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 15116274 times)

Offline anandml

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16920 on: April 15, 2013, 08:21:58 AM »
If the TK device works on nuclear basis setup then why he told his free energy device cannot be used in mountains. Why TK use famous Tesla system such as primary and secondary coils to reduce outpower or frequency or voltage....

Offline tagor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1333
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16921 on: April 15, 2013, 08:56:06 AM »


There is a French patent application number FR2680613 dated 19th August 1991 entitled “Activateur pour Mutation Isotopique” which provides some very interesting information. The system described is a

for the meyer-mace patent , look at this thread
 
http://www.overunity.com/4333/meyer-mace-isotopic-nmr-generator/msg84558/#msg84558

Offline garrypm

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16922 on: April 15, 2013, 09:12:52 AM »
Guys,
 
Regarding all this mutation from one form to another, is it possibe that ferrite could provide simialr results ?
 
Reson for asking is that it would then make sense that Romero's dynamo was really doing this stuff with a small (6 x 10mm) piece of ferrite
encased in a 300 or so turn multi strand coil, being driven (pulsed) from a 12v system.
 
Out there eh!
 
Cheers

Offline verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3480
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16923 on: April 15, 2013, 10:53:23 AM »
If the TK device works on nuclear basis setup then why he told his free energy device cannot be used in mountains.
IF you assume that TK's words are always truthful then this statement makes no sense in the transmutation context.

Why TK use famous Tesla system such as primary and secondary coils to reduce outpower or frequency or voltage....
Primary and secondary windings are not a "famous Tesla system". They are the famous transformer system.

Offline verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3480
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16924 on: April 15, 2013, 10:55:36 AM »
Regarding all this mutation from one form to another, is it possible that ferrite could provide similar results ?
Yes, the medium for the beta current does not have to be conductive.
The Yoke device used an old Russian ferrite.  Seemingly successfully.

Offline Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16925 on: April 15, 2013, 12:15:24 PM »
If the TK device works on nuclear basis setup then why he told his free energy device cannot be used in mountains.
Where can I find that statement? Here he says:

»Is it possible to use these devices in families living in the mountains?
Tariel Kapanadze: Not only possible, but necessary!«

»Tariel speaks to the interpreter: Tell him that no area where you can not use this device.
Most importantly - this device can be used in inaccessible places, such as in the mountains.
You can always get free electricity.«


More questions:

Is it possible to use these devices on the Moon or even Mars?

Is it possible to use these devices underground and in caves?


Offline verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3480
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16926 on: April 15, 2013, 12:40:07 PM »
Is it possible to use these devices on the Moon or even Mars?
Is it possible to use these devices underground and in caves?
Yes, but the device would have to use some kind of mechanism for self-tuning or spread-spectrum approach because Mars' magnetic field is different from Earth's magnetic field and these magnetic fields affect the NMR frequencies differently.
Even positioning it differently on a table or turning it upside-down might stop it from working if it is dependent on the ambient magnetic field (e.g. by using a fixed stimulation frequency).

Offline guruji

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 470
    • http://andyborg.tripod.com
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16927 on: April 15, 2013, 01:30:48 PM »
Hi guys are you saying that all HV devices like TK's;Don and other devices can emit harmful radiation??!!!
I think we are going to the extreme now. What about cellphones that we use everyday?

Offline anandml

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16928 on: April 15, 2013, 01:33:39 PM »
Where can I find that statement? Here he says:

»Is it possible to use these devices in families living in the mountains?
Tariel Kapanadze: Not only possible, but necessary!«

»Tariel speaks to the interpreter: Tell him that no area where you can not use this device.
Most importantly - this device can be used in inaccessible places, such as in the mountains.
You can always get free electricity.«


More questions:

Is it possible to use these devices on the Moon or even Mars?

Is it possible to use these devices underground and in caves?
Thanks Zeitmaschine you are right, Please tell me what you think about TK's device it works based on nuclear basis setup? Do you know why i am asking this question to you because i am following ur posts and replies 

Offline verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3480
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16929 on: April 15, 2013, 01:42:41 PM »
Hi guys are you saying that all HV devices like TK's;Don and other devices can emit harmful radiation??!!!
Not all HV devices emit X-rays, gamma, beta or neutrons, but some of them can (especially the ones that induce nuclear changes).

I think we are going to the extreme now. What about cellphones that we use everyday?
Cell phone radiation in the 1-2GHz range is harmful too but not as much as gamma radiation which has a frequency 10 billion times greater  (x 1010).
10EHz is capable of ionizing matter, while 1GHz is not.  Ionizing radiation damages DNA and causes cells to die quickly while 1-2GHz does not (or at least not quickly).

Also, note that the beta radiation, in the patents that we've been discussing recently, is largely confined inside the core by magnetic field or deliberately shielded with aluminum foil, steel cans or lead (e.g. Colman patent).

P.S.
After a decade of using a cell phone, I cannot use it longer that 15min a day, without subjecting myself to severe headaches.  The correspondence between prolonged use and pain is 100% now.

Offline a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1613
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16930 on: April 15, 2013, 02:43:26 PM »
I had a lot of discussion with TK and he assured me that his device can power electric cars.
The earth can be replaced with the negative terminal of a car battery.
(Or presumably the car chassis).
I understand the purpose of the earth is to fix a zero  voltage, otherwise the device can drift out of phase.
We disconnected the wire for a few minutes and the device carried on working.
Zeitmaschine: Re the conversation about mountains. Do you have a link?

Offline anandml

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107

Offline Grumage

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1116
NMR Experiments
« Reply #16932 on: April 15, 2013, 04:41:47 PM »
Hello to all,

I am avidly persuing this line.

Using a small sample of Copper within 2 solenoids at 90 deg to each other, larger solenoid providing MF sinusoidal field, smaller solenoid carries the sample and is fed via variable DC current.

With just 8 watts the G/M counter shows little murmers of heightend activity around the "Magic number". I need more power!!!

Can any of you Electronic people come up with a simple Voltage amplifier circuit? I have at my immediate disposal a complementory pair of TIP 3055's The MF solenoid has a DC resistance of 4.2 ohm's.
We also need a frequency range of 100Khz to 1 Mhz. As that is the limit of my signal generator.

The NMR frequency is in harmony with the magnetic field strength. That is, the greater the field strength the higher the frequency required to create the resonance condition.
Once I have a little more power I might try a varying LF AC applied to the sample carrier solenoid.

Cheers Grum.

Offline verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3480
Re: NMR Experiments
« Reply #16933 on: April 15, 2013, 05:19:47 PM »
smaller solenoid carries the sample and is fed via variable DC current.
There is a small gotcha here. 
The magnetic flux density inside a solenoid is not constant  :(    See Helmholtz coils.
Why would you care about that?  Well, I bet you would like the NM Resonance to take place in the whole volume of your copper core, wouldn't you?  After all, the more atoms are resonating, the better.
...but if the magnetic field varies throughout the volume of your core then different parts of the core will resonate at different frequencies.  This means that if you apply only a single frequency, then only a thin layer of copper will resonate, e.g. 1/5000 of the volume  :(

To involve more than this small fraction of your core's volume, you can do the following:
- Apply many frequencies at once,
- Sweep the frequency quickly (FM)
- Ensure that the static magnetic field in the core is homogeneous (constant)

Using a small sample of Copper within 2 solenoids at 90 deg to each other, larger solenoid providing MF sinusoidal field,
...The MF solenoid has a DC resistance of 4.2 ohm's.
But what is its inductance?
If we know the inductance and neglect the interwinding capacitance, then we will be able to calculate its effective AC resistance @ 100kHz and @ 1MHz (a.k.a. AC impedance).
The interwinding capacitance might not be neglectable if you used many close-spaced windings.

With just 8 watts the G/M counter shows little murmers of heightend activity around the "Magic number". I need more power!!!
That's good but RF can also create EM interference with the G/M counter, so beware of that.
Wesley observed an "afterglow" of radiation even after the RF was turned-off so we can be reasonably sure that he was really measuring radiation, not EMI.

Can any of you Electronic people come up with a simple Voltage amplifier circuit? I have at my immediate disposal a complementory pair of TIP 3055's
We also need a frequency range of 100Khz to 1 Mhz. As that is the limit of my signal generator.
Are you sure you need a voltage amplifier and not current amplifier?  Coils are predominantly current devices.
Anyway, take a look at this Transistor Amplifier.  I suggest class A or AB.
The output impedance of this amplifier should be able to handle the 100kHz impedance of your high frequency coil.

The NMR frequency is in harmony with the magnetic field strength. That is, the greater the field strength the higher the frequency required to create the resonance condition.
This relationship is a welcome indication of magnetic resonance with the RF.

Once I have a little more power I might try a varying LF AC applied to the sample carrier solenoid.
DC + LF AC is appropriate for the polarizing winding. The DC component can be substituted with a permanent magnet (non-conductive magnet preferably so the Lenz Effect does not kill the RF field).

Offline NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5213
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16934 on: April 15, 2013, 05:27:42 PM »
    Guys:
   After viewing the TK's 2004 video, where he is showing his device, made from what looks like ordinary everyday type of electrical junk, it makes me doubt that he is using anything involving magnetic resonance (beta decay), or some special chemicals, to make it work.
  TK does not look like a scammer to me, this is my heart felt opinion, even though he is not telling all, the whole truth. He has been freely showing his device to the world for years now, many times, many different projects, and explaining what he can. Explaining what his device can be used for, that it can work anywhere, and even to power electric vehicles, etz...    Like the pierce arrow?

  The Island video, was away from any grid related sources. And now we also hear that even the ground connection is not always necessary, for that kind of device to continue to function. WOW!!!  NO 30 second bump charge, every hour, no special radioactive substances, or RF required, at all.

  The French guy (in the Alps) is showing his version of a TK type of replication, again no mention of beta decay or anything similar. Looking very ordinary, using what looks like regular easy to obtain parts.  So simple you would laugh???

  I mention these things because it looks like the current direction is not going to be able to be followed by guys like me, working on their kitchen tables.  Somehow all this talk of radiation, worries me... using only aluminum foil as protection.
Common guys... what if...  this thing blows up,  in my house???
 I'd have to see this project done and safely working 24/7, to really have a go at it.

I hope that Wesley can lead the way here, without having to go through another 1000 + pages of discussion, concerning some things that most of us know little about.
As there are safer ways to obtain free energy, like solar, hydro, and wind powered 100% working devices.

  I STILL don't understand, how Wesley was scared to follow through on his successfully working yoke device (best thing yet), with 1 kw output, using only 10 watts input. Then, drops that device and goes after this beta decay project.  His yoke experiment probably did not even use the special ferrite yoke (Barium? or whatever), that nobody can find yet, if at all. He still had some very positive results. Maybe they just got sick from the Flue or whatever, as nothing was proven, like radiation poisoning, etz...

   Has anyone else had ANY positive results to share (like Wattsup, Itsu, Hoppy, etz...)

  This does not make sense to me.  Just trying to understand... please don't take me wrong. If I see that beta decay device is really the way to go, I'll be on it, in a flash.

  @ Wesley:  Thanks for all you've done, and continue to do. I do appreciate it.
 
           

            Nick_Z